Skip to main content

The Role of Staff Managers in Service Transformation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Shaping High Quality, Affordable and Equitable Healthcare

Part of the book series: Organizational Behaviour in Healthcare ((OBHC))

  • 149 Accesses

Abstract

Staff managers are often under-appreciated actors of radical service transformation in the NHS. The current debate is dominated by the role of clinical professionals, which are expected to treat the involvement of staff managers as an intrusion and a threat. Against such expectations, this chapter shows how staff managers can gain a key strategic role and establish collaborations with clinical groups. This chapter reviews four cases of large-scale integrated care programmes with three types of staff managers involved (operations managers, quality managers and innovation managers). These cases revealed that staff managers exploited three opportunities to support integrated care: they appropriate the scut work necessary for service improvements in order to simplify and ease the contribution required from clinicians; they share the specialist knowledge of their organizational profession (e.g. operations management or human resource management) to expand the expert framework used by clinicians when they make their decisions; they tactically use their peripheral and technical status in the organization to mediate micro-conflicts between clinical groups. Staff managers can position themselves as both organizational professionals who support clinicians’ decision-making, and diplomats who mediate cross-professional relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott, A. (2014). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auschra, C. (2018). Barriers to the integration of care in inter-organisational settings: A literature review. International Journal of Integrated Care, 18(1), 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, S., Johnson, M., Chambers, D., Sutton, A., Goyder, E., & Booth, A. (2018). The effects of integrated care: A systematic review of UK and international evidence. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, N., & Currie, G. (2013). The knowledge brokering role of the hybrid middle level manager: The case of healthcare. British Journal of Management, 24(S1), S132–S142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comeau-Vallée, M., & Langley, A. (2020). The interplay of inter-and intraprofessional boundary work in multidisciplinary teams. Organization Studies, 41(12), 1649–1672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, G., Lockett, A., Finn, R., Martin, G., & Waring, J. (2012). Institutional work to maintain professional power: Recreating the model of medical professionalism. Organization Studies, 33(7), 937–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deneckere, S., Euwema, M., Van Herck, P., Lodewijckx, C., Panella, M., Sermeus, W., & Vanhaecht, K. (2012). Care pathways lead to better teamwork: Results of a systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 75(2), 264–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiBenigno, J. (2020). Rapid Relationality: How peripheral experts build a foundation for influence with line managers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(1), 20–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evetts, J. (2006). Short Note: The sociology of professional groups, new directions. Current Sociology, 54(1), 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferlie, E., Fitzgerald, L., Wood, M., & Hawkins, C. (2005). The nonspread of innovations: The mediating role of professionals. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, R., Learmonth, M., & Reedy, P. (2010). Some unintended effects of teamwork in healthcare. Social Science & Medicine, 70(8), 1148–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, L., Ferlie, E., McGivern, G., & Buchanan, D. (2013). Distributed leadership patterns and service improvement: Evidence and argument from English healthcare. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 227–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freidson, E. (1988). Profession of medicine: A study of the sociology of applied knowledge. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Bate, P., Macfarlane, F., & Kyriakidou, O. (2008). Diffusion of innovations in health service organisations: A systematic literature review. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajek, A. M. (2013). Breaking down clinical silos in healthcare. Frontiers of Health Services Management, 29(4), 45–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard-Grenville, J. A. (2007). Developing issue-selling effectiveness over time: Issue selling as resourcing. Organization Science, 18(4), 560–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, D., & Bruera, E. (2015). Models of integration of oncology and palliative care. Annuals of Palliative Medicine, 4(3), 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huising, R. (2015). To hive or to hold? Producing professional authority through scut work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(2), 263–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabbour, M., Newton, A. S., Johnson, D., & Curran, J. A. (2018). Defining barriers and enablers for clinical pathway implementation in complex clinical settings. Implementation Science, 13(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, D., Diamant, A., & Quereshy, F. (2018). Why do Surgeons schedule their own surgeries? Journal of Operations Management, 65(3), 262–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolanki, O., Tynkkynen, L. K., & Sinervo, T. (2017). Professionals’ views on integrated care. Journal of Integrated Care, 25(4), 247–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, K. C. (2009). Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery. American Journal of Sociology, 115(3), 657–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, K. C. (2018). Subordinate activation tactics: Semi-professionals and micro-level institutional change in professional organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(4), 928–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kislov, R., Hodgson, D., & Boaden, R. (2016). Professionals as knowledge brokers: The limits of authority in healthcare collaboration. Public Administration, 94(2), 472–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberati, E. G., Gorli, M., & Scaratti, G. (2016). Invisible walls within multidisciplinary teams: Disciplinary boundaries and their effects on integrated care. Social Science & Medicine, 150, 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn, S. (2001). Two-way windows’: Clinicians as medical managers. Organization Studies, 22(4), 593–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, A., Currie, G., Finn, R., Martin, G., & Waring, J. (2014). The influence of social position on sensemaking about organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 1102–1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, A., Fitzgerald, L., Van Gestel, N. M., & Keating, M. A. (2015). From Bipartite to Tripartite Devolved HRM in professional service contexts: Evidence from hospitals in three countries. Human Resource Management, 54(4), 813–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNulty, T., & Ferlie, E. (2004). Process transformation: Limitations to radical organizational change within public service organizations. Organization Studies, 25(8), 1389–1412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muzio, D., Brock, D. M., & Suddaby, R. (2013). Professions and institutional change: Towards an institutionalist sociology of the professions. Journal of Management Studies, 50(5), 699–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, G., & Sitton-Kent, L. (2016). Middle managers and the translation of new ideas in organizations: A review of micro-practices and contingencies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(3), 311–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, G., Currie, G., Frattini, F., & Lettieri, E. (2017). The role of managers in enacting two-step institutional work for radical innovation in professional organizations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(4), 450–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raus, K., Mortier, E., & Eeckloo, K. (2020). Challenges in turning a great idea into great health policy: The case of integrated care. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reay, T., Golden-Biddle, K., & Germann, K. (2006). Legitimizing a new role: Small wins and microprocesses of change. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 977–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risi, D., & Wickert, C. (2017). Reconsidering the ‘symmetry’ between institutionalization and professionalization: The case of corporate social responsibility managers. Journal of Management Studies, 54(5), 613–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R. J., Dubrow, T. J., Rosso, R. F., Williams, R. A., Butler, J. A., & Wilson, S. E. (1992). Guidelines for surgical residents' working hours: Intent vs reality. Archives of Surgery, 127(7), 778–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struckmann, V., Leijten, F. R., van Ginneken, E., Kraus, M., Reiss, M., Spranger, A., Boland, M. R. S., Czypionka, T., Busse, R., & Rutten-van Mölken, M. (2018). Relevant models and elements of integrated care for multimorbidity: Results of a scoping review. Health Policy, 122(1), 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, R., & Viale, T. (2011). Professionals and field-level change. Institutional work and the professional project. Current Sociology, 59(4), 423–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Nordenflycht, A. (2010). What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledgeintensive firms. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 155–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, B., Schmid, T., & Floyd, S. W. (2008). The middle management perspective on strategy process: Contributions, synthesis, and future research. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1190–1221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zonneveld, N., Driessen, N., Stüssgen, R. A., & Minkman, M. M. (2018). Values of integrated care: A systematic review. International Journal of Integrated Care, 18(4), 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Radaelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Radaelli, G. (2023). The Role of Staff Managers in Service Transformation. In: Burgess, N., Currie, G. (eds) Shaping High Quality, Affordable and Equitable Healthcare. Organizational Behaviour in Healthcare. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24212-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24212-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24211-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24212-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics