Skip to main content

Occupant Satisfaction with Certified Green Office Buildings in Chile

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Removing Barriers to Environmental Comfort in the Global South

Abstract

Contemporary office buildings have primarily adopted environmental sustainability criteria through the guidelines and requirements of domestic or international green building rating systems. These systems incorporate criteria aimed at reducing resource consumption and the building’s impact on the environment into their design, as well as criteria to improve indoor environmental quality (IEQ). However, doubts remain about the ability of green rating systems to guarantee occupant satisfaction with the building and its indoor environment in contrast with their counterparts. This research is based on a field study comparing occupant satisfaction in certified green office buildings with conventional buildings in Chile, from a sample of 176 occupants of green buildings and 175 occupants of buildings (N \(=\) 351). The study included a survey of occupants and the monitoring of thermal conditions in workspaces. The results showed that there are no significant differences in satisfaction and comfort between green buildings and their conventional counterparts. The occupants of conventional buildings showed trends of higher overall satisfaction for the winter and summer months, as well as for winter and summer temperatures. The other criteria, such as air in winter and summer, showed fairly similar results in both building types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thatcher A, Milner K (2012) The impact of a ‘green’ building on employees’ physical and psychological wellbeing. Work 41:3816–3823. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-0683-3816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Loftness V, Hakkinen B, Adan O, Nevalainen A (2007) Elements that contribute to healthy building design. Environ Health Perspect 115:965–970. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cole RJ, Valdebenito MJ (2013) The importation of building environmental certification systems: international usages of BREEAM and LEED. Build Res Inf 41:662–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2013.802115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McArthur J, Powell C (2020) Health and wellness in commercial buildings: systematic review of sustainable building rating systems and alignment with contemporary research. Build Environ 171:106635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Koponen IK, Asmi A, Keronen P, Puhto K, Kulmala M (2001) Indoor air measurement campaign in Helsinki, Finland 1999 – the effect of outdoor air pollution on indoor air. Atmos Environ 35:1465–1477. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00338-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Altomonte S, Schiavon S (2013) Occupant satisfaction in LEED and non-LEED certified buildings. Build Environ 68:66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schiavon S, Altomonte S (2014) Influence of factors unrelated to environmental quality on occupant satisfaction in LEED and non-LEED certified buildings. Build Environ 77:148–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.03.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Geng Y, Ji W, Wang Z, Lin B, Zhu Y (2019) A review of operating performance in green buildings: energy use, indoor environmental quality and occupant satisfaction. Energy Build 183:500–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.11.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee J, Wargocki P, Chan Y, Chen L, Tham K (2019) Indoor environmental quality, occupant satisfaction, and acute building-related health symptoms in green mark-certified compared with non-certified office buildings. Indoor Air 29:112–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Khoshbakht M, Gou Z, Lu Y, Xie X, Zhang J (2018) Are green buildings more satisfactory? a review of global evidence. Habitat Int 74:57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Altomonte S, Schiavon S, Kent MG, Brager G (2019) Indoor environmental quality and occupant satisfaction in green-certified buildings. Build Res Inf 47:255–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2018.1383715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Steinemann A, Wargocki P, Rismanchi B (2017) Ten questions concerning green buildings and indoor air quality. Build Environ 112:351–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Elnaklah R, Fosas D, Natarajan S (2020) Indoor environment quality and work performance in “green” office buildings in the Middle East. Build Simul 13:1043–1062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-020-0695-1

  14. Gou Z, Prasad D, Lau SSY (2013) Are green buildings more satisfactory and comfortable? Habitat Int 39:156–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Leaman A, Bordass B (2007) Are users more tolerant of “green” buildings? Build Res Inf 35:662–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210701529518

  16. Almeida LM, Tam VWY, Le KN (2020) Quantification of the energy use due to occupant behaviour collected in surveys: a case study of a green and non-green building. J Build Perform Simul 13(6):777–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2020.1825529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zepeda-Gil C, Natarajan S (2020) A review of “green building” regulations, laws, and standards in Latin America. Buildings 10:188. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10100188

  18. Bluyssen PM, Roda C, Mandin C, Fossati S, Carrer P, de Kluizenaar Y, Mihucz VG, de Oliveira Fernandes E, Bartzis J (2016) Self-reported health and comfort in ‘modern’ office buildings: first results from the European OFFICAIR study. Indoor Air 26:298–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ko WH, Schiavon S, Zhang H, Graham LT, Brager G, Mauss I, Lin YW (2020) The impact of a view from a window on thermal comfort, emotion, and cognitive performance. Build Environ 175:106779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106779

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was developed under research projects Fondecyt 1171497 and Fondecyt 1201456. The authors are part of the research group on environmental comfort and energy poverty \(+\)CO-PE, of Universidad del Bío-Bío, Chile.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maureen Trebilcock-Kelly .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Trebilcock-Kelly, M., Castro, F., Wegertseder-Martínez, P., Soto-Muñoz, J., Ramírez-Vielma, R. (2023). Occupant Satisfaction with Certified Green Office Buildings in Chile. In: Marín-Restrepo, L., Pérez-Fargallo, A., Piderit-Moreno, M.B., Trebilcock-Kelly, M., Wegertseder-Martínez, P. (eds) Removing Barriers to Environmental Comfort in the Global South. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24208-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24208-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24207-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24208-3

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics