Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Evolutionary Biology – New Perspectives on Its Development ((EBNPD,volume 6))

Abstract

The gene’s-eye view of evolution is an prominent but controversial perspective on biology. It emerged in the aftermath of the Modern Synthesis and both proponents and detractors have stressed the link between the two. In particular, both the Modern Synthesis and the gene’s-eye view have been criticized for overemphasizing the role of genes at the expense of organisms in evolutionary explanations. In this chapter, I discuss the connection between the Modern Synthesis and the gene’s-eye view and evaluate the status of genes and organisms in contemporary biology. I show that while the gene’s-eye view traces its origin back to the Modern Synthesis, it can most accurately be said to represent a specific—adaptationist and gene-centric—version of it. To assess the role of genes and organisms, I examine the intimate relationship between the gene’s-eye view and another post-Synthesis development, the concept of inclusive fitness. I argue that the popularity and influence of inclusive fitness theory demonstrate that the individual organism remains safe at the heart of modern evolutionary biology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ågren JA (2014) Evolutionary transitions in individuality: insights from transposable elements. Trends Ecol Evol 29:90–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ågren JA (2016a) Selfish genetic elements and the gene’s-eye view of evolution. Curr Zool 62:659–665

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ågren JA (2016b) The social life of the genome. Trends Ecol Evol 31:494–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ågren JA (2021a) The gene’s-eye view of evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ågren JA (2021b) Sewall Wright’s criticism of the gene’s-eye view of evolution. Evolution 75:2326–2334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barash DP (1980) Evolutionary aspects of the family. In: Hofling CK, Lewis JM (eds) The family: evaluation and treatment. Brunner-Mazel, New York, pp 185–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson P (2005) The return of the whole organism. J Biosci 30:31–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma JJ (2016) Fifty years of illumination about the natural levels of adaptation. Curr Biol 26:R1250–R1255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borello ME (2010) Evolutionary restraints: the contentious history of group selection. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin H (1991) The ant and the peacock: altruism and sexual selection from Darwin to today. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin H (2005) Adaptation: “A critique of some current evolutionary thought”. Q Rev Biol 80:19–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1978) Replicator selection and the extended phenotype. Z Tierpsychol 47:61–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1982) The extended phenotype: the gene as the unit of selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1986) The blind watchmaker. Longman Scientific and Technical, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1998) Universal Darwinism. In: Hull D, Ruse M (eds) The philosophy of biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 15–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (2013) An appetite for wonder: the making of a scientist. Bantam Press, Ealing

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (2015a) Brief candle in the dark: my life in science. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (2015b) Evolvability. In: Brockman J (ed) Life. Harper Perennial, New York, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickins TE (2021) The modern synthesis: evolution and the organization of information. Springer, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards AWF (2014) R.A. Fisher’s gene-centred view of evolution and the fundamental theorem of natural selection. Biol Rev 89:135–147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1918) The correlation between relatives on the supposition of mendelian inheritance. Trans Roy Soc Edinb 52:399–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner A (2009) Adaptation as organism design. Biol Lett 5:861–864

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner A, Grafen A (2009) Capturing the superorganism: a formal theory of group adaptation. J Evol Biol 22:659–671

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner A, Úbeda F (2017) The meaning of intragenomic conflict. Nat Ecol Evol 1:1807–1815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner A, Welch JJ (2011) A formal theory of the selfish gene. J Evol Biol 24:1801–1813

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith P (2009) Darwinian populations and natural selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ (1983) The hardening of the modern synthesis. In: Grene M (ed) Dimensions of Darwinism; themes and counterthemes in twentieth-century evolutionary biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 71–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (2006) Optimization of inclusive fitness. J Theor Biol 238:541–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (2014a) The formal Darwinism project in outline. Biol Philos 29:155–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (2014b) The formal Darwinism project in outline: response to commentaries. Biol Philos 29:281–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths P, Stotz K (2013) Genetics and philosophy: an introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haig D (2006) Intragenomic politics. Cytogenet Genome Res 113:68–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haig D (2014) Genetic dissent and individual compromise. Biol Philos 29:233–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane JBS (1964) A defense of beanbag genetics. Perspect Biol Med 7:343–360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1963) The evolution of altruistic behavior. Am Nat 97:354–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour I and II. J Theoret Biol 7:1–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156:477–488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1972) Altruism and related phenomena, mainly in social insects. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 3:193–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull DL (1980) Individuality and selection. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 11:311–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull DL (1981) Units of evolution: a metaphysical essay. In: Jensen UJ, Harré R (eds) The philosophy of evolution. The Harvester Press, Brighton, pp 23–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Huneman P (2010) Assessing the prospects for a return of organisms in evolutionary biology. Hist Philos Life Sci 32:341–372

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huneman P (2014a) A pluralistic framework to address challenges to the modern synthesis in evolutionary theory. Biol Theory 9:163–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huneman P (2014b) Formal Darwinism as a tool for understanding the status of organisms in evolutionary biology. Biol Philos 9:271–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huneman P (2017) Why would we call for a new evolutionary synthesis? The variation issue and the explanatory alternatives. In: Huneman P, Walsh DM (eds) Challenging the modern synthesis: adaptation, development, and inheritance. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 68–110

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Huneman P, Walsh DM (2017) Challenging the modern synthesis: adaptation, development, and inheritance. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley J (1942/2009) Evolution: the modern synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kampourakis K (2017) Making sense of genes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn M (2004) A reason for everything: natural selection and the British imagination. Faber and Faber, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, Davies NB (1993) An introduction to behavioural ecology, 3rd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Laland K, Uller T, Feldman M et al (2014) Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Nature 514:161–164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laland KN, Uller T, Feldman MW et al (2015) The extended evolutionary synthesis: its structure, assumptions and predictions. Proc Royal Soc B 282:20151019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin SR, Grafen A (2019) Inclusive fitness is an indispensable approximation for understanding organismal design. Evolution 73:1066–1076

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lewens T (2019) Neo-Paleyan biology. Stud Hist Phil Biol Biomed Sci 76:101185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (1970) The units of selection. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 1:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd EA (2017) Units and levels of selection. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/selection- units/. Accessed 9 Feb 2022

  • Lu Q, Bourrat P (2018) The evolutionary gene and the extended evolutionary synthesis. Br J Philos Sci 69:775–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1969) The status of neo-darwinism. In: Waddington CH (ed) Sketching theoretical biology. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp 82–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1985) The birth of sociobiology. New Sci 26 September:48–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1997) Interview by Richard Dawkins. In: Web of Stories. https://www.webofstories.com/play/john.maynard.smith/40. Accessed 4 Feb 2022

  • Maynard Smith J (2002) Commentary on Kerr and Godfrey-Smith. Biol Philos 17:523–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Price G (1973) The logic of animal conflict. Nature 246:15–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1959) Where are we? Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant 24:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1999) What evolution is. Edge https://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/mayr/mayr_index.html. Accessed 1 Feb 2022

  • Mayr E, Provine WB (1980) The evolutionary synthesis: perspectives on the unification of biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath AE (2011) Darwinism and the divine: evolutionary thought and natural theology. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Noble D (2011) Neo-Darwinism, the modern synthesis and selfish genes: are they of use in physiology? J Physiol 589:1007–1015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Okasha S (2008) Fisher’s fundamental theorem of natural selection—a philosophical analysis. Br J Philos Sci 59:319–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okasha S (2018) Agents and goals in evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paley W (1802/2008) Natural theology or, evidences of the existence and attributes of the deity, collected from the appearances of nature. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci M, Müller G (2010) Evolution, the extended synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Provine WB (1971) The origins of theoretical population genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar S (1994) The additivity of variance and the selection of alleles. In: Hull D, Forbes M, Burian R (eds) PSA 1994, vol 1. Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, pp 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Smocovitis VB (1996) Unifying biology: the evolutionary synthesis and evolutionary biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober E, Wilson DS (1998) Unto others: the evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober E, Wilson DS (2011) Adaptation and natural selection revisited. J Evol Biol 24:462–468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q Rev Biol 46:35–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner JRG (1985) Random genetic drift, R.A. Fisher, and the Oxford school of ecological genetics. In: Krüger L, Gigerenzer G, Morgan MS (eds) The probabilistic revolution, vol 2. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 313–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Uller T, Helanterä H (2017) Heredity and evolutionary theory. In: Huneman P, Walsh DM (eds) Challenging the modern synthesis: adaptation, development, and inheritance. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 280–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade MJ (1977) The selfish gene. Evolution 32:220–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh D (2006) Organisms as natural purposes: the contemporary evolutionary perspective. Stud Hist Phil Biol Biomed Sci 37:771–791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh DM (2015) Organisms, agency, and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • West SA, Gardner A (2013) Adaptation and inclusive fitness. Curr Biol 22:R577–R584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard MJ (2003) Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and natural selection: a critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1985) A defense of reductionism in evolutionary biology. In: Dawkins R, Ridley M (eds) Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology, vol 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1992) Natural selection: domains, levels, and challenges. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1996) A package of information. In: Brockman J (ed) The third culture: beyond the scientific revolution. Simon and Schuster, New York, pp 38–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1997) The pony Fish’s glow: and other clues to plan and purpose in nature. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DS (2015) Does altruism exist? Culture, genes, and the welfare of others. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1980) Genic and organismic selection. Evolution 34:825–843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Tom Dickins for the invitation to contribute to this volume and for comments on an earlier draft. This work was supported by a grant from Wenner-Gren Stiftelserna/The Wenner-Gren Foundations (WGF2018-0083).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Arvid Ågren .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ågren, J.A. (2023). Genes and Organisms in the Legacy of the Modern Synthesis. In: Dickins, T.E., Dickins, B.J. (eds) Evolutionary Biology: Contemporary and Historical Reflections Upon Core Theory. Evolutionary Biology – New Perspectives on Its Development, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22028-9_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics