Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Interrogatory Imperative: Hope and Persistence from 20 Years of Interrogating Whiteness in OD

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing for Social Justice

  • 288 Accesses

Abstract

In 2001, Diane Grimes presented a charge to the field of organization development: that it should “get its own house in order,” by employing an “interrogation of whiteness” to examine the hidden assumptions about race embedded within OD literature and praxis. This paper explores how the field has responded to Grimes’ call to action over the past 20 years and examines how interrogations of whiteness have advanced the field’s capabilities to disrupt white supremacy culture within the discipline and its spheres of influence. A review of literature connects interrogating whiteness with its roots in critical race feminism and the humanistic values embedded in OD’s founding philosophies, then demonstrates significant advancements in the use of interrogating whiteness since Grimes’ original charge. Key findings support the conclusion that the field is more meaningfully equipped than ever to pursue racial equity within organizations. These findings include the development of new awareness of white supremacy’s impact on diversity management, new lenses through which to conduct interrogations of whiteness, new language to describe the dynamics of white supremacy culture and ways of disrupting it, and new models for integrating interrogations of whiteness into OD praxis. This paper concludes with a renewed call to action, charging the field to apply these findings to an expanded, multidimensional disruptive inquiry of oppressive systems, and proposing that to meet a new cultural moment, OD must unbind itself from its factionalized view of equity/diversity/inclusion and strategic values alignment, and recognize liberatory praxis as fundamental to the work of the discipline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    APA style guidelines and common practice among some critical race scholars recommends the capitalization of words that name racial or ethnic groups, e.g. “White” or “Black.” The majority of the authors I cite within this paper, however, do not follow this convention; therefore, for the purposes of consistency and clarity for readers, I chose not to capitalize these terms within this chapter, except in cases where an author I quote directly has done so.

  2. 2.

    For a history of Connecticut’s Inter-Racial Commission, now known as the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, see: https://www.ct.gov/chro/cwp/view.asp?a=2523&Q=315814.

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2004). Declarations of whiteness: The non-performativity of anti-racism. Borderlands, 3(2), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2007). ‘You end up doing the document rather than doing the doing’: Diversity, race equality and the politics of documentation. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(4), 590–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701356015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderfer, C. P. (1982). Problems of changing white males’ behavior and beliefs concerning race relations. Change in Organizations, 122–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderfer, C. P., & Thomas, D. A. (1988). The significance of race and ethnicity for understanding organizational behavior. In C. L. Cooper & I. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1–41). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderfer, C. P. (1990). Reflections on race relations and organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11(6), 493–495. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030110609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderfer, C. (2011). The practice of organizational diagnosis: Theory and methods. OUP USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldoory, L. (2006). A (re)conceived feminist paradigm for public relations: A case for substantial improvement. Journal of Communication, 55(4), 668–684. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03016.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, F., & Syed, J. (2018). ‘Good Muslim women’ at work: An Islamic and postcolonial perspective on ethnic privilege. Journal of Management and Organization, 24(5), 679–697. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2018.22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Institute of Architects. (2019, February). Equity by design: Voices, values, vision. Issuu Website. https://issuu.com/annelisepitts/docs/eqia_2018_early_findings.

  • Anand, R., & Winters, M.F. (2008). A retrospective view of corporate diversity training from 1964 to the present. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 7(3), 356–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebaum, B. (2017). Comforting discomfort as complicity: White fragility and the pursuit of invulnerability. Hypatia, 32(4), 862–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., Schinoff, B. S., & Rogers, K. M. (2016). “I identify with her”, “I identify with him”: Unpacking the dynamics of personal identification in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 41, 28–60. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atlassian. (2018a). State of Diversity and Inclusion in U.S. Tech: Stats Summary, March 2018a. https://www.atlassian.com/diversity/survey/2018a

  • Atlassian. (2018b). Fresh data reveals diversity fatigue is a global problem, June 20, 2018b. https://www.atlassian.com/blog/teamwork/techs-diversity-inclusion-efforts-paying-off

  • Berger, L. J., Essers, C., & Himi, A. (2017). Muslim employees within ‘white’ organizations: The case of Moroccan workers in the Netherlands. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(8), 1119–1139. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1166785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betters-Reed, B. L., & Moore, L. (1995). Shifting the management development paradigm for women. Journal of Management Development, 14(2), 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, A. L. (2014). Reconceptualising meaning-making and embracing disruptive inquiry. Weaving words: Personal and professional transformation through writing as research. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boler, M. (2004). Teaching for hope: The ethics of shattering world views. In D. Liston & J. Garrison (Eds.), Teaching, learning, and loving: Reclaiming passion in educational practice. Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (2014). Teaching our own racism: Incorporating personal narratives of whiteness into anti-racist practice. Adult Learning, 25(3), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045159514534189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, L. M., & Ramsey, V. J. (1996). Speaking as female and white: A non-dominant/dominant group standpoint. Organization, 3(4), 468–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrim, N. M. H., & Nkomo, S. M. (2016). Wedding intersectionality theory and identity work in organizations: South African Indian women negotiating managerial identity. Gender, Work and Organization, 23(3), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J., Horton, H., & Pini, M. (2019). Culture change or same old society? Consensus, sociocracy, and white supremacy culture. Communities, 184, 53–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collective, C. R., & The,. (1977). A black feminist statement. In T. P. McCarthy & J. McMillian (Eds.), Protest nation: Words that inspired a century of American radicalism (pp. 212–216). The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T. (1990). Problems with research by organizational scholars on issues of race and ethnicity. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 26(1), 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T. (1993). Cultural diversity in organizations: Theory, research, and practice. Berret-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T., & Nkomo, S. (1990) Invisible men and women: A status report on race as a variable in organization behavior research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11(6), 419–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiAngelo, R. (2011). White fragility. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 3(3), 54–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiAngelo, R. (2018). White fragility: Why it’s so hard for white people to talk about racism. Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erskine, S. E., & Bilimoria, D. (2019). White allyship of afro-diasporic women in the workplace: A transformative strategy for organizational change. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051819848993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, T., & Hylton, K. (2018). ‘Race’, ethnicity and whiteness in the governance of the events industry. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 10(2), 164–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, M. D. (2016). For a ruthless criticism of US politics. Polity, 48(1), 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberg, R. (1993). White women, race matters: The social construction of whiteness. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendlin, E. T. (1969). Focusing. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 6(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088716

  • Grimes, D. (2001). Putting our own house in order: Whiteness, change and organization studies. Journal of Organizational Change Management., 14(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810110388054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, D. S. (2002). Challenging the status quo? Whiteness in the diversity management literature. Management Communication Quarterly, 15(3), 381–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groscurth, C. R. (2011). Paradoxes of privilege and participation: The case of the American Red Cross. Communication Quarterly, 59(3), 296–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2011.583498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holgersson, C., Tienari, J., Meriläinen, S., & Bendl, R. (2016). Executive search as ethnosociality: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 16(2), 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holvino, E. (1994a). Making sense of ‘making sense of gender in the world economy’. Organization, 1,2, 341–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holvino, E. (1994b). Women of color in organizations: Revising our models of gender at work. In E. Y. Cross, J. H. Katz, F. A. Miller & E. W. Seashore (Eds.), The promise of diversity, pp. 52–59. Irwin Professional Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holvino, E. (1996). Reading organization development from the margins: Outsider within. Organization, 3(4), 520–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holvino, E. (2008). Intersections: The simultaneity of race, gender and class in organization studies. Gender, Work and Organization,. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00400.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holvino, E. (2010). Intersections: The simultaneity of race, gender and class in organization studies. Gender, Work and Organization, 17(3), 248–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • hooks, B. (1990). Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics. South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, B. (1989). Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black. South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HR Research Institute. (2019, February). The state of diversity and inclusion 2018/2019. HR.com. https://www.hr.com/en/resources/free_research_white_papers/hrcom-state-of-diversity-inclusion-2019-feb2019_jrttnwuk.html

  • Greene, A. M., & Kirton, G. (2011). The value of investigating stakeholder involvement in Diversity Management. Diversity in the Workplace: Multi-disciplinary and International Perspectives, 119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L. (2021, August 13). Our window of climate opportunity. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/13/podcasts/climate-change-solutions-ipcc.html

  • Jackson, L., & Chablani, M. (2021, July 30, August 2). Climate chaos is avoidable. Here’s how. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/30/podcasts/the-daily-newsletter-climate-change-avoidable.html

  • Jackson, L. M. (2019, September 04). What’s missing from “White Fragility.” slate. https://slate.com/human-interest/2019/09/white-fragility-robin-diangelo-workshop.html

  • Kyriakidou, O., Kyriacou, O., Özbilgin, M., & Dedoulis, E. (2016). Equality, diversity and inclusion in accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 35, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leong, N. (2012). Racial capitalism. Harvard Law Review, 126(8), 2151–2225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H. (2017). Undoing whiteness: The dao of anti-racist diversity practice. Gender, Work and Organization, 24(5), 457–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H. (2019). Decolonising organisations with bell hooks. In R. McMurray & A. Pullen (Eds.), Focus on women writers in organization studies: Power, politics and exclusion in organization and management (pp. 83–98). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H. (2020). Redeeming leadership: An anti-racist feminist intervention. Bristol University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H. (2021). How we learn whiteness: Disciplining and resisting management knowledge. Management Learning, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076211061622

  • Lu, D., Smart, C., & Gamio, L. (2021, August 12). Where the racial makeup of the U.S. shifted in the last decade. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/08/12/us/2020-census-race-ethnicity.html

  • Marshall, J., & Mead, G. (2005). Self-reflective practice and first-person action research. Action Research, 3(3), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750305055999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConarty, K., & Rose, H. (2017). Beyond the 22%: Gender inequity in regional theatres’ show selections. Women’s Studies in Communication, 40(2), 212–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, H., & Carroll, B. (2013). Identity undoing and power relations in leadership development. Human Relations, 66(9), 1225–1248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712469548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nkomo, S. (1992). The emperor has no clothes: Rewriting ‘race in organizations’. Academy of Management Review., 17, 487–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noer, D. (2017). Humanistic consulting: Its history, philosophy and power for organizations. McFarland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roithmayr, D. (2014). Reproducing racism: How everyday choices lock in white advantage. NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumens, N. (2011). Minority support: Friendship and the development of gay and lesbian managerial careers and identities. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 30(6), 444–462. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610151111157684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, M. A., Osherov, A., & Chung, P. J. (2020). Why counting black lives matters—The 2020 Census. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(9), e60–e60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segon, M., & Booth, C. (2015). Virtue: The missing ethics element in emotional intelligence. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(4), 789–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shonkoff, B. S., Morello-Frosch, R., Pastor, M., & Sadd, J. (2011). The climate gap: Environmental health and equity implications of climate change and mitigation policies in California—A review of the literature. Climatic Change, 109(Suppl 1), S485–S503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, A. (2006). Critical diversity management practice in Australia: Romanced or co-opted? In A. M. Konrad, P. Prasad, & J. Pringle (Eds.), Dimensions of Workplace Diversity (pp. 511–530). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. G., & Lindsay, J. B. (2014). Beyond inclusion: Worklife interconnectedness, energy, and resilience in organizations. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern Poverty Law Center. (2020, March). SPLC identifies 940 hate groups. SPLC Report, 1A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, B. H. (1977). Education and the socialization of Asian Americans: A revisionist analysis of the “model minority” thesis. Amerasia Journal, 4(2), 23–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, B. H. (2002). Revisiting the model minority stereotype: Implications for student affairs practice and higher education. New Directions for Student Services, 2002(97), 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The pursuit of hapa-ness. (2001, Jul 31). A_Magazine, 34. Retrieved from https://login.libproxy.newschool.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.libproxy.newschool.edu/docview/200218507?accountid=12261

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, M. A. R., & Hanafin, J. (2006). Use of self in OD consulting: What matters is presence. The NTL handbook of organization development and change: Principles, practices, and perspectives. Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trần, N. L. (2016). Calling IN: A less disposable way of holding each other accountable. In M. McKenzie (Ed.), The solidarity struggle: How people of color succeed and fail at showing up for each other in the fight for freedom (pp. 59–63). BGD Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Laer, K., & Janssens, M. (2011). Ethnic minority professionals’ experiences with subtle discrimination in the workplace. Human Relations, 64(9), 1203–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western, S. (2012). Leadership: A critical text (2nd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worley, C. G., & Jules, C. (2020). COVID-19’s uncomfortable revelations about agile and sustainable organizations in a VUCA World. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 56(3), 279–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahrawi, S. (2020). The Arab-American experience: Identity negotiation in how does it feel to be a problem? South Central Review, 37(1), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1353/scr.2020.0000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanoni, P., Janssens, M., Benschop, Y., & Nkomo, S. (2010). Unpacking diversity, grasping inequality: Rethinking difference through critical perspectives. Organization, 17(1), 9–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Leading ChangeMakers, NY, USA

    Kathryn L. Fong

Authors
  1. Kathryn L. Fong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn L. Fong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. New School, New York, NY, USA

    Latha Poonamallee

  2. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Heights, OH, USA

    Anita D. Howard

  3. Bangalore, Karnataka, India

    Simy Joy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fong, K.L. (2023). The Interrogatory Imperative: Hope and Persistence from 20 Years of Interrogating Whiteness in OD. In: Poonamallee, L., Howard, A.D., Joy, S. (eds) Managing for Social Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19971-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation