Abstract
Within the field of organization development (OD), organizational assessment and diagnosis (OAD) is a well-established area of practice understood to be fundamental to advancing change in organizations. Decades of rigorous research have produced a rich collection of diagnostic models and countless adaptations thereof. The use of these models and the practitioners who apply them have the ability to influence how change strategies are developed and organizations engage in a change-making process. With increasing frequency, OD and OCM consultants are being called upon to use their diagnostic skill sets to assess or “audit” the state of affairs related to issues of identity, power, and organizational culture regarding equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI). This work has a deep history in the United States stemming from the civil rights movement and progressing toward addressing issues of power inequity in organizations pertaining to identity. Nevertheless, EDI has consistently been marginalized as a sub-genre or niche area of study and practice in the field of OD. As models emerge to aid in the work of “auditing” organizations regarding EDI, canonical OAD models continue to be treated as power-neutral, and EDI as a separate realm within the diagnosis of organizational dynamics. Organizational goals around EDI require deep and transparent investigation of power dynamics; however, the models that are most commonly used for OD and OCM rarely, if at all, acknowledge their assumed neutrality around contextual influences like the personal and social identities of organizational staff and leaders, the cultural (religious, political, heritage, ethnic) differences, tensions, and similarities between stakeholders, and how white patriarchal, heteronormative ideals play out in power dynamics, decision-making and leadership behaviors. To meet the needs of organizations today and ensure meaningful impact, OD practitioners must incorporate anti-oppressive praxis into their approaches to OAD. The authors take up a review of canonical OAD literature and models, detailing a richness of resources whose relevance to today’s organizations is limited only by the assumptions of power neutrality within the dominant culture. Applying core concepts from positionality theory, which is informed by critical race and feminist theory, the authors then propose an Integrative OAD model for the OD Practitioner to expand upon the utility of diagnostic models to dismantle systemic inequality in organizations.Finally, the authors extend the imperative that practitioners engage in reflective practice as a means to explore identity and power and enhance individual capabilities essential to advancing humanistic change.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adler, P., & Jermier, J. (2005). Developing a field with more soul: Standpoint theory and public policy research for management scholars. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 941–944. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.19573091
Ahmed, S. (2007). “You end up doing the document rather than doing the doing”: Diversity, race equality and the politics of documentation. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(4), 590–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701356015
Alderfer, C. P. (2011). The practice of organizational diagnosis: Theory and methods. Oxford University Press.
Anderson, C., & Brion, S. (2014). Perspectives on power in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 67–97.
Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (1999). Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639902500303
Bauer, T. N., & Erdogan, B. (2014). Delineating and reviewing the role of newcomer capital in organizational socialization. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091251
Braidotti, R. (2010). Nomadism: Against methodological nationalism. Policy Futures in Education, 8(3–4), 408–418. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2010.8.3.408
Brookfield, S. (1998). Critically reflective practice. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 18(4), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.1340180402
Burke, W. W., & Litwin, G. H. (1992). A causal model of organizational performance and change. Journal of Management, 18(3), 523–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800306
Collins, P. H. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thought. Social Problems, 33(6), S14–S32. https://doi.org/10.2307/800672
Coruzzi, C. A. (2020). Leading change with intelligence: The power of diagnosis in creating organizational renewal. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 56(4), 420–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886320953982
Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2015). Organization development and change. Cengage Learning.
Dafoe, T., & Goldstein, C. (2020, August 14). The George Floyd protests spurred museums to promise change. Here’s what they’ve actually done so far. Artnet News. https://news.artnet.com/art-world/museums-diversity-equity-commitments-1901564
Denzin, N. K. (2010). Moments, mixed methods, and paradigm dialogs. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 419–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364608
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Heath & Co Publishers.
DiTomaso, N., Post, C., & Parks-Yancy, R. (2007). Workforce diversity and inequality: Power, status, and numbers. Annual Review of Sociology, 33(1), 473–501. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131805
Easley, C. A. (2010). Expanding a conversation: Is how we live as a culturally diverse society congruent with our underlying assumptions, methodologies, and theories regarding change? The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 46(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886309357540
Eyler, J., & Giles, D. E. (2010). Where’s the learning in service-learning? John Wiley & Sons.
Fook, J. (2002). Social work: Critical theory and practice. Sage.
Greene, R. D., & Berthoud, H. (2015). OD is diversity: Differences are at the heart of the field. OD Practitioner, 47(4), 36–41.
Grimes, D. (2001). Putting our own house in order: Whiteness, change and organization studies. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 14(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810110388054
Harding, S. G. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Cornell University Press.
Holvino, E. (2010). Doing OD from the margins. OD Practitioner, 42(2), 54–58.
Hoskins, K. (2015). Researching female professors: The difficulties of representation, positionality and power in feminist research. Gender and Education, 27(4), 393–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2015.1021301
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1966). Social psychology of organizations. Wiley-Blackwell.
Katz, J., & Miller, F. A. (2018). The past, present and future of diversity and inclusion in OD. OD Practioner, 50(4), 16–21.
Kezar, A. (2002). Reconstructing static images of leadership: An application of positionality theory. Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(3), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190200800308
Liu, H. (2019). Decolonising organizations with bell hooks. In R. McMulley & A. Pullen (Eds.), Power, politics and exclusion in organization and management (pp. 83–98). Routledge.
Liu, H. (2021). How we learn whiteness: Disciplining and resisting management knowledge. Management Learning.https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076211061622
Ludema, J. D., Cooperrider, D. L., & Barrett, F. J. (2006). Appreciative inquiry: The power of the unconditional positive question. Handbook of action research, 155–165.
Malcove, L. (1975). The analytic situation: Toward a view of the supervisory experience. Journal of the Philadelphia Association of Psychoanalysis, 2, 1–19.
Marques da Silva, S., & Webster, J. P. (2018). Positionality and standpoint. In D. Beach, C. Bagley, & S. Marques da Silva (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of ethnography of education (pp. 501–512). John Wiley & Sons.
Maupin, J. E., & Warren, R. C. (2012). Transformational medical education leadership: Ethics, justice and equity—The U. S. public health service syphilis study at tuskegee provides insight for health care reform. Ethics & Behavior, 22(6), 501–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2012.730790
McCormick, D. W., & White, J. (2000). Using one’s self as an instrument for organizational diagnosis. Organization Development Journal, 18(3), 49–62.
Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. (1977). A diagnostic model for organizational behavior. In R. Hackman, E. E. Lawler, L. W. Porter, & P. S. Nave (Eds.), Perspectives on behavior in organizations (pp. 85–98). McGraw-Hill.
Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1980). A model for diagnosing organizational behavior. Organizational Dynamics, 9(2), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(80)90039-x
Nevis, E. C. (1987). Organizational consulting: A gestalt approach. Gestalt Institute of Cleveland Press.
Nicholl, D. (1998). From the editor: Is OD meant to be relevant? Part III. OD Practitioner, 30(4), 3–6.
Nkomo, S. M. (1992). The emperor has no clothes: Rewriting “race in organizations.” The Academy of Management Review, 17(3), 487–513. https://doi.org/10.2307/258720
Noer, D. (2017). Organization development: A concept in search of a definition. Its History, Philosophy and Power for Organizations. McFarland & Company Inc.
Palmer, I., Dunford, R., & Akin, G. (2009). Managing organizational change: A multiple perspectives approach (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Palmer, I., Dunford, R., & Akin, G. (2017). Managing organizational change: A multiple perspectives approach (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Quinn, R. E., & McGrath, M. R. (1982). Moving beyond the single-solution perspective: The competing values approach as a diagnostic tool. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18(4), 463–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638201800407
Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1981). A competing values approach to organizational effectiveness. Public Productivity Review, 5(2), 122. https://doi.org/10.2307/3380029
Roberts, P., & Green, B. (2013). Researching rural places: On social justice and rural education. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(10), 765–774. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413503795
Rolin, K. (2009). Standpoint theory as a methodology for the study of power relations. Hypatia, 24(4), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01070.x
Smith, J. G., & Lindsay, J. B. (2014). Beyond inclusion: Worklife interconnectedness, energy, and resilience in organizations. Palgrave Macmillan.
Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
Spettel, S., & White, M. D. (2011). The portrayal of J. Marion Sims’ controversial surgical legacy. The Journal of Urology, 185(6), 2424–2427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.01.077
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2006). A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methods. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 12–28.
van Kleef, G. A., & Lange, J. (2019). How hierarchy shapes our emotional lives: Effects of power and status on emotional experience, expression, and responsiveness. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.009
Vernon, L. F. (2019). J. Marion Sims, MD: Why he and his accomplishments need to continue to be recognized a commentary and historical review. Journal of the National Medical Association, 111(4), 436–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2019.02.002
Waterman, R. H., Peters, T. J., & Phillips, J. R. (1980). Structure is not organization. Business Horizons, 23(3), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(80)90027-0
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications.
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
Weisbord, M. R. (1976). Organizational diagnosis: Six places to look for trouble with or without a theory. Group & Organization Studies, 1(4), 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960117600100405
Werkman, R. (2010). Reinventing organization development: How a sensemaking perspective can enrich OD theories and interventions. Journal of Change Management, 10(4), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2010.516489
Whitney, D., & Cooperrider, D. L. (1998). The appreciative inquiry summit: Overview and applications. Employment Relations Today, 25(2), 17–28.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meyers, A.D., Neal, C.E., Fong, K.L. (2023). Integrative OAD: De-neutralizing the Organizational Assessment Canon to Advance Humanistic Change. In: Poonamallee, L., Howard, A.D., Joy, S. (eds) Managing for Social Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19971-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19971-4_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19970-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19971-4
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)