Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Contemporary Endocrinology ((COE))

  • 510 Accesses

Abstract

Successful implantation and placentation are important prerequisites for normal pregnancy. The initial interaction between embryo and endometrium is complex, and even minor perturbations can derail this carefully choreographed process. During implantation, the dialogue between the embryo and uterine wall is bi-directional and requires both a competent embryo and receptive endometrium. In this chapter, we discuss the diagnosis and management of common intrauterine pathologies, thin endometrial lining and chronic endometritis, as well as novel methods of assessing endometrial receptivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Taylor HS, Fritz MA, Pal L, Seli E. Speroff’s clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility. 9th ed. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Diedrich K, Fauser BCJM, Devroey P, Griesinger G, Evian Annual Reproduction (EVAR) Workshop Group. The role of the endometrium and embryo in human implantation. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13(4):365–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Simon A, Laufer N. Repeated implantation failure: clinical approach. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(5):1039–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kliman HJ, Frankfurter D. Clinical approach to recurrent implantation failure: evidence-based evaluation of the endometrium. Fertil Steril. 2019;111(4):618–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Munro MG. Uterine polyps, adenomyosis, leiomyomas, and endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril. 2019;111(4):629–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile female: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(6):e44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Richter KS, Bugge KR, Bromer JG, Levy MJ. Relationship between endometrial thickness and embryo implantation, based on 1,294 cycles of in vitro fertilization with transfer of two blastocyst-stage embryos. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(1):53–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Abdalla HI, Brooks AA, Johnson MR, Kirkland A, Thomas A, Studd JW. Endometrial thickness: a predictor of implantation in ovum recipients? Hum Reprod. 1994;9(2):363–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Oliveira JB, Baruffi RL, Mauri AL, Petersen CG, Borges MC, Franco JG. Endometrial ultrasonography as a predictor of pregnancy in an in-vitro fertilization programme after ovarian stimulation and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone and gonadotrophins. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(11):2515–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gonen Y, Casper RF. Prediction of implantation by the sonographic appearance of the endometrium during controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization (IVF). J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1990;7(3):146–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cruz F, Bellver J. Live birth after embryo transfer in an unresponsive thin endometrium. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014;30(7):481–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sundström P. Establishment of a successful pregnancy following in-vitro fertilization with an endometrial thickness of no more than 4 mm. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(6):1550–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Check JH, Cohen R. Live fetus following embryo transfer in a woman with diminished egg reserve whose maximal endometrial thickness was less than 4 mm. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(4):330–2.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Senturk LM, Erel CT. Thin endometrium in assisted reproductive technology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;20(3):221–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lebovitz O, Orvieto R. Treating patients with “thin” endometrium - an ongoing challenge. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014;30(6):409–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sher G, Fisch JD. Effect of vaginal sildenafil on the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) after multiple IVF failures attributed to poor endometrial development. Fertil Steril. 2002;78(5):1073–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sher G, Fisch JD. Vaginal sildenafil (Viagra): a preliminary report of a novel method to improve uterine artery blood flow and endometrial development in patients undergoing IVF. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(4):806–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Navot D, Scott RT, Droesch K, Veeck LL, Liu HC, Rosenwaks Z. The window of embryo transfer and the efficiency of human conception in vitro. Fertil Steril. 1991;55(1):114–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Díaz-Gimeno P, Horcajadas JA, Martínez-Conejero JA, et al. A genomic diagnostic tool for human endometrial receptivity based on the transcriptomic signature. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(1):50–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, Díaz-Gimeno P, et al. The endometrial receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):818–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ruiz-Alonso M, Galindo N, Pellicer A, Simón C. What a difference two days make: “personalized” embryo transfer (pET) paradigm: a case report and pilot study. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(6):1244–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hashimoto T, Koizumi M, Doshida M, et al. Efficacy of the endometrial receptivity array for repeated implantation failure in Japan: a retrospective, two-centers study. Reprod Med Biol. 2017;16(3):290–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Patel JA, Patel AJ, Banker JM, Shah SI, Banker MR. Personalized embryo transfer helps in improving in vitro fertilization/ICSI outcomes in patients with recurrent implantation failure. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2019;12(1):59–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bassil R, Casper R, Samara N, et al. Does the endometrial receptivity array really provide personalized embryo transfer? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(7):1301–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kitaya K, Matsubayashi H, Yamaguchi K, et al. Chronic endometritis: potential cause of infertility and obstetric and neonatal complications. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2016;75(1):13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Greenwood SM, Moran JJ. Chronic endometritis: morphologic and clinical observations. Obstet Gynecol. 1981;58(2):176–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kitaya K, Takeuchi T, Mizuta S, Matsubayashi H, Ishikawa T. Endometritis: new time, new concepts. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(3):344–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kitaya K, Yasuo T. Immunohistochemistrical and clinicopathological characterization of chronic endometritis. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2011;66(5):410–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Di Pietro C, Cicinelli E, Guglielmino MR, et al. Altered transcriptional regulation of cytokines, growth factors, and apoptotic proteins in the endometrium of infertile women with chronic endometritis. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2013;69(5):509–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bayer-Garner IB, Korourian S. Plasma cells in chronic endometritis are easily identified when stained with syndecan-1. Mod Pathol. 2001;14(9):877–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bayer-Garner IB, Nickell JA, Korourian S. Routine syndecan-1 immunohistochemistry aids in the diagnosis of chronic endometritis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004;128(9):1000–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Song D, Feng X, Zhang Q, et al. Prevalence and confounders of chronic endometritis in premenopausal women with abnormal bleeding or reproductive failure. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;36(1):78–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. McQueen DB, Bernardi LA, Stephenson MD. Chronic endometritis in women with recurrent early pregnancy loss and/or fetal demise. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(4):1026–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Johnston-MacAnanny EB, Hartnett J, Engmann LL, Nulsen JC, Sanders MM, Benadiva CA. Chronic endometritis is a frequent finding in women with recurrent implantation failure after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(2):437–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Recommendations for practices utilizing gestational carriers: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(2):e3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua Stewart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Aluko, A., Stewart, J. (2023). Endometrial Factor. In: Chung, P.H., Rosenwaks, Z. (eds) Problem-Focused Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility. Contemporary Endocrinology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19443-6_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19443-6_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19442-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19443-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics