Abstract
The transition to the digital economy has a significant impact on the labor market, due to a large-scale transformation of requirements for specialists and improving the efficiency of the labor market. In modern conditions, digital technologies are permeating all spheres of life and activities of our society and have become one of the main trends in the development of all economic and social systems. The article notes that the structure of Russian labor market has been gradually changing in recent years. Today, vacancies that were not relevant a few years ago are becoming popular. Among the main problems of the labor market in Russia, the authors single out unemployment and improper use of labor. Unemployment is characterized by heterogeneity, strong differentiation by industry, employment and territories. Analysis of statistics on changes in the number of unemployed and employed persons aged 15–72 years in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation over the past 10 years (put forward in the study) shows that unemployment is characterized by an uneven distribution of unemployed people across regions. As a result, the conclusion is presented that digital transformation carries not only great opportunities within the framework of the development of the modern labor market, but also entails a number of negative consequences: job cuts, due to the displacement of manual labor by machine labor, in addition, the speed of transformation of the labor market is so high, that it becomes very difficult to plan and predict the need for labor resources for almost all sectors of the economy. The increase in the share of informal (unformed) labor relations in the digital economy, contributing to the growth of social insecurity of workers, is also a rather serious negative consequence of digitalization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Su, L.: Jamie peck, 2005: struggling with the creative class. Open J. Soc. Sci. (2021). https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2021.93023
Pratt, A.: Cultural Industries and public policy: an oxymoron? Int. J. Cult. Policy 11, 31–44 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/10286630500067739
Agrawal, A., Catalini, Ch., Goldfarb, A.: The Geography of Crowdfunding. SSRN Electron. J. 16820 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3386/w16820
Hardt, M.: Affective labor. Boundary 2, 26(2), 89–100 (1999). https://doi.org/10.18510/ijmier.2020.626
OECD: Stimulating digital innovation for growth and inclusiveness: the role of policies for the successful diffusion of ICT. OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 256, OECD Publishing, Paris (2016). https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlwqvhg3l31-en
OECD: Entrepreneurship at a Glance 2016. OECD Publishing, Paris (2016). https://doi.org/10.1787/entrepreneur_aag-2016-en
Lazzarato, M.: Les machines à cristalliser le temps: perception et travail dans le post-fordisme (Ph.D.). Université de Paris VIII. OCLC 491240299. Immaterial Labor (Trans. by Colilli, P., Emery, E) (1996)
Negri, A.: Reflections on Empire, çev. Emery, Polity Press, Cambridge, Edt (2008)
Fuchs, C.: The digital labour theory of value and Karl Marx in the age of Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and Weibo. In: Fisher, E., Fuchs, C. (eds.) Reconsidering Value and Labour in the Digital Age. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire (2015) https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137478573_2
Gill, R.: Cool, creative and egalitarian? Exploring gender in project-based new media work in Europe. Inf. Commun. Soc. 5(1), 70–89 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180110117668
Federal State Statistics Service [Electronic resource]. https://visasam.ru/russia/rabotavrf/rynok-truda-v-rossii.html
Yakimova, E.V.: Microsociology of creativity. In: Domestic and Foreign Literature, Ser. 11, Sotsiologiya: Referativny zhurnal, p. 3 (2020)
Miller, T.: The new international division of cultural labor revisited. Loughborough University. J. Contrib. (2016). https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v14i2.992
Oakley, K., Sperry, B., Pratt, A.C.: The Art of Innovation: How Fine Arts Graduates Contribute to Innovation (2008)
Throsby, D., Hollister, V.: Don’t give up your day job: an economic study of professional artists in Australia. Aust. Counc. Arts (2003). https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1866/CGP/v03i03/35472
Markusen, A.: Urban development and the politics of a creative class: evidence from a study of artists. Env. Plan. A 38, 1921–1940 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1068/a38179
Labor market in Russia. Visasam.ru. [Electronic resource]. https://visasam.ru/russia/rabotavrf/rynok-truda-v-rossii.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Riazantseva, I., Parshukova, G. (2023). Digital Transformation of the Economy and a New Paradigm of the Labor Market. In: Beskopylny, A., Shamtsyan, M., Artiukh, V. (eds) XV International Scientific Conference “INTERAGROMASH 2022”. INTERAGROMASH 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 574. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21432-5_352
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21432-5_352
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21431-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21432-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)