Abstract
The aim of this chapter is not to work on a better definition of populism, although it is a complex term that needs to be explored in depth, but to use the approach of political science to focus on the qualitative features of democratic systems, in order to review the relationship between populism and contemporary democracy. Is it possible to interpret populism as an expression and vector of transformation of the representative model of democracy? And if so, with what consequences? We will rely on some international reports that monitor and evaluate the quality of democratic systems and introduce to a possible connection between the populist phenomenon and the decline of some established indicators of the democratic framework in recent years. What we are asking is whether the fundamental questions that populism poses to contemporary democracies, and in particular to representation, leadership and citizenship, can contribute to understanding some of the main criticalities of current democratic structures, in terms of accountability, deliberation and co-governance. Even within the framework of an urgent updating of the often exhausted democratic forms, the way forward seems to be that of strengthening social ties. There are no formal solutions and abstract procedures that can replace the power of social cohesion that political action must prioritise.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The author of the chapter is responsible for the translation of the texts that do not come from original works in English.
References
Arditi, B. (2004). Populism as a spectre of democracy: A response to Canovan. Political Studies, 52(1), 135–143.
Ascani, A. (2014). Accountability. La virtù della politica democratica. Città Nuova.
Baldini, G. (2014). Populismo e democrazia rappresentativa in Europa. Quaderni di Sociologia, 65, 11–29. https://journals.openedition.org/qds/365. Accessed 29 Dec 2021.
Berlin, I. (1968). To define populism. Government and Opposition, 3(2), 137–179.
Bobbio, L. (1996). La democrazia non abita a Gordio. Franco Angeli.
Bobbio, L. (2013). Democrazia dei cittadini e democrazia deliberativa. Cosmopolis VIII, 1. https://www.cosmopolisonline.it/articolo.php?numero=VIII12013&id=12. Accessed 30 Dec 2021.
De Benoist, A. (2017). Populismo. La fine della destra e della sinistra. Arianna Ed.
Diamanti, I., & Lazar, M. (2018). Popolocrazia. La metamorfosi delle nostre democrazie. Laterza.
Floridia, A. (2017). Un’idea deliberativa di democrazia. il Mulino.
Foster, S., & Iaione, C. (2016). The city as a commons. Yale Law & Policy Review, 34(2), 281–349. https://ylpr.yale.edu/sites/default/files/YLPR/foster_iaione_final_copy3.pdf. Accessed 30 Dec 2021.
Iaione, C. (2015). La collaborazione civica per l’amministrazione, la governance e l’economia dei beni comuni. In G. Arena & C. Iaione (Eds.), L’età della condivisione (pp. 31–82). Roma.
Ionescu, G., & Gellner, E. (Eds.). (1969). Populism: Its meaning and national characteristics. Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Laclau, E. (2005). La razón populista. Fondo de Cultura Economica.
Mair, P. (2002). Populist democracy versus party democracy. In Y. Mény & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 81–98). Palgrave Macmillan.
Manin, B. (1997). The principles of representative government. Cambridge University Press.
Mastropaolo, A. (2005). La mucca pazza della democrazia. Nuove destre, populismo, antipolitica. Torino, Bollati Boringhieri.
Mény, Y., & Surel, Y. (Eds.). (2002). Democracies and the populist challenge. Palgrave Macmillan.
Morlino, L. (2014). Democrazia e mutamenti. Attori, strutture, processi. Luiss University Press.
Mouffe, C. (2019). For a left populism. Verso Books.
Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (Eds.). (2012). Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or corrective for democracy? Cambridge University Press.
Nicoletti, M. (2014). Introduzione. In A. Ascani (Ed.), Accountability. Città Nuova.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. Cambridge University Press.
Pasquino, G. (2008). Populism and democracy. In D. Albertazzi & D. Mc Donnell (Eds.), Twenty-first century populism (pp. 15–29). Palgrave Macmillan.
Piketty, T. (2017, January 17). Long live populism. Le Monde.fr Éd. global. https://www.lemonde.fr/blog/piketty/2017/01/17/long-live-populism/. Accessed 29 Dec 2021.
Rajan, R. (2019). The third pillar. Penguin Press.
Revelli, M. (2019). La politica senza politica: Perché la crisi ha fatto entrare il populismo nelle nostre vite. E-book. ISBN 9788858430194 (Kindle ed.). Einaudi. Accessed 30 Dec 2021.
Ropelato, D. (2008). Votare non basta. Il Patto eletto-elettore nella crisi democratica. Nuova Umanità , 178–179, 423–451.
Ropelato, D. (Ed.). (2010). Democrazia intelligente. La partecipazione: attori e processi. Città Nuova.
Sassen, S. (2018). Espulsioni (Italian ed.). il Mulino.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1969). Two hundred million Americans in search of a government. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Tarchi, M. (2015). Italia populista (II ed.). il Mulino.
Tarchi, M. (Ed.). (2019). Anatomia del populismo. Diana Edizioni.
The Oxford Handbook of Populism. (2017). Oxford University Press.
Urbinati, N. (2019). Political theory of populism. Annual Review of Political Science, 2019(22), 111–127. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070753. Accessed 29 Dec 2021
Zanatta, L. (2002). Il populismo. Sul nucleo forte di una ideologia debole. Polis XVI, (2), 263–292.
Democracy’s Indices Reports
Autocratization Turns Viral – Democracy Report 2021. The Varieties of Democracy Institute. https://www.v-dem.net/static/website/files/dr/dr_2021.pdf. Accessed 30 Dec 2021.
Democracy Index 2020. In sickness and in health?. The Economist Intelligence Unit. https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2020/. Accessed 30 Dec 2021.
‘Populist government and democracy: An impact assessment using the Global State of Democracy Indices’ in Global State of Democracy In Focus 9, 2020. The International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance/International IDEA. https://www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/populist-government-and-democracy-impact-assessment. Accessed 30 Dec 2021.
Ruth-Lovell, S. P., Lührmann, A., & Grahn, S. (2019). Democracy and populism: Testing a contentious relationship. The Varieties of Democracy Institute. https://www.v-dem.net/media/publications/working_paper_91.pdf. Accessed 30 Dec 2021.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ropelato, D. (2023). In Search of the Relationship Between Democracy and Populism from a Multidimensional Perspective. Some Paths: Accountability, Deliberation and Co-governance. In: Baggio, A.M., Baldarelli, MG., Idowu, S.O. (eds) Populism and Accountability. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20032-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20032-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20031-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20032-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)