Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Contemporary Endocrinology ((COE))

  • 499 Accesses

Abstract

Ambiguous genitalia discovered in the delivery room can be a stressful situation for the parents and care providers. The differential diagnosis of disorders of sexual development (DSD) includes genetic etiologies, disorders of steroid hormone production, as well as exogenous hormone exposure. Life-threatening conditions such as congenital adrenal hyperplasia must be identified. In the case of partial androgen insensitivity, a multidisciplinary team is instrumental in helping the parents and the individual manage the decisions including potential genitoplasty, gonadectomy, and hormone replacement at puberty. As these issues are influenced by the individual’s ultimate gender identity, deferring these decisions until adolescence may be advantageous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yau M, Gujral J, New MI. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia: diagnosis and emergency treatment [Internet]. MDText.com, Inc.; 2019 [cited 2022 Jan 6]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279085/.

  2. Murphy C, Allen L, Jamieson MA. Ambiguous genitalia in the newborn: an overview and teaching tool. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2011;24(5):236–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang D, Yao F, Tian T, Deng S, Luo M, Tian Q. Clinical characteristics and molecular genetics of complete androgen insensitivity syndrome patients: a series study of 30 cases from a Chinese tertiary medical center. Fertil Steril. 2021;115(5):1270–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hughes IA, Werner R, Bunch T, Hiort O. Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome. Semin Reprod Med. 2012;30(5):432–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Eggers S, Sadedin S, van den Bergen JA, Robevska G, Ohnesorg T, Hewitt J, et al. Disorders of sex development: insights from targeted gene sequencing of a large international patient cohort. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1):243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hughes IA, Davies JD, Bunch TI, Pasterski V, Mastroyannopoulou K, MacDougall J. Androgen insensitivity syndrome. Lancet. 2012;380(9851):1419–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Weidler EM, Linnaus ME, Baratz AB, Goncalves LF, Bailey S, Hernandez SJ, et al. A management protocol for gonad preservation in patients with androgen insensitivity syndrome. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019;32(6):605–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Adachi M, Takayanagi R, Tomura A, Imasaki K, Kato S, Goto K, et al. Androgen-insensitivity syndrome as a possible coactivator disease. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(12):856–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Batista RL, Yamaguchi K, Rodrigues A d S, Nishi MY, Goodier JL, Carvalho LR, et al. Mobile DNA in endocrinology: LINE-1 retrotransposon causing partial androgen insensitivity syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104(12):6385–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Holterhus PM, Wiebel J, Sinnecker GH, Brüggenwirth HT, Sippell WG, Brinkmann AO, et al. Clinical and molecular spectrum of somatic mosaicism in androgen insensitivity syndrome. Pediatr Res. 1999;46(6):684–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mazur T. Gender dysphoria and gender change in androgen insensitivity or micropenis. Arch Sex Behav. 2005;34(4):411–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer-Bahlburg HF. Gender monitoring and gender reassignment of children and adolescents with a somatic disorder of sex development. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2011;20(4):639–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Conn J, Gillam L, Conway GS. Revealing the diagnosis of androgen insensitivity syndrome in adulthood. BMJ. 2005;331(7517):628–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hughes IA, Houk C, Ahmed SF, Lee PA, LWPES Consensus Group, ESPE Consensus Group. Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders. Arch Dis Child. 2006;91(7):554–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cools M, Wolffenbuttel KP, Hersmus R, Mendonca BB, Kaprová J, Drop SLS, et al. Malignant testicular germ cell tumors in postpubertal individuals with androgen insensitivity: prevalence, pathology and relevance of single nucleotide polymorphism-based susceptibility profiling. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(12):2561–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Levin HS. Tumors of the testis in intersex syndromes. Urol Clin North Am. 2000;27(3):543–51, x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hurt WG, Bodurtha JN, McCall JB, Ali MM. Seminoma in pubertal patient with androgen insensitivity syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161(3):530–1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chaudhry S, Tadokoro-Cuccaro R, Hannema SE, Acerini CL, Hughes IA. Frequency of gonadal tumours in complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS): a retrospective case-series analysis. J Pediatr Urol. 2017;13(5):498.e1–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Döhnert U, Wünsch L, Hiort O. Gonadectomy in complete androgen insensitivity syndrome: why and when? Sex Dev. 2017;11(4):171–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hiort O, Holterhus PM. Androgen insensitivity and male infertility. Int J Androl. 2003;26(1):16–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Finlayson C, Johnson EK, Chen D, Dabrowski E, Gosiengfiao Y, Campo-Engelstein L, et al. Proceedings of the working group session on fertility preservation for individuals with gender and sex diversity. Transgend Health. 2016;1(1):99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Batista RL, Costa EMF, Rodrigues AS, Gomes NL, Faria JA Jr, Nishi MY, et al. Androgen insensitivity syndrome: a review. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2018;62(2):227–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Akin JW. The use of clomiphene citrate in the treatment of azoospermia secondary to incomplete androgen resistance. Fertil Steril. 1993;59(1):223–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tordjman KM, Yaron M, Berkovitz A, Botchan A, Sultan C, Lumbroso S. Fertility after high-dose testosterone and intracytoplasmic injection in a patient with androgen insensitivity syndrome with a previously unreported androgen receptor mutation. Andrologia. 2014;46(6):703–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pinsky L, Kaufman M, Killinger DW. Impaired spermatogenesis is not an obligate expression of receptor-defective androgen resistance. Am J Med Genet. 1989;32(1):100–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Weidemann W, Peters B, Romalo G, Spindler KD, Schweikert HU. Response to androgen treatment in a patient with partial androgen insensitivity and a mutation in the deoxyribonucleic acid-binding domain of the androgen receptor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83(4):1173–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Birnbaum W, Marshall L, Werner R, Kulle A, Holterhus P-M, Rall K, et al. Oestrogen versus androgen in hormone-replacement therapy for complete androgen insensitivity syndrome: a multicentre, randomised, double-dummy, double-blind crossover trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(10):771–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Al-Bassam A, Gado A. Feminizing genital reconstruction: experience with 52 cases of ambiguous genitalia. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2004;14(3):172–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Baskin A, Wisniewski AB, Aston CE, Austin P, Chan Y-M, Cheng EY, et al. Post-operative complications following feminizing genitoplasty in moderate to severe genital atypia: results from a multicenter, observational prospective cohort study. J Pediatr Urol. 2020;16(5):568–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Callans N, De Cuypere G, De Sutter P, Monstrey S, Weyers S, Hoebeke P, et al. An update on surgial and non-surgical treatments for vaginal hypoplasia. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(5):775–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chan JL, Levin PJ, Ford MP, Stanton DC, Pfeifer SM. Vaginoplasty with an autologous buccal mucosa fenestrated graft in two patients with vaginal agenesis: a multidisciplinary approach and literature review. J Min Invasiv Gynecol. 2017;24(4):670–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shah R, Woolley MM, Costin G. Testicular feminization: the androgen insensitivity syndrome. J Pediatr Surg. 1992;27(6):757–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samantha M. Pfeifer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pollie, M., Pfeifer, S.M. (2023). Ambiguous Genitalia. In: Chung, P.H., Rosenwaks, Z. (eds) Problem-Focused Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility. Contemporary Endocrinology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19443-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19443-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19442-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19443-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics