Abstract
In the present study, the crisis communication model adopted by the Ministry of Health, the manager of the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey, is analyzed based on chronological developments that were criticized and discussed during the beginning, emergence, and chronicity of the pandemic. The study argues that an effective crisis communication strategy, required during the COVID-19 pandemic, could not be adopted due to the communication problems across the social stakeholders in Turkey. This miscommunication stemmed from Ministry of Health’s flawed strategy and the value paradox due to the neglect of social reaction, demands, concerns, and requirements. Those responsible for the crisis management attempted to spread messages not only through conventional media but also through social media to achieve media diversity. However, these messages were not only repetitive and similar, but they aimed to influence rather than interact. Therefore, the value and credibility of these messages gradually decreased across the public that was significantly affected by the crisis. Furthermore, the Ministry of Health did not provide accurate, adequate, and timely information to the citizens, leading to the interruption of mutual and solidaristic communication between the ruler and the ruled. Turkish COVID-19 experience presented in the present study is a significant example that demonstrated how the provision of sustainable development goals—especially the elimination of poverty (SGD1) and hunger (SGD2), health and welfare (SGD3), and gender equality (SGD5)—could be interrupted and how the disruption of the communications during the crisis would complicate normalization for social stakeholders in the absence of an accurate and realistic communication strategy. For this purpose, the main outline of an effective crisis communication model is also presented in the study.
The present study benefited from the TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey) project “Crisis Communication: Preventive Communication Approaches Based on the Lessons Learned During the Covid-19 Pandemic” (No: 120K634).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The name is abbreviated as requested by the interviewee.
- 2.
- 3.
References
Barker, D. J. P. (2004). The developmental origins of adult disease. Journal of the American College of Nutrition., 23(6), 588–595.
Başaran, F. (2010). İletişim Teknolojileri ve Toplumsal Gelişme [Communication Technologies and Social Development]. Ütopya Yayınevi.
Beam, S. (1992). Surveying the territory: Re-examining MacBride and theories of development. Gazette., 50(2–3), 109–145.
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2020). The coronavirus crisis—Crisis communication, meaning-making, and reputation management. International Public Management Journal, 23(5), 713–729.
Duffy, B. E., & Chan, N. C. (2019). ‘You never really know who’s looking’: Imagined surveillance across social media platforms. New Media & Society., 21(1), 119–138.
Fink, S. (1986). Crisis management: Planning fort the inevitable. American Management Ass.
Hudson, H. E. (1983). The role of telecommunications in development: A synthesis of current research. In O. H. Gandy, P. Espinosa, & J. A. Ordover (Eds.), Proceedings from the tenth annual telecommunications policy research conference (pp. 291–307). Ablex.
Hugill, P. J. (2003). Technology, its innovation and diffusion as the motor of capitalism. Comparative Technology Transfer and Society, 1(1), 89–113.
Jinqiu, Z., & Xiaoming, H. (2005). Modernization in the information age. Media Asia, 32(4), 191–196.
Liu, B. F., Fraustino, J. D., & Jin, Y. (2016). Social media use during disasters: How information form and source influence intended behavioral responses. Communication Research, 43(5), 626–646.
Mansell, R., & Wehn, U. (1998). Knowledge societies: Information technology for sustainable development. Oxford University Press.
Mattelart, A. (1994). Mapping world communication: War, progress and culture. University of Minnesota Press.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Polk, E., & Servaes, J. (2015). Sustainability and participatory communication: A case study of the transition town Amherst. Massachusetts. Management Communication Quarterly, 29(1), 160–167.
Riaz, A. (1997). The role of telecommunications in economic growth: Proposal for an alternative framework of analysis. Media, Culture & Society, 19(4), 557–583.
Samarajiva, R., & Shields, P. (1990). Integration, telecommunication and development: Power in paradigms. Journal of Communication, 40(3), 84–105.
Servaes, J. (2000). Communication for development: Alive and kicking! Communicato, 26(1), 84–89.
Servaes, J. (2016). How ‘sustainable’ is development communication research? The International Communication Gazette, 78(7), 701–710.
Servaes, J. (Ed.). (2020). Handbook of communication for development and social change. Springer.
Servaes, J., & Lie, R. (2015). New challenges for communication for sustainable development and social change: A review essay. The Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 10(1), 124–148.
Servaes, J., & Malikhao, P. (2007). Communication and sustainable development. In FAO (Ed.), Communication and sustainable development: Selected Papers from the 9th UN Roundtable on Communication for Development. Food & Agriculture Org..
Stevenson, R. L. (2003). National development and communication. Encyclopedia of International Media and Communications, 5, 163–175.
Stokke, O. (1991). Sustainable development: A multi-challenge. The European Journal of Development, 3(1), 8–31.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Törenli, N., Kıyan, Z. (2023). The Importance of Sustainable Communication in the Covid-19 Period: The Case of Turkey. In: Servaes, J., Yusha'u, M.J. (eds) SDG18 Communication for All, Volume 2. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19459-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19459-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19458-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19459-7
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)