Skip to main content

Integration of Data and Algorithms in Solving Inverse Problems of Spectroscopy of Solutions by Machine Learning Methods

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Neural Computation, Machine Learning, and Cognitive Research VI (NEUROINFORMATICS 2022)

Abstract

This study presents the results of solving the inverse problem of determining the concentrations of heavy metal ions of multicomponent solutions by their Raman and absorption spectra using integration of machine learning algorithms and integration of optical spectroscopy methods. It is shown that if the integrated methods differ much by their accuracy, then their integration is not effective. This is observed both for algorithmic integration and for integration of physical methods.

This study has been performed at the expense of the Russian Science Foundation, grant no. 19–11-00333, https://rscf.ru/en/project/19-11-00333/.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bradl, H. (ed.): Heavy Metals in the Environment: Origin, Interaction and Remediation. Elsevier (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. He, Z.L., et al.: Trace elements in agroecosystems and impacts on the environment. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 19(2–3), 125–140 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jaishankar, M., et al.: Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 7(2), 60–72 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu, X., Cobbina, S.J., Mao, G., Xu, H., Zhang, Z., Yang, L.: A review of toxicity and mechanisms of individual and mixtures of heavy metals in the environment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23(9), 8244–8259 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6333-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pitot, C.H., Dragan P.Y.: Casarett and Doull’s Toxicology. Chemical Carcinogenesis, pp. 201–260. McGraw Hill, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Koedrith, P., et al.: Toxicogenomic approaches for understanding molecular mechanisms of heavy metal mutagenicity and carcinogenicity. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 216(5), 587–598 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kauffmann, T.H., Fontana, M.D.: Inorganic salts diluted in water probed by Raman spectrometry: data processing and performance evaluation. Sens. Actuators, B Chem. 209, 154–161 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Crompton, T.R.: Determination of Anions in Natural and Treated Waters. CRC Press (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kulkarni, S., et al.: A review on spectrophotometric determination of heavy metals with emphasis on cadmium and nickel determination by UV Spectrophotometry. IJAERS 2(9), 35–38 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burikov, S.A., et al.: Application of artificial neural networks to solve problems of identification and determination of concentration of salts in multi-component water solutions by Raman spectra. Optical Memory Neural Networks 19(2), 140–148 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Isaev, I.V., et al.: Joint application of Raman and optical absorption spectroscopy to determine concentrations of heavy metal ions in water using artificial neural networks. In: Proceedings SPIE 11458, Saratov Fall Meeting 2019, pp. 114580R (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dolenko, T.A., et al.: Application of adaptive neural network algorithms for determination of salt composition of waters using laser spectroscopy. Int. J. Comput. Inf. Eng. 8(10), 1242–1248 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Burikov, S.A., et al.: Identification of inorganic salts and determination of their concentrations in aqueous solutions based on the valence Raman band of water using artificial neural networks. Pattern Recognit. Image Anal. 17(4), 554–559 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wolpert, D.H.: Stacked generalization. Neural Networks 5(2), 241–259 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aishwarya, T., Ravi Kumar, V.: Machine learning and deep learning approaches to analyze and detect COVID-19: a review. SN Comput. Sci. 2(3), 1–9 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nguyen, D.K., et al.: Deep Stacked Generalization Ensemble Learning models in early diagnosis of Depression illness from wearable devices data. In: 5th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics, pp. 7–12 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Alizadeh, S., et al.: Using stacked generalization ensemble method to estimate shear wave velocity based on downhole seismic data: a case study of Sarab-e-Zahab, Iran. J. Seismic Explor. 30, 281–301 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, N., Gao, H., Zhao, Z., Hu, Y., Duan, L.: A stacked generalization ensemble model for optimization and prediction of the gas well rate of penetration: a case study in Xinjiang. J. Petrol. Explor. Product. Technol. 1–14 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-021-01402-z

  19. Giannuzzi, D., et al.: In-line near-infrared analysis of milk coupled with machine learning methods for the daily prediction of blood metabolic profile in dairy cattle. Sci. Rep. 12(1), 1–13 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guindo, M.L., et al.: Particle swarm optimization and multiple stacked generalizations to detect nitrogen and organic-matter in organic-fertilizer using Vis-NIR. Sensors 21(14), 4882 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zeng, J., et al.: Hackem-LIBS: An heterogeneous stacking ensemble model for laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy elemental quantitative analysis. IEEE Access 8, 136141–136150 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gruszczyński, S., Gruszczyński, W.: Supporting soil and land assessment with machine learning models using the Vis-NIR spectral response. Geoderma 405, 115451 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cybenko, G.: Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function. Math. Control Signals Syst. 2(4), 303–314 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Breiman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1), 5–32 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Artem Guskov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Guskov, A., Laptinskiy, K., Burikov, S., Isaev, I. (2023). Integration of Data and Algorithms in Solving Inverse Problems of Spectroscopy of Solutions by Machine Learning Methods. In: Kryzhanovsky, B., Dunin-Barkowski, W., Redko, V., Tiumentsev, Y. (eds) Advances in Neural Computation, Machine Learning, and Cognitive Research VI. NEUROINFORMATICS 2022. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 1064. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19032-2_41

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics