Skip to main content

Ortega y Gasset and the Austrian Economists: A Missed Encounter

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Emergence of a Tradition: Essays in Honor of Jesús Huerta de Soto, Volume II
  • 179 Accesses

Abstract

There is an unwritten page in the history of ideas, because the main actors, who might have usefully come into contact with each other, did not. Due to the many accidents of life, they were unable to take each other’s works into consideration. If this had happened, today we would have at our disposal a more extensive basis of knowledge on which to work. What I am referring to is the encounter which never took place between José Ortega y Gasset and Carl Menger (and the first exponents of the Austrian School of Economics). They clearly showed hostility toward contractualist theories of society and their ‘false individualism’. Ortega and the ‘Austrians’ analyzed social phenomena through the lens of cultural evolution and were in search of a “true individualism.” They recognized how limited the forces of the individual are and how strong the necessity is to channel the knowledge and the resources of each into a grand social (atheleological) process.

It is a great pleasure for me to contribute to this volume of writings in honour of Jesús Huerta de Soto, which allows me the opportunity to recall some very pleasant moments of my life. My friendship with Jesús goes back many years. I owe it to our common publisher, the late lamented Juan Marcos de la Fuente, who translated and published my books into Spanish. Later, our relationship grew stronger during the time when Jesús invited me, as a visiting professor, to the Rey Juan Carlos University in Madrid. That was a fruitful stay for me, which also gave me the opportunity to collect material for my research on the philosophy of the social sciences. At the same time, I got to know Jesús’s family, so much so that one of his daughters, Silvia, moved to Rome for a semester to follow my course there; and she was one of my most exemplary students. I believe that the most joyful moment of our friendship was the day when Jesús came, together with his wife and children, to visit me at my university. It was a joyous occasion for all of us!

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This did not prevent Ortega from making some explorations into the territory of economics. In one of these sorties, he mistakenly attributed to Gustav Cassel the merit of having renewed the science of economics, by making scarcity its basis, and he concluded that in the Land of Cockaigne no economic activities would exist (Ortega, 1930b, p. 330). In actual fact, the theoretical reversal which Ortega referred to had taken place much earlier, and Menger had been one of its major actors. It should be added that the expression ‘Land of Cockaigne’ had already been used by Ludwig von Mises in his epistemological essays (Mises, [1933] 1981, p. 79).

  2. 2.

    It is not only on the basis of knowledge of works that I consider Ortega an omnivorous reader. During my stay in Madrid, as a visiting professor at Rey Juan Carlos, I had the opportunity to see his personal library and to realize how vast his reading was.

References

  • Antonelli, É. (1953). Léon Walras er Carl Menger á travers leur correspondence. Économie Appliquée, 6, 269–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. ([1637] 1960). Discourse on Method. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diez del Corral, L. (1956). Il liberalismo dottrinario. Instituto de Estudios Politicos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1946). Individualism: True and False. Blackwell, now in Hayek, Individualism and Economic Order, 1949. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1960). The Constitution of Liberty. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1982). Law, Legislation and Liberty. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Infantino, L. (1998). Individualism in Modern Thought. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Infantino, L. (2010). Hayek and the Evolutionary Tradition against the Homo Oeconomicus. Advances in Austrian Economics, 13, 159–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Infantino, L. (2019). Cercatori di Libertà. Rubbettino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffé, W. (1976). Menger, Jevons and Walras De-homogenized. Economic Enquire, 14, 511–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauder, E. (1965). A History of Marginal Utility Theory. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Menger, C. ([1871] 1994). Principles of Economics. Libertarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, C. ([1883] 1996). Investigations into the Method of Social Sciences. Libertarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L. v. ([1933] 1981). Epistemological Problems of Economics. New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega y Gasset, J. (1923). El tema de nuestro tiempo, in Ortega (1946–83), vol. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega y Gasset, J. (1927). Mirabeau o el politico, in Ortega (1946–83), vol. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega y Gasset, J. (1930a). La rebelión de las masas, in Ortega (1946–83), vol. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega y Gasset, J. (1930b). Misión de la Universidad, in Ortega (1946–83), vol. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega y Gasset, J. (1937). Prólogo para Franceses, in Ortega (1946–83), vol. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega y Gasset, J. (1940). Apuntes sobre el pensamiento, in Ortega (1946–83), vol. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega y Gasset, J. (1946–83). Obras completas. Revista de Occidente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega y Gasset, J. (1948). Prospecto del Instituto de Humanidades, in Ortega (1946–83), vol. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega y Gasset, J. (1974). Epistolario. Revista de Occidente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.-J. ([1755] 1997). Discourse on the Origin and Foundation of Inequality among Men. In The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatz, A. (1907). L’individualisme économique et social. Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A. de. ([1835–40] 1994). Democracy in America. Everyman’s Library.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorenzo Infantino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Infantino, L. (2023). Ortega y Gasset and the Austrian Economists: A Missed Encounter. In: Howden, D., Bagus, P. (eds) The Emergence of a Tradition: Essays in Honor of Jesús Huerta de Soto, Volume II. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17418-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17418-6_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17417-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17418-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics