Skip to main content

Estimating the Environmental Footprint of the O.A.S.A Group

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart Energy for Smart Transport (CSUM 2022)

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1565 Accesses

Abstract

Transportation accounts for 24% of global CO2 emissions; according to the current trends, energy use and CO2 emissions associated with this sector are projected to increase by more than 80% by 2050. Following UN Recommendations, EU Directives and Policies prioritising the transition to more clean modes of transport, the O.A.S.A Group (Group) estimated its annual environmental footprint. Specifically, the Group quantified the impact of its activities (transport-related and others) on the environment aiming at the integration of the environmental parameter into the decision-making process. 2019 was the baseline year for all estimations performed; the study estimated the carbon (and other) emissions from the transport fleet (direct emissions), as well as carbon emissions and carbon removals from the Group’s other supporting activities (indirect emissions). A mix of internationally recognised methodologies (i.e., EMEP/EEA 2020, 2006 IPCC Guidelines), activity data and emission factors were used and applied in the study. The study highlights the positive impact of the Group to the environment, justifying that – without its existence - approximately 200,000 tn of CO2 would be emitted annually in the metropolitan area of Athens. Electricity consumption of the electrified transport means is the Group’s most critical CO2 emission source overall (approx. 40%). Diesel-buses come first amongst all transport means, accounting for approximately 35% of direct emissions. The rising share of renewable energy sources in the electricity generation mix, the fleet renewal initiatives and the deployment of electric buses are expected to further improve the Group’s environmental footprint in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Athens Urban Transport Organisation S.A. (O.A.S.A) is the sole shareholder (participation rate 100%) of its subsidiaries transport companies O.SY. S.A. (O.SY) and STA.SY. S.A. (STA.SY). The three companies constitute the O.A.S.A Group (Group). O.SY is the distinctive title of the company called “Road Transport S.A.”, that provides urban transportation services with thermal (diesel and CNG) and trolley-buses in the Attica Region. STA.SY is the distinctive title of the company called “Urban Rail Transport S.A.”, that provides urban transportation services with metro (line 2, line 3), urban electric railway (line 1) and tram in the Attica Region [20].

  2. 2.

    Subsidiary company of O.A.S.A that aims at the operation and exploitation of the transport services provided by the metro (line 2, line 3), electric urban railway (line 1) and tram [21, 26].

  3. 3.

    Subsidiary company of O.A.S.A that aims at the operation and exploitation of the transport services provided by thermal (1289 diesel, 418 CNG) and trolley (286) buses in the metropolitan area of Athens [19, 21].

References

  1. Anderson, R., Maxwell, R., Harris, N.G.: Maximising the Potential for Metros to Reduce Energy Consumption and Deliver Low-Carbon Transportation in Cities. CoMET and Nova Groups/ Imperial College London, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. APTA: Public Transportation Reduces Greenhouse Gases and Conserves Energy. The Benefits of Public Transportation. American Public Transportation Association (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beer, Τ., Grant, Τ., Morgan, G., Lapszewicz, J., Anyon, P., Edwards, J., Nelson, P., Watson, H., Williams, D.: Life-cycle Emissions Analysis of Alternative Fuels for Heavy Vehicles. Australian Greenhouse Office (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Byeongho, L., Sung-Ho, T., Sung Woo, S. Youngho, Y.: Carbon dioxide reduction through urban green space in the case of Sejong City Master Plan. In: SB Seoul International Conference on Sustainable Building Asia, pp. 537–542 (n.d.)

    Google Scholar 

  5. DEFRA: 2008 Guidelines to Defra’s GHG Conversion Factors: Methodology Paper for Transport Emission Factors. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, AEA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. EC: Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy—Putting European transport on track for the future. European Commission (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. EC: The New EU Urban Mobility Framework. European Commission (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  8. EMEP/EEA: Air Pollutant Emission Inventory Guidebook 2019—Update Oct. 2020. EMEP/EEA (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. FTA: Public Transportation’s Role in Responding to Climate Change. Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. IEA, Tracking Transport 2020. https://www.iea.org/reports/tracking-transport-2020. Last accessed 21 Mar 2022

  11. Imperial College: Keeping Metros Competitive—Cost and Carbon Footprint. Case Study—Interim Report. Imperial College (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. IPCC: 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. ITF: Worldwide transport activity to double, emissions to further increase. https://www.itf-oecd.org/worldwide-transport-activity-double-emissions-rise-further. Last accessed 21 Mar 2022

  14. Lie, K.W., Synnevåg, T.A., Lamb, J.J., Lien, K.M.: The carbon footprint of electrified city buses: a case study in Trondheim, Norway. Energies 14(3), 770 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lozzi, G., Rodrigues, M., Marcucci, E., Gatta V., Teoh, T., Ramos, C., Jonkers, E.: Research for TRAN Committee—Sustainable and Smart Urban Transport. European Parliament, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, Brussels (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ministry of Environment and Energy: National Inventory Report of Greece for Greenhouse and Other Gases for the Years 1990–2019. Ministry of Environment and Energy, Athens (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nanaki, E.A, Koroneos, C.J., Roset, J., Susca, T., Christensen, T.H., De Gregorio Hurtado, S., Rybka, A., Kopitovic, J., Heidrich, O., Amparo López‐Jiménez, P.: Environmental Assessment of 9 European Public Bus Transportation Systems (n.d)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nylund, N-O., Erkkilä, K., Lappi, M., Ikonen, M.: Transit Bus Emission Study: Comparison of Emissions from Diesel and Natural Gas Buses. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Research Report. Project 3/P5150/04 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. O.SY S.A, https://www.osy.gr/. Last accessed 21 Mar 2022

  20. OASA S.A, https://www.oasa.gr/. Last accessed 21 Mar 2022

  21. OASA S.A: Activity Report 2018. OASA S.A, Athens (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. PPC: Sustainability Report 2019. Public Power Corporation (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  23. RAE: Decision no. 248/2021 approval of network distribution loss factors. Regulatory Authority for Energy (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sehmi, G.S., Stolz, M.: Electric mobility is rising—how can we make the most of it? World Bank, Transport on Development (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  25. SLOCAT: Transport and Climate Change Global Status Report. Tracking Trends in a Time of Change: The Need for Radical Action Towards Sustainable Transport Decarbonisation. 2nd edn. Partnership on Sustainable Low Carbon Transport (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  26. STA.SY S.A., http://www.stasy.gr/index.php?id=13. Last accessed 21 Mar 2022

  27. SuM4All: Sustainable Electric Mobility: Building Blocks and Policy Recommendations. CC BY 3.0, Washington DC (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  28. TFL: London Underground Carbon Footprint Report. Transport for London, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  29. UITP: Climate Action and Public Transport. International Association of Public Transport (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. UN, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Dynamics: 2018 Revision of World Urbanization Prospects. United Nations (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marlen Michali .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Michali, M., Karampourniotis, K., Zafeiriou, P., Vavaliou, L. (2023). Estimating the Environmental Footprint of the O.A.S.A Group. In: Nathanail, E.G., Gavanas, N., Adamos, G. (eds) Smart Energy for Smart Transport. CSUM 2022. Lecture Notes in Intelligent Transportation and Infrastructure. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23721-8_118

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23721-8_118

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-23720-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-23721-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics