Skip to main content

Autonomous Drone Path Scheduling and Management Strategy with Multi-agent Decision Support and Coordination

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence and Online Engineering (REV 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 524))

  • 492 Accesses

Abstract

In a harsh and isolated environment with limited communication and human interaction, e.g., Antarctica, multiple unmanned vehicles or multiple drone systems can use fuel/battery faster than normal conditions. This has led to many drone failures. Preservation of fuel level becomes an essential factor for the management of drones while performing the required set of tasks within an acceptable time. The uncertainty of the environment further challenges the autonomous task allocation and path planning for drones. The existing literature algorithm was not tested or used in these severe conditions, which creates the major gaps in the autonomous drone’s management. This paper proposes a CBS-LSA algorithm, which is a combined algorithm of conflict-based search and linear sum assignment. This algorithm considers the drones’ fuel consumption before allocating the tasks uniformly and proportionately to all the available agents whenever the new sets of tasks were generated randomly. It can proportionately allocate tasks to drones, even if the number of drones is lesser than the number of tasks while maintaining the optimal task allocation process. Moreover, the algorithm optimizes the fuel consumption of the drones by allocating them to the nearest available agents and providing the best possible path for the agents that avoid static obstacles such as mountains and terrains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brunet L, Choi H-L, How JP (2008) Consensus-based auction approaches for decentralized task assignment. AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference (GNC). Honolulu, Hawaii

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burkard R, Dell’Amico M, Martello S (2012) Assignment Problems: Revised Reprint, 1st edn. SIAM, Philadelphia, USA

    Google Scholar 

  3. Choi HL, Brunet L, How JP (2009) Consensus-based decentralized auctions for robust task allocation. IEEE Trans Rob 25(1):912–926

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crouse DF (2016) On implementing 2D rectangular assignment algorithms. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 52(4):1679–1696

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fu Z, Yu J, Xie G, Chen Y, Mao Y (2018) A heuristic evolutionary algorithm of UAV path planning. Wirel Commun Mob Comput 2018(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hönig W, Kiesel S, Tinka A, Durham J, Ayanian N (2018) Conflict-based search with optimal task assignment. In: Dastani M, Sukthankar G, André E, Koenig S (eds) Proceedings of the international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems. AAMAS, Stockholm, Sweden (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hunt S, Meng Q, Hinde C, Huang T (2014) A consensus-based grouping algorithm for multi-agent cooperative task allocation with complex requirements. Cogn Comput 6(3):338–350

    Google Scholar 

  8. Qadir Z, Ullah F, Munawar HS, Al-Turjman F (2021) Addressing disasters in smart cities through UAVs path planning and 5G communications: a systematic review. Comput Commun 168(1):114–135

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rachmawati D, Gustin L (2020) Analysis of Dijkstra’s algorithm and A* algorithm in shortest path problem. J Phys Conf Ser 1566:012061

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rossi F, Bandyopadhyay S, Wolf M, Pavone M (2018) Review of multi-agent algorithms for collective behavior: a structural taxonomy. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51(12):112–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Serratosa F (2015) Computation of graph edit distance: reasoning about optimality and speed-up. Image Vis Comput 40(1):38–48

    Google Scholar 

  12. Serratosa F (2015) Speeding up fast bipartite graph matching through a new cost matrix. Int J Pat Recogn Artif Intell 29(2):1550010-1–1550010-17

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shah K, Ballard G, Schmidt A, Schwager M (2020) Multidrone aerial surveys of penguin colonies in Antarctica. Sci Robot 5(47):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sharon G, Stern R, Felner A, Sturtevant NR (2015) Conflict-based search for optimal multi-agent pathfinding. Artif Intell 219(40):40–66

    Google Scholar 

  15. Turner J, Meng Q, Schaefer G, Soltoggio A (2018) Fast consensus for fully distributed multi-agent task allocation. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM symposium on applied computing, pp 832–839. ACM, France

    Google Scholar 

  16. Whitbrook A, Meng Q, Chung PWH (2018) Addressing robustness in time-critical, distributed, task allocation algorithms. Appl Intell 49(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-018-1169-3

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ananda Maiti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ganeshalingam, L., Maiti, A. (2023). Autonomous Drone Path Scheduling and Management Strategy with Multi-agent Decision Support and Coordination. In: Auer, M.E., El-Seoud, S.A., Karam, O.H. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Online Engineering. REV 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 524. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17091-1_58

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics