Abstract
The competition conditions, which are getting more and more difficult in our age, made it inevitable to constantly monitor the performance of banks, which is one of the most important elements of the financial system. The ruthless competition environment forces bank to use the resources they have in the most efficient way. Therefore, it is very important for banks to evaluate their own performance and take measures to increase their performance in line with the evaluation results. The aim of this study is to comparatively analyse the financial performances of the top five banks operating in Turkey in 2020, which have the highest profit ratio in terms of asset size, for four quarters. Performance evaluation of banks was made using 9 criteria and the success of the management strategies followed by the banks throughout the year was evaluated by monitoring the performance rankings in four periods.
According to the results obtained from the study; Ranking first in the financial performance ranking of the five banks analysed, Ziraat Bank raised its score from 0.62 in the first quarter to 0.75 points in the second quarter, and managed to maintain its first place performance until the end of the year, despite falling to 0.60 points in the third quarter. The performance increase of this bank in the first place in the second quarter, which is the crisis period, was interpreted as turning the crisis into an opportunity. While the performance score of the other bank, which ranked second in the first quarter, was 0.56, it decreased to 0.37 points in the second quarter and increased again to 0.50 points in the third quarter. The continuation of this bank's second place performance throughout the year was interpreted as demonstrating a stable performance management, but not being able to take advantage of the opportunities in the second quarter and its performance declined, but showed a rapid recovery in the third quarter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Omurbek, V., Kinay, B.: Havayolu tasimaciliği sektöründe TOPSIS yöntemiyle finansal performans değerlendirmesi. Suleyman Demirel Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 18(3), 343–363 (2013)
Sari, T.: Banka performans olcumunde TOPSIS ve PROMETHEE yontemlerinin karsilastirilmasi. Atatürk Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Dergisi 34(1), 99–117 (2020)
Ondes, T., Cali, M.S., Aydin, S., Muti, A.: Turkiye’de bulunan ticari bankalar ile katilim bankalarinin ELECTRE yontemi ile performans analizi. Atatürk Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Dergisi 34(3), 689–710 (2020)
Özkan, T.: Turk bankacilik sektöründe finansal performans olcmede TOPSIS yonteminin kullanimi: Katilim bankalari üzerine bir uygulama. Maliye ve Finans Yazıları 113, 47–64 (2020)
Eren, S.A., Celik, I.E.: Finansal performansin olculmesinde TOPSIS yonteminin kullanimi: Turk bankacilik sektoru uygulamasi. Içtimaiyat 4(2), 171–180 (2020)
Aycin, E., Orcun, C.: Mevduat bankalarinin performanslarinin Entropi ve MAIRCA yontemleri ile değerlendirilmesi. Balikesir Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 22(42), 175–194 (2019)
Kendirli, H.C., Kendirli, S., Aydin, Y.: Küresel kriz çerçevesinde katilim bankalarinin ve ticari bankalarin mali performanslarinin TOPSIS yontemiyle analizi. Atatürk Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Dergisi 33(1), 137–154 (2019)
Altunoz, U.: Bankaların finansal performanslarinin bulanik MOORA ve bulanik AHP yontemleri ile analizi: Turk bankalari deneyimi. Route Educational and Social Science Journal 4(4), 116–132 (2017)
Caliskan, E., Eren, T.: Bankaların performanslarinin çok kriterli karar verme yontemiyle değerlendirilmesi. Ordu Universitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi 6(2), 85–107 (2016)
Guneysu, Y., Er, B., Ar, I.: Turkiye’deki ticari bankalarin performanslarinin AHS ve GIA yontemleri ile incelenmesi. Karadeniz Teknik Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 5(9), 71–93 (2015)
Bagci, H., Rencber, Ö.F.: Kamu bankalari ve halka açik ozel bankalarin PROMETHEE yontemi ile kârliliklarinin analizi. Aksaray Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi 6(1), 39–47 (2014)
Onder, E., Tas, N., Hepsen, A.: Performance evaluation of Turkish banks using analytical hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods. J. Int. Sci. Publ. Eco. Bus. 7(1), 470–503 (2013)
Wu, X., Zhang, C., Yang, L.: Evaluation and selection of transportation service provider by TOPSIS method with Entropy Weight. Therm. Sci. 00, 1–6 (2020)
Zlaugotne, B., Zihare, L., Balode, L., Kalnbalkite, A., Khabdullin, A., Blumberga, D.: Multi-Criteria decision analysis methods comparison. Environmental and Climate Technologies 24(1), 454–471 (2020)
Chen, P.: Effects of the Entropy weight on TOPSIS. Expert Syst. Appl. 168, 1–13 (2021)
Yildirim, B.F., Demirci, E.: Banka performansinin TOPSIS-M uygulamasi ile değerlendirilmesi. Söke Isletme Fakültesi Priene Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 1(1), 35–48 (2017)
Esmerve, Y., Bagci, H.: Katılım bankalarinda finansal performans analizi: Turkiye örneği. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi 8(15), 17–30 (2016)
Aylık, B.: Turkiye bankalar birligi website (2021). https://www.tbb.org.tr/tr
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Karahan, M., Kızkapan, L., Dinç, H. (2023). Analysis of the Financial Performances of Banks with the TOPSIS Method Weighed by Entropy. In: Durakbasa, N.M., Gençyılmaz, M.G. (eds) Towards Industry 5.0. ISPR 2022. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24457-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24457-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24456-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24457-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)