Skip to main content

China’s and the Great GHG Emitters’ Response to the World Climate Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
China and World Politics in Transition

Part of the book series: Global Power Shift ((GLOBAL))

  • 235 Accesses

Abstract

China has realized the importance of matching the goal of fast industrialization and of raising the living standard of the population with the imperative of transitioning to an economy based on low carbon emissions and renewable energy sources. At the same time, the requirements of economic development, the dependence on oil-producing countries for energy supply, and the politics of world order transition put brakes to China’s compliance with the world climate policy. The chapter analyses how multilateral policymaking has won on multiple obstacles to forming the world climate policy despite the swinging attitude of the great powers, China included. The chapter spotlights China’s compliance with the climate policy in comparison with the other large greenhouse gas (GHG) emitters’ compliance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL.

  2. 2.

    https://ourworldindata.org.

References

  • Attinà, F. (2021). The world order lifecycle and world power competition. In F. Attinà (Ed.), World order transition and the Atlantic area. Theoretical perspectives and empirical analysis. Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Babic, M. (2020). Let’s talk about the interregnum: Gramsci and the crisis of the liberal world order. International Affairs, 96(3), 767–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bäckstrand, K., & Lövbrand, E. (2019). The road to Paris: Contending climate governance discourses in the post-Copenhagen era. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(5), 519–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2012). Times of interregnum. Ethics & Global Politics, 5(1), 49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, S. (2020). The absence of great power responsibility in global environmental politics. European Journal of International Relations, 26(1), 8–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, P.-O., & Jorgens, H. (2005). The international sources of policy convergence: Explaining the spread of environmental policy innovations. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 860–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, K. P., et al. (2021). Slow Progress on UN rapid deployment: The pitfalls of policy paradigms in international organizations. International Studies Review, 23, 455–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crippa, M., et al. (2020). Fossil CO2 emissions of all world countries - 2020 report. Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crippa, M., et al. (2021). GHG emissions of all world countries - 2021 report. Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckersley, R. (2020). Rethinking leadership: Understanding the roles of the US and China in the negotiation of the Paris agreement. European Journal of International Relations, 26(4), 1178–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafner, M., & Tagliapietra, S. (2020). The geopolitics of the global energy transition. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hurri, K. (2020). Rethinking climate leadership: Annex I countries’ expectations for China’s leadership role in the post-Paris UN climate negotiations. Environmental Development, 35, 100544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanova, M., & Escobar-Pemberthy, N. (2021). Biodiversity. Protecting the planetary web of life. In T. G. Weiss & R. Wilkinson (Eds.), Global governance futures. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, C. F., & Karlsson, C. (2018). The UN climate change negotiations and the role of the United States: Assessing American leadership from Copenhagen to Paris. Environmental Politics, 27(3), 519–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (1993). Multilateralism matters. The theory and praxis of an institutional form. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, R. (2019). Ruling the Interregnum: Politics and ideology in nonhegemonic times. Politics and Society, 47, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDESA (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs), World Economic and Social Survey 2011 The Great Green Technological Transformation, Chapter 2, (2011) http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/wess/wess_current/2011wess_chapter2.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fulvio Attinà .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Attinà, F. (2023). China’s and the Great GHG Emitters’ Response to the World Climate Policy. In: Attinà, F., Feng, Y. (eds) China and World Politics in Transition. Global Power Shift. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27358-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics