Skip to main content

Improved Scheduling of Morphing Edge Drawing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13764))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Morphing edge drawing (MED), a graph drawing technique, is a dynamic extension of partial edge drawing (PED), where partially drawn edges (stubs) are repeatedly stretched and shrunk by morphing. Previous experimental evaluations have shown that the reading time with MED may be shorter than that with PED. The morphing scheduling method limits visual clutter by avoiding crossings between stubs. However, as the number of intersections increases, the overall morphing cycle tends to lengthen in this method, which is likely to have a negative effect on the reading time. In this paper, improved scheduling methods are presented to address this issue. The first method shortens the duration of a single cycle by overlapping a part of the current cycle with the succeeding one. The second method duplicates every morph by the allowable number of times in one cycle. The third method permits a specific number of simultaneous crossings per edge. The effective performances of these methods are demonstrated through experimental evaluations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Binucci, C., Liotta, G., Montecchiani, F., Tappini, A.: Partial edge drawing: homogeneity is more important than crossings and ink. In: 2016 7th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA). pp. 1–6 (July 2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/IISA.2016.7785427

  2. Bruckdorfer, T., Kaufmann, M.: Mad at edge crossings? Break the edges! In: Kranakis, E., Krizanc, D., Luccio, F. (eds.) FUN 2012. LNCS, vol. 7288, pp. 40–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30347-0_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruckdorfer, T., Kaufmann, M., Leibßle, S.: PED user study. In: Di Giacomo, E., Lubiw, A. (eds.) GD 2015. LNCS, vol. 9411, pp. 551–553. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27261-0_47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Burch, M.: A user study on judging the target node in partial link drawings. In: 2017 21st International Conference Information Visualisation (iV), pp. 199–204 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/iV.2017.43

  5. Burch, M., Vehlow, C., Konevtsova, N., Weiskopf, D.: Evaluating partially drawn links for directed graph edges. In: van Kreveld, M., Speckmann, B. (eds.) GD 2011. LNCS, vol. 7034, pp. 226–237. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25878-7_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Misue, K., Akasaka, K.: Graph drawing with morphing partial edges. In: Archambault, D., Tóth, C.D. (eds.) Graph Drawing and Network Visualization, pp. 337–349. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35802-0

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Nöllenburg, M.: Crossing layout in non-planar graph drawings. In: Hong, S.-H., Tokuyama, T. (eds.) Beyond Planar Graphs, pp. 187–209. Springer, Singapore (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6533-5_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Purchase, H.: Which aesthetic has the greatest effect on human understanding? In: DiBattista, G. (ed.) GD 1997. LNCS, vol. 1353, pp. 248–261. Springer, Heidelberg (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63938-1_67

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Purchase, H.C., Cohen, R.F., James, M.: Validating graph drawing aesthetics. In: Brandenburg, F.J. (ed.) GD 1995. LNCS, vol. 1027, pp. 435–446. Springer, Heidelberg (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0021827

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmauder, H., Burch, M., Weiskopf, D.: Visualizing dynamic weighted digraphs with partial links. In: Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Information Visualization Theory and Applications (IVAPP), pp. 123–130 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP21K11975.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazuo Misue .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (mp4 14404 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (mp4 19521 KB)

Supplementary material 3 (mp4 23679 KB)

Supplementary material 4 (mp4 25955 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Misue, K. (2023). Improved Scheduling of Morphing Edge Drawing. In: Angelini, P., von Hanxleden, R. (eds) Graph Drawing and Network Visualization. GD 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13764. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22203-0_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22203-0_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-22202-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-22203-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics