Skip to main content

New Trends on Bio-cementation and Self-healing Testing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances on Testing and Experimentation in Civil Engineering

Abstract

In the last decade, a significant effort was made by research institutions and industry to change ordinary construction materials into green, smart, adaptive, and advanced materials. Green materials (for example bio-cement) are developed to reduce carbon footprint and waste, using biological agents replacing common binders. Smart materials can monitor their condition and respond to state changes as designed. Examples of smart materials are composite materials that can heal autonomously after structural damage occurs. Nevertheless, despite the disposition of the construction industry to accept innovations being at high, these green and smart materials will only prevail if they prove to be sustainable and useful in the long-term. To this, they need to be adequately characterized and the benefits in comparison with conventional materials assessed. However, the standardized methods and apparatus used to characterize the conventional materials are often not adequate to these materials, either because of their atypical composition, therefore requiring different tests (e.g., chemical analysis) or lack of standardized methods to evaluate the specific property. This chapter describes and discusses the recent developments in the testing of green materials such as bio-cemented and self-healing materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this chapter the European terminology of bituminous materials is used: “bitumen” designates the binder and “asphalt” designates the mixture.

References

  1. Phillips A, Gerlach R, Lauchnor E, Mitchell A, Cunningham A, Spangler L (2013) Engineered applications of ureolytic biomineralization: a review. Biofouling: J Bioadhesion Biofilm Res 29:715–733

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akiyama M, Kawasaki S (2012) Microbially mediated sand solidification using calcium phosphate compounds. Eng Geol 137–138:29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Xu J, Du Y, Jiang Z, She A (2015) Effects of calcium source on biochemical properties of microbial CaCO3 precipitation. Front Microbiol 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cardoso R, Pedreira R, Duarte S, Monteiro G, Borges H, Flores-Colen I (2016) Chap 5- biocementation as rehabilitation technique of porous materials. In: de Freitas VP, Costa A, Delgado J (eds) Building pathology and rehabilitation. Springer, pp 99–120

    Google Scholar 

  5. Al Qabany A, Soga K, Santamarina C (2012) Factors affecting efficiency of microbially induced calcite precipitation. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 138:992–1001

    Google Scholar 

  6. Al Qabany A, Soga K (2013) Effect of chemical treatment used in MICP on engineering properties of cemented soils. Geotechnique 63:331–339

    Google Scholar 

  7. Van Paassen L, Ghose R, van der Linden T, van der Star W, Van Loosdrecht M (2010) Quantifying biomediated ground improvement by ureolysis: large-scale biogrout experiment. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 136:1721–1728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jimenez-Lopez C, Rodriguez-Navarro C, Pinar G, Carrillo-Rosúa FJ, Rodriguez-Gallego M, González-Munoz MT (2007) Consolidation of degraded ornamental porous limestone by calcium carbonate precipitation induced by microbiota inhabiting the stone. Chemosphere 68:1929–1936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. De Muynck W, De Beliea N, Verstraete W (2010) Microbial carbonate precipitation in construction materials: a review. Ecol Eng 36:118–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Achal V, Mukerjee A, Reddy MS (2013) Biogenic treatment improves the durability and remediates the cracks of concrete structures. Constr Build Mater 48:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. García-González J, Pereira AS, Lemos PC, Almeida N, Silva V, Candeias A, Juan-Valdes A, Faria P (2020) Effect of surface biotreatments on construction materials. Constr Build Mater 241:118019

    Google Scholar 

  12. Raut SH, Sarode DD, Lele SS (2014) Biocalcification using B. pasteurii for strengthening brick masonry civil engineering structures. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 30:191–200

    Google Scholar 

  13. Montoya BM, DeJong JT, Boulanger R (2013) Dynamic response of liquefiable sand improved by microbial-induced calcite precipitation. Geotechnique 63(4):302–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. De Muynck W, Debrouwer D, DeBelie N, Verstraete W (2008) Bacterial carbonate precipitation improves the durability of cementitious materials. Cem Concr Res 38:1005–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Harkes MP, van Paassen LA, Booster JL, Whiffin VS, van Loosdrecht MCM (2010) Fixation and distribution of bacterial activity in sand to induce carbonate precipitation for ground reinforcement. Ecol Eng 36:112–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Albuquerque D, Cardoso R, Monteiro G, Martins V, Cardoso S (2019) Towards a portable magnetoresistive biochip for urease-based biocementation monitoring. In: Proceedings of 6th IEEE Portuguese meeting on bioengineering (ENBENG 2019). Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ropp RC (2013) Encyclopedia of the alkaline earth compounds. Elsevier. ISBN: 9780444595508

    Google Scholar 

  18. Oral CM, Ercan B (2018) Influence of pH on morphology, size and polymorph of room temperature synthesized calcium carbonate particles. Powder Technol 339:781–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. DeJong JT, Fritzges MB, Nusslein K (2006) Microbially induced cementation to control sand response to undrained shear. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 132:1381–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang Y, Soga K, Dejong JT, Kabla AJ (2019) Microscale visualization of microbial-induced calcium carbonate precipitation processes. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 145(9):04019045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mitchell AC, Ferris FG (2006) The influence of Bacillus pasteurii on the nucleation and growth of calcium carbonate. Geomicrobiol J 23:213–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. El Mountassir R, Lunn RJ, Moir H, MacLachan E (2014) Hydrodinamic coupling in microbially mediated fracture mineralization: formation of self-organized groundwater flow channels. Water Resour Res 50

    Google Scholar 

  23. Felício F, Silvério V, Duarte SO, Galvão A, Monteiro A, Cardoso S, Cardoso R (2019) Preliminary tests on a microfluidic device to study pore clogging during biocementation. In: Proceedings of 7th international symposium on deformation characteristics of geomaterials (IS-Glasgow2019). Glasgow, UK

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dias FC, Borges I, Duarte S, Monteiro G, Cardoso R (2020) Comparison of experimental techniques for biocementation of sands considering homogeneous volume distribution of precipitated calcium carbonate. In: 4th European conference on unsaturated soils, E-UNSAT2020. Lisbon, Portugal, p 05004

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cabalar AF, Karabash Z, Erkmen O (2018) Stiffness of a biocemented sand at small strains. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 1:54

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stabnikov V, Chu J, Naeimi M, Ivanov V (2011) Formation of water-impermeable crust on sand surface using biocement. Cem Concr Res 41:1143–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gomez M, Martinez M, DeJong JT, de Hunt C, Vlaming L, Major D, Dworatzek S (2015) Field-scale bio-cementation tests to improve sands. Ground Improv Proc Inst Civ Eng ICE 168(3):206–216

    Google Scholar 

  28. Terzis D, Hicher P, Laloui L (2020) Benefits and drawbacks of applied direct currents for soil improvement via carbonate mineralization. In: 4th European conference on unsaturated soils, E-UNSAT2020. Lisbon, Portugal, p 05007

    Google Scholar 

  29. Van Paassen LA (2011) Bio-mediated ground improvement: from laboratory experiment to pilot applications. Geotech Spec Publ 41165(211 GSP):4099–4108

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cardoso R, Pires I, Duarte SO, Monteiro G (2018) Effects of clay’s chemical interactions on biocementation. Appl Clay Sci 156:96–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Phillips AJ, Cunningham AB, Gerlach R, Hiebert R, Hwang C, Lomans BP, Spangler L (2016) Fracture sealing with microbially-induced calcium carbonate precipitation: a field study. Environ Sci Technol 50(7):4111–4117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tiano P, Cantisani E, Sutherland I, Paget JM (2006) Biomediated reinforcement of weathered calcareous stones. J Cult Herit 7:49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Minto JM, Maclachlan E, Mountassir GE, Lunn RJ (2016) Rock fracture grouting with microbially induced carbonate precipitation. Water Resour Res 52(11):8827–8844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Arbabzadeh E, Cardoso R (2019) Efficiency of biocementation as rock joints sealing technique evaluated through permeability changes. In: 4th International conference on geotechnical research and engineering (ICGRE’19). Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  35. Van Tittelboom K, De Belie N, De Muynk W, Verstraete W (2010) Use of bacteria to repair craks in concrete. Cem Concr Res 40:157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. De Belie N, De Muynck W (2008) Crack repair in concrete using biodeposition. In: Proceedings of ICCRR. Cape Town, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ramachandran SK, Ramakrishnan V, Bang SS (2001) Remediation of concrete using micro-organisms. ACI Mater J 98:3–9

    Google Scholar 

  38. Choi SG, Wang K, Wen Z, Chu J (2017) Mortar crack repair using microbial induced calcite precipitation. J Cem Concr Compos 83:209–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mitchell J, Santamarina C (2005) Biological considerations in geotechnical engineering. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 131(10):1222–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rodriguez-Navarro C, Rodriguez-Gallego M, BenChekroun K, Gonzalez-Munoz MT (2003) Conservation of ornamental stone by Myxococcus xanthus-induced carbonate biomineralization. Appl Environ Microb 69:2182–2193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sanchéz M, Faria P, Ferrara L, Horszczaruk E, Jonkers HM, Kwiecién A, Mosa J, Peled A, Pereira AS, Snoeck D, Stefanidou M, Stryszewska T, Zajac B (2018) External treatments for the preventive repair of existing constructions: a review. Constr Build Mater 193:435–452

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cheng Y, Feng G, Moraru CI (2019) Micro- and nanotopography sensitive bacterial attachment mechanisms: a review. Front Microbiol

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kahori H, Bagherpour R (2017) Application of carbonate precipitating bacteria for improving properties and repairing cracks of shotcrete. J Constr Build Mater 148:249–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Peng S, Di H, Fan L, Fan W, Qin L (2020) Factors affecting permeability reduction of MICP for fractured rock. Front Earth Sci 8:217

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wu C, Chu J, Wu S, Guo W (2018) Quantifying the permeability reduction of biogrouted rock fracture. Rock Mech Rock Eng

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wiktor V, Jonkers HM (2015) Field performance of bacteria-based repair system: pilot study on a parking garage. Case Stud Constr Mater 2:11–17

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cardoso R, Monteiro A, Flores-Colen I, Monteiro G (2017) Use of biocementation for cracks rehabilitation of different construction materials. In: 3rd International conference on protection of historical constructions (PROHITECH’17). Lisbon, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ghosh P, Mandal S, Chattopadhyay BD, Pal S (2005) Use of microorganism to improve the strength of cement mortar. Cem Concr Res 35(10):1980–1983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Jonkers HM, Thijssen A, Muyzer G, Copuroglu O, Schlangen E (2010) Application of bacteria as self-healing agent for the development of sustainable concrete. Ecol Eng 36:230–235

    Google Scholar 

  50. Bazin P, Saunier JB (1967) Deformability, fatigue and healing properties of asphalt mixes. In: 2nd International conference on the structural design of asphalt pavements, pp 553–569

    Google Scholar 

  51. Little DN, Bhasin A (2007) Exploring mechanism of healing in asphalt mixtures and quantifying its impact. In: Self healing materials: an alternative approach to 20 centuries of materials science. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 205–218

    Google Scholar 

  52. Garcia A, Schlangen E, Van de Ven M (2009) Two ways of closing cracks on asphalt concrete pavements: microcapsules and induction heating. KEM 417–418:573–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Xu S, García A, Su J et al (2018) Self-healing asphalt review: from idea to practice. Adv Mater Interfaces 5:1800536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Sun D, Sun G, Zhu X et al (2018) A comprehensive review on self-healing of asphalt materials: mechanism, model, characterization and enhancement. Adv Coll Interface Sci 256:65–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. García Á, Schlangen E, van de Ven M, Sierra-Beltrán G (2010) Preparation of capsules containing rejuvenators for their use in asphalt concrete. J Hazard Mater 184:603–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Micaelo R, Al-Mansoori T, Garcia A (2016) Study of the mechanical properties and self-healing ability of asphalt mixture containing calcium-alginate capsules. Constr Build Mater 123:734–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Liang B, Lan F, Shi K et al (2021) Review on the self-healing of asphalt materials: mechanism, affecting factors, assessments and improvements. Constr Build Mater 266:120453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Lesueur D (2009) The colloidal structure of bitumen: consequences on the rheology and on the mechanisms of bitumen modification. Adv Coll Interface Sci 145:42–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Al-Mansoori T, Norambuena-Contreras J, Micaelo R, Garcia A (2018) Self-healing of asphalt mastic by the action of polymeric capsules containing rejuvenators. Constr Build Mater 161:330–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Su J-F, Han S, Wang Y-Y et al (2017) Experimental observation of the self-healing microcapsules containing rejuvenator states in asphalt binder. Constr Build Mater 147:533–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Garcia A, Salih S, Gómez-Meijide B (2020) Optimum moment to heal cracks in asphalt roads by means electromagnetic induction. Constr Build Mater 238:117627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Norambuena-Contreras J, Liu Q, Zhang L et al (2019) Influence of encapsulated sunflower oil on the mechanical and self-healing properties of dense-graded asphalt mixtures. Mater Struct 52:78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Micaelo R, Freire AC, Pereira G (2020) Asphalt self-healing with encapsulated rejuvenators: effect of calcium-alginate capsules on stiffness, fatigue and rutting properties. Mater Struct 53:20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Chung K, Lee S, Cho W et al (2018) Rheological analysis of self-healing property of microcapsule-containing asphalt. J Ind Eng Chem 64:284–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Ajam H, Gómez-Meijide B, Artamendi I, Garcia A (2018) Mechanical and healing properties of asphalt mixes reinforced with different types of waste and commercial metal particles. J Clean Prod 192:138–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. BS EN 12697-26 (2004) Bituminous mixtures—test methods for hot mix asphalt—part 26: stiffness. British Standards Institution, London

    Google Scholar 

  67. Xu S, Liu X, Tabaković A, Schlangen E (2020) A novel self-healing system: towards a sustainable porous asphalt. J Clean Prod 259:120815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Al-Mansoori T, Micaelo R, Artamendi I et al (2017) Microcapsules for self-healing of asphalt mixture without compromising mechanical performance. Constr Build Mater 155:1091–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Hunter RN, Shelf A, Read J (2015) The shell bitumen handbook, 6th edn. ICE Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  70. CRD-C652-95 (1995) Standard test method for measurement of reduction in Marshall stability of bituminous mixtures caused by immersion in water. US Army Corps of Engineers, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of FCT for the partial funding of this work under the strategic project UIDB/04625/2020 from the research unit CERIS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui Micaelo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Micaelo, R., Faria, P., Cardoso, R. (2023). New Trends on Bio-cementation and Self-healing Testing. In: Chastre, C., Neves, J., Ribeiro, D., Neves, M.G., Faria, P. (eds) Advances on Testing and Experimentation in Civil Engineering. Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23888-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23888-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-23887-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-23888-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics