Skip to main content

Understanding KlimaDAO Use and Value: Insights from an Empirical Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Electronic Governance with Emerging Technologies (EGETC 2022)

Abstract

Blockchain technologies have demonstrated the potential to build decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols that are composable and interoperable. One of the envisioned applications of blockchains is that of becoming a platform for markets of greenhouse-gas emissions. KlimaDAO is one of the recently launched protocols that attempts to bridge existing voluntary carbon markets to DeFi by means of building incentive mechanisms on top of tokenized carbon assets. That approach may eventually bring benefits to carbon markets in terms of liquidity and transparency and address a wider audience. Here we report the analysis of the early status of that initiative in an attempt to get insights in its actual functioning and value, and on the extent to which they are currently addressing the original goals and potential benefits of this kind of protocols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.regen.network/.

  2. 2.

    https://nori.com/.

  3. 3.

    https://moss.earth/.

  4. 4.

    Smart contract source code is available at https://github.com/ToucanProtocol/contracts/.

  5. 5.

    It should be noted that there are also a much lower volume of transactions using retireCarbon_specific.

  6. 6.

    https://dune.com/Cujowolf/Klima-DAO.

References

  1. Al-Breiki, H., Rehman, M.H.U., Salah, K., Svetinovic, D.: Trustworthy blockchain oracles: review, comparison, and open research challenges. IEEE Access 8, 85675–85685 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chitra, T., Kulkarni, K., Angeris, G., Evans, A. Xu, V.: DeFi liquidity management via Optimal Control: Ohm as a case study (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dalsgaard, S.: Tales of carbon offsets: between experiments and indulgences? J. Cult. Econ. 15(1), 52–66 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Franke, L., Schletz, M., Salomo, S.: Designing a blockchain model for the Paris agreement’s carbon market mechanism. Sustainability 12(3), 1068 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Freni, P., Ferro, E., Moncada, R.: Tokenomics and blockchain tokens: a design-oriented morphological framework. Blockchain: Res. Appl 3(1), 100069 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hartmann, S., Thomas, S.: Applying blockchain to the Australian carbon market. Econ. Pap. J. Appl. Econ. Policy 39(2), 133–151 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Howson, P., Oakes, S., Baynham-Herd, Z., Swords, J.: Cryptocarbon: the promises and pitfalls of forest protection on a blockchain. Geoforum 100, 1–9 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kotsialou, G., Kuralbayeva, K., Laing, T.: Blockchain’s potential in forest offsets, the voluntary carbon markets and REDD+. Environ. Conserv. 1–9 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kreibich, N., Hermwille, L.: Caught in between: credibility and feasibility of the voluntary carbon market post-2020. Clim. Policy 21(7), 939–957 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsumura, E.M., Prakash, R., Vera-Munoz, S.C.: Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures. Account. Rev. 89(2), 695–724 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Meyer, E., Welpe, I. M., Sandner, P.: Decentralized Finance-A Systematic Literature Review and Research Directions. ECIS 2022 Research Papers, vol. 25 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rajamani, L.: The 2015 Paris agreement: interplay between hard, soft and non-obligations. J. Environ. Law 28(2), 337–358 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tao, H., Zhuang, S., Xue, R., Cao, W., Tian, J., Shan, Y.: Environmental finance: an interdisciplinary review. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 179, 121639 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Woo, J., Fatima, R., Kibert, C.J., Newman, R.E., Tian, Y., Srinivasan, R.S.: Applying blockchain technology for building energy performance measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) and the carbon credit market: a review of the literature. Build. Environ. 205, 108199 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel-Angel Sicilia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sicilia, MA., García-Barriocanal, E., Sánchez-Alonso, S., Mora-Cantallops, M., de Lucio, JJ. (2022). Understanding KlimaDAO Use and Value: Insights from an Empirical Analysis. In: Ortiz-Rodríguez, F., Tiwari, S., Sicilia, MA., Nikiforova, A. (eds) Electronic Governance with Emerging Technologies. EGETC 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1666. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22950-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22950-3_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-22949-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-22950-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics