Skip to main content

Aligning SDOH Pillars to Learning Outcomes and Assessments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrating a Social Determinants of Health Framework into Nursing Education
  • 670 Accesses

Abstract

The World Health Organization and other health agencies have identified several social determinants of health (SDOH) that negatively impact patient health and contribute to health inequity. Nurses are at the frontlines of healthcare and are uniquely situated to assess for SDOH and address health equity. This chapter examines SDOH and nursing education, particularly the alignment between learning outcomes and course assessments. The premise is that learning outcomes are an integral component of curriculum development to serve as the basis for formative and summative assessment. The chapter discusses course-level assessments concerning learning outcomes for SDOH in pre- and post-licensure nursing programs. As part of the curriculum mapping process described in Chap. 5, the alignment between the learning outcomes, course resources, and assessments was analyzed using a two-phase qualitative and quantitative approach and a curriculum mapping matrix. Findings indicate that SDOH pillars covered vary by course goals and content covered. Social, cultural, and law/policy pillars were the most recurrent, and topics and assessment content often overlapped. The most used assessment types were discussion forums, case studies, writing assignments, and quizzes. The chapter concludes that constructive alignment is an appropriate strategy to integrate SDOH within course objectives, learning activities, and assessments. It is a practical approach for creating nursing programs that thread SDOH successfully into the curriculum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Catalyst N. Social determinants of health (SDOH). NEJM Catal. 2017;3(6). https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/cat.17.0312.

  2. WHO. Social determinants of health. World Health Organization; 2008. Retrieved 25 May from https://www.who.int/health-topics/social-determinants-of-health#tab=tab_1

  3. Thornton M, Persaud S. Preparing today’s nurses: social determinants of health and nursing education. Online J Issues Nurs. 2018;23(3). https://ojin.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Vol-23-2018/No3-Sept-2018/Social-Determinants-of-Health-Nursing-Education.html.

  4. Rozendo CA, Salas AS, Cameron B. A critical review of social and health inequalities in the nursing curriculum. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;50:62–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kucherepa U, O’Connell MB. Self-assessment of cultural competence and social determinants of health within a first-year required pharmacy course. Pharmacy. 2021;10(1):6. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy10010006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Emory. Emory School of Nursing’s SDOH framework. Emory School of Nursing. 2020. Retrieved 25 May from https://rise.articulate.com/share/ED2wyDMDBhUy53UxcbIoi50FC9Y8EUdF#/lessons/GQxbm6QPXkN-1Lsjh_bPjjHiluPgtq7y

  7. Auchmutey P. Determinant determination. Emory Nursing Magazine, Autumn. 2021. https://emorynursingmagazine.emory.edu/issues/2021/autumn/features/determinant-determination/index.html

  8. Joseph S, Juwah C. Using constructive alignment theory to develop nursing skills curricula. Nurse Educ Pract. 2012;12(1):52–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Biggs J. Constructive alignment in university teaching. HERDSA Rev High Educ. 2014;1:5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tyler RW. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  11. University of Tasmania. Teaching and learning: constructive alignment. University of Tasmania; n.d. Retrieved 26 May from https://www.teaching-learning.utas.edu.au/unit-design/constructive-alignment

  12. Kandlbinder P, Peseta T. Key concepts in postgraduate certificates in higher education teaching and learning in Australasia and the United Kingdom. Int J Acad Dev. 2009;14(1):19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kertesz J. U-map: beyond curriculum mapping. Adv Scholarsh Teach Learn. 2015;2(1):16–34.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR, (eds). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bloom BS. Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. Cognitive domain. 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Krathwohl DR. A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory Pract. 2002;41(4):212–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Biggs J. Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. High Educ. 1996;32(3):347–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bell C, Simmons A, Martin E, McKenzie C, McLeod J, McCoombe S. Competent with patients and populations: integrating public health into a medical program. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Boud D. Assessment and learning–unlearning bad habits of assessment. Conference on effective assessment at University, University of Queensland. 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Biggs J. What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning. High Educ Res Dev. 1999;18(1):57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ali L. The design of curriculum, assessment and evaluation in higher education with constructive alignment. J Educ e-Learn Res. 2018;5(1):72–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dixson DD, Worrell FC. Formative and summative assessment in the classroom. Theory Pract. 2016;55(2):153–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Allal L. Assessment and the regulation of learning. In: International encyclopedia of education, vol. 3; 2010. p. 348–52.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ng V. Re-designing the architecture curriculum through the lens of graduate capabilities. In: Preparing 21st century teachers for teach less, learn more (TLLM) pedagogies. IGI Global; 2020. p. 221–42.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Archambault SG, Masunaga J. Curriculum mapping as a strategic planning tool. J Libr Adm. 2015;55(6):503–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bell CE, Ellaway RH, Rhind SM. Getting started with curriculum mapping in a veterinary degree program. J Vet Med Educ. 2009;36(1):100–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Harden R. Curriculum mapping: a tool for transparent and authentic teaching and learning. AMEE Guide No. 21. Med Teach. 2001;23(2):123–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Plaza CM, Draugalis JR, Slack MK, Skrepnek GH, Sauer KA. Curriculum mapping in program assessment and evaluation. Am J Pharm Educ. 2007;71(2):20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Neville-Norton M, Cantwell S. Curriculum mapping in nursing education: a case study for collaborative curriculum design and program quality assurance. Teach Learn Nurs. 2019;14(2):88–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Levin PF, Suhayda R. Transitioning to the DNP: ensuring integrity of the curriculum through curriculum mapping. Nurse Educ. 2018;43(3):112–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hermann CP, Head BA, Black K, Singleton K. Preparing nursing students for interprofessional practice: the interdisciplinary curriculum for oncology palliative care education. J Prof Nurs. 2016;32(1):62–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Porter AC. Measuring the content of instruction: uses in research and practice. Educ Res. 2002;31(7):3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Arafeh S. Curriculum mapping in higher education: a case study and proposed content scope and sequence mapping tool. J Furth High Educ. 2016;40(5):585–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Beckham R, Riedford K, Hall M. Course mapping: expectations visualized. J Nurse Pract. 2017;13(10):e471–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Oermann MH, Gaberson KB. Evaluation and testing in nursing education. In: Evaluation and testing in nursing education. Springer Publishing Company; 2016. p. 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1891/9780826135759.0001

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wanjira Kinuthia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kinuthia, W., Abiri, A., Hamilton, J.B., Char, A. (2023). Aligning SDOH Pillars to Learning Outcomes and Assessments. In: Hamilton, J.B., Swan, B.A., McCauley, L. (eds) Integrating a Social Determinants of Health Framework into Nursing Education . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21347-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21347-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21346-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21347-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics