Abstract
In this chapter, I explore how the study of grammatical gender has been a prime example of the impact that boundary crossing can have on the understanding of a phenomenon by creating nuance through the incorporation and juxtaposition of multiple perspectives. In the first section, I start with a description of grammatical gender and its different instantiations (or absence) across languages, including cue patterns, agreement structures, and noun-class parallels. I then move on to the ways in which grammatical gender has been investigated and how this research has crossed theoretical and methodological boundaries. The third section focuses on grammatical gender in SLA and aims to deconstruct the boundary between theory and practice, with a focus on what functional approaches have taught us about instruction of grammatical gender. The fourth section focuses on the history of grammatical gender instruction and the various pedagogies that have been tested to support the teaching of grammatical gender, including innovative approaches based on functional and sociocultural approaches. In the final section, I reflect on the many boundaries crossed: theoretical, methodological, disciplinary, linguistic, developmental, typological and, maybe most importantly, temporal. I end with a discussion of the future boundaries to be crossed in this area of research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Or through the suffix -lein, although -chen is more productive, especially in modern German.
- 2.
This result was also found by Walter (2020) for L1 English high school learners of L2 German.
References
Aikhenvald, A. (2004). Gender and noun class. Walter de Gruyter.
Aljadani, A. S. (2019). The acquisition of grammatical gender in Arabic demonstratives by English native speakers. International Journal of Contemporary Education, 2(1), 78–86.
Arnon, I., & Ramscar, M. (2012). Granularity and the acquisition of grammatical gender: How order-of-acquisition affects what gets learned. Cognition, 122(3), 292–305.
Arzt, J., & Kost, C. (2016). Effect of different teaching techniques on the acquisition of grammatical gender by beginning German second language learners. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 49(1), 1–23.
Ayoun, D. (2007). The second language acquisition of grammatical gender and agreement. French Applied Linguistics, 16, 130–170.
Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Pizzamiglio, L., D’amico, S., & Hernandez, A. (1995). Gender and lexical access in Italian. Perception & Psychophysics, 57(6), 847–862.
Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Hernandez, A., & Pizzamiglio, L. (1996). Gender priming in Italian. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(7), 992–1004.
Bender, A., Beller, S., & Klauer, K. C. (2011). Grammatical gender in German: A case for linguistic relativity? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(9), 1821–1835.
Blom, E., Polisenska, D., & Weerman, F. (2008). Articles, adjectives and age of onset: The acquisition of Dutch grammatical gender. Second Language Research, 24(3), 297–331.
Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1–22.
Boroditsky, L., Schmidt, L. A., & Phillips, W. (2003). Sex, syntax, and semantics. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 61–79). The MIT Press.
Caffarra, S., Janssen, N., & Barber, H. A. (2014). Two sides of gender: ERP evidence for the presence of two routes during gender agreement processing. Neuropsychologia, 63, 124–134.
Caffarra, S., Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Pesciarelli, F., Vespignani, F., & Cacciari, C. (2015). Is the noun ending a cue to grammatical gender processing? An ERP study on sentences in Italian. Psychophysiology, 52(8), 1019–1030.
Carroll, S. E. (1999). Input and SLA: Adults’ sensitivity to different sorts of cues to French gender. Language Learning, 49(1), 37–92.
Carstens, V. (2010). Implications of grammatical gender for the theory of uninterpretable features. In M. T. Putnam (Ed.), Exploring crash-proof grammars (pp. 31–58). John Benjamins.
Davydov, V. (2004). Problems of developmental instruction: A theoretical and experimental psychological study. (P. Moxay, Trans.). Akademyia Press.
De Resende, N. C. A., Mota, M. B., & Seuren, P. (2019). The processing of grammatical gender agreement in Brazilian Portuguese: ERP evidence in favor of a single route. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48(1), 181–198.
Desrochers, A. (1982). Effects of an imagery mnemonic on the acquisition and retention of French article-noun pairs. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Western Ontario.
Desrochers, A., & Paivio, A. (1990). Le phonme initial des noms inanimes et son effet sur l’identification du genre grammatical. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 44(1), 44–57.
Desrochers, A., Gélinas, C., & Wieland, L. D. (1989). An application of the mnemonic keyword method to the acquisition of German nouns and their grammatical gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 25–32.
Dias de Oliveira Santos, V. (2015). Can colors, voices, and images help learners acquire the grammatical gender of German nouns? Language Teaching Research, 19(4), 473–498.
Dominguez, A., Cuetos, F., & Segui, J. (1999). The processing of grammatical gender and number in Spanish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(5), 485–498.
Dussias, P. E., Kroff, J. R. V., Tamargo, R. E. G., & Gerfen, C. (2013). When gender and looking go hand in hand: Grammatical gender processing in L2 Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(2), 353–387.
Epstein, S. D., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G. (1996). Universal grammar and second language acquisition: The null hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19(4), 746–758.
Gal’perin, P. I. (1989). Organization of mental activity and the effectiveness of learning. Soviet Psychology, 27(3), 65–82.
Gal’perin, P. I. (1992). Stage-by-stage formation as a method of psychological investigation. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 30(4), 60–80.
Gollan, T. H., & Frost, R. (2001). Two routes to grammatical gender: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(6), 627–651.
Grüter, T., Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2012). Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem? Second Language Research, 28(2), 191–215.
Hawkins, R., & Chan, C. Y.-H. (1997). The partial availability of universal grammar in second language acquisition: The ‘failed functional features hypothesis’. Second Language Research, 13(3), 187–226.
Hernandez, A. E., Kotz, S. A., Hofmann, J., Valentin, V. V., Dapretto, M., & Bookheimer, S. Y. (2004). The neural correlates of grammatical gender decisions in Spanish. Neuroreport, 15(5), 863–866.
Hohlfeld, A. (2006). Accessing grammatical gender in German: The impact of gender-marking regularities. Applied PsychoLinguistics, 27(2), 127–142.
Kay, P., & Kempton, W. (1984). What is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis? American Anthropologist, 86(1), 65–79.
Kempe, V., & MacWhinney, B. (1996). The crosslinguistic assessment of foreign language vocabulary learning. Applied PsychoLinguistics, 17(2), 149–183.
Kempe, V., & MacWhinney, B. (1998). The acquisition of case marking by adult learners of Russian and German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 543–587.
Keppenne, V., Hopman, E. W., & Jackson, C. N. (2021). Production-based training benefits the comprehension and production of grammatical gender in L2 German. Applied PsychoLinguistics, 42(4), 907–936.
Klassen, R. (2016). The representation of asymmetric grammatical gender systems in the bilingual mental lexicon. Probus, 28(1), 9–28.
Köpcke, K.-M., & Zubin, D. A. (1984). Sechs Prinzipien für die Genuszuweisung im Deutschen: Ein Beitrag zur natürlichen Klassifikation. Linguistische Berichte, 93, 26–50.
Köpcke, K.-M., & Zubin, D. A. (1996). Prinzipien für die Genuszuweisung im Deutschen. In E, Lang & G. Zifonun (Hrsg.), Deutsch typologisch. Jahrbuch des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache 1995 (pp. 473–491). Walter de Gruyter.
Kousta, S.-T., Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2008). Investigating linguistic relativity through bilingualism: The case of grammatical gender. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(4), 843–858.
Kramer, R. (2014). Gender in Amharic: A morphosyntactic approach to natural and grammatical gender. Language Sciences, 43, 102–115.
Matthews, C. (2010). On the nature of phonological cues in the acquisition of French gender categories: Evidence from instance-based learning models [DP- internal information structure]. Lingua, 120(4), 879–900.
Mills, A. E. (2012). The acquisition of gender: A study of English and German. Springer-Verlag.
Negueruela, E. (2003). Systemic-theoretical instruction and l2 development: A sociocultural approach to teaching-learning and researching l2 learning. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University.
Phillips, W., & Boroditsky, L. (2003). Can quirks of grammar affect the way you think? Grammatical gender and object concepts. In R. Alterman & D. Kirsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 928–933). Cognitive Science Society.
Presson, N., MacWhinney, B., & Tokowicz, N. (2014). Learning grammatical gender: The use of rules by novice learners. Applied PsychoLinguistics, 35(4), 709–737.
Sabourin, L., Stowe, L. A., & De Haan, G. J. (2006). Transfer effects in learning a second language grammatical gender system. Second Language Research, 22(1), 1–29.
Samuel, S., Cole, G., & Eacott, M. J. (2019). Grammatical gender and linguistic relativity: A systematic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(6), 1767–1786.
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12(1), 40–72.
Stetsenko, A., & Arievitch, I. M. (2010). Cultural-historical activity theory: Foundational worldview and major principles. In J. Martin & S. Kirschner (Eds.), The sociocultural turn in psychology: The contextual emergence of mind and self (pp. 231–253). Columbia University Press.
Taft, M., & Meunier, F. (1998). Lexical representation of gender: A quasiregular domain. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27(1), 23–45.
Tucker, G. R. (1967). The French speaker’s skill with grammatical gender: An example of rule-governed behavior. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. McGill University.
Tucker, G. R., Lambert, W. E., Rigault, A., & Segalowitz, N. (1968). A psychological investigation of French speakers’ skill with grammatical gender. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7(2), 312–316.
Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M. (1996). Gradual development of L2 phrase structure. Second Language Research, 12(1), 7–39.
van Compernolle, R. A., & Henery, A. (2014). Instructed concept appropriation and L2 pragmatic development in the classroom. Language Learning, 64(3), 549–578.
Vigliocco, G., Antonini, T., & Garrett, M. F. (1997). Grammatical gender is on the tip of Italian tongues. Psychological Science, 8(4), 314–317.
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. The MIT Press.
Walter, D. R. (2020). The acquisition of German declension in additive and concept-based approaches to instruction via computer-based cognitive tutors. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 11(1), 130–162.
Walter, D. R., & MacWhinney, B. (2015). US German majors’ knowledge of grammatical gender. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 48(1), 25–40.
Walter, D. R., & van Compernolle, R. A. (2017). Teaching German declension as meaning: A concept-based approach. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 68–85.
Wang, M., & Schiller, N. O. (2019). A review on grammatical gender agreement in speech production. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 27–54.
Zubin, D. A., & Köpcke, K.-M. (1981). Gender: A less than arbitrary grammatical category. Chicago Linguistic Society, 17, 439–449.
Zubin, D. A., & Köpcke, K.-M. (1986). Gender and folk taxonomy: The indexical relation between grammatical and lexical categorization. In C. Craig (Ed.), Noun classes and categorization (pp. 139–180). John Benjamins.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Walter, D.R. (2023). Boundary Crossing from the Start: 55 Years of Second Language Grammatical Gender Research in Review. In: Zhang, D., Miller, R.T. (eds) Crossing Boundaries in Researching, Understanding, and Improving Language Education. Educational Linguistics, vol 58. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24078-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24078-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24077-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24078-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)