Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Medical, Social, Legal, and Religious Aspects of Genetic Donation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hot Topics in Human Reproduction

Part of the book series: Reproductive Medicine for Clinicians ((REMECL,volume 3))

  • 382 Accesses

Abstract

Sperm, oocyte, and embryo donation have become an integral part of the management of infertility, due in part to increasing maternal age and the cryopreservation of surplus oocytes. Donation also offers treatment for genetic mutation carriers by affording fertilization with normal, tested, genetic material. Despite their obvious merits in solving infertility issues previously unresolved by existing technologies such as IVF and intracytoplasmatic sperm injection, gamete and embryo donations present various medical, social, legal, and religious dilemmas that must be addressed and deliberated in the physician–patient encounter. When performing gamete or embryo donation, all entities participating in the clinical scenario—donors, recipients, and offspring—must be considered individually, as each possesses different needs, motivations, concerns, and risks resulting from treatment. This review aims to thoroughly examine these aspects in an evolving field, delineate the roots of gamete and embryo donation, present their intricacies, and, lastly, highlight their ultimate value in contemporary treatment of infertile couples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Antinori S, Versaci C, Gholami GH, Panci C, Caffa B. Oocyte donation in menopausal women. Hum Reprod. 1993;8(9):1487–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Benshushan A, Schenker JG. Age limitation in human reproduction: is it justified? J Assist Reprod Genet. 1993;10(5):321–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pantos K, Meimeti-Damianaki T, Vaxevanoglou T, Kapetanakis E. Oocyte donation in menopausal women aged over 40 years. Hum Reprod. 1993;8(3):488–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Paulson RJ, Sauer MV. Pregnancies in post-menopausal women. Oocyte donation to women of advanced reproductive age: ‘how old is too old?’. Hum Reprod. 1994;9(4):571–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Navot D, Laufer N, Kopolovic J, Rabinowitz R, Birkenfeld A, Lewin A, et al. Artificially induced endometrial cycles and establishment of pregnancies in the absence of ovaries. N Engl J Med. 1986;314(13):806–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sauer MV, Paulson RJ, Lobo RA. Pregnancy after age 50: application of oocyte donation to women after natural menopause. Lancet. 1993;341(8841):321–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Soderstrom-Anttila V. Pregnancy and child outcome after oocyte donation. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7(1):28–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cobo A, Bellver J, Domingo J, Perez S, Crespo J, Pellicer A, et al. New options in assisted reproduction technology: the Cryotop method of oocyte vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17(1):68–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Noyes N, Hampton BS, Berkeley A, Licciardi F, Grifo J, Krey L. Factors useful in predicting the success of oocyte donation: a 3-year retrospective analysis. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(1):92–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Humaidan P, Kol S, Papanikolaou E. GnRH agonist for triggering of final oocyte maturation: time for a change of practice? Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(4):510–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schenker JG. Sperm, oocyte, and pre-embryo donation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995;12(8):499–508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sibai BM, Frangieh A. Maternal adaptation to pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1995;7(6):420–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Paulson RJ, Boostanfar R, Saadat P, Mor E, Tourgeman DE, Slater CC, et al. Pregnancy in the sixth decade of life: obstetric outcomes in women of advanced reproductive age. JAMA. 2002;288(18):2320–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Salihu HM, Shumpert MN, Slay M, Kirby RS, Alexander GR. Childbearing beyond maternal age 50 and fetal outcomes in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(5 Pt 1):1006–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jequier AM, Winterton WR. Diagnostic problems of trophoblastic disease in women aged 50 or more. Obstet Gynecol. 1973;42(3):378–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Naeye RL. Maternal age, obstetric complications, and the outcome of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1983;61(2):210–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tuck SM, Yudkin PL, Turnbull AC. Pregnancy outcome in elderly primigravidae with and without a history of infertility. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988;95(3):230–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yogev Y, Melamed N, Bardin R, Tenenbaum-Gavish K, Ben-Shitrit G, Ben-Haroush A. Pregnancy outcome at extremely advanced maternal age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(6):558.e1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Simchen MJ, Shulman A, Wiser A, Zilberberg E, Schiff E. The aged uterus: multifetal pregnancy outcome after ovum donation in older women. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(10):2500–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Simchen MJ, Yinon Y, Moran O, Schiff E, Sivan E. Pregnancy outcome after age 50. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(5):1084–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dior UP, Laufer N, Chill HH, Granovsky-Grisaru S, Yagel S, Yaffe H, et al. Increased incidence of preeclampsia in mothers of advanced age conceiving by oocyte donation. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;297(5):1293–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zalud I, Shaha S. Three-dimensional sonography of the placental and uterine spiral vasculature: influence of maternal age and parity. J Clin Ultrasound JCU. 2008;36(7):391–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dulitzki M, Soriano D, Schiff E, Chetrit A, Mashiach S, Seidman DS. Effect of very advanced maternal age on pregnancy outcome and rate of cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92(6):935–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sheffer-Mimouni G, Mashiach S, Dor J, Levran D, Seidman DS. Factors influencing the obstetric and perinatal outcome after oocyte donation. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(10):2636–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bewley S, Wright JT. Maternal death associated with ovum donation twin pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 1991;6(6):898–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Edwards RG. Pregnancies are acceptable in post-menopausal women. Hum Reprod. 1993;8(10):1542–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schenker JG. The therapeutic approach to infertility in cases of ovarian failure. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991;626:414–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kenny LC, Lavender T, McNamee R, O'Neill SM, Mills T, Khashan AS. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: evidence from a large contemporary cohort. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56583.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Goold I. Should older and postmenopausal women have access to assisted reproductive technology? Monash Bioeth Rev. 2005;24(1):27–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Oocyte donation to postmenopausal women. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(Suppl 1):S254–5.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kortman M, Macklon NS. Oocyte donation in postmenopausal women: medical and ethical considerations. Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2008;18(6):168–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Almekaty K, Abomelha S, Thum Y, Nicopoullos J, Bracewell-Milnes T, Yap T, et al. Reporting on longitudinal live birth rates and cumulative delivery rates are more realistic outcome measures than sperm retrieval rates in couples undergoing mTESE-ICSI. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2019;22(2):139–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, The Practice Committee for the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Guidance regarding gamete and embryo donation. Fertil Steril. 2021;115(6):1395–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Adams DH, Clark RA, Davies MJ, de Lacey S. A meta-analysis of sperm donation offspring health outcomes. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2017;8(1):44–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lampic C, Skoog Svanberg A, Gudmundsson J, Leandersson P, Solensten NG, Thurin-Kjellberg A, et al. National survey of donor-conceived individuals who requested information about their sperm donor-experiences from 17 years of identity releases in Sweden. Hum Reprod. 2022;37(3):510–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Johnson M. Payments to gamete donors: position of the human fertilisation and embryology authority. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(9):1839–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Goedeke S, Shepherd D, Rodino IS. Support for recognition and payment options for egg and sperm donation in New Zealand and Australia. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(1):117–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zakarin Safier L, Gumer A, Kline M, Egli D, Sauer MV. Compensating human subjects providing oocytes for stem cell research: 9-year experience and outcomes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(7):1219–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Dunstan GR. In-vitro fertilization: the ethics. Hum Reprod. 1986;1(1):41–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schenker JG. FIGO committee for the study of ethical aspects of human reproduction. Ethical aspects in the management of the severely malformed fetus. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Ginekol Pol. 1996;67(11):585–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Schenker JG, Shushan A. Ethical and legal aspects of assisted reproduction practice in Asia. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(4):908–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Infertility and IVF Unit, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel

    Yoel Shufaro & Alyssa Hochberg

  2. Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Yoel Shufaro & Alyssa Hochberg

  3. The Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel

    Joseph G. Schenker

Authors
  1. Yoel Shufaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alyssa Hochberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joseph G. Schenker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoel Shufaro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebrew University - Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel

    Joseph G. Schenker

  2. Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproduction, University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    Martin H. Birkhaeuser

  3. Department of Reproductive Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

    Andrea R. Genazzani

  4. Campus Kiel, University Clinics of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany

    Liselotte Mettler

  5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, IL, USA

    John J. Sciarra

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shufaro, Y., Hochberg, A., Schenker, J.G. (2023). Medical, Social, Legal, and Religious Aspects of Genetic Donation. In: Schenker, J.G., Birkhaeuser, M.H., Genazzani, A.R., Mettler, L., Sciarra, J.J. (eds) Hot Topics in Human Reproduction. Reproductive Medicine for Clinicians, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24903-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24903-7_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24902-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24903-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation