Skip to main content

The Role of Heterogeneity in Autonomous Perimeter Defense Problems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics XV (WAFR 2022)

Abstract

When is heterogeneity in the composition of an autonomous robotic team beneficial and when is it detrimental? We investigate and answer this question in the context of a minimally viable model that examines the role of heterogeneous speeds in perimeter defense problems, where defenders share a total allocated speed budget. We consider two distinct problem settings and develop strategies based on dynamic programming and on local interaction rules. We present a theoretical analysis of both approaches and our results are extensively validated using simulations. Interestingly, our results demonstrate that the viability of heterogeneous teams depends on the amount of information available to the defenders. Moreover, our results suggest a universality property: across a wide range of problem parameters the optimal ratio of the speeds of the defenders remains nearly constant.

Supported by the Army Research Laboratory as part of the Distributed and Collaborative Intelligent Systems and Technology (DCIST) Collaborative Research Alliance (CRA) under contract W911NF-17-2-0181. G.S. Sukhatme holds concurrent appointments as a Professor at USC and as an Amazon Scholar. This paper describes work performed at USC and is not associated with Amazon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For instance, if \(g = 5\) and \((v_{\min }, v_{\max }] = (0,1]\), we measure \({\boldsymbol{v}}\) where \(v_i \in \{0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1\}\) for all i.

  2. 2.

    We consider this case because it has a number of nice symmetries, and because perimeters enclosing a simply-connected 2D area are homeomorphic to \({\mathcal {S}}^1\).

References

  1. Adler, A., Mickelin, O., Ramachandran, R.K., Sukhatme, G.S., Karaman, S.: The role of heterogeneity in autonomous perimeter defense problems (2022). arXiv:abs/2202.10433

  2. Casey, M.: Drones bring fight and flight to battle against poachers. Sci. Am. (online) 20 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cormen, T.H., Leiserson, C.E., Rivest, R.L., Stein, C.: Introduction to Algorithms. 2nd edn. The MIT Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fuchs, Z.E., Khargonekar, P.P., Evers, J.: Cooperative defense within a single-pursuer, two-evader pursuit evasion differential game. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision Control (CDC), pp. 3091–3097 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Isaacs, R.: Differential Games: A Mathematical Theory with Applications to Warfare and Pursuit, Control and Optimization. SIAM Series in Applied mathematics, Wiley (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, E.S., Shishika, D., Kumar, V.: Perimeter-defense game between aerial defender and ground intruder. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision Control (CDC), pp. 1530–1536 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lykou, G., Moustakas, D., Gritzalis, D.: Defending airports from UAS: a survey on cyber-attacks and counter-drone sensing technologies. Sensors 20(12), 3537 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mayya, S., Ramachandran, R.K., Zhou, L., Senthil, V., Thakur, D., Sukhatme, G.S., Kumar, V.: Adaptive and risk-aware target tracking for robot teams with heterogeneous sensors. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 7(2), 5615–5622 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. National Interagency Fire Center: Statistics. https://www.nifc.gov/fire-information/statistics. Accessed: 2022-02-01

  10. Puterman, M.L.: Markov Decision Processes: Discrete Stochastic Dynamic Programming. Wiley (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ramachandran, R.K., Preiss, J.A., Sukhatme, G.S.: Resilience by reconfiguration: exploiting heterogeneity in robot teams. In: 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 6518–6525 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ramachandran, R.K., Pierpaoli, P., Egerstedt, M., Sukhatme, G.S.: Resilient monitoring in heterogeneous multi-robot systems through network reconfiguration. IEEE Trans. Robot. 38(1), 126–138 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ravichandar, H., Shaw, K., Chernova, S.: Strata: unified framework for task assignments in large teams of heterogeneous agents. Auton. Agent. Multi-Agent Syst. 34(2), 1–25 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Missiles, R.: Defense: Iron Dome System and SkyHunter Missile. https://www.raytheonmissilesanddefense.com/capabilities/products/irondome. Accessed: 2022-02-01

  15. Santos, M., Egerstedt, M.: Coverage control for multi-robot teams with heterogeneous sensing capabilities using limited communications. In: IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 5313–5319 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shishika, D., Kumar, V.: Local-game decomposition for multiplayer perimeter-defense problem. In: Proceedings IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 2093–2100 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shishika, D., Kumar, V.: A review of multi agent perimeter defense games. In: Zhu, Q., Baras, J.S., Poovendran, R., Chen, J. (eds.) Decision and Game Theory for Security, pp. 472–485. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2020)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Shishika, D., Paulos, J., Dorothy, M.R., Ani Hsieh, M., Kumar, V.: Team composition for perimeter defense with patrollers and defenders. In: Proceedings IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pp. 7325–7332 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shishika, D., Paulos, J., Kumar, V.: Cooperative team strategies for multi-player perimeter-defense games. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 5(2), 2738–2745 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Twu, P., Mostofi, Y., Egerstedt, M.: A measure of heterogeneity in multi-agent systems. In: 2014 Proceedings of the American Control Conference, pp. 3972–3977 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Von Moll, A., Garcia, E., Casbeer, D., Suresh, M., Swar, S.C.: Multiple-pursuer, single-evader border defense differential game. J. Aerosp. Inf. Syst. 17(8), 407–416 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yan, R., Shi, Z., Zhong, Y.: Reach-avoid games with two defenders and one attacker: an analytical approach. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 49(3), 1035–1046 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aviv Adler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Adler, A., Mickelin, O., Ramachandran, R.K., Sukhatme, G.S., Karaman, S. (2023). The Role of Heterogeneity in Autonomous Perimeter Defense Problems. In: LaValle, S.M., O’Kane, J.M., Otte, M., Sadigh, D., Tokekar, P. (eds) Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics XV. WAFR 2022. Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics, vol 25. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21090-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics