Skip to main content

Potentially Preventable Trauma Deaths: A Challenge for Trauma Care Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The High-risk Surgical Patient

Abstract

Death preventability is a marker of quality of care, and it can be used to evaluate the effectiveness, performance, and adequacy of trauma patient management. In general, preventable deaths after a traumatic injury have been defined as casualties whose lives could have been saved by appropriate and timely medical care, regardless of tactical, logistical, or environmental issues. They are identified as preventable (frankly or definitive) if they occur when a care error is clearly the cause of death; potentially preventable if non-lethal injury, suboptimal care, and management errors are the direct or indirect cause of death. Non-preventable deaths are due to catastrophic injuries considered unsurvivable. The vast majority of preventable deaths are haemorrhage related, and errors determining preventability can be identified across all the systems of care. Several strategies can be implemented both prehospital and in-hospital to reduce preventable death rate through a systematic approach and education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rutstein DD, Berenberg W, Chalmers TC, et al. Measuring the quality of medical care: a clinical method. N Engl J Med. 1976;294:582–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Drake SA, Wolf DA, Meininger JC, et al. Methodology to reliably measure preventable trauma death rate. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2017;2:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chiara O, Scott JD, Cimbanassi S, et al. Trauma deaths in an Italian urban area: an audit of pre-hospital and in-hospital trauma care. Injury. 2002;33:553–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Matsumoto S, Jung K, Coimbra R. Trauma center maturity measured by an analysis of preventable and potentially preventable deaths: there is always something to be learned. Surg Today. 2018;48:1004–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Spinella PC. Zero preventable deaths after traumatic injury: an achievable goal. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;82(Suppl 1):S2–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. MacKenzie EJ, Steinwachs DM, Bone LR, et al. Inter-rater reliability of preventable death judgement. The Preventable Deaths Study Group. J Trauma. 1992;33:292–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eastridge BJ, Mabry RL, Seguin P, et al. Death on the battlefield (2001-2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73:S431–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang A, Schyve PM, Croteau RJ, et al. The JCHAO patient safety event taxonomy: a standard terminology and classification schema for near misses and adverse events. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005;17:95–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. National Quality Forum. Standardized a patient safety taxonomy. Washington. DC: National Quality Forum; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Reason JT. Understanding adverse events: the human factors. In: Vincent C, et al., editors. Clinical risk management: enhancing patient safety. London: BMJ Books; 2001. p. 6–30.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gruen RL, Jurkovich GJ, McIntyre LK, et al. Patterns of error contributing to trauma mortality: lesson learned from 2594 deaths. Ann Surg. 2006;244:371–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Trunkey DD. Trauma accidental and intentional injuries account for more years lost in the U.S. than cancer and heart disease. Among the prescribed remedies are improved preventive efforts, speedier surgery and further research. Sci Am. 1983;249:28–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shackford SR, Hollingworth-Fridlund P, Cooper GF, et al. The effect of regionalization upon the quality of trauma care as assessed by concurrent audit before and after institution. J Trauma. 1986;26:812–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoyt DB, Coimbra R, Potenza B, et al. A twelve-year analysis of disease and provider complications on an organized level I trauma service: as good as it gets? J Trauma. 2003;54:26–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ivatury R, Guilford K, Malhotra AK, et al. Patients safety in trauma: maximal impact management errors at a level I trauma center. J Trauma. 2008;64:265–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chiara O, Cimbanassi S, Pitisid A, Vesconi S. Preventable trauma deaths: from panel review to population based studies. World J Emerg Surg. 2006;1:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-1-12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Fallon WF Jr, Barnoski AL, Mancuso CL, et al. Benchmarking the quality-monitoring process: a comparison of outcomes analysis by trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) methodology with the peer-review process. J Trauma. 1997;42:810–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shanti CM, Tyburski JG, Rishell KB, et al. Correlation of revised trauma score and injury severity score (TRISS) predicted probability of survival with peer-reviewed determination of trauma deaths. Am Surg. 2003;69:257–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Takayanagi K, Koseki K, Aruga T. Preventable trauma deaths: evaluation by peer-review and a guide for quality improvement. Clin Perform Qual Health Care. 1998;6:163–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Martin BT, Fallon WF, Palmieri PA, et al. Autopsy data in the peer review process improves outcome analysis. J Trauma. 2007;62:69–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Forsythe RM, Livingston DH, Lavery RF, et al. Autopsies in trauma do not add to peer review or quality assurance. J Trauma. 2002;53:321–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, et al. A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:366–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ray JJ, Meizoso JP, Satahoo SS, et al. Potentially preventable prehospital deaths from motor vehicle collisions. Traffic Inj Prev. 2016;17:676–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines for trauma quality improvement programs. 2009. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44061/1/9789241597746_eng.pdf.

  25. Koh EY, Oyeniyi BT, Fox EE, et al. Trends in preventable trauma deaths between 2005-2006 and 2012-2013. Am J Surg. 2019;218:501–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Davis J, Satahoo S, Butler FK, et al. An analysis of prehospital deaths: who can we save? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77:213–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kwon AM, Garbett NC, Kloecker GH. Pooled preventable deaths rates in trauma patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014;40:279–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kotwal RS, Montgomery HR, Miles EA, et al. Leadership and a casualty response system for eliminating preventable death. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;82(Suppl 1):S9–S15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Acosta JA, Yang JC, Winchell RJ, et al. Lethal injuries and time to deaths in a level I trauma center. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186:528–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stewart RM, Myers JG, Dent DL, et al. Seven hundred fifty-three consecutive deaths in a level I trauma center: the argument for injury prevention. J Trauma. 2003;54:66–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Drake SA, Holcomb JB, Yang Y, et al. Establishing a regional trauma preventable/potentially preventable death rate. Ann Surg. 2020;271:375–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Valdez C, Sarani B, Young H, et al. Timing of death after traumatic injury—a contemporary assessment of the temporal distribution of death. J Surg Res. 2016;200:604–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Oyeniyi B, Fox EE, Scerbo M, et al. Trends in 1029 trauma deaths at a level 1 trauma center. Injury. 2017;48:5–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kotwal RS, Butler FK, Gross KR, et al. Management of junctional haemorrhage in tactical combat casualty care: TCCC guidelines? Proposed change 13-03. J Spec Oper Med. 2013;13:85–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jacobs LM, Wade DS, McSwain NE, et al. The Hartford consensus: THREAT, a medical disaster preparedness concept. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:947–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Stop the Bleed. Us Department of Homeland Security web site. https://www.dhs.gov/stopthebleed. Updated October, 2016.

  37. van Oostendorp SE, Tan ECTH, Geeraedts LMG Jr. Prehospital control of life-threatening truncal and junctional haemorrhage is the ultimate challenge in optimizing trauma care; a review of treatment options and their applicability in the civilian trauma setting. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24:110–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. London HEMS. First prehospital REBOA. 2014. https://londonsairambulance.co.uk/our-service/news/2014/06/we-perform-worlds-first-pre-hospital-reboa.

  39. Holcomb JB, Donothan DP, Cotton BA, et al. Prehospital transfusion of plasma and red blood cells in trauma patients. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015;19:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Duchesne JC, Holcomb JB. Damage control resuscitation: addressing trauma-induced coagulopathy. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2009;70:22–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefania Cimbanassi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Self-assessment Test

Self-assessment Test

  1. 1.

    A death can be defined as preventable if

    1. (a)

      A care error may contribute to death

    2. (b)

      A care error is clearly the cause of death

    3. (c)

      The death occurs in a non-trauma centre

    4. (d)

      All of the above

  2. 2.

    The vast majority of late deaths are due to

    1. (a)

      Lack of bleeding control

    2. (b)

      Multiorgan failure

    3. (c)

      System errors

    4. (d)

      Catastrophic brain injuries

  3. 3.

    Most of the preventable trauma deaths are related to

    1. (a)

      Torso haemorrhage

    2. (b)

      Primary brain injury

    3. (c)

      Sepsis

    4. (d)

      None of the above

Correct Answers

  1. 1.

    (b)

  2. 2.

    (b)

  3. 3.

    (a)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cimbanassi, S., Bini, R., Chiara, O. (2023). Potentially Preventable Trauma Deaths: A Challenge for Trauma Care Systems. In: Aseni, P., Grande, A.M., Leppäniemi, A., Chiara, O. (eds) The High-risk Surgical Patient. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17273-1_63

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17273-1_63

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17272-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17273-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics