Abstract
Medicine is organized around specific kinds of patients. In the cross-section of overarching biomedical narratives, international and national regulations and guidelines, and local practices, a particular kind of “ideal” patient is produced. The ideal patient embraces the larger biomedical paradigm, fits standardized diagnostic or treatment protocols, and behaves in expected and respectful ways. At the same time, its downside is created. Modern medicine’s narrow pathways create all sorts of “difficult patients.” Rather than focusing on the “difficult patient” as a psychological or relational struggle for individual care professionals or patients – a common focus in medical literature and debate – this chapter approaches the “difficult patient” as a phenomenon inherent in the ways in which medicine is organized. It shows how the difficult patient can provide an analytic lens through which individuals can see health care norms and logics in play. In particular, the chapter discusses how the difficult patient comes into being in “misfits” between dominant logics in medicine and individual patient lives and needs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson B (2013) Us and them? The dangerous politics of immigration control. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Boyle M, Smith S, Liao L-M (2005) Adult genital surgery for intersex: a solution to what problem? J Health Psychol 10(4):573–584
Braun V (2005) In search of (better) sexual pleasure: female genital “cosmetic” surgery. Sexualities 8(4):407–424
Braun V (2009) The women are doing it for themselves. Aust Fem Stud 24(60):233–249
Braun V (2010) Female genital cosmetic surgery: a critical review of current knowledge and contemporary debates. J Women’s Health 19(7):1393–1407
Brüggemann AJ (2017) Exploring patient strategies in response to untoward healthcare encounters. Nurs Ethics 24(2):190–197
Brüggemann AJ, Forsberg C, Thornberg R (2019) Re-negotiating agency – patients using comics to reflect upon acting in situations of abuse in health care. BMC Health Serv Res 19(58). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-12019-13902-y
Conrad P, Schneider JW (1985) Deviance and medicalization: from badness to sickness. Merrill, Columbus
Coyle J, Williams B (1999) Seeing the wood for the trees: defining the forgotten concept of patient dissatisfaction in the light of patient satisfaction research. Leadersh Health Serv 12(4):1–9
de Boer M, van der Hulst R, Slatman J (2015) The surprise of a breast reconstruction: a longitudinal phenomenological study to women’s expectations about reconstructive surgery. Hum Stud 38(3):409–430
DiMatteo RM, Lepper HS (1998) Promoting adherence to courses of treatment: mutual collaboration in the physician-patient relationship. In: Duffy BK, Jackson LD (eds) Health communication research: a guide to developments and directions. Greenwood, Westport
Doherty C, Stavropoulou C (2012) Patients’ willingness and ability to participate actively in the reduction of clinical errors: a systematic literature review. Soc Sci Med 75(2):257–263
Drakos G, Hydén L-C (2011) Diagnos & Identitet. Gothia, Stockholm
Dreger AD (ed) (1999) Intersex in the age of ethics. University Publishing Group, Hagerstown
Egan T, Jaye C (2009) Communities of clinical practice: the social organization of clinical learning. Health 13(1):107–125
Entwistle VA, McCaughan D, Watt IS et al (2010) Speaking up about safety concerns: multi-setting qualitative study of patients’ views and experiences. Qual Saf Health Care 19(6):e33
Epstein S (2007) Inclusion: the politics of difference in medical research. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Everly EM (2021) How to deal with a difficult patient. In: Garett PM, Yoon-Flannery K (eds) A pediatrician’s path: what to expect after a pediatrics residency. Springer, New York, pp 271–277
Fausto-Sterling A (2000) Sexing the body: gender politics and the construction of sexuality. Basic Books, New York
Fries CJ (2008) Governing the health of the hybrid self: integrative medicine, neoliberalism, and the shifting biopolitics of subjectivity. Health Sociol Rev 17(4):353–367
Garland-Thomson R (2011) Misfits: a feminist materialist disability concept. Hypatia 26(3):591–609
Garpenby P, Nedlund A-C (2020) The patient as a policy problem: ambiguous perceptions of a critical interface in healthcare. Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459320976757
Gouge C (2018) “The inconvenience of meeting you”: rereading non/compliance. Enabling care. In: Booher A, Jung J (eds) Feminist rhetorical science studies: human bodies, posthumanist worlds. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, pp 114–140
Groves JE (1978) Taking care of the hateful patient. N Engl J Med 298(16):884–887
Guntram L (2013) Creating, maintaining and questioning (hetero)relational normality in narratives about vaginal reconstruction. Fem Theory 14(1):105–121
Hahn SR, Kroenke K, Spitzer RL et al (1996) The difficult patient. J Gen Intern Med 11(1):1–8
Holm S (1993) What is wrong with compliance? J Med Ethics 19(2):108–110
Holt RE, Slade P (2003) Living with an incomplete vagina and womb: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of the experience of vaginal agenesis. Psychol Health Med 8(1):19
Jeffery R (1979) Normal rubbish: deviant patients in casualty departments. Sociol Health Illn 1(1):90–107
Jewkes R, Abrahams N, Mvo Z (1998) Why do nurses abuse patients? Reflections from South African obstetric services. Soc Sci Med 47(11):1781–1795
Joyce K, Jeske M (2019) Revisiting the sick role: performing regimes of patienthood in the 21st century. Sociol Viewp 33(1):70–90
Kessler SJ (1998) Lessons from the intersexed. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick
Knaapen L (2014) Evidence-based medicine or cookbook medicine? Addressing concerns over the standardization of care. Sociol Compass 8(6):823–836
Lee PA, Houk CP, Ahmed SF et al (2006) Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders. Pediatrics 118(2):488–500
May D, Kelly MP (1982) Chancers, pests and poor wee souls: problems of legitimation in psychiatric nursing. Sociol Health Illn 4(3):279–301
McCreaddie M, Wiggins S (2009) Reconciling the good patient persona with problematic and non-problematic humour: a grounded theory. Int J Nurs Stud 46(8):1079–1091
Mol A (2008) The logic of care: health and the problem of patient choice. Routledge, London
Mol A, Berg M (1994) Principles and practices of medicine. Cult Med Psychiatry 18(2):247–265
Nedlund A-C (2012) Designing for legitimacy: policy work and the art of juggling when setting limits in health care. Linköping University Press, Linköping
Nedlund AC, Nordh J (2015) Crafting citizen(ship) for people with dementia: how policy narratives at national level in Sweden informed politics of time from 1975 to 2013. J Aging Stud 34:123–133
Nedlund A-C, Nordh J (2018) Constructing citizens: a matter of labelling, imaging and underlying rationales in the case people living with dementia. Crit Policy Stud 12(3):253–272
Parsons T (1975) The sick role and the role of the physician reconsidered. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc 53(3):257–278
Petersen A (2003) Governmentality, critical scholarship, and the medical humanities. J Med Humanit 24(3):187–201
Qvarsell R (2013) Välfärdssamhällets idémässiga förhistoria. In: Swärd H, Edebalk PG, Wadensjö E (eds) Vägar till välfärd: idéer, inspiratörer, kontroverser, perspektiv. Liber, Stockholm
Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS (1996) Evidence-based medicine: what it is and isn’t. BMJ 312(7023):71–72
Schneider AL, Ingram H (1997) Policy design for democracy. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence
Seear K (2009) The etiquette of endometriosis: stigmatisation, menstrual concealment and the diagnostic delay. Soc Sci Med 69(8):1220–1227
Segal JZ (2005) Health and the rhetoric of medicine. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale
Shaw I (2004) Doctors, “dirty work” patients, and “revolving doors”. Qual Health Res 14(8):1032–1045
Shim JK (2010) Cultural health capital: a theoretical approach to understanding health care interactions and the dynamics of unequal treatment. J Health Soc Behav 51(1):1–15
Sinding C, Miller P, Hudak P et al (2011) Of time and troubles: patient involvement and the production of health care disparities. Health 16(4):400–417
Smith S (1995) Dealing with the difficult patient. Postgrad Med J 71(841):653–657
Sointu E (2017) “Good” patient/“bad” patient: clinical learning and the entrenching of inequality. Sociol Health Illn 39(1):63–77
Spencer KL (2018) Transforming patient compliance research in an era of biomedicalization. J Health Soc Behav 59(2):170–184
Stevenson F, Scambler G (2005) The relationship between medicine and the public: the challenge of concordance. Health 9(1):5–21
Stone D (2012) Policy paradox: the art of political decision making. W.W. Norton & Co, New York
Strong P (1980) Doctors and dirty work – the case of alcoholism. Sociol Health Illn 2(1):24–47
Strous RD, Ulman A-M, Kotler M (2006) The hateful patient revisited: relevance for 21st century medicine. Eur J Intern Med 17(6):387–393
Timmermans S, Epstein S (2010) A world of standards but not a standard world: toward a sociology of standards and standardization. Annu Rev Sociol 36:69–89
Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, New York
Wickström A (2016) “I hope I get movie-star teeth”: doing the exceptional normal in orthodontic practice for young people. Med Anthropol Q 30(3):285–302
Wiesemann C, Ude-Koeller S, Sinnecker GH et al (2010) Ethical principles and recommendations for the medical management of differences of sex development (DSD)/intersex in children and adolescents. Eur J Pediatr 6:671–679
Winthereik BR, Langstrup H (2010) When patients care (too much) for information. In: Mol A, Moser I, Pols J (eds) Care in practice: on tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. Transcript, Bielefeld, pp 195–214
World Health Organization (2003) Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. World Health Organization, Geneva
Young K, Fisher J, Kirkman M (2019) “Do mad people get endo or does endo make you mad?”: clinicians’ discursive constructions of medicine and women with endometriosis. Fem Psychol 29(3):337–356
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Brüggemann, J., Guntram, L., Nedlund, AC. (2023). The “Difficult Patient”: Dominant Logics and Misfits in Medicine. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Social Sciences and Global Public Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25110-8_138
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25110-8_138
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-25109-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-25110-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences