Skip to main content

UTAUT2 Model to Explain the Adoption of Augmented Reality Technology in Education: An Empirical Study in Morocco

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Intelligent Systems (ICETIS 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 573))

  • 695 Accesses

Abstract

The use of Augmented Reality (AR) is recognized as the latest advances in technology that can serve as an educational device capable of improving learning outcomes. Previous research has found that learning through AR technology will help students understand knowledge more creatively and reach a high level of commitment to the learning system. In contrast, the acceptance behavior of AR in an educational setting has been examined by a limited amount of research. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the vitality of AR adoption to motivate learners to use this creative technology in education. In this regard, this study determined the factors of AR acceptance using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT 2). A total of 100 surveys were conducted. The results indicate that effort expectancy (EE), performance expectancy (PE), and social influence (SI) impact the behavioural intention (BI) to use AR-learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chien, Y.-C., Su, Y.-N., Wu, T.-T., Huang, Y.-M.: Enhancing students’ botanical learning by using augmented reality Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 18 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0590-4

  2. Akçayır, M., Akçayır, G.: Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: a systematic review of the literature. Educ. Res. Rev. 20, 1–11 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., Mitchell, R.: Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 18, 7–22 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Garzón, J., Pavón, J., Baldiris, S.: Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual Real. 23(4), 447–459 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00379-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hincapie, M., Diaz, C., Valencia, A., Contero, M., Güemes-Castorena, D.: Educational applications of augmented reality: a bibliometric study. Comput. Electr. Eng. 93, 107289 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arici, F., Yıldırım, P., Caliklar, S., Yilmaz, R.: Research trends in the use of augmented reality in science education: content and bibliometric mapping analysis. Comput. Educ. 142, 103647 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y.L., Xu, X.: Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 36, 157–178 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Labti, O., Belkadi, E.: Factors affecting the online travel purchasing decision: an ıntegration of fuzzy logic theory. İn: Shakya, S., Balas, V.E., Haoxiang, W., Baig, Z. (eds.) Proceedings of International Conference on Sustainable Expert Systems, pp. 77–93. Springer (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4355-9_7

  9. Labti, O., Belkadi, E.: Modeling travelers behavior using FSQCA. İn: Abraham, A. et al., (eds.) Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, pp. 657–666. Springer International Publishing (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96308-8_61

  10. Tamilmani, K., Rana, N.P., Dwivedi, Y.K.: Use of ‘Habit’ ıs not a habit in understanding ındividual technology adoption: a review of UTAUT2 based empirical studies. İn: Elbanna, A., Dwivedi, Y.K., Bunker, D., Wastell, D. (eds.) Smart Working, Living and Organising, pp. 277–294. Springer International Publishing (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04315-5_19

  11. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst. (2003). https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Faqih, K.M.S., Jaradat, M.-I.R.M.: Integrating TTF and UTAUT2 theories to investigate the adoption of augmented reality technology in education: perspective from a developing country. Technol. Soc. 67, 101787 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, Y.-S., Wu, M.-C., Wang, H.-Y.: Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 40, 92–118 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu, Y.-L., Tao, Y.-H., Yang, P.-C.: The use of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology to confer the behavioral model of 3G mobile telecommunication users. J. Stat. Manag. Syst. 11 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rauschnabel, P.A., Rossmann, A., Tom Dieck, M.C.: An adoption framework for mobile augmented reality games: the case of Pokémon Go. Comput. Hum. Behav. 76 276–286 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sharif, A., Afshan, S., Qureshi, M.A.: Acceptance of learning management system in university students: an integrating framework of modified UTAUT2 and TTF theories. Int. J. Technol. Enhanc. Learn. 11, 201–229 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shang, L.W., Siang, T.G., Zakaria, M.H. Bin & Emran, M.H.: Mobile augmented reality applications for heritage preservation in UNESCO world heritage sites through adopting the UTAUT model. In: AIP Conference Proceedigns, vol. 1830, pp. 030003 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moorthy, K., Yee, T.T., T’ing, L.C., Kumaran, V.V.: Habit and hedonic motivation are the strongest influences in mobile learning behaviours among higher education students in Malaysia. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 35 174–191 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Palau-Saumell, R., Forgas-Coll, S., Sánchez-García, J., Robres, E.: User acceptance of mobile apps for restaurants: an expanded and extended UTAUT-2. Sustainability 11, 1210 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brislin, R.W.: Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In: Triandis, H.C., Berry, J.W. (eds.) Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chinn, W.W.: The partial least squares approach to structural equation modelling. Mod. Methods Bus. Res. (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C.L., Randolph, A.B., Chong, A.Y.L.: An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 117, 442–458 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hadi, S.H., et al.: Developing augmented reality-based learning media and users’ intention to use it for teaching accounting ethics. Educ. Inf. Technol. 27, 643–670 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10531-1

  24. Chauhan, S., Jaiswal, M.: Determinants of acceptance of ERP software training in business schools: empirical investigation using UTAUT model. Int. J. Manag. Educ. 14, 248–262 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pinto, A.S., Abreu, A., Costa, E., Paiva, J.: Augmented reality for a new reality: using UTAUT-3 to assess the adoption of mobile augmented reality in tourism (MART). J. Inf. Syst. Eng. Manag. 7, 14550 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mohd Nizar, N.N., Rahmat, M.K., Maaruf, S.Z., Damio, S.M.: Examining the use behaviour of augmented reality technology through MARLCardio: adapting the UTAUT model. Asian J. Univ. Educ. 15, 198 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bourhim, E.M., Cherkaoui, A.: Efficacy of virtual reality for studying people’s pre-evacuation behavior under fire. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 142, 102484 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bourhim, E.M., Cherkaoui, A.: Usability evaluation of virtual reality-based fire training simulator using a combined AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation approach. İn: Jeena Jacob, I., Kolandapalayam Shanmugam, S., Piramuthu, S., alkowski-Gilski, P. (eds.) Data Intelligence and Cognitive Informatics, pp. 923–931. Springer (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8530-2_73

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support and technical assistance provided by the Moroccan Association of Innovation and Scientific Research in Artificial Intelligence and Extended Reality, BP.154, Settat, Morocco. Without its generous support, this publication would not have been possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Benrahal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Benrahal, M., Bourhim, E.M., Dahane, A., Labti, O., Akhiate, A. (2023). UTAUT2 Model to Explain the Adoption of Augmented Reality Technology in Education: An Empirical Study in Morocco. In: Al-Sharafi, M.A., Al-Emran, M., Al-Kabi, M.N., Shaalan, K. (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Intelligent Systems . ICETIS 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 573. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20429-6_45

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics