Skip to main content

Lower Bounds for Monotone q-Multilinear Boolean Circuits

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
SOFSEM 2023: Theory and Practice of Computer Science (SOFSEM 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13878))

  • 318 Accesses

Abstract

A monotone Boolean circuit is composed of OR gates, AND gates and input gates corresponding to the input variables and the Boolean constants. It is multilinear if for any AND gate the two input functions have no variable in common. We consider a generalization of monotone multilinear Boolean circuits to include monotone q-multilinear Boolean circuits. Roughly, a sufficient condition for the q-multilinearity is that in the formal Boolean polynomials at the output gates of the circuit no variable has degree larger than q. First, we study a relationship between q-multilinearity and the conjunction depth of a monotone Boolean circuit, i.e., the maximum number of AND gates on a path from an input gate to an output gate. As a corollary, we obtain a trade-off between the lower bounds on the size of monotone q-multilinear Boolean circuits for semi-disjoint bilinear forms and the parameter q. Next, we study the complexity of the monotone Boolean function \(Isol_{k,n}\) verifying if a k-dimensional matrix has at least one 1 in each line (e.g., each row and column when \(k=2\)) in terms of monotone k-multilinear Boolean circuits. We show that the function admits \(\Pi _2\) monotone k-multilinear circuits of \(O(n^k)\) size. On the other hand, we demonstrate that any \(\Pi _2\) monotone Boolean circuit for \(Isol_{k,n}\) is at least k-multilinear. Also, we show under an additional assumption that any \(\varSigma _3\) monotone Boolean circuit for \(Isol_{k,n}\) is not \((k-1)\)-multilinear or it has an exponential in n size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    A similar interpretation of Krieger’s results can be found in [5].

  2. 2.

    Recently, the author has obtained an alternative proof, eliminating the need of the additional assumption. The new proof will be included in the journal version.

References

  1. Alon, N., Boppana, R.: The monotone circuit complexity of Boolean functions. Combinatorica 7(1), 1–22 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Grinchuk, M.I., Sergeev, I.S.: Thin circulant matrices and lower bounds on the complexity of some Boolean operations. Diskretn. Anal. Issled. Oper. 18, pp. 35–53, (2011). (See also CORR.abs/1701.08557 2017

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jerrum, M., Snir, M.: Some exact complexity results for straight-line computations over semirings. J. ACM 29(3), 874–897 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Jukna, S.: Personnal communication, June (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jukna, S.: Notes on Boolean Read-k Circuits. Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex. TR22-094 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Krieger, M.P.: On the incompressibility of monotone DNFs. Theor. Comput. Syst. 41(2), 211–231 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Lingas, A.: A Note on Lower Bounds for Monotone Multilinear Boolean Circuits. Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex. TR22-085 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lingas, A.: Small normalized Boolean circuits for semi-disjoint bilinear forms require logarithmic conjunction-depth. Theoretical Computer Science 820, pp. 17–25 (2020) (prel. version Computational Complexity Conference (CCC) 2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mehlhorn, K., Galil, Z.: Monotone switching circuits and Boolean matrix product. Computing 16, 99–111 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Nes̆etr̆il, J., Poljak, S.: On the complexity of the subgraph problem. Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae 26(2), 415–419 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Paterson, M.: Complexity of monotone networks for Boolean matrix product. Theor. Comput. Sci. 1(1), 13–20 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Ponnuswami, A.K., Venkateswaran, H.: Monotone multilinear Boolean circuits for bipartite perfect matching require exponential size. In Proceedings of 24th International Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FST-TCS), pp. 16–18 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pratt, R.: The power of negative thinking in multiplying Boolean matrices. SIAM J. Comput. 4(3), 326–330 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Raz, R.: Multi-linear formulas for permanent and determinant are of super-polynomial size. Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex. (067) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Raz, R., Wigderson, A.: Monotone circuits for matching require linear depth. J. ACM 39(3), 736–744 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Razborov, A.A.: Lower bounds for the monotone complexity of some Boolean functions. Soviet Math. Dokl. 31, 354–357 (1985)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Razborov, A.A.: Lower bounds on monotone complexity of the logical permanent. Math. Notes of the Acad. of Sci. of the USSR, 37(6), pp. 485–493 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schnorr, C.P.: A lower bound on the number of additions in monotone computations. Theor. Comput. Sci. 2(3), 305–315 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Sengupta, R., Venkateswaran, H.: Multilinearity can be exponentially restrictive (pre-liminary version). Technical Report GIT-CC-94-40, Georgia Institute of Technology. College of Computing (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shamir, E., Snir, M.: Lower bounds on the number of multiplications and the number of additions in monotone computations. Tech. Rep. RC 6757, IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, (1977)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Susanna de Rezende for bringing attention to the monotone Boolean circuit complexity of the Boolean permanent problem studied in [12, 17] and valuable discussions. Thanks also go to Stasys Jukna for valuable comments. The research was supported by Swedish Research Council grant 621-2017-03750.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrzej Lingas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lingas, A. (2023). Lower Bounds for Monotone q-Multilinear Boolean Circuits. In: Gąsieniec, L. (eds) SOFSEM 2023: Theory and Practice of Computer Science. SOFSEM 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13878. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23101-8_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23101-8_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-23100-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-23101-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics