Abstract
This chapter uses Zelizer’s work to analyze environmental social movements in the Brazilian Amazon. I look at networks supporting environmental leaders facing death threats from those involved with illegal logging, mining, and other destructive activities. This chapter identifies a new economic circuit used to financially support social movement activities, particularly the protection of these leaders. This chapter is also an effort to advance Zelizer’s work in two fronts. First, I discuss how boundaries in economic circuits are not binary—I identify a few important characteristics of these boundaries in social movement settings, and I argue that boundaries are layered. Social movements have a process of evaluating and vetting new members, and subsequent decisions allow them to get closer to the core or to stay at the periphery. The second contribution I offer is identifying the process of how social movement actors distinguish between different kinds of monies depending on the kinds of social relations they have with one another.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anheier, Helmut. 2003. “Movement Development and Organizational Networks: The Role of ‘Single Members’ in the German Nazi Party, 1925–30.“ In Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collection Action, edited by Mario Diani and Doug Mcadam, 49–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Arrighi, Giovanni, and Jessica Drangel. 1986. “The Stratification of the World-Economy: An Exploration of the Semiperipheral Zone.“ Review- Fernand Braudel Center 10 (1): 9–74.
Arrighi, Giovanni, Terence K Hopkins, and Immanuel Maurice Wallerstein. 2012. Antisystemic Movements.
Brito, José. 2020. “Brasil é o 3º em mortes de ativistas ambientais e dos direitos humanos, diz ONG.“ CNN, 28 Julho. https://www.cnnbrasil.com.br/nacional/brasil-e-o-3-em-mortes-de-ativistas-ambientais-e-dos-direitos-humanos-diz-ong/.
Camargo, Suzana. 2021. “2020 teve número recorde de assassinatos de ambientalistas, ativistas e indígenas. Brasil é 4º país em assassinatos.“ Conexão Planeta, 14 Setembro. https://conexaoplaneta.com.br/blog/2020-teve-numero-recorde-de-assassinatos-de-ambientalistas-ativistas-e-indigenas-brasil-e-4o-pais-em-numero-de-mortes/.
Carvalho, Andrea. 2020. “Opinião: Os defensores da floresta não estão sozinhos.“ UOL, 23 Novembro. https://noticias.uol.com.br/opiniao/coluna/2020/11/23/opiniao-os-defensores-da-floresta-nao-estao-sozinhos.htm.
Castells, Manuel. 1997. The Power of Identity, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol. 2, Economy, Society and Culture.
Cowie, Sam. 2021. “A bordo de uma balsa de garimpo: quanto vale a vida no mercado de ouro ilegal?” Repórter Brasil, 13 September. https://reporterbrasil.org.br/2021/09/a-bordo-de-uma-balsa-de-garimpo-quanto-vale-a-vida-no-mercado-de-ouro-ilegal/.
Della Porta, Donatella , and Mario Diani, eds. 2014. The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements. London: Oxford University Press.
Dolce, Júlia. 2021. “Conflitos no campo: 77% dos assassinatos em 2021 foram na Amazônia Legal.” InfoAmazônia, 10 Dezembro. https://infoamazonia.org/2021/12/10/conflitos-no-campo-77-dos-assassinatos-em-2021-foram-na-amazonia-legal/.
Edelstam Foundation. 2020. “Background Information on the Edelstam Prize Laureate 2020: Osvalinda Marcelino Alves Pereria.” https://www.edelstam.org/the-edelstam-prize/laureate-2020/.
Edelstam Foundation.. n.d. “The Edelstam Prize.” https://www.edelstam.org/the-edelstam-prize/.
Eisinger, Peter K. 1973. “The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities.“ American Political Science Review 67 (1): 11–28.
Global Witness. n.d. “Brazil.” Accessed January 2022. https://www.globalwitness.org/en/all-countries-and-regions/brazil/#:~:text=We%20recorded%2024%20murders%20of,protected%20and%20their%20voices%20heard.
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience: Harvard University Press.
Gould, Roger V. 2003. “Why do Networks Matter? Rationalist and Structuralist Interpretations.“ In Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collection Action, edited by Mario Diani and Doug Mcadam, 233–257. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Granovetter, Mark 1983. “The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited.“ Sociological Theory 1: 201–233.
Human Rights Watch. 2019. Rainforest Mafias: How Violence and Impunity Fuel Deforestation in Brazil's Amazon.
Kendall, Diana. 2016. Sociology in Our Times: The Essentials. 10th ed. Cengage Learning.
Kornhauser, Willian. 1959. The Politics of Mass Society. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.
Lacerda, Paula Mendes. 2013. “Movimentos Sociais na Amazônia: Articulações Possíveis entre Gênero, Religião e Estado.” Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi de Ciências Humanas 8 (1): 153–168.
Linz, J. 1967. “Cleavages and Concensus in West German Politics: The Early Fifties’.” In Party System and Voter Alignments, edited by S. M. Lipset and S. Rokkan. New York: Free Press.
Lipset, S. M. 1960. Political Man. New York: Anchor Books.
McAdam, Doug, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald. 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
McAdam, Doug, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy, John D., and Mayer N. Zald. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory.” The American Journal of Sociology 82 (6): 1212–1241.
Meyer, David S. 2004. “Protest and Political Opportunities.” Annu. Rev. Sociol. 30: 125–145.
Meyer, David S., and Debra C. Minkoff. 2004. “Conceptualizing Political Opportunity.” Social Forces 82 (4): 1457–1492.
Olson, Mancur. 1971. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA, USA.: Harvard University Press.
Passy, Florence. 2003. “Social Networks Matter. But How?” In Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action, edited by Mario Diani and Doug McAdam, 21–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paula, Elder Andrade De, and Sílvio Simione Da Silva. 2008. “Movimentos Sociais na Amazônia Brasileira: Vinte Anos Sem Chico Mendes.” Revista NERA 11 (13):102-117.
Polanyi, Karl. 1975. The great transformation. New York: Octagon Books.
Ribeiro, Maria Fernanda. 2020. “Brasil é o terceiro país mais perigoso para defensores ambientais, aponta Global Witness.“ Amazônia Real, 29 Julho. https://amazoniareal.com.br/brasil-e-o-terceiro-pais-mais-perigoso-para-defensores-ambientais-aponta-global-witness-29-07-2020/.
Runciman, Walter Garrison. 1966. Relative Deprivation and Social Justice: A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth-Century England. Vol. 13. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. Yale University Press.
Smelser, Neil J. 1963. Theory of collective behavior. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
Smith, Jackie. 2001. “Globalizing Resistance: The Battle of Seattle and the Future of Social Movements.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 6 (1): 1–19.
Smith, Jackie.. 2008. Social Movements for Global Democracy. JHU Press.
Snow, David A. 2004. “Framing Processes, Ideology, and Discursive Fields.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, 380–412.
Tarrow, Sidney G. 2011. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Edited by Margaret Levi. 3rd ed, Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, Jennifer Ann. 2020. “Relatório mostra que Brasil é o terceiro país que mais mata ambientalistas.“ Veja, 28 Julho. https://veja.abril.com.br/coluna/impacto/relatorio-mostra-que-brasil-e-o-terceiro-pais-que-mais-mata-ambientalistas/.
Tilly, Charles. 2004. Social Movements, 1768–2004. Boulder, CO, USA: Paradigms Publishers.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1979. The Capitalist World-Economy. Cambridge University Press.
Zelizer, Viviana A. 2010. Economic Lives: How Culture Shapes the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Zelizer, Viviana A.. 2017. The Social Meaning of Money. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Original edition, 1997.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chase, V.M. (2023). The Economic Circuits of Social Movements. In: Haeffele, S., Storr, V.H. (eds) Living Better Together. Mercatus Studies in Political and Social Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17127-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17127-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17126-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17127-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)