Skip to main content

Healthcare Complexity and the Role of Service Design in Complex Healthcare Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human-Centered Service Design for Healthcare Transformation

Abstract

There is a continuous change in healthcare experiential and operational challenges that require a shift to a collaborative approach which fosters the new ways utilizing methods and requires expanding perspectives. Therefore, service design within the healthcare sector gets increasingly important. It increases the need for understanding complexity, since healthcare systems and subsystems can always be called complex. Traditionally, service design and complexity has been framed by a wicked problem approach which has been a great description of complexity situations and the need for adapting to wicked problems when designing. Therefore, this article starts with a recommendation of five mindsets in service design before it explores the value of service design drawing from interdisciplinary knowledge when unraveling healthcare systems. An interdisciplinary exploration of complex systems, considering the various thinking schools, adds fundamentally to the framework to understand emergency departments within hospitals and healthcare systems and shows what service design can contribute to such healthcare systems. The second part of the paper follows a research and design process, looking at a healthcare system using service design to improve the emergency department experience. Because of the deadline, the description of this application comprehends the intelligence and design phase, showing how complexity can be handled by carefully designing, enacting, and testing the mindsets presented. It shows that in complex systems like healthcare and emergency departments, service design practice needs to be done with time and care, since systems and subsystems react and present interdependencies that need to be intentionally designed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmad, N., Ghani, N. A., Kamil, A. A., & Tahar, R. M. (2015). Modelling the complexity of emergency department operations using hybrid simulation. International Journal of Simulation and Process Modelling, 10(4), 360–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomkvist, J. (2014). Representing future situations of service: Prototyping in service design. Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, Dissertation No. 618. Linköping, Sweden: Linköping University Electronic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. D., & Zellner, M. (2020). Wicked problems, foolish decisions: Promoting sustainability through urban governance in a complex world. Vanderbilt Law Review, 73, 1643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, P. (1999). ‘Complexity and postmodernism. Understanding complex systems’. Reply to David Spurrett. South African Journal of Philosophy, 18(2), 275–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers, P. (2001). Boundaries, hierarchies and networks in complex systems. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(02), 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottam, H., & Leadbeater, C. (2004). RED paper 01: Health: Co-creating services. London, United Kingdom: Design Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duguay, C., & Chetouane, F. (2007). Modelling and improving emergency department systems using discrete event simulation. SIMULATION, 83(4), 311–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, K. (2014). Communicating the new: Methods to shape and accelerate innovation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, A., Liu, Y., Li, Z., Nguyen, V., Johnson, T.R., Robinson, D., Okafor, N., King, B., Patel, V.L., & Zhang, J., (2011) Opportunistic decision making and complexity in emergency care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 44(3), 469–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güse, C., & Schuster, S. (2016). Kundenorientierte Dienstleistungsprozesse für alte Menschen in der Notaufnahme. In Dienstleistungsmanagement im Krankenhaus (pp. 173–202). Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, E. L., Giglio, R. J., & Sadowski, R. S. (1974). A simulation analysis of a hospital emergency department. In Proceedings of the 7th conference on winter simulation, Washington DC, January 14–16, 1974 (Vol. 1, pp. 379–388).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannampallil, T. G., Schauer, G. F., Cohen, T., & Patel, V. L. (2011). Considering complexity in healthcare systems. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 44(6), 943–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komashie, A., & Mousavi, A. (2005). Modelling emergency departments using discrete event simulation techniques. In Proceedings of the winter simulation conference, Sunday, December 4–7, 2005, Orlando, FL. (pp. 2681–2685). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mager, B., & de Leon, N. (2022). Service design-innovation for complex systems. In B. Edvardsson & B. Tronvoll (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of service management (pp. 483–496). Cham: Cologne, Germany: Springer Nature.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mager, B., Haynes, A., Ferguson, C., Sangiorgi, D., Gullberg, G., & Jones, M. (2017). Impact and future perspectives. In B. Mager (Ed.), Service design impact report: Health sector. Cologne, Germany: Service Design Network (pp. 94–98).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mager, B., Oertzen, A.-S., & Vink, J. (2022). Co-creation in health services through service design. In M. A. Pfannstiel, N. Brehmer, & C. Rasche, Service design practices for healthcare innovation. Paradigms, principles, prospects. (pp. 497–510). Cham: Springer Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäurer, M. (2018). Springer Medizin. Albtraum Notaufnahme. Der Neurologe & Psychiater, 19(2), 3–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, N., Shrader-Frechette, K., & Belitz, K. (1994). Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science, 263(5147), 641–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plsek, P. E. (1997). Systematic design of healthcare processes. Quality in Health Care, 6(1), 40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plsek, P. E., & Greenhalgh, T. (2001). The challenge of complexity in health care. British Medical Journal (BMJ), 323(7313), 625–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, K. (2004). The problematization of existence: Towards a philosophy of complexity. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 8(1), 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, K. A. (2006). Complex systems thinking and its implications for policy analysis. In G. Morcol (Ed.), Handbook of decision making (pp. 189–221). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0000-0000(00)00000-0.

  • Sanders, E., & Stappers, P. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-Design, 4(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharmer, C. O. (2009). Theory U: Leading from the future as it emerges. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shetty, P., Cohen, T., Patel, B., & Patel, V. L. (2009). The cognitive basis of effective team performance: Features of failure and success in simulated cardiac resuscitation. In AMIA annual symposium proceedings (Vol. 2009, p. 599). American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA). November 14, 2009–November 18, 2009, Hilton San Francisco & Towers, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1977). New science of management decision. Reading, PA: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1991). The architecture of complexity. In Facets of systems science (pp. 457–476). Boston, MA: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Q., Phoebe, J., & Ziwei, L. (2022). Service design practice and its future relevance. In The 23rd DMI: Academic design management conference proceedings (pp. 21–34). DMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, W. (1991). Science and complexity. In Facets of systems science (pp. 449–456). Boston, MA: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisser, T., Jonas, W., & Mager, B. (2018). Successfully implementing service design projects. Touchpoint, 10(1), 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, R. A., Lee, R., Ospina, M. B., Blitz, S., Lari, H., Bullard, M. J., & Rowe, B. H. (2008). Consultation outcomes in the emergency department: Exploring rates and complexity. Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 10(1), 25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, M., & Campbell, S. D. (2015). Planning for deep-rooted problems: What can we learn from aligning complex systems and wicked problems? Planning Theory & Practice, 16(4), 457–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jürgen Faust .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Faust, J., Mager, B., Massa, C. (2023). Healthcare Complexity and the Role of Service Design in Complex Healthcare Systems. In: Pfannstiel, M.A. (eds) Human-Centered Service Design for Healthcare Transformation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20168-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics