Skip to main content

Stra2Bis: A Model-Driven Method for Aligning Business Strategy and Business Processes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conceptual Modeling (ER 2022)

Abstract

MDA-based initiatives for software development have included computation-independent models to align information system models with business knowledge which is important in the development process. One source of business knowledge is the business strategy, which, traditionally, has had a long-term perspective; changes in the organisational structure and their high-level ends and means were less frequent and arguably not relevant for software development. However, organisations that aim to accelerate their software development cycles define their business strategy and reconfigure their structure on a short-term, continuous basis, fusing, splitting and creating as independent as possible organisation units. These changes directly affect the business processes and the design of software components of the organisation. Based on this approach to business strategy, we propose Stra2Bis, a method for designing strategically aligned business processes in an MDA-based context. Stra2Bis proposes a business strategy modelling step when redesigning business processes and three transformation guidelines to support the analysis of the alignment of processes with the organisational structure and the measurement of the units’ outcomes. We discussed the effect of the guidelines on the software design with five professionals who supported the proposal’s feasibility and usefulness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://microservices.io/refactoring/.

  2. 2.

    Net Promoter Score, https://hbr.org/2003/12/the-one-number-you-need-to-grow.

  3. 3.

    https://www.hotjar.com/.

References

  1. Amyot, D., et al.: Combining goal modelling with business process modelling. Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Architect. (EMISAJ) 17, 1–2 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atlassian: the spotify model. www.atlassian.com/agile/agile-at-scale/spotify. Accessed 31 May 2021

  3. Bērziša, S., Bravos, G., Gonzalez, T., et al.: Capability driven development: an approach to designing digital enterprises. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 57(1), 15–25 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Conway, M.E.: How do committees invent. Datamation 14(4), 28–31 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Castro, V., Marcos, E., Vara, J.M.: Applying CIM-to-PIM model transformations for the service-oriented development of information systems. Inf. Softw. Technol. 53(1), 87–105 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Doerr, J.: Measure what matters: how google, bono, and the gates foundation rock the world with OKRs. Penguin (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Engelsman, W., Gordijn, J., Haaker, T., van Sinderen, M., Wieringa, R.: Quantitative alignment of enterprise architectures with the business model. In: Ghose, A., Horkoff, J., Silva Souza, V.E., Parsons, J., Evermann, J. (eds.) ER 2021. LNCS, vol. 13011, pp. 189–198. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89022-3_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. España, S., González, A., Pastor, Ó.: Communication analysis: a requirements engineering method for information systems. In: van Eck, P., Gordijn, J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) CAiSE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5565, pp. 530–545. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02144-2_41

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. España, S.: Methodological integration of communication analysis into a model-driven software development framework, Ph. D. thesis, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Evans, E., Evans, E.J.: Domain-driven design: tackling complexity in the heart of software. Addison-Wesley Professional (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Forsgren, N., Humbpotifle, J., Kim, G.: Accelerate: the science of lean software and devops building and scaling high performing technology organizations. IT Revolution Press (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gröner, G., Asadi, M., Mohabbati, B., Gašević, D., Bošković, M., Parreiras, F.S.: Validation of user intentions in process orchestration and choreography. Inf. Syst. 43, 83–99 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guizzardi, R., Reis, A.N.: A method to align goals and business processes. In: Johannesson, P., Lee, M.L., Liddle, S.W., Opdahl, A.L., López, Ó.P. (eds.) ER 2015. LNCS, vol. 9381, pp. 79–93. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25264-3_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Habba, M., Fredj, M., Benabdellah Chaouni, S.: Alignment between business requirement, business process, and software system: a systematic literature review. J. Eng. 2019, 6918105 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Henderson-Sellers, B., Ralyté, J., Ågerfalk, P.J., Rossi, M.: Situational method engineering, 1st Edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41467-1

  16. Highsmith, J., Luu, L., Robinson, D.: EDGE: value-driven digital transformation. Addison-Wesley Professional (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Insfrán, E., Abrahão, S., de Oliveira, R.P., González-Ladrón-de Guevara, F., Fernández-Diego, M., Cano-Genoves, C.: Specifying value in GRL for guiding BPMN activities prioritization. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems Development (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kontio, J., Lehtola, L., Bragge, J.: Using the focus group method in software engineering: obtaining practitioner and user experiences. In: Proceedings of the 2004 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kraiem, N., Kaffela, H., Dimassi, J., Al Khanjari, Z.: Mapping from map models to BPMN processes. J. Soft. Eng. 8(4), 252–264 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Larman, C., Vodde, B.: Large-scale scrum: more with LeSS. Addison-Wesley Professional (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mintzberg, H.: The strategy concept i: five PS for strategy. Calif. Manage. Rev. 30(1), 11–24 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nagel, B., Gerth, C., Engels, G., Post, J.: Ensuring consistency among business goals and business process models. In: 2013 17th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pp. 17–26. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Noel, R., Panach Navarrete, J.I., Ruiz, M., Pastor Lopez, O.: The LiteStrat method: towards strategic model-driven development. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems Development (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  24. von Rosing, M., White, S., Cummins, F., de Man, H.: Business process model and notation-BPMN(2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ruiz, M., Costal, D., España, S., Franch, X., Pastor, O.: GoBIS: an integrated framework to analyse the goal and business process perspectives in information systems. Inf. Syst. 53, 330–345 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Scaled Agile, INC: Safe 5 for lean enterprises. www.scaledagileframework.com/. Accessed 10 Apr 2021

  27. Sousa, H.P., do Prado Leite, J.C.S.: Modeling organizational alignment. In: Yu, E., Dobbie, G., Jarke, M., Purao, S. (eds.) ER 2014. LNCS, vol. 8824, pp. 407–414. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12206-9_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. The Object Management Group: Model driven architecture (MDA). www.omg.org/mda/. Accessed 14 Apr 2021

  29. The object management group: business motivation model specification version 1.3 (2015). www.omg.org/spec/BMM/About-BMM/

  30. The Open Group: Archimate®2.1 specification - motivation extension. https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/archimate2-doc/chap10.html. Accessed 09 Nov 2020

  31. de la Vara, J.L., Sánchez, J., Pastor, Ó.: Business process modelling and purpose analysis for requirements analysis of information systems. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 213–227. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69534-9_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Yu, E., Strohmaier, M., Deng, X.: Exploring intentional modeling and analysis for enterprise architecture. In: 2006 10th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW2006), p. 32. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zimmermann, O.: Microservices tenets. Comput. Sci. Res. Dev. 32(3), 301–310 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has the financial support of the Spanish State Research Agency and the Generalitat Valenciana under the projects PID2021-123824OB-I00 and PDC2021-121243-I00 funded by MICIN/ AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033, INNEST/ 2021/57 and GV/ 2021/072, co-financed with ERDF and the European Union NextGenerationEU/PRTR, and the National Agency for Research and Development (ANID)/ Scholarship Program/ Doctorado Becas Chile/2020–72210494. Special thanks to Claudia Negri for her advice on the design of the focus group.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rene Noel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Noel, R., Panach, J.I., Ruiz, M., Pastor, O. (2022). Stra2Bis: A Model-Driven Method for Aligning Business Strategy and Business Processes. In: Ralyté, J., Chakravarthy, S., Mohania, M., Jeusfeld, M.A., Karlapalem, K. (eds) Conceptual Modeling. ER 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13607. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17995-2_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17995-2_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17994-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17995-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics