Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is the PSVT:R Suitable for Evaluating Spatial Skill in Design? A Critique

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design Computing and Cognition’22 (DCC 2022)

Included in the following conference series:

  • 740 Accesses

Abstract

Design educators and spatial researchers frequently use the Purdue Spatial Visualization Test: Rotations (PSVT:R) to assess students’ spatial abilities. Some researchers have claimed that the PSVT:R is the strongest measure of mental rotation ability, that relative to other tests, the PSVT:R most incorporates the “gestalt thinking process,” and that the gestalt thinking process is widely accepted as the key component of spatial ability. In this study, we present evidence that the claims surrounding the PSVT:R’s validity may not be accurate and represent a co-construction of gender and spatial ability. We suggest that the PSVT:R is not an ideal tool for assessment of spatial skill in design disciplines, and instruments that allow for open-ended responses are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Guay RB (1977) Purdue spatial visualisation test: rotations. Purdue Research Foundation, West Lafayette

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kelly W, Branoff TJ, Clark A (2014) Spatial ability measurement in an introductory graphic communications course. In: 2014 ASEE Annual conference & exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-23028

  3. Milne M, Morris R, Katz T, Covill D, Elton E (2014) Culturally influenced learning: why do some students have difficulties visualizing in 3D? In: International conference on engineering and product design education, University of Twente, Enschende, the Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  4. Milne M, Morris R, Katz T, Covill D (2012) Assessing the 3D visualisation skills of engineering students and developing techniques for support. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on engineering & product design education (E&PDE12), Antwerp, Belgium, pp 47–52

    Google Scholar 

  5. Branoff TJ, Dobelis M (2012) The relationship between spatial visualization ability and students’ ability to model 3D objects from engineering assembly drawings. Eng Des Graph J 76(3):37–43

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yoon SY (2011) Revised Purdue spatial visualization test: visualization of rotations (revised PSVT:R). Psychometric Instrument

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yue J (2006) Spatial visualization by isometric drawing. In: Intertech conference, Union, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bartlett KA, Camba JD (2021) The role of a graphical interpretation factor in the assessment of spatial visualization: a critical analysis. Spat Cogn Comput 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2021.2019260

  9. Branoff TJ (2000) Spatial visualization measurement: a modification of the Purdue spatial visualization test—visualization of rotations. Eng Des Graph J 64(2):14–22

    Google Scholar 

  10. Takahashi G, Connolly P (2012) Impact of binocular vision on the perception of geometric shapes in spatial ability testing. In: 67th EDGD midyear meeting proceedings, Limerick, Ireland, pp 26–31

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ernst JV, Williams TO (2017) Factors of spatial visualization: an analysis of the PSVT:R. Eng Des Graph J 81(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yoon SY (2011) Psychometric properties of the revised Purdue spatial visualization tests: visualization of rotations (the revised PSVT:R). Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University. Publication Number 3480934, ProQuest dissertations and theses global

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maeda Y, Yoon SY (2013) A meta-analysis on gender differences in mental rotation ability measured by the Purdue spatial visualization tests: visualization of rotations (PSVT:R). Educ Psychol Rev 25(1):69–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9215-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bodner GM, Guay RB (1997) The Purdue visualization of rotations test. Chem Educ 2(4):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00897970138a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Katsioloudis P, Jovanovic V, Jones M (2014) A comparative analysis of spatial visualization ability and drafting models for industrial and technology education students. J Technol Educ 26:1. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v26i1.a.6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sorby SA (2007) Developing 3D spatial skills for engineering students. Australas J Eng Educ 13(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2007.11463998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cho JY, Suh J (2019) Understanding spatial ability in interior design education: 2D-to-3D visualization proficiency as a predictor of design performance. J Inter Des 44(3):141–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith C (2020) The development of a digital apparel spatial visualization test. Master of Science, University of Delaware

    Google Scholar 

  19. Workman JE, Zhang L (1999) Relationship of general and apparel spatial visualization ability. Cloth Text Res J 17(4):169–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9901700401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rahimian FP, Ibrahim R (2011) Impacts of VR 3D sketching on novice designers’ spatial cognition in collaborative conceptual architectural design. Des Stud 32(3):255–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2010.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Black AA (2005) Spatial ability and earth science conceptual understanding. J Geosci Educ 53(4):402–414. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-53.4.402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shepard RN, Cooper LA (1982) Mental images and their transformations. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts; London

    Google Scholar 

  23. Guay RB, McDaniel E, Angelo S (1978) Analytic factor confounding spatial ability measurement. Correl. Perform. Spat. Aptit. Tests Final Rep. Grant No DAHC 19-77-G-0019 US Army Res. Inst. Behav

    Google Scholar 

  24. Guay RB (1980) Spatial ability measurement: a critique and an alternative. In: Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bock RD, Kolakowski D (1973) Further evidence of sex-linked major-gene influence on human spatial visualizing ability. Am J Hum Genet 25(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  26. Michael WB, Guilford JP, Fruchter B, Zimmerman WS (1957) The description of spatial-visualization abilities. Educ Psychol Meas 17(2):185–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316445701700202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Smith IM (1964) Spatial ability: its educational and social significance. Robert R. Knapp, San Diego, California

    Google Scholar 

  28. Spearman C, Jones LLW (1950) Human ability: a continuation of “the abilities of man.” Macmillan & Co. Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  29. Branoff TJ (1998) The effects of adding coordinate axes to a mental rotations task in measuring spatial visualization ability in introductory undergraduate technical graphics courses. Eng Des Graph J 62(2):16–34

    Google Scholar 

  30. Eliot J, Smith IM (1983) An international directory of spatial tasks. NFER-NELSON Publishing Company, Windsor, Berkshire

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vandenberg SG (1975) Sources of variance in performance on spatial tests. In: Eliot J, Salkind N (eds) Children’s spatial development, pp 57–66

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fairweather H (1976) Sex differences in cognition. Cognition 4(3):231–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(76)90019-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sherman JA (1978) Sex-related cognitive differences: an essay on theory and evidence. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kaufmann H, Steinbügl K, Dünser A, Glück J (2005) Improving spatial abilities by geometry education in augmented reality—application and evaluation design. In: Proceedings of the virtual reality international conference, pp 25–34

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hegarty M, Waller DA (2005) Individual differences in spatial abilities. In: The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking, pp 121–169

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lohman DF (1988) Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge. In: Advances in the psychology of human intelligence. Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ, pp 181–248

    Google Scholar 

  37. Carroll JB (1993) Human cognitive abilities: a survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Gorska R, Sorby S (2008) Testing instruments for the assessment of 3D spatial skills. In: 2008 Annual conference & exposition proceedings, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, pp 13.1196.1–13.1196.10. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--4411

  39. Atit K, Uttal DH, Stieff M (2020) Situating space: using a discipline-focused lens to examine spatial thinking skills. Cogn Res Princ Implic 5(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00210-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work received no outside funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA

    Kristin A. Bartlett & Jorge D. Camba

Authors
  1. Kristin A. Bartlett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jorge D. Camba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge D. Camba .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Science and Architecture, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA

    John S Gero

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bartlett, K.A., Camba, J.D. (2023). Is the PSVT:R Suitable for Evaluating Spatial Skill in Design? A Critique. In: Gero, J.S. (eds) Design Computing and Cognition’22. DCC 2022. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20418-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20418-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20417-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20418-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation