Abstract
Innovation is a key driver to address the challenges of sustainability. To achieve this goal, the various entities participating in the innovation process must work together to ensure that research methodologies and results are aligned with the needs and expectations of society. Having a conceptual and practical approach that allows exploring and measuring how projects are fulfilling this expectation is key in this process. In this sense, this study aims to explore the relevance of this phenomenon for the development of innovation practices and to characterize and compare several responsible innovation assessment tools (RIATs) that can be used by research teams. A qualitative methodology is used to identify, map, and compare the characteristics of each RIAT. The main strengths and limitations of each approach are also explored. The findings reveal a total of 18 RIATs and 16 dimensions. The challenge is to get a harmonious balance between these various dimensions and to have this analysis performed in the early stages of each project. This study makes practical contributions by identifying areas that each project must assess and ensure for its innovation activities to be socially desirable and ethically acceptable.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Licht, G. (2017). National systems of innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 997–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9481-8
Aguirre, J. C., Peralta Zuñiga, M. L., Mora, P., & Blanco, F. (2021). Innovative entrepreneurship and quality of life. The case of Ecuador. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 34(1), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-04-2020-0076
Almeida, F. (2021). Open-innovation practices: Diversity in Portuguese SMEs. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7030169
Almeida, F., & Wasim, J. (2022). Eco-innovation and sustainable business performance: Perspectives of SMEs in Portugal and the UK. Society and Business Review, 18, 28. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-12-2021-0233
Andrade, V. (2017). Como promover inovação com foco na sustentabilidade? https://blog.waycarbon.com/2017/06/inovacao-com-foco-na-sustentabilidade/
Bacq, S., & Aguilera, R. V. (2022). Stakeholder governance for responsible innovation: A theory of value creation, appropriation, and distribution. Journal of Management Studies, 59(1), 29–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12746
Balland, P. A., Boschma, R., & Ravet, J. (2019). Network dynamics in collaborative research in the EU, 2003–2017. European Planning Studies, 27(9), 1811–1837. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1641187
Balogun, J. (2007). The practice of organizational restructuring: From design to reality. European Management Journal, 25(2), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2007.02.001
Bhaduri, S., & Talat, N. (2020). RRI beyond its comfort zone: Initiating a dialogue with frugal innovation by ‘the vulnerable’. Science, Technology and Society, 25(2), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721820902967
Bianchi, G., Testa, F., Boiral, O., & Iraldo, F. (2022). Organizational learning for environmental sustainability: Internalizing lifecycle management. Organization & Environment, 35(1), 103–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026621998744
Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007
Bora, B., Borah, S., & Chungyalpa, W. (2017). Elaborando objetivos estratégicos: examinando o papel da visão de negócios e declarações de missão. Órgão Gerenciar, 6(1), 1e6.
Bos-Brouwers, H. E. J. (2010). Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: Evidence of themes and activities in practice. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(7), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.652
Burget, M., Bardone, E., & Pedaste, M. (2017). Definitions and conceptual dimensions of responsible research and innovation: A literature review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9782-1
Chen, J., Yin, X., & Mei, L. (2018). Holistic innovation: An emerging innovation paradigm. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2018.02.001
Chen, J., Nichele, E., Ellerby, Z., & Wagner, C. (2022). Responsible research and innovation in practice: Driving both the ‘how’ and the ‘what’ to research. Journal of Responsible Technology, 11, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2022.100042
Chung, C.-C., Chao, L.-C., Chen, C.-H., & Lou, S.-J. (2016). A balanced scorecard of sustainable management in the Taiwanese bicycle industry: Development of performance indicators and importance analysis. Sustainability, 8(6), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8060518
Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T., & Matear, M. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: Why we don’t need a new theory and how we move forward from here. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24, 37–57. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.24.3.37
Deloitte. (2020). A quick guide to EU Funding 2014–2020. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/cy/Documents/finance/CY_Finance_EUFunding2014-2020Guide_Noexp.pdf
Dreyer, M., von Heimburg, J., Goldberg, A., & Schofield, M. (2020). Designing responsible innovation ecosystems for the mobilisation of resources from business and finance to accelerate the implementation of sustainability. A view from industry. Journal of Sustainability Research, 4(3), e200033. https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20200033
ENCORE. (2022). Exploring natural capital opportunities, risks and exposure. https://encore.naturalcapital.finance/en
European Commission (EC). (2011). Horizon 2020 – The framework programme for research and innovation. EC.
Gupta, P. (2008). Inovação empresarial no século XXI. Vida Económica.
Gurzawska, A. (2021). Responsible innovation in business: Perceptions, evaluation practices and lessons learnt. Sustainability, 13(4), 1826. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041826
Hauser, J., Tellis, G. J., & Griffin, A. (2006). Research on innovation: A review and agenda for marketing science. Marketing Science, 25(6), 687–717. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1050.0144
Hin, G., Daigney, M., Haudebault, D., Raskin, K., Bouché, Y., Pavie, X., & Carthy, D. (2014). Introduction to responsible innovation criteria. https://www.nweurope.eu/media/1118/guide_online.pdf
Interreg Central Europe – ROSIE. (2020). About Rosie Ri toolbox. https://www.ciseonweb.it/progetti-europei/rosie/
Kaiser, M., & Forsberg, E. M. (2001). Assessing fisheries – Using an ethical matrix in a participatory process. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 14(2), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011300811590
Kneipp, J. M., Gomes, C. M., Bichueti, R. S., Frizzo, K., & Perlin, A. P. (2019). Sustainable innovation practices and their relationship with the performance of industrial companies. Revista de Gestão, 26(2), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-01-2018-0005
Landeweerd, L., Townend, D., Mesman, J., & Van Hoyweghen, I. (2015). Reflections on different governance styles in regulating science: A contribution to ‘responsible research and innovation’. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 11(8), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-015-0026-y
Lehoux, P., Silva, H. P., Oliveira, R. R., & Rivard, L. (2020). The responsible innovation in health tool and the need to reconcile formative and summative ends in RRI tools for business. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(3), 646–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1844974
Lichtenthaler, U. (2016). Toward an innovation-based perspective on company performance. Management Decision, 54, 66–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2015-0161
Long, T. B., Blok, V., Dorrestijn, S., & Macnaghten, P. (2020). The design and testing of a tool for developing responsible innovation in start-up enterprises. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(1), 45–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1608785
Meissner, D., & Kotsemir, M. (2016). Conceptualizing the innovation process towards the ‘active innovation paradigm’ – Trends and outlook. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 5(14), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-016-0042-z
Meyer, J. V., Pascucci, L., & Mangolin, L. (2012). Gestão estratégica: Um exame de práticas em universidades privadas. Revista de Administração Pública, 46(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122012000100004
Moczek, N., Voigt-Heucke, S. L., Mortega, K. G., Cartas, C. F., & Knobloch, J. (2021). A self-assessment of European citizen science projects on their contribution to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Sustainability, 13(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041774
Morawska-Jancelewicz, J. (2021). The role of universities in social innovation within quadruple/quintuple helix model: Practical implications from Polish experience. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00804-y
Oduro, S. (2019). Examining open innovation practices in low-tech SMEs: Insights from an emerging market. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 10(3), 509–532. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-03-2019-0036
Pasquale, P. P. (2012). Comunicação Integrada de Marketing – a Teoria na Prática. Elsevier.
Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., O’Regan, N., & James, P. (2015). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: A systematic review. Group & Organization Management, 40, 428–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601114560063
Pozo, H., Akabane, G. K., & Tachizava, T. (2019). Innovation and technology processes in micro and small business. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1588088
Roach, D. C., Ryman, J. A., & Makani, J. (2016). Effectuation, innovation and performance in SMEs: An empirical study. European Journal of Innovation Management, 19, 214–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2014-0119
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students. Pearson Education.
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors: Toward a new role of the transnational corporation in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), 505–532. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200616446
Schütz, M., & Strohmaier, R. (2022). Power relations in European RDI-collaboration networks. Disparities in policy-driven opportunities for knowledge generation in ICT. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 31(3), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2020.1799139
SDG Compass. (2015). The SDG Compass provides guidance for companies on how they can align their strategies as well as measure and manage their contribution to the realization of the SDGs. https://sdgcompass.org
Sheehy, B., & Farneti, F. (2021). Corporate social responsibility, sustainability, sustainable development and corporate sustainability: What is the difference, and does it matter? Sustainability, 13(11), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115965
Silva, H. P., Lefebvre, A. A., Oliveira, R. R., & Lehoux, P. (2021). Fostering responsible innovation in health: An evidence informed assessment tool for innovation stakeholders. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 10(4), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2020.34
Silverman, D. (2010). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. Sage.
Srivastava, V., & Mushtaq, G. (2011). Corporate restructuring – A financial strategy. Asian Journal of Technology & Management Research, 1(1), 1–9.
Stahl, B. C., Obach, M., Yaghmaei, E., Ikonen, V., Chatfield, K., & Brem, A. (2017). The responsible research and innovation (RRI) maturity model: Linking theory and practice. Sutainability, 9, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061036
Stahl, B. C., Chatfield, K., Holter, C. T., & Brem, A. (2019). Ethics in corporate research and development: Can responsible research and innovation approaches aid sustainability? Journal of Cleaner Production, 239, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118044
Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
Sutcliffe, H. (2011). A report on responsible research and innovation. MATTER and the European Commission.
Tavassoli, S., & Karlsson, C. (2016). Innovation strategies and firm performance: Simple or complex strategies? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 25, 631–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2015.1108109
Tello, S. F., & Yoon, E. (2008). Examining drivers of sustainable innovation. International Journal of Business Strategy, 8(3), 164–169.
Thorstensen, E. (2019). Responsibility for assistive technologies: Product assessment frameworks and responsible research and innovation. Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics, 13(1), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.5324/eip.v13i1.2525
Tijdink, J. K., Horbach, S., Nuijten, M. B., & O’Neill, G. (2021). Towards a research agenda for promoting responsible research practices. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 16(4), 450–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211018916
Voegtlin, C., & Scherer, A. G. (2017). Responsible innovation and the innovation of responsibility: Governing sustainable development in a globalized world. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(2), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2769-z
Von Schomberg, R. (2013). A vision of responsible research and innovation. In R. Owen, J. Bessant, & M. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society (pp. 51–74). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424.ch3
Wender, B. A., Foley, R. W., Hottle, T. A., Sadowski, J., Prado-Lopez, V., Eisenberg, D. A., Laurin, L., & Seager, T. P. (2014). Anticipatory life-cycle assessment for responsible research and innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1(2), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.920121
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Caldeira, C., Pereira, D., Santos, J.D., Guimarães, C., Almeida, F. (2023). Relevance and Characteristics of Responsible Innovation Assessment Tools. In: Almeida, F.L., Morais, J.C., Santos, J.D. (eds) Multidimensional Sustainability: Transitions and Convergences. ISPGAYA 2022. Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24892-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24892-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24891-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24892-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)