Abstract
Ethics of clinical research deals with norms and values defining what ought and ought not to be done in the context of clinical trials to protect the rights, safety, and well-being of the study participants. As a result of past unethical approaches, protection for human subjects has been strictly regulated, introducing three fundamental ethical principles: respect for person, beneficence and non-maleficence, and justice. Many believe that informed consent is the sufficient and necessary step point to make clinical research ethical. However, to be ethical a clinical research must satisfy seven specific requirements underpinning the three general principles (social or scientific value, scientific validity, fair subject selection, favorable risk/benefit ratio, independent review, informed consent, and respect for enrolled participants). In this regard, RECs/IRBs have been established to protect patients’ dignity and well-being while promoting the potential benefit of ethical research, even if presenting with large variation in practice across different countries. In the clinical research setting, the primary ethical dilemma is that only those individuals enrolled in a clinical trial are asked to face burden or risk as research subjects to benefit others and society with a range of unique ethical problems featuring the design and conduction of RCTs. Dealing with individuals who serve as human subjects, the chance of exploitation must be minimized, and the respect must be pursued in accordance with ethical principles and the rigorous methodology of clinical research. This chapter aims to highlight ethical principles, concerns, and considerations surrounding the clinical research setting while discussing the legislative and organizational role of research committees.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Nardini C (2014) The ethics of clinical trials. Ecancer 8:387. https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2014.387
Sierra X (2011) Ethics in medical research in humans: a historical perspective. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas 102(6):395–401
Bernard C (1859) Introduction à l’étude de la médecine experimental. Collège de France, Paris
Merz JF (2018) The Nuremberg code and informed consent for research. JAMA 319(1):85–86. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.17704
Rice TW (2008) The historical, ethical, and legal background of human-subjects research. Respir Care 53(10):1325–1329
Dixon JR (1998) The international conference on harmonization good clinical practice guideline. Qual Assur 6(2):65–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/105294199277860
Truog RD, Robinson W, Randolph A, Morris A (1999) Is informed consent always necessary for randomized, controlled trials? N Engl J Med 340:804–807
Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C (2000) What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA 283(20)
Ross A, Athanassoulis N (2014) The role of research ethics committees in making decisions about risk. HEC Forum 26(3):203–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-014-9244-6
Aulisio MP (2016) Why did hospital ethics committees emerge in the US? PhD AMA J Ethics 18(5):546–553
Hajibabaee F, Joolaee S, Cheraghi MA, Salari P, Rodney P (2016) Hospital/clinical ethics committees’ notion: an overview. J Med Ethics Hist Med 9(17)
Whitney SN, Alcser K, Schneider CE, McCullough LB, McGuire AL, Volk RJ (2008) Principal investigator views of the IRB system. Int J Med Sci 5(2):68–72
Vijayananthan A, Nawawi O (2008) The importance of good clinical practice guidelines and its role in clinical trials. Biomed Imaging Interv J 4:e5
Levine R (1986) Ethics and regulation of clinical research, 2nd edn. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Baltimore
Freedman B (1990) Placebo controlled trials and the logic of clinical purpose. IRB: Rev Hum Subj Res 12(6):1e5
Miller F, Brody H (2002) What makes placebo-controlled trials unethical? Am J Bioeth 2(2):3e9
Howick JH (2011) The philosophy of evidence-based medicine. Wiley-Blackwell, London. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444342673
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gristina, V., Galvano, A., Pirrotta, A., Russo, A. (2023). Ethics in Life Sciences and Research. In: Congiunti, L., Lo Piccolo, F., Russo, A., Serio, M. (eds) Ethics in Research. UNIPA Springer Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24060-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24060-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24059-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24060-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)