Skip to main content

Constraint Modeling for Forest Management

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Dynamic Control and Optimization (DCO 2021)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 407))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Forest management is an activity of prime economic and ecological importance. Managed forest areas can span very large regions and their proper management is paramount to an effective development, in terms both of economic and natural resources planning. A managed activity consists of individual and mutually independent policy choices which apply to distinct patches of land—named stands—which, as a whole, make up the forest area. A forest management plan typically spans a period of time on the order of a century and is normally geared towards the optimisation of economic or environmental metrics (e.g. total wood yield.) In this article we present a method which uses a declarative programming approach to formalise and solve a long-term forest management problem. We do so based on a freely available state-of-the-art constraint programming system, which we extend to naturally express concepts related to the core problem and efficiently compute solutions thereto.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that both the management unit identifiers and the prescription identifiers are remapped from the original external arbitrary string representation, which is more complicated than what we have here.

References

  1. Rossi, F., van Beek, P., Walsh, T. (eds.) Handbook of Constraint Programming, volume 2 of Foundations of Artificial Intelligence. Elsevier (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Krzysztof, R.: Apt. Principles of Constraint Programming. Cambridge University Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Machado, R., Abreu, S., Diaz, D.: Parallel performance of declarative programming using a PGAS model. In: Sagonas, K (ed.) Practical Aspects of Declarative Languages - 15th International Symposium, PADL 2013. Rome, Italy. Proceedings, volume 7752 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 244–260. Springer, Berlin (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bettinger, P., Boston, K., Siry, J., Grebner, D.; Spatial restrictions and considerations in forest planning. In: Forest Management and Planning, pp. 249–267. Academic (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gharbi, C., Ronnqvist, M., Beaudoin, D., Carle, M.-A.: A new mixed-integer programming model for spatial forest planning. Can. J. For. Res. 49, 1493–1503 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gunn, E., Richards, E.: Solving the adjacency problem with stand-centered constraints. Can. J. For. Res. 35, 832–842 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hof, J., Joyce, L.: a mixed integer linear programming approach for spatially optimizing wildlife and timber in managed forest ecosystems. Forest Sci. 39, 816–834 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. McDill, M.E., Rebain, S., Braze, M.E., McDill, J., Braze, J.: Harvest scheduling with area-based adjacency constraints. Forest Sci. 48(4), 631–642 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Murray, A.: Spatial restrictions in harvest scheduling. Forest Sci. 45(1), 45–52 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goycoolea, M., Murray, A., Vielma, J.P., Weintraub, A.: Evaluating approaches for solving the area restriction model in harvest scheduling. Forest Sci. 55(2), 149–165 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baskent, E.Z., Keles, S.: Spatial forest planning: a review. Ecol. Model. 188, 145–173 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Constantino, M., Martins, I., Borges, J.G.: A new mixed-integer programming model for harvest scheduling subject to maximum area restrictions. Oper. Res. 56(3), 542–551 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. McDill, M.E., Braze, J.: Using the branch and bound algorithm to solve forest planning problems with adjacency constraints. Forest Sci. 47(3), 403–418 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boston, K., Bettinger, P.: An analysis of monte carlo integer programming, simulated annealing, and tabu search heuristics for solving spatial harvest scheduling problems. Forest Sci. 45(2), 292–301 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Borges, P., Eid, T., Bergseng, E.: Applying simulated annealing using different methods for the neighborhood search in forest planning problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 233(3), 700–710 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Boston, K., Bettinger, P.: Combining tabu search and genetic algorithm heuristic techniques to solve spatial harvest scheduling problems. Forest Sci. 48(1), 35–46 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Borges, J.G., Hoganson, H.M., Rose, D.W.: Combining a decomposition strategy with dynamic programming to solve the spatially constrained forest management scheduling problem. Forest Sci. 45(1), 201–212 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Marques, S., Bushenkov, V., Lotov, A., Borges, J.G.: Building pareto frontiers for ecosystem services tradeoff analysis in forest management planning integer programs. Forests 12, 1244 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schulte, C., Tack, G., Lagerkvist, M.Z.: Modeling. In: Schulte, C., Tack, G., Lagerkvist, M.Z. (eds.) Modeling and Programming with Gecode (2009). Corresponds to Gecode 6.2.0

    Google Scholar 

  20. Prud’homme, C., Fages, J.-G., Lorca, X.: Choco Solver Documentation. TASC, INRIA Rennes, LINA CNRS UMR 6241, COSLING S.A.S. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nethercote, N., Stuckey, P.J., Becket, R., Brand, S., Duck, G.J., Tack, G.: Minizinc: Towards a standard CP modelling language. In: Bessiere, C. (ed.) 13th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming—CP 2007, Providence, RI, USA, Proceedings, volume 4741 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 529–543. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lecoutre, C., Szczepanski, N.: Pycsp3: Modeling combinatorial constrained problems in python (2020). arXiv:2009.00326

  23. Michel, L., Van Hentenryck, P.: Constraint-based local search. In: Martí, R., Pardalos, P.M., Resende, M.G.C. (eds.) Handbook of Heuristics, pp. 223–260. Springer, Berlin (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Codognet, P., Munera, D., Diaz, D., Abreu, S.: Parallel local search. In: Hamadi, Y., Sais, L. (eds.) Handbook of Parallel Constraint Reasoning, pp. 381–417. Springer, Berlin (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Régin, J.-C., Malapert, A.: Parallel constraint programming. In: Hamadi, Y., Sais, L. (eds.) Handbook of Parallel Constraint Reasoning, pp. 337–379. Springer, Berlin (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Boussemart, F., Lecoutre, C., Audemard, G., Piette, C.: Xcsp3-core: a format for representing constraint satisfaction/optimization problems (2020). arXiv:2009.00514

  27. Machado, R., Pedro, V., Abreu, S.: On the scalability of constraint programming on hierarchical multiprocessor systems. In: 42nd International Conference on Parallel Processing, ICPP 2013, pp. 530–535. IEEE Computer Society,Lyon, France (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partly funded by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) under grants LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-030391, PTDC/ASP-SIL/30391/2017 (BIOECOSYS), PCIF/MOS/0217/2017 (MODFIRE), strategic projects UIDB/04674/ 2020 (CIMA) and UIDB/04516/2020 (NOVA LINCS). Some of the experimental work was carried out on the khromeleque cluster of the University of Évora, which was partly funded by grants ALENT-07-0262-FEDER-001872 and ALENT-07-0262-FEDER-001876.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladimir Bushenkov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Eloy, E., Bushenkov, V., Abreu, S. (2022). Constraint Modeling for Forest Management. In: Tchemisova, T.V., Torres, D.F.M., Plakhov, A.Y. (eds) Dynamic Control and Optimization. DCO 2021. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 407. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17558-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics