Abstract
Landslides are fatal climate-induced natural disasters that leave more people homeless than any other calamity in Sri Lanka. Relocation is a frequently adopted policy initiative led by the government and related authorities in post-disaster reconstruction in Sri Lanka. The hesitancy of most vulnerable communities to relocate to new places has rendered relocation efforts difficult to execute and unsatisfactory. The current study was carried out using a purposively drawn sample of 21 residents who have refused to move away from their current place of residence following the Samasarakanda landslide which struck the area of Aranayaka in 2016. The main objective of this study is to provide an in-depth overview of their reluctance to relocate and suggest measures to strengthen policy planning measures associated with the relocation of vulnerable communities. Primary data collection was carried out using a questionnaire survey, and data were analyzed through the integrative use of Microsoft Excel, SPSS, and Arc GIS 10.5 analytical tools. The study revealed that 33% of the dwellers have wholly refused to relocate, while 66% have a partial willingness to cooperate with the process in the future. The respondents who ultimately declined to relocate have highlighted their lack of trust in government provisions (53%), insufficient financial support (73.7%), and the barriers to income gains through self-employment (38%) as the main reasons to refuse the process. The study further revealed lack of education among the dwellers, where the majority (80%) have not completed their secondary education, as one of the main reasons for a lack of understanding about the long-term benefits of relocation. Further, 24% of the informants had a clear idea about disaster risk reduction pre-preparation plans, whereas most (76%) had no idea about disaster management plans. According to the findings of the study, policy planning associated with relocation should be aligned more with better coordination of socioeconomic and cultural requirements of the dwellers. A balanced framework of rational decision-making on resettlement alternatives and options, safety assessment, accessibility to existing public and social infrastructure and livelihood opportunities, community involvement in house designing, and consideration of socio-cultural values of the affected communities are urgent necessities in Sri Lanka with regard to the design and execution of natural disaster-induced relocation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bandara R (2011) Landslides in Sri Lanka. NBRO, Sri Lanka
Brookings Institution, Georgetown University, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) (2015) Guidance on protecting people from disasters and environmental change through planned relocation, 7 Oct 2015
Burson B, Kälin W, McAdam J, Weerasinghe S (2018) The duty to move people out of harm’s way in the context of climate change and disasters. Refug Surv Q 37:379–407
Cernea M (2002) Impoverishment risks and reconstruction: a model for population displacement and resettlement. In: Cernea M, McDowell C (eds) Risks and reconstruction experiences of resettlers and refugees. The World Bank, pp 11–55
CSSL (Department of Census & Statistics, Sri Lanka) (2016) Census of population, housing, and land use. Department of Census & Statistics Ministry of Policy Planning and Economic Affairs, Colombo, pp 187–280. http://www.statistics.gov.lk/PopHouSat. Accessed 25 Feb
Cusin F (2014) Les dynamiques urbaines au prisme de mobilités résidentielles longues. In: Fol S, Miot Y, Vignal C (eds) Mobilités résidentielles, territoires et politiques publiques [Residential mobility, territories and public policies]. Septentrion, Villeneuve d’Ascq, pp 65–95
Debrand T, Taffin C (2005) The structural and cyclical factors of residential mobility over the last 20 years. Econ Stat 381–382:125–146
Dissanayake D, Morimoto T, Ranagalage M (2018) Accessing the soil erosion rate based on RUSLE model for sustainable land use management: a case study of the Kotmale watershed, Sri Lanka. Model Earth Syst Environ 4:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-018-0534-x
Eiser J, Bostrom A, Burton I, Johnston D, McClure J, Paton D, Pligt J, White M (2013) Risk interpretation and action (RIA) report no. 1. Integrated Research on Disaster Risk, Beijing. http://www.irdrinternational.org/2013/01/25/ria-report-1
EM-DAT (2009) The OFDA/CRED international disaster database. Technical report. Universite Catholique de Louvain, Belgium
Faure S (2006) The social effects of housing demolitions: a study of public housing high-rises in Saint-Etienne, France. Espaces Soc 124–125(2–3):191–206
Fernando N (2018) Lessons learnt from long term impact of 2004 tsunami relocation: a case study of selected relocation settlements in Akmeemana Divisional Secretary Division in Galle District, Sri Lanka. Procedia Eng 212:47–54
Freeman PK (2000) Estimating chronic risk from natural disasters in developing countries: a case study on Honduras. Working paper
Global Compact for Safe (GCS) (2018) Orderly and regular migration, Dec 2018, para 18(j)
IDMC, GRID (2017) Global report on internal displacement, June 2017. IDMC, Geneva, p 11
Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC) (2011) IASC operational guidelines on the protection of persons in situations of natural disasters. Brookings-Bern project on internal displacement (IASC guidelines), Jan 2011. Available at: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/IDPersons/OperationalGuidelines_IDP.pdf. Last visited 15 Aug 2018
Jayasinghe P (2016) Social geology and landslide disaster risk reduction in Sri Lanka. J Trop For Environ 6:1–13
Kahn ME (2005) The death toll from natural disasters: the role of income geography and institutions. Rev Econ Stat 87(2):271–284
Lupton D (1999) Risk. Routledge, London and New York
Luttik J (2000) The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house prices in the Netherlands. Landsc Urban Plan 48(3–4):161–167
MDM (Ministry of Disaster Management, Sri Lanka) (2014) Sri Lanka comprehensive disaster management program. MDM, Colombo, pp 127–245
Mileti D, Passerini E (1996) A social explanation of urban relocation after earthquakes. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 14(1):97–110
Mitchell W (1976) Reconstruction after disaster: the Gediz earthquake of 1970. Geogr Rev 66(3):296–313
Ockey J (1997) Weapons of the urban weak: democracy and resistance to eviction in Bangkok slum communities. Sojourn J Soc Issues Southeast Asia 12(1):1–25
Oliver-Smith A (2021) The choice of perils: understanding resistance to resettlement for urban disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation. In: Johnson C, Jain G, Lavell A (eds) Rethinking urban risk and resettlement in the global south. UCL Press, London, pp 133–153
Perera E, Jayawardana D, Jayasinghe P, Ranagalage M (2019) Landslide vulnerability assessment based on entropy method: a case study from Kegalle district, Sri Lanka. Model Earth Syst Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00615-w
Ploeg L, Vanclay F (2017) A human rights-based approach to project induced displacement and resettlement. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 35(1):34–52
Raju E (2013) Housing reconstruction in disaster recovery: a study of fishing communities post-tsunami in Chennai, India. http://currents.plos.org/disasters/article/housingreconstruction-in-disaster-recovery-a-study-of-fishing-communities-post-tsunami-inchennai-india/
Rey-Valette H, Robert S, Rulleau B (2019) Resistance to relocation in flood-vulnerable coastal areas: a proposed composite index. Clim Policy 19(2):206–218
Scudder T, Colson E (1982) From welfare to development: a conceptual framework for the analysis of dislocated people. In: Hansen A, Oliver-Smith A (eds) Involuntary migration and resettlement: the problems and responses of dislocated people. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp 267–287
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030, adopted by the Third United Nations World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction and endorsed by the UN General Assembly in Res. 69/283, 3 June 2015, Annex II, para. 33(m) (Sendai Framework)
Sugathapala K, Vijekumara PA (2013) Importance of implementing landslide clearance process complementary to national physical plan 2030. In: 5th annual symposium: engineering in disaster resilience. National Building Research Organization, Ministry of Disaster Management, pp 78–86
Weiss K, Girandola F, Colbeau-Justin L (2011) Protection behaviors with regard to natural hazards: from resistance to commitment. Prat Psychol 17(3):251–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prps.2010.02.002
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gunathilake, K.L.W.I., Jayathilake, P.P.G., Fernando, N., Jayasinghe, N., Amaratunga, D., Haigh, R. (2023). Living with Landslide Risks: A Case of Resistance to Relocation Among Vulnerable Households Residing in the Kegalle District of Sri Lanka. In: Hamza, M., Amaratunga, D., Haigh, R., Malalgoda, C., Jayakody, C., Senanayake, A. (eds) Rebuilding Communities After Displacement. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21414-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21414-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21413-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21414-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)