Abstract
The events across society and business influenced by COVID-19 demonstrate that we live in a volatile and uncertain world. Whether events are shaped by the pandemic or other crises, digitalization, political instability, economic downturns, and a globally stretched healthcare system, each requires significant knowledge of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) to solve problems. In the face of unprecedented challenges and opportunities, there is a dissolution of the traditional silos within the technical and scientific disciplines, and further between scientific knowledge and transferable skills such as creativity, innovation and problem solving. Thus, learning for and in STEM will need to go beyond mere transmission of knowledge within STEM disciplines to the possession of transferable skills of creativity, ingenuity, and the ability to work collaboratively. A realistic understanding of the broader business, social and ethical contexts within STEM will be required. Our findings propose an Entre-STEM unifying framework for use by a range of STEM stakeholders ranging from educational institutions, policy makers, educators, and funding agencies as it provides a common baseline to work from and enables more consistency in guiding programme design, implementation and evaluation. We suggest that Entre-STEM is a means of achieving this, delivering on the correct mix of technical knowledge in an applied context-relevant manner.
Graphical Abstract
Don't let anyone rob you of your imagination, your creativity, or your curiosity. It's your place in the world; it's your life. Go on and do all you can with it and make it the life you want to live.
Mae Jemison, first African American woman astronaut in space
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
European Commission, Horizon (2020). https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020. Accessed July 2021
Taylor PH (2020) Science education: a societal imperative. Clear House J Educ Strateg Iss Ideas 93(3):281–285
Science Foundation Ireland (2020) Shaping our future, delivering for today preparing for tomorrow science foundation strategy 2025. Government Publications, Dublin
Caprile M, Palmen R, Sanz P, Dente G (2015) Encouraging STEM studies: labour market situation and comparison of practices targeted at young people in different member states. European Parliament: Policy Department. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/542199/IPOL_STU(2015)542199_EN.pdf
Zilberman A, Ice L (2019) Beyond the numbers. US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Jan 2021, vol 10, no 1, pp 1–10. https://stats.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-10/pdf/why-computer-occupations-are-behind-strong-stem-employment-growth.pdf
Zilberman A, Ice L (2021) Beyond the rumbles, why computer occupations are behind strong STEM employment growth in the 2019–29-decade, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, vol 10, no 1. https://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-10/why-computer-occupations-are-behind-strong-stem-employment-growth.htm
Beede DN, Julian TA, Langdon D, McKittrick G, Khan B, Doms ME (2011) Women in STEM: a gender gap to innovation. Economics and Statistics Administration Issue Brief No. 4–11
Legewie J, DiPrete TA (2014) The high school environment and the gender gap in science and engineering. Sociol Educ 87(4):259–280
Wang MT, Degol JL (2017) Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educ Psychol Rev 29(1):119–140
Kuschel K, Ettl K, Díaz-García C, Alsos AG (2020) Stemming the gender gap in STEM entrepreneurship—insights into women’s entrepreneurship in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Int Entrep Manag 16:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00642-5
Hyde JS, Mertz JE (2009) Gender, culture and mathematics performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(22):8801–8807
Polman JL, Miller D (2010) Changing stories: trajectories of identification among African American youth in a science outreach apprenticeship. Am Educ Res J 47(4):879–918. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210367513
Martin-Paez T, Aguilera D, Perales- Palacios FJ, Vilchez-Gonzalez JM (2019) What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A review of literature. Sci Educ 103(4):799–822
Higher Education Authority (2021) Student Enrollment Data Ireland. https://hea.ie/statistics/
Orser B, Riding A, Stanley J (2012) Perceived career challenges and response strategies of women in the advanced technology sector. Entrep Reg Dev 24(1/2):73–93
Pringle RM, Dawson K, Ritzhaupt AD (2015) Integrating science and technology: using technological pedagogical content knowledge as a framework to study the practices of science teachers. J Sci Educ Technol 24(5):648–662
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2018) Graduate STEM education for the 21st century. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/25038
Carlisle DL, Weaver GC (2018) STEM education centers: catalyzing the improvement of undergraduate STEM education. Int J STEM Educ 5:47
Fan S, Ritz J (2014) International views of STEM education. In: PATT-28 research into technological and engineering literacy core connections. International Technology and Engineering Educators Association, Orlando, pp 7–14. Retrieved from http://www.iteea.org/Conference/PATT/PATT28/Fan%20Ritz.pdf
Prasad R, Wicklow B, Traynor C (2018) Practical problem-based learning: an interdisciplinary approach. In: IEEE integrated STEM education conference (ISEC), 2018, pp 258–261. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISECon.2018.8340496
Moore TJ, Stohlmann MS, Wang HH, Tank KM, Roehrig GH (2014) Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In: Strobel J, Purzer S, Cardella M (eds) Engineering in precollege settings: research into practice. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, pp 35–60
Eltanahya M, Forawia S, Mansour N (2020) Incorporating entrepreneurial practices into STEM education: development of interdisciplinary E-STEM model in high school in the United Arab Emirates. Thinking Skills Creat 37:100697
Shaer S, Zakzak L, Shibl E (2019) THE STEAM dilemma advancing sciences in UAE schools—the case of Dubai. Mohammed Bin Rashid School of Government (MBRSG), Dubai. Retrieved from: https://www.mbrsg.ae/getattachment/174c88b2-e633-4dc9-9f9a-a473f6c91892/The-STEAM-Dilemma-Advancing-Sciences-inUAE-School
Zollman A (2012) Learning for STEM literacy: STEM literacy for learning. Sch Sci Math 112(1):12–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2012.00101.x
Sanders M (2009) STEM, STEM education, STEMAnia. Technol Teach 68(4):20–27
Bybee RW (2013) The case for STEM education: challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press, Arlington, VA
Baran E, Bilici C, Mesutoglu SC, Ocak C (2016) Moving STEM beyond schools: students’ perceptions about an out‐ of‐school STEM education program. Int J Educ Math Sci Technol 4(1):9–19. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.71338
NCGE (2008) Developing entrepreneurial graduates, putting entrepreneurship at the centre of higher education
Liu CH (2010) To promote university’s students’ entrepreneurial competence with academic capital. Expl Educ Dev 21:19–29
Jones C, Matlay H (2011) Understanding the heterogeneity of entrepreneurship education: going beyond Gartner. Education + Training 53(8/9):692–703. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911111185026
Gibb A (2010) Towards the entrepreneurial university: enterprise education as a lever for change. In: Presenting and shaping the environment for graduate entrepreneurship in higher education, National Council for Graduate Entrepreneurship (NCGE) report, National Council for-Graduate Entrepreneurship, Coventry
Shi Y (2013) Research on ten-year development of Chinese entrepreneurship education in higher education institutions. China Higher Educa Res 4:69–73
Hindle K (2007) Teaching entrepreneurship at university: from the wrong building to the right philosophy. In Fayolle A (ed) Handbook of research in entrepreneurship education, pp 104–126
Hynes B, Richardson I (2007) Creating an entrepreneurial mindset: getting the process right for information and communication technology students. In: Lowry, G (ed) Information systems and technology education: from the university to the workplace (Chapter V1)
Cooney T, Murray T (2008) Entrepreneurship education in the third-level sector in Ireland. Institute of Minority Entrepreneurship Report, Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin
Blackburn R, Kovalainen A (2009) Research small firms and entrepreneurship: past, present and future. Int J Manag Rev 11:127–148
Nelson AJ, Byers T (2010) Challenges in university technology transfer and the promising role of entrepreneurship education. Kauffman: Emerging Scholars Initiatives
Byers T, Seelig T, Sheppard S, Weilerstein P (2013) Entrepreneurship: its role in engineering education. Notational Academy of Engineering. Available at: http://www.nae.edu/File.aspx?id=83149
Warhuus JP, Basaiawmoit RV (2013) Nordic science and technology entrepreneurship education: comparing, contrasting, and measuring. In: ISBE conference proceedings, Dublin
Warren L (2004) A systemic approach to entrepreneurial learning: an exploration using storytelling. Syst Res Behav Sci 21(1):3–16
MacPherson M (2009) Entrepreneurial learning: secret ingredients for business success. Train Dev
Rae D (2009) Connecting entrepreneurial learning and action learning in student-initiated new business ventures: the case of SPEED. Action Learn: Res Pract 6(3):289–303
Hynes B, Kennedy N, Pettigrew J (2016) The role of business schools in framing entrepreneurial thinking across disciplines—the case of allied health professions. In: Daly P, Reid K, Buckley P (eds) Innovative business education design for 21st century learning. Advances in business education and training, vol 7. Springer, pp 75–91
Kolb D (2005) Learning styles and learning spaces: enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Acad Manag Learn Educ 4(2):193–212
Brennan L (2005) Integrating work-based learning into higher education: a guide to good practice. A report by the University Vocational Awards Council. University of Bolton, Bolton, MA
Burns G, Chisholm C (2005) Graduate to professional engineer in a knowledge organisation—does the undergraduate curriculum provide the basic skills? Glob J Eng Educ 9(1):89–96
Starkey K, Tempest S (2008) A clear sense of purpose: the evolving role of the business school. J Manag Dev 27(4):379–390
Huggins R, Jones M, Upton S (2008) Universities as drivers of knowledge-based regional development: a triple helix analysis of Wales. Int J Innov Reg Dev 1(1):24–47
Haase H, Lautenschläger A (2011) The ‘“teachability dilemma”’ of entrepreneurship. Int Entrep Manag J 7(2):145–162
O’Dwyer M, Costin Y, Hynes B (2019) Explicit and tacit knowledge transfer in entrepreneurial education: the method approach. In: Fayolle A, Kariv D, Matlay H (eds) The role and impact of entrepreneurship education. Edward Elgar, London, pp 87–103
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Additional information
Authors’ Quote: There are many paths which lead to the one end-goal—a creative and entrepreneurial mindset is a crucial navigating compass to arriving at your best end goal.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hynes, B., Costin, Y., Richardson, I. (2023). Educating for STEM: Developing Entrepreneurial Thinking in STEM (Entre-STEM). In: Kaya-Capocci, S., Peters-Burton, E. (eds) Enhancing Entrepreneurial Mindsets Through STEM Education. Integrated Science, vol 15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17816-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17816-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17815-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17816-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)