Skip to main content

The “Difficult Patient”: Dominant Logics and Misfits in Medicine

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Social Sciences and Global Public Health

Abstract

Medicine is organized around specific kinds of patients. In the cross-section of overarching biomedical narratives, international and national regulations and guidelines, and local practices, a particular kind of “ideal” patient is produced. The ideal patient embraces the larger biomedical paradigm, fits standardized diagnostic or treatment protocols, and behaves in expected and respectful ways. At the same time, its downside is created. Modern medicine’s narrow pathways create all sorts of “difficult patients.” Rather than focusing on the “difficult patient” as a psychological or relational struggle for individual care professionals or patients – a common focus in medical literature and debate – this chapter approaches the “difficult patient” as a phenomenon inherent in the ways in which medicine is organized. It shows how the difficult patient can provide an analytic lens through which individuals can see health care norms and logics in play. In particular, the chapter discusses how the difficult patient comes into being in “misfits” between dominant logics in medicine and individual patient lives and needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,399.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,399.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson B (2013) Us and them? The dangerous politics of immigration control. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle M, Smith S, Liao L-M (2005) Adult genital surgery for intersex: a solution to what problem? J Health Psychol 10(4):573–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braun V (2005) In search of (better) sexual pleasure: female genital “cosmetic” surgery. Sexualities 8(4):407–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun V (2009) The women are doing it for themselves. Aust Fem Stud 24(60):233–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun V (2010) Female genital cosmetic surgery: a critical review of current knowledge and contemporary debates. J Women’s Health 19(7):1393–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brüggemann AJ (2017) Exploring patient strategies in response to untoward healthcare encounters. Nurs Ethics 24(2):190–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brüggemann AJ, Forsberg C, Thornberg R (2019) Re-negotiating agency – patients using comics to reflect upon acting in situations of abuse in health care. BMC Health Serv Res 19(58). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-12019-13902-y

  • Conrad P, Schneider JW (1985) Deviance and medicalization: from badness to sickness. Merrill, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle J, Williams B (1999) Seeing the wood for the trees: defining the forgotten concept of patient dissatisfaction in the light of patient satisfaction research. Leadersh Health Serv 12(4):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Boer M, van der Hulst R, Slatman J (2015) The surprise of a breast reconstruction: a longitudinal phenomenological study to women’s expectations about reconstructive surgery. Hum Stud 38(3):409–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMatteo RM, Lepper HS (1998) Promoting adherence to courses of treatment: mutual collaboration in the physician-patient relationship. In: Duffy BK, Jackson LD (eds) Health communication research: a guide to developments and directions. Greenwood, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty C, Stavropoulou C (2012) Patients’ willingness and ability to participate actively in the reduction of clinical errors: a systematic literature review. Soc Sci Med 75(2):257–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drakos G, Hydén L-C (2011) Diagnos & Identitet. Gothia, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreger AD (ed) (1999) Intersex in the age of ethics. University Publishing Group, Hagerstown

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan T, Jaye C (2009) Communities of clinical practice: the social organization of clinical learning. Health 13(1):107–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle VA, McCaughan D, Watt IS et al (2010) Speaking up about safety concerns: multi-setting qualitative study of patients’ views and experiences. Qual Saf Health Care 19(6):e33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein S (2007) Inclusion: the politics of difference in medical research. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Everly EM (2021) How to deal with a difficult patient. In: Garett PM, Yoon-Flannery K (eds) A pediatrician’s path: what to expect after a pediatrics residency. Springer, New York, pp 271–277

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fausto-Sterling A (2000) Sexing the body: gender politics and the construction of sexuality. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fries CJ (2008) Governing the health of the hybrid self: integrative medicine, neoliberalism, and the shifting biopolitics of subjectivity. Health Sociol Rev 17(4):353–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garland-Thomson R (2011) Misfits: a feminist materialist disability concept. Hypatia 26(3):591–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garpenby P, Nedlund A-C (2020) The patient as a policy problem: ambiguous perceptions of a critical interface in healthcare. Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459320976757

  • Gouge C (2018) “The inconvenience of meeting you”: rereading non/compliance. Enabling care. In: Booher A, Jung J (eds) Feminist rhetorical science studies: human bodies, posthumanist worlds. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, pp 114–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves JE (1978) Taking care of the hateful patient. N Engl J Med 298(16):884–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guntram L (2013) Creating, maintaining and questioning (hetero)relational normality in narratives about vaginal reconstruction. Fem Theory 14(1):105–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn SR, Kroenke K, Spitzer RL et al (1996) The difficult patient. J Gen Intern Med 11(1):1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holm S (1993) What is wrong with compliance? J Med Ethics 19(2):108–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Holt RE, Slade P (2003) Living with an incomplete vagina and womb: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of the experience of vaginal agenesis. Psychol Health Med 8(1):19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery R (1979) Normal rubbish: deviant patients in casualty departments. Sociol Health Illn 1(1):90–107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes R, Abrahams N, Mvo Z (1998) Why do nurses abuse patients? Reflections from South African obstetric services. Soc Sci Med 47(11):1781–1795

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce K, Jeske M (2019) Revisiting the sick role: performing regimes of patienthood in the 21st century. Sociol Viewp 33(1):70–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler SJ (1998) Lessons from the intersexed. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  • Knaapen L (2014) Evidence-based medicine or cookbook medicine? Addressing concerns over the standardization of care. Sociol Compass 8(6):823–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee PA, Houk CP, Ahmed SF et al (2006) Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders. Pediatrics 118(2):488–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May D, Kelly MP (1982) Chancers, pests and poor wee souls: problems of legitimation in psychiatric nursing. Sociol Health Illn 4(3):279–301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCreaddie M, Wiggins S (2009) Reconciling the good patient persona with problematic and non-problematic humour: a grounded theory. Int J Nurs Stud 46(8):1079–1091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mol A (2008) The logic of care: health and the problem of patient choice. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mol A, Berg M (1994) Principles and practices of medicine. Cult Med Psychiatry 18(2):247–265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nedlund A-C (2012) Designing for legitimacy: policy work and the art of juggling when setting limits in health care. Linköping University Press, Linköping

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedlund AC, Nordh J (2015) Crafting citizen(ship) for people with dementia: how policy narratives at national level in Sweden informed politics of time from 1975 to 2013. J Aging Stud 34:123–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nedlund A-C, Nordh J (2018) Constructing citizens: a matter of labelling, imaging and underlying rationales in the case people living with dementia. Crit Policy Stud 12(3):253–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons T (1975) The sick role and the role of the physician reconsidered. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc 53(3):257–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen A (2003) Governmentality, critical scholarship, and the medical humanities. J Med Humanit 24(3):187–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qvarsell R (2013) Välfärdssamhällets idémässiga förhistoria. In: Swärd H, Edebalk PG, Wadensjö E (eds) Vägar till välfärd: idéer, inspiratörer, kontroverser, perspektiv. Liber, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS (1996) Evidence-based medicine: what it is and isn’t. BMJ 312(7023):71–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider AL, Ingram H (1997) Policy design for democracy. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence

    Google Scholar 

  • Seear K (2009) The etiquette of endometriosis: stigmatisation, menstrual concealment and the diagnostic delay. Soc Sci Med 69(8):1220–1227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Segal JZ (2005) Health and the rhetoric of medicine. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw I (2004) Doctors, “dirty work” patients, and “revolving doors”. Qual Health Res 14(8):1032–1045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shim JK (2010) Cultural health capital: a theoretical approach to understanding health care interactions and the dynamics of unequal treatment. J Health Soc Behav 51(1):1–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sinding C, Miller P, Hudak P et al (2011) Of time and troubles: patient involvement and the production of health care disparities. Health 16(4):400–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith S (1995) Dealing with the difficult patient. Postgrad Med J 71(841):653–657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sointu E (2017) “Good” patient/“bad” patient: clinical learning and the entrenching of inequality. Sociol Health Illn 39(1):63–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer KL (2018) Transforming patient compliance research in an era of biomedicalization. J Health Soc Behav 59(2):170–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson F, Scambler G (2005) The relationship between medicine and the public: the challenge of concordance. Health 9(1):5–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stone D (2012) Policy paradox: the art of political decision making. W.W. Norton & Co, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong P (1980) Doctors and dirty work – the case of alcoholism. Sociol Health Illn 2(1):24–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strous RD, Ulman A-M, Kotler M (2006) The hateful patient revisited: relevance for 21st century medicine. Eur J Intern Med 17(6):387–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans S, Epstein S (2010) A world of standards but not a standard world: toward a sociology of standards and standardization. Annu Rev Sociol 36:69–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wickström A (2016) “I hope I get movie-star teeth”: doing the exceptional normal in orthodontic practice for young people. Med Anthropol Q 30(3):285–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesemann C, Ude-Koeller S, Sinnecker GH et al (2010) Ethical principles and recommendations for the medical management of differences of sex development (DSD)/intersex in children and adolescents. Eur J Pediatr 6:671–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winthereik BR, Langstrup H (2010) When patients care (too much) for information. In: Mol A, Moser I, Pols J (eds) Care in practice: on tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. Transcript, Bielefeld, pp 195–214

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2003) Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Young K, Fisher J, Kirkman M (2019) “Do mad people get endo or does endo make you mad?”: clinicians’ discursive constructions of medicine and women with endometriosis. Fem Psychol 29(3):337–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jelmer Brüggemann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Brüggemann, J., Guntram, L., Nedlund, AC. (2023). The “Difficult Patient”: Dominant Logics and Misfits in Medicine. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Social Sciences and Global Public Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25110-8_138

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics