Skip to main content

Detecting Ordinary Tax Evaders: The Example of the 1945 National Solidarity Tax in France

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Tax Evasion and Tax Havens since the Nineteenth Century

Abstract

Introduced by the Ordinance of 15 August 1945, the National Solidarity Tax—impôt de solidarité nationale—was the first wealth tax established in France. It consisted of a tax on the assets held by individuals on 4 June 1945, but also of a levy on wealth acquired between 1940 and 1945. More than two million citizens filed declarations that were thoroughly checked by the Administration de l’Enregistrement, which was responsible for this tax. In a context where the extent of tax evasion was denounced by all, and given the financial and moral stakes involved, all possible measures had to be taken to limit tax evasion and detect tax evaders. Indeed, the published statistics show the scale of the controls and adjustments. The originality of this article lies in the fact that it compares the official instructions and the aggregate data with the findings from the wealth tax returns of Parisian taxpayers. This micro-historical approach makes it possible to examine the interactions between controllers and taxpayers and sheds light on the crucial role played by auditors in the fight against tax evasion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There was also a proportional levy on companies and legal persons, which is not included in this study.

  2. 2.

    About 15% of tax households.

  3. 3.

    Before it was abolished in 1969, the Administration de l’Enregistrement, des Domaines et du Timbre was responsible for transfer duties, and in particular inheritance tax, which became progressive in 1901. Hereafter, we will refer to it as the Enregistrement, as contemporaries did.

  4. 4.

    The total amount of ISN collected in 1957, including the levy on companies, was about 130 billion francs. In 1946, 51 billion francs were collected, i.e. 14% of State tax revenues, and 39 billion in 1947 (7%). See: Annuaire (1949) and Statistiques (1952, 16).

  5. 5.

    Bouloc (2018) analyses the work of the auditors and their interactions with the taxpayers after World War I through the files. His study shows the richness of a ground-level approach. Another example is the analysis of the confiscation of illicit profits (Bergère 2008).

  6. 6.

    On tax evasion before 1945 (Delalande 2011, Chapter 12; Tristram 1997; Spire and Weidenfeld 2015, Chapter 1) see also Béatrice Touchelay’s contribution in this book.

  7. 7.

    This argument had served the detractors of the tax. In their eyes, far from being a tool for fiscal justice, the ISN would aggravate the inequalities: the extent of the tax evasion would penalise honest taxpayers.

  8. 8.

    On the 17th of January, the census of gold, foreign currency, and foreign securities kept in France was also ordered.

  9. 9.

    From 1941 onwards, bearer shares had to be deposited in the ‘Caisse centrale de virements des titres’.

  10. 10.

    Small-denomination notes, which were not affected, accounted for only 1.8% of the total currency in circulation.

  11. 11.

    Note du receveur municipal de Villejuif, 22 May 1945, in File Litigation cases conducted by the Special Tax Evasion Control Unit, Centre des archives économiques et financières (CAEF), Savigny-le-Temple, B 0050272.

  12. 12.

    Instruction 45.1177 of 5 June 1945 required stockbrokers, securities brokers, banks and financial institutions to register, after checking, the names and addresses of the persons for whom they sold or had sold securities. The Minister’s office, alerted to the lack of identity checks by financial institutions opening accounts before the start of the banknote exchange period, asked them to strengthen controls on withdrawals. This would make it possible to control purchases of public annuities just before the exchange of notes, which, having not given rise to any income and therefore being recorded on the coupon slips, could have escaped taxation. According to the economist René Courtin, this was a ‘huge hole left in the net, through which many fish, big and small, could pass’ (‘Une lacune de l’impôt de péréquation nationale’, Le Monde, 2 July 1945) .

  13. 13.

    Instruction 45.2515 of 25 October 1945 on tax adjustments.

  14. 14.

    It should be noted that assets with a material basis abroad (real estate, business assets) were not subject to ISN.

  15. 15.

    We also include in this group the bosses of the restaurant and hotel industry.

  16. 16.

    The same was true for proving the seniority of cash owned in 1940.

  17. 17.

    Réponse à l’inspecteur de l’Enregistrement, March 1948, Archives de Paris (AP), Paris, 1600W1139, file 6203.

  18. 18.

    Underlined in red by the controller.

  19. 19.

    Fiche de contrôle, 15 February 1948, AP, 1600W185, file 5885.

  20. 20.

    Réponse à l’inspecteur, op. cit.

  21. 21.

    Fiche de contrôle, 14 May 1947, AP, 1600W48, file 406.

  22. 22.

    Note, 17 October 1954, AP, 1600W68, file 2561.

Bibliography

  • Annuaire statistique abrégé. 1949. Second volume. 1950. Paris: Imprimerie nationale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergère, Marc (ed.). 2008. L’épuration économique en France à la Libération. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pur.4762.

  • Bouloc, François. 2018. Le recouvrement de la contribution sur les bénéfices de guerre. Une tâche de longue haleine pour les services fiscaux. In Une fiscalité de guerre ? Contraintes, Innovations, Résistances, eds. Florence Descamps, and Laure Quennouëlle-Corre. Paris: IGPD. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.igpde.5282.

  • Bulletin de la Direction générale des Impôts - Enregistrement - et du service des Domaines. 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delalande, Nicolas. 2011. Les batailles de l’impôt. Consentement et résistances de 1789 à nos jours. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquet, Christophe. 2012. The International Tax Evasion Market in the Interwar Period. L’économie Politique 54: 95–112. https://doi.org/10.3917/leco.054.0095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guérin, Jean. 1949. L’impôt de solidarité nationale (étude comparée). PhD dissertation, Université de Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guex, Sébastien. 2007. 1932: The Tax Fraud Affair and the Herriot Government. L’économie Politique 33: 89–104. https://doi.org/10.3917/leco.033.0089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hautcoeur, Cyril, and Pierre Sicsic. 1999. Threat of a Capital Levy, Expected Devaluation and Interest Rates in France during the Interwar Period. European Review of Economic History 3: 25–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Instructions générales et circulaires de M. le Directeur général de l’Enregistrement, des domaines et du timbre. 1946. Paris: Imprimerie nationale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Journal officiel de la République française. 1945. Débats de l’Assemblée consultative provisoire: compte rendu in-extenso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mémoires. 2004. Hommes et femmes des Impôts. Récits autobiographiques 1920–1960, I. Paris: CHEFF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabault-Mazières, Isabelle. 2020. La justice fiscale au sortir de la guerre: l’impôt de solidarité nationale de 1945. In La Justice fiscale (Xe-XXIe siècles), ed. Emmanuel De Crouy-Chanel, Cédric Glineur, and Céline Husson-Rochcongar, 257–273. Bruxelles: Bruylant Édition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaufelbuehl, Janick Marina. 2009. La France et la Suisse ou la force du petit. Évasion fiscale, relations commerciales et financières (1940–1954). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spire, Alexis, and Katia Weidenfeld. 2015. L’impunité fiscale. Quand l’État brade sa souveraineté. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistiques et Études financières. 1949/4. Suppléments Statistiques.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistiques et Études financières. 1952/16. Suppléments Statistiques.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tristram, Frédéric. 1997. L’administration fiscale et l’impôt sur le revenu dans l’entre-deux-guerres. In Études et documents, vol. 9, 211–242. Vincennes: CHEFF.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabelle Rabault-Mazières .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rabault-Mazières, I. (2023). Detecting Ordinary Tax Evaders: The Example of the 1945 National Solidarity Tax in France. In: Guex, S., Buclin, H. (eds) Tax Evasion and Tax Havens since the Nineteenth Century. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18119-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18119-1_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-18118-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-18119-1

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics