Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Resilient Flood Recovery—Financial Schemes for the Recovery–Mitigation Nexus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Homeowners and the Resilient City

Abstract

Substantial public and private resources have been devoted to recover from floods (through building and infrastructure reconstructions) pursuing the solidarity principle. However, particular flood recovery schemes have not been used strategically to prevent future damages. The prevention and recovery phases seem to be in many ways disconnected. That is why financial mechanisms applied during recovery phase often increase the vulnerability of areas at risk (due to their abrupt redevelopment). Contrarily, efficient flood relief can stimulate adaptation throughout the catchment and support (rather than undermine) other types of flood resilience measures. The aim of the section is to explore the understanding of these interconnections and to discuss what types of financial flood recovery schemes can contribute to increase urban resilience in the long run.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akbar, P. S., & Aldrich, D. P. (2018). Social capital’s role in recovery: Evidence from communities affected by the 2010 Pakistan floods. Disasters, 42(3), 475–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albright, E. A., & Crow, D. A. (2015). Learning processes, public and stakeholder engagement: Analyzing responses to Colorado’s extreme flood events of 2013. Urban Climate, 14(Part 1), 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arceneaux, K., & Stein, R. M. (2006). Who is held responsible when disaster strikes? The attribution of responsibility for a natural disaster in an urban election. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(1), 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arlikatti, S., Maghelal, P., Agnimitra, N., & Chatterjee, V. (2018). Should I stay or should I go? Mitigation strategies for flash flooding in India. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 27, 48–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artur, L., & Hilhorst, D. (2014). Floods, resettlement and land access and use in the lower Zambezi, Mozambique. Land Use Policy, 36, 361–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bang, H. N., & Few, R. (2012). Social risks and challenges in post-disaster resettlement: The case of Lake Nyos. Cameroon. Journal of Risk Research, 15(9), 1141–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodet, M. A., Thomas, M., & Tessier, C. (2016). Come hell or high water: An investigation of the effects of a natural disaster on a local election. Electoral Studies, 43, 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brent, J., Boronyak-Vasco, L., Moyle, K., & Leith, P. (2016). Ensuring resilience of natural resources under exposure to extreme climate events. Resources, 5(2), 20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, S. D., Zahran, S., Highfield, W. E., Bernhardt, S. P., & Vedlitz, A. (2009). Policy learning from flood mitigation: A longitudinal assessment of the community rating system in Florida. Risk Analysis, 29(6), 912–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundiers, K., & Hallie, C. E. (2018). Leveraging post-disaster windows of opportunities for change towards sustainability: A framework. Sustainability, 10(5), 1390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruneau, M., Chang, S. E., Eguchi, R. T., Lee, G. C., O’Rourke, T. D., Reinhorn, A. M., Shinozuka, M., Tierney, K., Wallace, W. A., & von Winterfeldt, D. (2003). A Framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra, 19(4), 733–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco, S., Ochiai, C., & Okazaki, K. (2016). Disaster induced resettlement: Multi-stakeholder interactions and decision making following tropical storm Washi in Cagayan de Oro, Philippines. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 218, 35–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clar, C., Löschner, L., Nordbeck, R., Fischer, T., & Thaler, T. (2021). Population dynamics and natural hazard risk management: Conceptual and practical linkages for the case of Austrian policy making. Natural Hazards, 105(2), 1765–1796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, F., Jenkins, K., & Surminski, S. (2018). Strengthening insurance partnerships in the face of climate change – Insights from an agent-based model of flood insurance in the UK. Science of the Total Environment, 636, 192–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, D., Jouannic, G., Minh, C.T. D., Kolli, Z., Matagne, E., & Arbizzi, S. (2016). Post-disaster recovery: a window of opportunity to reduce the territorial vulnerability? Espaces-Populations-Societes, 3. http://journals.openedition.org/eps/7033

  • Dai, W., Chen, L., Tan, H., Wang, J., Lai, Z., Kaminga, A. C., Li, Y., & Liu, A. (2016). Association between social support and recovery from post-traumatic stress disorder after flood: A 13–14 year follow-up study in Hunan. China. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. (2016). Economic analysis of the costs of flooding. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 41(3/4), 204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davy, B. (1997). Essential injustice: When legal institutions cannot resolve environmental and land use disputes. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Disse, M., Johnson, T. G., Leandro, J., & Hartman, T. (2020). Exploring the relation between flood risk management and flood resilience. Water Security, 9, 100059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drennan, L., McGowan, J., & Tiernan, A. (2016). Integrating recovery within a resilience framework: Empirical insights and policy implications from regional Australia. Politics and Governance, 4(4), 74–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fekete, A., Hartmann, T., & Jüpner, R. (2020). Resilience: On-going wave or subsiding trend in flood risk research and practice? Wires Water, 7(1), e1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, J., Elmore, R., Godschalk, D., & Rohe, W. (2003). Implementing floodplain land acquisition programs in urban localities. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, T. (2010). Reframing polyrational floodplains: Land policy for large areas for temporary emergency retention. Nature & Culture, 5(1), 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, T. (2011a). Clumsy floodplains: Responsive land policy for extreme floods. Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, T. (2011b). Contesting land policies for space for rivers – rational, viable, and clumsy floodplain management. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 4(3), 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, T. (2018). Ethik in der Raumplanung. In ARL Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung (Eds.), Handwörterbuch der Stadt- und Raumentwicklung (pp. 571–575). ARL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, T., & Jüpner, R. (2014). The flood risk management plan: An essential step towards the institutionalization of a paradigm shift. International Journal of Water Governance, 2(2), 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, T., van Doorn-Hoekveld, W., van Rijswick, M., & Spit, T. (2019). Editorial. Water International, 44(5), 489–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heersink, B., Jenkins, J. A., & Peterson, B. D. (2017). Disasters and elections: Estimating the net effect of damage and relief in historical perspective. Political Analysis, 25(2), 260–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-González, Y., Ceddia, M. G., Zepharovich, E., & Christopoulos, D. (2016). Prescriptive conflict prevention analysis: An application to the 2021 update of the Austrian flood risk management plan. Environmental Science & Policy, 66, 299–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, P., Botzen, W. J. W., Feyen, L., & Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2016). Analysis: Incentivizing flood risk adaptation through risk based insurance premiums: Trade-offs between affordability and risk reduction. Ecological Economics, 125, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, P., De Ruig, L. T., de Ruiter, M. C., Kuik, O. J., Botzen, W. J. W., Le Den, X., Persson, M., Benoist, A., & Nielsen, C. N. (2020). An assessment of best practices of extreme weather insurance and directions for a more resilient society. Environmental Hazards, 19(3), 301–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, J. C., Franco, G., Rio, C. R., & Khazai, B. (2006). Post-disaster recovery dilemmas: Challenges in balancing short-term and long-term needs for vulnerability reduction. Environmental Science and Policy, 9, 607–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jingyuan, L., & Landry, C. E. (2018). Flood risk, local hazard mitigation, and the community rating system of the national flood insurance program. Land Economics, 94(2), 175–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joakim, E. (2011). Post-disaster recovery and vulnerability. https://www.crhnet.ca/sites/default/files/library/Joakim.pdf

  • Kammerbauer, M., & Wamsler, C. (2017). Social inequality and marginalization in post-disaster recovery: Challenging the consensus? International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 24, 411–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapucu, N., Van Wart, M., Sylves, R., & Yuldashev, F. (2011). U.S. presidents and their roles in emergency management and disaster policy 1950‐2009. Risk, Hazards and Crisis in Public Policy, 2(3), 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kita, S. M. (2017). Urban vulnerability, disaster risk reduction and resettlement in Mzuzu city, Malawi. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 22, 158–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlicke, C., Seebauer, S., Hudson, P., Begg, C., Bubeck, P., Dittme, C., Grothmann, T., Heidenreich, A., Kreibich, H., Lorenz, D. F., Masson, T., Reiter, J., Thaler, T., Thieken, A. H., & Bamberg, S. (2020). The behavioral turn in flood risk management, its assumptions and potential implications. Wires Water, 7(3), e1418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, H., & Kleindorfer, P. R. (1999). The complementary roles of mitigation and insurance in managing catastrophic risks. Risk Analysis, 19(4), 727–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, K.-H. (2012). A theory on urban resilience to floods: A basis for alternative planning practices. Ecology and Society, 17(4), 48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, K.-H., Le, T. A., & Van Nguyen, K. (2016). Urban design principles for flood resilience: Learning from the ecological wisdom of living with floods in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. Landscape and Urban Planning, 155, 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, A. Y., Xu, B., Chan, F. K., & Su, R. (2015). Social capital and community preparation for urban flooding in China. Applied Geography, 64, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medd, W., Deeming, H., Walker, G., Whittle, R., Mort, M., Twigger-Ross, C., Walker, M., Watson, N., & Kashefi, E. (2015). The flood recovery gap: A real-time study of local recovery following the floods of June 2007 in Hull, North East England. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 8(4), 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mileti, D. (1999). Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moatty, A., & Vinet, F. (2016). Post-disaster recovery: The challenge of anticipation. In E3S web of conferences 7/17003. Third European conference on flood risk management (FLOODrisk 2016). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160717003

  • Mohd, R., Abu Bakar, N., Hassan, S., & Hussain, A. H. (2017). Sustainable post-disaster recovery plan for flood victims in Gua Musang and Kuala Krai, Kelantan. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 25, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J., Flannery, W., & Revez, A. (2017). Discourse and practice of participatory flood risk management in Belfast, UK. Land Use Policy, 63, 408–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mort, M., Walker, M., Williams, A. L., & Bingley, A. (2018). From victims to actors: The role of children and young people in flood recovery and resilience. Environmental and Planning C—Politics and Space, 36(3), 423–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, C. E., & Tate, E. (2016). Unequal recovery? Federal resource distribution after a Midwest Flood disaster. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(5), E507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newig, J., Challies, E., Jager, N., & Kochskämper, E. (2014). What role for public participation in implementing the EU Floods Directive? A comparison with the Water Framework Directive, early evidence from Germany and a research agenda. Environmental Policy & Governance, 24(4), 275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olshansky, R.B., Johnson, L.A. (2014). The evolution of the federal role in supporting community recovery after U.S. disasters. Journal of the American Planning Association, 80(4), 293–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, C. (2018). How can governments enable and support community-led disaster recovery? Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 33(1), 66–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pathak, S., & Emah, I. E. (2017). Gendered approach towards disaster recovery: Experiences from 2011 floods in Pathumthani province, Thailand. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 24, 129–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, W. G., Van Zandt, S., Zhang, Y., & Highfield, W. E. (2015). Inequities in long-term housing recovery after disasters. Journal of the American Planning Association, 80(4), 356–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platt, S. (2017). Factors affecting the speed and quality of post disaster recovery and resilience. In: R. Rupakhety and S. Olafsson (Eds.), Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics in memory of Prof. Ragnar Sigbjörnsson: selected topics. Geotechnical, geological and earthquake engineering (pp. 369–403). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest, J. S., Penning-Rowsell, E. C., & Suykens, C. (2016). Promoting adaptive flood risk management: the role and potential of flood recovery mechanisms. In E3S web of conferences 7/17005. https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2016/02/e3sconf_flood2016_17005.pdf

  • PSC [Public Safety Canada]. (2011). Public safety Canada 2011–2012 (Final report). Public Safety Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raschky, P. A., Schwarze, R., Schwindt, M., & Zahn, F. (2013). Uncertainty of governmental relief and the crowding out of flood insurance. Environmental and Resources Economics, 54, 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rateau, M. R. (2017). An analysis of stories from those who have encountered catastrophic loss from flood. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 31, 561–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rufat, S., Fekete, A., Armas, I., Hartmann, T., Kuhlicke, C., Prior, T., Thaler, T., & Wisner, B. (2020). Swimming alone? Why linking flood risk perception and behavior requires more than “it’s the individual, stupid.” Wires Water, 7(5), e1462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumbach, A., Makarewicz, C., & Németh, J. (2016). The importance of place in early disaster recovery: A case study of the 2013 Colorado floods. Journal of Environmental Planning & Management, 59(11), 2045–2063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandink, D. (2015). Insurance issues in Atlantic Canada /, Canadian Electronic Library. Fredericton, New Brunswick. Retrieved from https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1229690/insurance-issues-in-atlantic-canada/1782761/ on 19 Oct 2022. CID: 20.500.12592/79smn0.

  • Sandink, D., Kovacs, P., Oulahen, G., & Shrubsole, D. (2016). Public relief and insurance for residential flood losses in Canada: Current status and commentary. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 41(3/4), 220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapri, M., S& iti, A. R. M. (2016). Asset management recovery after the disaster: State of knowledge. MATEC Web of Conferences, 66, 00067. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20166600067

  • Slavikova, L. (2018). Effects of government flood expenditures: The problem of crowding-out. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 11(1), 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavíková, L., & Hartmann, T. (2018). How private land matters in flood risk management. IWRA Policy Brief. http://www.land4flood.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/policy_brief_WEB.pdf

  • Slavíková, L., Hartmann, T., & Thaler, T. (2020a). Financial schemes for resilient flood recovery. Environmental Hazards, 19(3), 223–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavíková, L., Raska, P., Banaski, K., Barta, M., Kis, A., Kohnova, S., Matczak, P., & Szolgay, J. (2020b). Approaches to state flood recovery funding in Visegrad Group Countries. Environmental Hazards, 19(3), 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavíková, L., Hartmann, T., & Thaler, T. (2021). Paradoxes of financial schemes for resilient flood recovery of households. Wires Water, 8(2), e1497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavikova, L., Raska, P., & Kopacek, M. (2019). Mayors and “their” land: Revealing approaches to flood risk management in small municipalities. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 12(3), e12474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. P., & Wenger, D. (2007). Sustainable disaster recovery: Operationalizing an existing agenda. In Handbook of disaster research (pp. 234–257). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snel, K. A. W., Witte, P. A., Hartmann, T., & Geertman, S. C. M. (2020). The shifting position of homeowners in flood resilience: From recipients to key-stakeholders. Wires Water, 7(4), e1451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sridarran, P., Keraminiyage, K., & Amaratunga, D. (2018). Enablers and barriers of adapting post-disaster resettlements. Procedia Engineering, 212, 125–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storr, V., Haeffele-Balch, S., & Grube, L. (2017). Social capital and social learning after Hurricane Sandy. Review of Austrian Economics, 30(4), 447–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surminski, S., Aerts, J. C. J. H., Botzen, W. J. W., Hudson, P., Mysiak, J., & Pérez-Blanco, C. D. (2015). Reflections on the current debate on how to link flood insurance and disaster risk reduction in the European Union. Natural Hazards, 79, 1451–1479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suykens, C., Priest, S. J., van Doorn-Hoekveld, W. J., Thuillier, T., & van Rijswick, M. (2016). Dealing with flood damages: Will prevention, mitigation, and ex post compensation provide for a resilient triangle? Ecology and Society, 21(4), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suykens, C. B. R., Tarlock, D., Priest, J. S., Doorn-Hoekveld, W. J., & van Rijswick, H. F. M. W. (2019). Sticks and carrots for reducing property-level risks from floods: An EU–US comparative perspective. Water International, 44(5), 622–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takim, R., Mohammad, M. F., & Nawawi, A. H. (2018). Malaysian entrepreneurship through ‘building back better’ (BBB) agenda in the redevelopment of Banda Aceh. In Procedia engineering, 212 (7th international conference on building resilience: Using scientific knowledge to inform policy and practice in disaster risk reduction (pp. 324–331).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate, E., Strong, A., Kraus, T., & Xiong, H. (2016). Flood recovery and property acquisition in Cedar Rapids. Iowa. Natural Hazards, 80(3), 2055–2079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, T., & Fuchs, S. (2020). Financial recovery schemes in Austria: How planned relocation is used as an answer to future flood events. Environmental Hazards, 19(3), 268–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, T., & Levin-Keitel, M. (2016). Multi-level stakeholder engagement in flood risk management: A question of roles and power: Lessons from England. Environmental Science & Policy, 55, 292–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, T., & Priest, S. (2014). Partnership funding in flood risk management: New localism debate and policy in England. Area, 46(4), 418–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, T., & Hartmann, T. (2016). Justice and flood risk management: Reflecting on different approaches to distribute and allocate flood risk management in Europe. Natural Hazards, 83(1), 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, T., Doorn, N., & Hartmann, T. (2020). Justice of compensation for spatial flood risk management – comparing the flexible Austrian and the structured Dutch approach. DIE ERDE – Journal of the Geographical Society of Berlin, 151(2–3), 104–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomalla, F., Lebel, L., Boyland, M., Marks, D., Kimkong, H., Tan, S. B., & Nugroho, A. (2018). Long-term recovery narratives following major disasters in Southeast Asia. Regional Environmental Change, 18(4), 1211–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. S. K., Phillips, B. D., Lovekamp, W. E., & Fothergill, A. (2013). Social vulnerability to disasters (2nd ed.). CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trimboli, J. (2018). Floodproofing methods that work in West Virginia. https://www.slideshare.net/BZjoe/floodproofing-methods-that-work-in-west-virginia

  • Walters, P. (2015). The problem of community resilience in two flooded cities: Dhaka 1998 and Brisbane 2011. Habitat International, 50, 51–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehn, U., Rusca, M., Evers, J., & Lanfranchi, V. (2015). Participation in flood risk management and the potential of citizen observatories: A governance analysis. Environmental Science & Policy, 48, 225–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I. (2004). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters (2nd ed.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yila, O., Weber, E., & Neef, A. (2013). The role of social capital in post-flood response and recovery among downstream communities of the Ba River, Western Viti Levu, Fiji Islands. In A. Neef & R. Shaw (Eds.), Risk and conflicts: Local responses to natural disasters (pp. 79–107). Emerald Group Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zavar, E., & Hagelman III, R. R. (2016). Land use change on U.S. floodplain buyout sites, 1990–2000. Disaster Prevention & Management, 25(3), 360–374.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Social and Economic Studies, Jan Evangelista Purkyně University, Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic

    Lenka Slavíková

  2. Department of Spatial Planning, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany

    Thomas Hartmann

Authors
  1. Lenka Slavíková
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Hartmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lenka Slavíková .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Mountain Risk Engineering, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria

    Thomas Thaler

  2. Department of Spatial Planning, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany

    Thomas Hartmann

  3. JEP University Usti and Labem, Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic

    Lenka Slavíková

  4. Land Use Planning Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Barbara Tempels

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Slavíková, L., Hartmann, T. (2022). Resilient Flood Recovery—Financial Schemes for the Recovery–Mitigation Nexus. In: Thaler, T., Hartmann, T., Slavíková, L., Tempels, B. (eds) Homeowners and the Resilient City. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17763-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17763-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17762-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17763-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation