Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimentation in Academic Technology Commercialization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intellectual Property Management for Start-ups

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

  • 855 Accesses

Abstract

Technology commercialization is now one of the cornerstones of the experience in the academic environment. Universities and colleges are now highly dedicated to understanding and giving priority not only to creating new technologies but also to commercializing them. This chapter describes some of the experiences and empirical evidence that we received as we were building the Runway Startup Postdoc Program at the Jacobs Technion-Cornell Institute at Cornell Tech. It explains three broad steps of technology transfer experimentations and flips the traditional technology and transfer office (TTO) model. Experimenting should be a natural component of incubator programs and the most effective way of producing meaningful change in technology transfer systems. Our recommendation to academic incubators and TTOs is to embrace experimentation and build a technology transfer culture that is less concerned about the traditional output metrics (i.e., patents, licenses, revenue) and is more geared toward providing people with the resources, connections, and knowledge they require to create a start-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Selected content in this chapter has been used from https://tech.cornell.edu/programs/phd/startup-postdocs/. Used with permission

  2. 2.

    The content of the Runway Startup Postdoc Program example section has been used from https://tech.cornell.edu/programs/phd/startup-postdocs/. Used with permission.

References

  • Adam, A. F., & Fayolle, A. (2015). Bridging the entrepreneurial intention-behavior gap: The role of commitment and implementation intention. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 25(1), 36–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A. (2006). Engaging the inventor: exploring licensing strategies for university inventions and the role of latent knowledge. Strategic Management, 27(1), 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Åstebro, T., Bazzazian, N., & Braguinsky, S. (2012). Startups by recent university graduates and their faculty: Implications for university entrepreneurship policy. Research Policy, 41(4), 663–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities. IAU and Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell University. (2012, January). FastTrack startup license. Retrieved from Center for Technology Transfer at Cornell University: https://ctl.cornell.edu/entrepreneurs/fasttrack/

  • Coupé, T. (2003). Science is golden: Academic R & D and university patents. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28, 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Cruz, C., & O’Neal, T. (2003). Integration of technology incubator programs with academic entrepreneurship curriculum. In PICMET ‘03: Portland international conference on management of engineering and technology technology management for reshaping the world, Portland (pp. 327–332).

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36, 316–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2008). Factors fostering academics to start up new ventures: An assessment of Italian founders’ incentives. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(4), 380–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fini, R., Perkmann, M., & Ross, J. -M. (2021). Attention to exploration: the effect of academic entrepreneurship on the production of scientific knowledge. Organization Science, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haan, U., Shwartz, S. C., & Gómez-Baquero, F. (2020). A startup postdoc program as a channel for university technology transfer: the case of the Runway Startup Postdoc Program at the Jacobs Technion–Cornell Institute at Cornell Tech. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(6), 1611–1633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isabelle, D. (2013). Key factors affecting a technology entrepreneur’s choice of incubator or accelerator. Technology Innovation Management Review, 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs Technion-Cornell Institute at Cornell Tech. (2022, January). Runway application. Retrieved from Cornell Tech: https://tech.cornell.edu/programs/phd/startup-postdocs/runway-application/.

  • Jeong, J., Kim, J., Son, H., & Nam, D.-I. (2020). The role of venture capital investment in startups’ sustainable growth and performance: Focusing on absorptive capacity and venture capitalists’ reputation. Sustainability, 12(8), 3447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MIT. (2022, January). Retrieved from The Engine - Built by MIT: https://www.engine.xyz/.

  • Mowery, D., Nelson, R., Sampat, B., & Ziedonis, A. (1999). The effects of the Bayh-Dole Act on U.S. University Research and Technology Transfer: An analysis of data from Columbia University, the University of California, and Stanford University. In L. M. Branscomb, F. Kodama, & R. Florida (Eds.), Industrializing knowledge: University-industry linkages in Japan and the United States. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. (2021). The National Science Foundation’s Innovation Corps (I-Corps™) Program. Retrieved September 2022, from https://beta.nsf.gov/funding/initiatives/i-corps.

  • Nerva Blumho, S. C. (2021). Critical issues for an analytical framework in the relationship between academic spin-offs and their incubators. In Proceedings of the international conference on industrial engineering and operations management, São Paulo, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noel, M., & Schankerman, M. (2013). Strategic patenting and software innovation. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 481–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obschonka, M., Moeller, J., & Goethner, M. (2019). Entrepreneurial passion and personality: The case of academic entrepreneurship. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 2697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obschonka, M., Silbereisen, R., & Schmitt-Rodermund, E. (2012). Explaining entrepreneurial behavior: dispositional personality traits, growth of personal entrepreneurial resources, and business idea generation. The Career Development Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2012.00015.x

  • Pavitt, K. (1998). Do patents reflect the useful research output of universities? Research Evaluation, 7, 105–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rancic Moogk, D. (2012). Minimum viable product and the importance of experimentation in technology startups. Technology Innovation Management Review, 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reypens, C., Delanote, J., & Rückert, D. (2020). From starting to scaling how to foster startup growth in Europe. Nesta, Startup Europe Partnership, European Investment Bank, Crunchbase.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Burks, J., Brophy, D., Jensen, T., Milovac, M., & Kagan, E. (2017). Mentoring in startup ecosystems (Ross School of Business Paper No. 1376, p. 54).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheperd, C., Marchisio, G., Morrish, S., Deacon, J., & Miles, M. (2010). Entrepreneurial burnout: exploring antecedents, dimensions and outcomes. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 71–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2015). Academic entrepreneurship: Time for a rethink? British Journal of Management, 26, 582–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solan, D., Cohen, I., Gómez-Baquero, F., Shtub, A., & Srivannaboon, S. (2021, December 24). Exploring the differences in early-stage incubator and accelerator startups across developed and developing countries: Evidence from the U.S., Israel, and Thailand. Retrieved January 2022, from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Izack-Cohen/publication/357300041_Exploring_the_differences_in_early-stage_incubator_and_accelerator_startups_across_developed_and_developing_countries_Evidence_from_the_US_Israel_and_Thailand/links/61c54e8ee669ee0f5c5.

  • Stagars, M. (2014, November 20). How universities can support their startups today. University Startups and Spin-Offs, 165–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss Einhorn, C. (2017). Problem Solved. Career Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thursby, J., Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. (2001). Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major U.S. universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thursby, J., & Thursby, M. (2007). University licensing. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 620–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todorovic, Z. W., & Moenter (Meyer), K. (2010). Tenant firm progression within an incubator: Progression towards an optimal point of resource utilization. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 16(1), 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiradinata, T., & Antonio, T. (2019). The role of curriculum and incubator towards new venture creation in information technology. International Journal of Education and Management Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • YCombinator. (2022, January). Retrieved from Safe Financing Documents: https://www.ycombinator.com/documents/.

  • Yitshaki, R., & Drori, I. (2018). Chapter 4: Understanding mentorship processes. In E. B. Drori (Ed.), Accelerators: Successful venture creation and growth (p. 224).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L., & Darby, M. (1996). Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93(23), 12709–12716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Jacobs Technion-Cornell Institute at Cornell Tech, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA

    Fernando Gómez-Baquero

Authors
  1. Fernando Gómez-Baquero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando Gómez-Baquero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. THI Business School, Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany

    Martin A. Bader

  2. Technical University of Applied Sciences Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

    Sevim Süzeroğlu-Melchiors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gómez-Baquero, F. (2023). Experimentation in Academic Technology Commercialization. In: Bader, M.A., Süzeroğlu-Melchiors, S. (eds) Intellectual Property Management for Start-ups. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16993-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation