Abstract
With the onset of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, mitigation measures to stop the spread of the deadly virus were promoted by officials in government leadership and scientists. However, as lockdowns ensued worldwide, some suffered from the consequences of job loss, economic insecurity, lack of access to healthcare or quality education, or violence within their home. Once tests for COVID-19 slowly became available more widely, ethical issues became a focal point. Marginalized groups were disproportionately unable to use tests or refused to test due to where they lived, an inability to work from home, or distrust of the healthcare system. Further, individuals were not the only ones who viewed the results of their tests as surveillance testing was used for widespread contact tracing to help the community as a whole. Internationally, countries were sometimes more invasive in prevention, such as through the use of phone applications or location tracking, to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. Countries that had less access to testing and other preventative measures also suffered disproportionately. Throughout the pandemic, conspiracy theories spread on social media, attacking those in public health and minimizing the threat of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, seemingly in ignorance of those who had died or lost someone to COVID-19. Although systemic issues regarding physical and mental health became more noticeable during the pandemic and are important to address further, a key takeaway that anyone can apply is that disease prevention—when possible—is beneficial.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
RT-PCR stands for reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, and NAAT stands for nucleic acid amplification test. A reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction test is the full name for the polymerase chain reaction test used for SARS-CoV-2, as it is specific to RNA and requires reverse transcription. RT-PCR is one type of NAAT, which identifies genetic material; in this case, it identifies genetic material in RNA that is part of SARS-CoV-2. Importantly, these terms are, colloquially, used interchangeably (Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests, 2021).
- 2.
Quantitative transcription PCR, or qPCR, is a form of technology that allows for quantification of genetic material in RNA transcripts that have been reverse transcribed in DNA (Heid et al., 1996).
References
Abuhammad, S. (2020). Barriers to distance learning during the COVID-19 outbreak: A qualitative review from parents’ perspective. Heliyon, 6(11), Article e05482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05482
Becker, S. P., Breaux, R., Cusick, C. N., Dvorsky, M. R., Marsh, N. P., Sciberras, E., & Langberg, J. M. (2020). Remote learning during COVID-19: Examining school practices, service continuation, and difficulties for adolescents with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Adolescent Health, 67(6), 769–777.
Bevan, I., Stage Baxter, M., Stagg, H. R., & Street, A. (2021). Knowledge, attitudes, and behavior related to COVID-19 testing: A rapid scoping review. Diagnostics, 11(9), 1685. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091685
Bixter, M. T., McMichael, S. L., Bunker, C. J., Adelman, R. M., Okun, M. A., Grimm, K. J., Graudejus, O., & Kwan, V. S. Y. (2020). A test of a triadic conceptualization of future self-identification. PLoS One, 15(11), Article e0242504. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242504
Boserup, B., McKenney, M., & Elkbuli, A. (2020). Alarming trends in US domestic violence during the COVID-19 pandemic. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 38(12), 2753–2755.
Bradbury-Jones, C., & Isham, L. (2020). The pandemic paradox: The consequences of COVID-19 on domestic violence. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(13–14), 2047–2049. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15296
Calvillo, D. P., Ross, B. J., Garcia, R. J., Smelter, T. J., & Rutchick, A. M. (2020). Political ideology predicts perceptions of the threat of COVID-19 (and susceptibility to fake news about it). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(8), 1119–1128.
Campbell, A. M. (2020). An increasing risk of family violence during the Covid-19 pandemic: Strengthening community collaborations to save lives. Forensic Science International: Reports, 2, 100089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2020.100089
Campbell, T. H., & Kay, A. C. (2014). Solution aversion: On the relation between ideology and motivated disbelief. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(5), 809–824.
Cardenas, M. C., Bustos, S. S., & Chakraborty, R. (2020). A ‘parallel pandemic’: The psychosocial burden of COVID-19 in children and adolescents. Acta Paediatr, 109(11), 2187–2188.
Caroline, B. J., & Louise, I. (2020). The pandemic paradox: The consequences of COVID-19 on domestic violence. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/jocn.15296. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037963
Caron, F., Plancq, M.-C., Tourneux, P., Gouron, R., & Klein, C. (2020). Was child abuse underdetected during the COVID-19 lockdown? Archives de Pédiatrie, 27(7), 399–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcped.2020.07.010
Cauberghe, V., Van Wesenbeeck, I., De Jans, S., Hudders, L., & Ponnet, K. (2020). How adolescents use social media to cope with feelings of loneliness and anxiety during COVID-19 lockdown. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0478
Choma, B. L., Hanoch, Y., Gummerum, M., & Hodson, G. (2013). Relations between risk perceptions and socio-political ideology are domain- and ideology- dependent. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.028
Coughlin, S. S. (2006). Ethical issues in epidemiologic research and public health practice. Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, 3(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-3-16
Courtice, E. L., Quinn-Nilas, C., Bickram, D. A., Witoski, S., Hoskin, R. A., & Blair, K. L. (2021). Is the messenger the message? Canadian political affiliation and other predictors of mask wearing frequency & attitudes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement.
Drotning, K. J., Doan, L., Sayer, L. C., Fish, J. N., & Rinderknecht, R. G. (2022). Not all homes are safe: Family violence following the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Family Violence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00372-y
Escobar-Viera, C. G., Shensa, A., Bowman, N. D., Sidani, J. E., Knight, J., James, A. E., & Primack, B. A. (2018). Passive and active social media use and depressive symptoms among United States adults. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 21(7), 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0668
Fichera, A. (2021). Posts baselessly link COVID-19 tests to vaccine conspiracy theory. FactCheck.org. Retrieved from https://www.factcheck.org/2021/07/scicheck-posts-baselessly-link-covid-19-tests-to-vaccine-conspiracy-theory/
Garrett, P. M., Wang, Y., White, J. P., Hsieh, S., Strong, C., Lee, Y.-C., Lewandowsky, S., Dennis, S., & Yang, C.-T. (2021). Young adults view smartphone tracking technologies for COVID-19 as acceptable: The case of Taiwan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 1332. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031332
Geana, M. V., Rabb, N., & Sloman, S. (2021). Walking the party line: The growing role of political ideology in shaping health behavior in the United States. SSM—Population Health, 16, 100950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100950
Giri, A. K., & Rana, D. R. (2020). Charting the challenges behind the testing of COVID-19 in developing countries: Nepal as a case study. Biosafety and Health, 2(2), 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bsheal.2020.05.002
Girum, T., Lentiro, K., Geremew, M., Migora, B., & Shewamare, S. (2020). Global strategies and effectiveness for COVID-19 prevention through contact tracing, screening, quarantine, and isolation: A systematic review. Tropical Medicine and Health, 48(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-020-00285-w
Hall, M. A., & Studdert, D. M. (2021). “Vaccine passport” certification—Policy and ethical considerations. New England Journal of Medicine, 385(11), Article e32. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2104289
Heid, C. A., Stevens, J., Livak, K. J., & Williams, P. M. (1996). Real time quantitative PCR. Genome Research, 6(10), 986–994. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.6.10.986
Hoofman, J., & Secord, E. (2021). The effect of COVID-19 on education. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 68(5), 1071–1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2021.05.009
Jost, J. T. (2017). Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology. Political Psychology, 38(2), 167–208.
Kennedy, A. G., & Cwik, B. (2021). Diagnostic justice: Testing for Covid-19. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 17(2), S2–S25. https://doi.org/10.31820/ejap.17.3.1
Kim, Y.-E., Huh, K., Park, Y.-J., Peck, K. R., & Jung, J. (2022). Association between vaccination and acute myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke after COVID-19 infection. Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.12992
Krishnakumar, A., & Verma, S. (2021). Understanding domestic violence in India during COVID-19: A routine activity approach. Asian Journal of Criminology, 16(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-020-09340-1
Kyriacou, D. N., Anglin, D., Taliaferro, E., Stone, S., Tubb, T., Linden, J. A., ... & Kraus, J. F. (2017). Risk factors for injury to women from domestic violence. In Domestic Violence (pp. 145–151). Routledge.
Lawrence, K. C., & Fakuade, O. V. (2021). Parental involvement, learning participation and online learning commitment of adolescent learners during the COVID-19 lockdown. Research in Learning Technology, 29. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v29.2544
Lee, D., & Lee, J. (2020). Testing on the move: South Korea’s rapid response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 5, Article e100111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100111
Liao, M., Liu, H., Wang, X., Hu, X., Huang, Y., Liu, X., Brenan, K., Mecha, J., Nirmalan, M., & Lu, J. R. (2021). A technical review of face mask wearing in preventing respiratory COVID-19 transmission. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 52, Article e101417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2021.101417
Lu, J. G., Jin, P., & English, A. S. (2021). Collectivism predicts mask use during COVID-19. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America, 118(23), Article e2021793118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2021793118
Marziali, M. E., Hogg, R. S., Oduwole, O. A., & Card, K. G. (2021). Predictors of COVID-19 testing rates: A cross-country comparison. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 104, 370–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.12.083
McElfish, P. A., Purvis, R., James, L. P., Willis, D. E., & Andersen, J. A. (2021). Perceived barriers to COVID-19 testing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), Article e2278. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052278
Meghani, A., Agarwal, S., Zapf, A. J., Edwards, J. G., Labrique, A., & Gibson, D. (2022). Schooling amidst a pandemic in the United States: Parents’ perceptions about reopening schools and anticipated challenges during COVID-19. PLoS One, 17(8), Article e0268427. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268427
Mello, M. M., Greene, J. A., & Sharfstein, J. M. (2020). Attacks on public health officials during COVID-19. JAMA, 324(8), 741–742. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.14423
Midgley, C., Thai, S., Lockwood, P., Kovacheff, C., & Page-Gould, E. (2021). When every day is a high school reunion: Social media comparisons and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(2), 285–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000336
Moore, G., Buckley, K., Howarth, E., Burn, A.-M., Copeland, L., Evans, R., & Ware, L. (2022). Police referrals for domestic abuse before and during the first COVID-19 lockdown: An analysis of routine data from one specialist service in South Wales. Journal of Public Health, 44(2), e252–e259. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdab343
Moreira, D. N., & da Costa, M. P. (2020). The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic in the precipitation of intimate partner violence. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 71, 101606.
Nehal, K. R., Steendam, L. M., Campos Ponce, M., van der Hoeven, M., & Smit, G. S. A. (2021). Worldwide vaccination willingness for COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccine, 9(10), 1071. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9101071
Neil, J. (2020). Domestic violence and COVID 19. Australian Journal for General Practitioners, 49. https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-COVID-25
Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests. (2021). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/naats.html
O’Sullivan, R., Burns, A., Leavey, G., Leroi, I., Burholt, V., Lubben, J., Holt-Lunstad, J., Victor, C., Lawlor, B., Vilar-Compte, M., Perissinotto, C. M., Tully, M. A., Sullivan, M. P., Rosato, M., Power, J. M., Tiilikainen, E., & Prohaska, T. R. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on loneliness and social isolation: A multi-country study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(19), Article e9982. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18199982
Pecoraro, V., Negro, A., Pirotti, T., & Trenti, T. (2022). Estimate false-negative RT-PCR rates for SARS-CoV-2. A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 52(2), Article e13706. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13706
Perry, B. L., Aronson, B., Railey, A. F., & Ludema, C. (2021). If you build it, will they come? Social, economic, and psychological determinants of COVID-19 testing decisions. PLoS One, 16(7), Article e0252658. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252658
Pyle, G., & Huang, J. H. (2022). Myocarditis: COVID-19 is a much bigger risk to the heart than vaccination. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/myocarditis-covid-19-is-a-much-bigger-risk-to-the-heart-than-vaccination-174580
Rudolph, J., Rong, C. S., & Tan, S. (2021). Anti-facemaskism—Politicisation of face masks during COVID-19 in the context of Trump’s plutocratic populism. Journal of Education, Innovation and Communication, 3(1), 37–58.
Schochetman, G., Ou, C.-Y., & Jones, W. K. (1988). Polymerase chain reaction. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 158(6), 1154–1157.
Tybur, J. M., Inbar, Y., Aarøe, L., Barclay, P., Barlow, F. K., De Barra, M., ... & Žeželj, I. (2016). Parasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(44), 12408–12413.
Shah, S., Gwee, S. X. W., Ng, J. Q. X., Lau, N., Koh, J., & Pang, J. (2022). Wastewater surveillance to infer COVID-19 transmission: A systematic review. Science of the Total Environment, 804, Article e150060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150060
Singh, A. G., Singhavi, H., Sharin, F., Lakdawala, M., Mhatre, S., Deodhar, J., Chaturvedi, P., & Dikshit, R. (2022). Cross-sectional and longitudinal mental health status prevailing among COVID-19 patients in Mumbai, India. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 47(1), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_928_21
Stosic, M. D., Helwig, S., & Ruben, M. A. (2021). Greater belief in science predicts mask-wearing behavior during COVID-19. Personality and Individual Differences, 176, Article e110769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110769
Topazian, R. J., McGinty, E. E., Han, H., Levine, A. S., Anderson, K. E., Presskreischer, R., & Barry, C. L. (2022). US adults’ beliefs about harassing or threatening public health officials during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Network Open, 5(7), Article e2223491. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.23491
Tsao, J., Kussman, A. L., Costales, C., Pinsky, B. A., Abrams, G. D., & Hwang, C. E. (2022). Accuracy of rapid antigen vs reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection in college athletes during prevalence of the omicron variant. JAMA Network Open, 5(6), Article e2217234. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.17234
Turel, O., Brevers, D., & Bechara, A. (2018). Time distortion when users at-risk for social media addiction engage in non-social media tasks. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 97, 84–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.11.014
Usher, K., Bhullar, N., Durkin, J., Gyamfi, N., & Jackson, D. (2020). Family violence and COVID-19: Increased vulnerability and reduced options for support. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 29(4), 549–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12735
Vigue, D. (2020). Experts predicted a coronavirus pandemic years ago. Now it’s playing out before our eyes. CNN. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/08/health/coronavirus-pandemic-training-scenario/index.html
Voo, T. C., Reis, A. A., Thomé, B., Ho, C. W., Tam, C. C., Kelly-Cirino, C., Emanuel, E., Beca, J. P., Littler, K., Smith, M. J., Parker, M., Kass, N., Gobat, N., Lei, R., Upshur, R., Hurst, S., & Munsaka, S. (2021). Immunity certification for COVID-19: Ethical considerations. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 99(2), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.20.280701
WHO Definition of Public Health. (2020). World Health Organization. Retrieved from https://www.publichealth.com.ng/who-definition-of-public-health/
Witberg, G., Barda, N., Hoss, S., Richter, I., Wiessman, M., Aviv, Y., Grinberg, T., Auster, O., Dagan, N., Balicer, R. D., & Kornowski, R. (2021). Myocarditis after Covid-19 vaccination in a large health care organization. New England Journal of Medicine, 385(23), 2132–2139. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2110737
Wright, L. (2021). The Plague Year: America in the Time of COVID. New York: Knopf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hall, M. (2023). COVID-19 Testing, Preventive Measures, and Ethical Issues. In: Searight, H.R. (eds) Covid-19: Health Disparities and Ethical Challenges Across the Globe. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26200-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26200-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-26199-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-26200-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)