Abstract
Convict criminology (CC) teaches us that it is essential for critical prison studies to foreground the voices, views and lived experiences of those who have endured criminalization and incarceration, for without access to the experiential, we are unable to accurately conceptualize or understand the pains of imprisonment. Critical criminologists, both those who identify as formerly incarcerated and as ‘noncons’ or prisoner allies (for example, see ‘Qualities of a Prisoner Ally’ information sheet created by prisoners of the Prisoner’s Justice Day Committee, Vancouver, BC. Available at: https://penalpress.com), have taken up this charge primarily via qualitative research that incorporates fieldwork, interviews, observation and autoethnography – and where possible, ethnography. Following the edict ‘nothing about us, without us’, convict criminology advances a critical approach to prison research that centres notions of justice, diversity and inclusivity as primary research values. We situate this chapter within a CC perspective to help us unpack the emotional labour involved in doing critical prison research. Given the traumatic nature and long-lasting effects of incarceration, we showcase how this kind of inclusion and representation in critical prison research can take different emotional tolls on formerly incarcerated scholars. Using the second author’s lived experience of incarceration and her participation in a large-scale qualitative research project on the emotional geography of the Canadian federal penal landscape as the primary object lesson, we also outline the advantages of inclusive research team membership for the project and those who are involved in it, namely, the differently located research team members as well as the participants. We conclude the chapter with a discussion of some of the ways that allied prison researchers can support their research assistants, graduate students and colleagues with criminal histories as they cope with the emotional labour of conducting critical prison research and outline a series of possible coping strategies for researchers who are exposed to and who may be struggling with the emotional toll of the research topic and content, including the intense and oftentimes emotional participant interactions and observations they witness while in the field.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
W2B students earn college or university course credits and tuition fees are covered by the school. W2B engages students’ whole selves (i.e. body, mind, emotions and spirit) and differs from the parent program in a few key ways (Davis, 2013, p. 259). Reflecting the sociopolitical, economic and cultural differences in Canada, including a much smaller prisoner population, shorter average sentences and a disproportionate number of Indigenous prisoners, W2B’s pedagogical approach integrates Indigenous teachings into the training and pedagogy. W2B also works with community-based alumni groups who participate in workshops and training and engages in advocacy related to prisoner justice, access to education, employment, housing and community re-entry (Davis, 2013; Fayter, 2016; Pollack, 2019). For more information about W2B, see www.wallstobridges.ca
- 2.
The Feeling the Carceral project is funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Grant Funding reference number 435-2019-1152.
- 3.
The vast majority of the CC literature has been produced by men; this chapter helps fill a gap in this literature by providing women’s voices in this field.
References
Asgharzadeh, A. (2008). The return of the Subaltern: International education and politics of voice. Journal of Studies in International Education, 12(4), 334–363.
Barrington, A. J., & Shakespeare-Finch, J. (2013). Working with refugee survivors of torture and trauma: An opportunity for vicarious post-traumatic growth. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 26, 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2012.727553
Becker, H. (1967). Whose side are we on? Social Problems, 14(3), 234–247.
Bergman Blix, S., & Wettergren, Å. (2015). The emotional labour of gaining and maintaining access to the field. Qualitative Research, 15(6), 688–704.
Crawley, E. (2004). Doing prison work: The public and private lives of prison officers. Willan Publishing.
Crewe, B. (2011). Depth, weight, tightness: Revisiting the pains of imprisonment. Punishment & Society, 13(5), 509–529.
Crewe, B., Warr, J., Bennett, P., & Smith, A. (2013). The emotional geography of prison life. Theoretical Criminology, 18(1), 56–74.
Davis, S. W. (2013). Beyond “replication”: Inside-out Canada. In S. W. Davis & B. S. Roswell (Eds.), Turning teaching inside out: A pedagogy of transformation for community-based education (pp. 257–265). Palgrave Macmillan.
Denzin, N. (2000). Aesthetics and practices of qualitative research inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(2), 256–265.
Dickson-Swift, V., James, E. L., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2009). Researching sensitive topics: Qualitative research as emotion work. Qualitative Research, 9, 61–79.
Drake, D. H., & Harvey, J. (2014). Performing the role of ethnographer: Processing and managing the emotional dimensions of prison research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17(5), 489–501.
Earle, R. (2014). Insider and out: Making sense of a prison experience and a research experience. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(4), 429–438.
Earle, R. (2016). Convict criminology: Inside and out. Bristol University Press.
Earle, R. (2018). Convict criminology in England: Developments and dilemmas. British Journal of Criminology, 58, 1499–1516.
Fabian, S. C. (2014). Reconciling the irreconcilable: Resolving emotionality and research responsibility when working for the traumatizer. In J. M. Kilty, M. Felices-Luna, & S. C. Fabian (Eds.), Demarginalizing voices: Commitment, emotion and action in qualitative research (pp. 245–266). UBC Press.
Faith, K. (2011). Unruly women: The politics of confinement and resistance (New ed.). Seven Stories Press.
Fayter, R. (2016). Social justice praxis within the walls to bridges program: Pedagogy of oppressed federally sentenced women. Journal of Prisoners on Prisons, 25(2), 56–71.
Fayter, R., Mario, B., Chartrand, V., & Kilty, J. M. (2021). Surviving the pandemic on the inside: From crisis governance to caring communities. Canadian Journal of Sociology.
Freire, P. (2006). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th Anniversary ed.). Continuum
Garrihy, J., & Watters, A. (2020). Emotions and agency in prison research. Methodological Innovations, May–August: 1–14.
Gobo, G. & Molle, A. (2017). Doing Ethnography (2nd ed.), London, Sage.
Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280.
Haggerty, K. D., & Bucerius, S. (2020). The proliferating pains of imprisonment. Incarceration, 1(1), Online first. https://doi.org/10.1177/2632666320936432
Hancock, P., & Jewkes, Y. (2011). Architectures of incarceration: The spatial pains of imprisonment. Punishment & Society, 13(5), 611–629.
Haney, C. (2006). Reforming punishment: Psychological limits to the pains of imprisonment. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11382-000
Hannem, S. (2014). Grappling with reflexivity and the role of emotion in criminological analysis. In J. M. Kilty, M. Felices-Luna, & S. C. Fabian (Eds.), Demarginalizing voices: Commitment, emotion and action in qualitative research (pp. 267–285). UBC Press.
Harding, S. (1991). Whose science/whose knowledge? Open University Press.
Harding, S. (2004). Introduction: Standpoint theory as a site of political, philosophic, and scientific debate. In S. Harding (Ed.), The feminist standpoint theory reader (pp. 1–16). Routledge.
Hartling, L. (2008). Strengthening resilience in a risky world: It’s all about relationships. Women & Therapy, 31, 51–70.
Hill Collins, P. (2004). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thought. In S. Harding (Ed.), The feminist standpoint theory reader (pp. 103–126). Routledge.
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
Hunter, S. V. & Schofield, M. J. (2006). How counsellors cope with traumatized clients: Personal, Professional and Organizational Strategies. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 28, 121–138.
Humblet, D. (2020). Locking out emotions in locking up older prisoners? Emotional labour of Belgian prison officers and prison nurses. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 60, 1–13.
Jewkes, Y. (2011). Autoethnography and emotion as intellectual resources: Doing prison research differently. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(1), 63–75.
Kilty, J. M. (2018). Carceral optics and the crucible of segregation: Revisiting scenes of state sanctioned violence against incarcerated women. In J. M. Kilty & E. Dej (Eds.), Containing madness: Gender and ‘Psy’ in institutional contexts (pp. 119–144). Palgrave Macmillan.
Law, V. (2012). Resistance behind bars: The struggles of incarcerated women (2nd ed.). PA Press.
Liebling, A. (2001). Whose side are we on? Theory, practice and allegiances in prisons research. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 472–484.
Maier, K., & Ricciardelli, R. (2021). “Prison didn’t change me, I have changed”: Narratives of change, self, and prison time. Criminology & Criminal Justice, July, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958211031336
McGowan, W. (2020). ‘If you didn’t laugh, you’d cry’: Emotional labour, reflexivity and ethics-as-practice in a qualitative fieldwork context (pp. 1–10). Methodological Innovations.
Moran, D. (2015). Carceral geography: Spaces and practices of incarceration. Ashgate.
Moran, R. J., & Asquith, N. L. (2020). Understanding the vicarious trauma and emotional labour of criminological research. Methodological Innovations, May–August, 1–11.
Newbold, G., & Ross, J. I. (2012). Convict criminology at the crossroads: Research note. The Prison Journal, 93(1), 3–10.
Pack, M. (2013). Vicarious traumatisation and resilience: An ecological systems approach to sexual abuse counsellors’ trauma and stress. Sexual Abuse in Australia and New Zealand, 5, 69–76.
Pearlman, L., & Caringi, J. (2009). Living and working self-reflectively to address vicarious trauma. In Courtois, C.A. & Ford, J.D. (Eds.), Treating complex traumatic stress disorders: An evidence-based guide (pp. 202–224). New York: Guildford Press.
Pollack, S. (2019). Transformative praxis with incarcerated women: Collaboration, leadership, & voice. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 35(3), 1–14.
Richards, S. C. (2013). The new school of convict criminology thrives and matures. Critical Criminology, 21, 375–387.
Sampson, H., Bloor, M., & Fincham, B. (2008). A price worth paying? Considering the ‘cost’ of reflexive researchmethods and the influence of feminist ways of ‘doing.’ Sociology (Oxford), 42, 919–933.
Sawatsky, J. (2018). Healing justice: Stories of wisdom and love. Red Canoe Press.
Smith, J. M., & Kinzel, A. (2021). Carceral citizenship as strength: Formerly incarcerated activists, civic engagement and criminal justice transformation. Critical Criminology, 29, 93–110.
Sykes, G. M. (1958/2007). The society of captives. Princeton University Press.
Tietjen, G. (2019). Convict criminology: Learning from the past, confronting the present, expanding for the future. Critical Criminology, 27, 101–114.
van der Kolk, B. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Random House.
Wakeman, S. (2014). Fieldwork, biography and emotion: Doing criminological autoethnography. British Journal of Criminology, 54(5), 705–721. (1–17).
Walby, K., & Coleb, D. (2019). Beyond emotional labour: Emotions and peer support in a Canadian prison. Emotion, Space and Society, 33, 1–7.
Waters, J., Westaby, C., Fowler, A., & Phillips, J. (2020a). Doing criminological research: An emotional labour perspective. In J. Phillips, J. Waters, C. Westaby, & A. Fowler (Eds.), The emotional labour of criminology and criminal justice (pp. 101–124). Routledge.
Waters, J., Westaby, C., Fowler, A., & Phillips, J. (2020b). The emotional labour of doctoral criminological researchers. Methodological Innovations, May–August, 1–12.
Yuen, F. (2011). Embracing emotionality: Clothing my “naked truths”. Critical Criminology, 19, 75–88.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kilty, J.M., Fayter, R. (2023). Trigger Warnings, Feeling Rules and Other Lessons from the Inside: The Emotional Labour of Qualitative Prison Research. In: Faria, R., Dodge, M. (eds) Qualitative Research in Criminology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18401-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18401-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-18400-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-18401-7
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)