Abstract
In many different ways, organizational scholars have engaged with the pleasures of work. Play, passion, commitment, enjoyment, and meaningfulness are only a few examples of how work can be beneficial for people. In this chapter, we will review these different strands of literature to provide an overview of topics that have been associated with the pleasures of work. We then move on to claim that these different literatures have largely neglected the very essence of pleasure; that is, pleasure as an end in itself. Having neglected our human need for pleasure, we suggest, leads to an impoverished and incomplete understanding of work—primarily focused on rationality, effectiveness, and efficiency—that all but helped achieve other ends. Instead, and grounding our argumentation in the tradition of ethical hedonism, we believe that organizations should commit to pleasure in the workplace and, most importantly, decouple pleasure from outcomes thereof. We conclude with an actionable plan for interventions that will help employees, teams, and managers bring pleasure back into work and allow them to seek pleasure for the sake of pleasure.
All authors contributed equally.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abramis, D. J. (1990). Play in work: Childish hedonism or adult enthusiasm? American Behavioral Scientist, 33(3), 353–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764290033003010
Anderson, A. R., & Fowers, B. J. (2020). An exploratory study of friendship characteristics and their relations with hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(1), 260–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519861152
Andriani, P., Ali, A., & Mastrogiorgio, M. (2017). Measuring exaptation and its impact on innovation, search, and problem solving. Organization Science, 28(2), 320–338. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1116
Apter, M. J. (2001). Motivational styles in everyday life: A guide to reversal theory. American Psychological Association.
Austin, R. D., Devin, L., & Sullivan, E. E. (2012). Accidental innovation: Supporting valuable unpredictability in the creative process. Organization Science, 23(5), 1505–1522. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0681
Baldessarelli, G., Stigliani, I., & Elsbach, K. D. (2022). The aesthetic dimension of organizing: A review and research agenda. Academy of Management Annals, 16(1), 217–257. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0198
Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. University of Chicago Press.
Beersma, B., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2011). How the grapevine keeps you in line: Gossip increases contributions to the group. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(6), 642–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611405073
Bentham, J. (1879). The principles of morals and legislation. Clarendon Press.
Boubekri, M., Hull, R. B., & Boyer, L. L. (1991). Impact of window size and sunlight penetration on office workers’ mood and satisfaction. Environment and Behavior, 23(4), 474–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916591234004
Clark, D. (2021). Google’s ‘20% rule’ shows exactly how much time you should spend learning new skills—and why it works. CNBC Make It. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/16/google-20-percent-rule-shows-exactly-how-much-time-you-should-spend-learning-new-skills.html
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey-Bass.
Dandridge, T. C. (1986). Ceremony as an integration of work and play. Organization Studies, 7(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084068600700205
De Dreu, C. K. W., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 739–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.739
Deichmann, D., Gillier, T., & Tonellato, M. (2021a). Getting on board with new ideas: An analysis of idea commitments on a crowdsourcing platform. Research Policy, 50(9), 104320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104320
Deichmann, D., & Jensen, M. (2018). I can do that alone…or not? How idea generators juggle between the pros and cons of teamwork. Strategic Management Journal, 39(2), 458–475. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2696
Deichmann, D., Moser, C., & van den Ende, J. (2021b). Talk, talk, talk: exploring idea conversations and the micro-level foundations of knowledge sharing for innovation. Innovation: Organization & Management, 23(3), 287–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2020.1763177
Deichmann, D., & Stam, D. (2015). Leveraging transformational and transactional leadership to cultivate the generation of organization-focused ideas. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(2), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.10.004
Deutschman, A. (2004). Gore’s text for innovation. Fast Company. https://www.fastcompany.com/51510/gores-text-innovation
Dew, N. (2009). Serendipity in entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 30(7), 735–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609104815
Dokko, G., & Kane, A. A. (2014). One of us or one of my friends: How social identity and tie strength shape the creative generativity of boundary-spanning ties. Organization Studies, 35(5), 703–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613508397
Duymedjian, R., & Rüling, C. C. (2010). Towards a foundation of bricolage in organization and management theory. Organization Studies, 31(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609347051
Cunha, M. P., Clegg, S. R., & Kamoche, K. (2006). Surprises in management and organization: Concept, sources and a typology. British Journal of Management, 17(4), 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00470.x
Elsbach, K. D., & Bechky, B. A. (2007). It’s more than a desk: Working smarter through leveraged office design. California Management Review, 49(2), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166384
Elsbach, K. D., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). The physical environment in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 181–224. https://doi.org/10.5465/078559809
Feldman, F. (2004). Pleasure and the good life: Concerning the nature, varieties, and plausibility of hedonism. Oxford University Press.
Feldman, F. (2007). Precis of pleasure and the good life: Concerning the nature, varieties, and plausiblity of hedonism. Philosophical Studies, 136(3), 405–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-006-9039-y
Fuchs, C., Sting, F. J., Schlickel, M., & Alexy, O. (2019). The ideator’s bias: How identity-induced self-efficacy drives overestimation in employee-driven process innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 62(5), 1498–1522. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0438
Füller, J., Jawecki, G., & Muhlbacher, H. (2007). Innovation creation by online basketball communities. Journal of Business Research, 60(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.09.019
Gerbasi, A., Prath, C., Parker, A., Spreitzer, G., & Cross, R. (2015). Destructive de-energizing relationships: How thriving buffers their effect on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1423. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000015
Granovetter, M. S. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233. https://doi.org/10.2307/202051
Hjorth, D., Strati, A., Drakopoulou Dodd, S., & Weik, E. (2018). Organizational creativity, play and entrepreneurship: Introduction and framing. Organization Studies, 39(2–3), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617752748
Ho, V. T., Garg, S., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2021). Passion contagion at work: Investigating formal and informal social influences on work passion. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 131, 103642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103642
Huizinga, J. (1955). Homo ludens. Beacon Press.
Hunter, C., Jemielniak, D., & Postuła, A. (2010). Temporal and spatial shifts within playful work. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 23(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811011017225
Inceoglu, I., Thomas, G., Chu, C., Plans, D., & Gerbasi, A. (2018). Leadership behavior and employee well-being: An integrated review and a future research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.006
Kraatz, M. S., & Flores, R. (2015). Introduction. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 44, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20150000044001
Kraatz, M. S., Flores, R., & Chandler, D. (2020). The value of values for institutional analysis. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 474–512. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0074
Larson, R., Mannell, R., & Zuzanek, J. (1986). Daily well-being of older adults with friends and family. Psychology and Aging, 1(2), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.1.2.117
Lysova, E. I., & Khapova, S. N. (2019). Enacting creative calling when established career structures are not in place: The case of the Dutch video game industry. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 114, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.06.004
McColl-Kennedy, J. R., & Anderson, R. D. (2002). Impact of leadership style and emotions on subordinate performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(5), 545–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00143-1
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Bird of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
Moser, C., den Hond, F., & Lindebaum, D. (2021). Morality in the age of artificially intelligent algorithms. Academy of Management Learning & Education. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2020.0287
Moser, C., Ganley, D., & Groenewegen, P. (2013). Communicative genres as organising structures in online communities - of team players and storytellers. Information Systems Journal, 23(6), 551–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12022
Nisen, M. (2013). Google’s obsession with efficiency has killed its most famous perk. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.in/Googles-Obsession-With-Efficiency-Has-Killed-Its-Most-Famous-Perk/articleshow/21871847.cms
Oh, H., Chung, M. H. O., & Labianca, G. (2004). Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 860–875. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159627
Perkmann, M., & Spicer, A. (2014). How emerging organizations take form: The role of imprinting and values in organizational bricolage. Organization Science, 25(6), 1785–1806. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0916
Perry-Smith, J. E. (2006). Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20785503
Piezunka, H., & Dahlander, L. (2015). Distant search, narrow attention: How competition for attention alters organizations’ filtering of suggestions in crowdsourcing. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 856–880. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0458
Podolny, J. M., & Baron, J. N. (1997). Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 673–693. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657354
Pollack, J. M., Ho, V. T., O’Boyle, E. H., & Kirkman, B. L. (2020). Passion at work: A meta-analysis of individual work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(4), 311–331. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2434
Pringle, R., Rinehart, R. E., & Caudwell, J. (2015). Sport and the social significance of pleasure. Routledge.
Rubin, R. S., Munz, D. C., & Bommer, W. H. (2005). Leading from within: The effects of emotion recognition and personality on transformational leadership behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 845–858. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.18803926
Schrage, M. (2013). Just how valuable is Google’s “20% time”? Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2013/08/just-how-valuable-is-googles-2-1#:~:text=Reports%20of%20the%20death%20or,Yahoo's%20targeted%20euthanizing%20of%20telecommuting
Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. A sociological interpretation. University of California Press.
Sidgwick, H. (1907). The methods of ethics. Hackett Publishing.
Simpson, B., & den Hond, F. (2022). The contemporary resonances of classical pragmatism for studying organization and organizing. Organization Studies, 43(1), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840621991689
Starkey, K., & Hatchuel, A. (2002). The long detour: Foucault’s history of desire and pleasure. Organization, 9(4), 641–656. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840294007
Suddaby, R., Ganzin, M., & Minkus, A. (2017). Craft, magic and the re-enchantment of the world. European Management Journal, 35(3), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.03.009
Trimble, C. (2010). Google and the myth of free time. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2010/08/free-time-innovation
Uy, M. A., Jacob, G. H., Gielnik, M. M., Frese, M., Antonio, T., & Wonohadidjojo, M. (2020). When passions collide: Passion convergence in entrepreneurial teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(6), 902–920. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000812
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393808
Venkataramani, V., Labianca, G.(Joe), & Grosser, T. (2013). Positive and negative workplace relationships, social satisfaction, and organizational attachment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 1028–1039. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034090
Vesa, M., Hamari, J., Harviainen, J. T., & Warmelink, H. (2017). Computer games and organization studies. Organization Studies, 38(2), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616663242
Vesa, M., den Hond, F., & Harviainen, J. T. (2019). On the possibility of a paratelic initiation of organizational wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3852-z
von Krogh, G., Haefliger, S., Spaeth, S., & Wallin, M. W. (2012). Carrots and rainbows: Motivation and social practice in open source software development. Mis Quarterly, 36(2), 649–676. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703471
Vozza, S. (2020). How to replace small talk when working remotely. Fast Company. https://www.fastcompany.com/90491792/how-to-replace-small-talk-when-working-remotely
Wan, M., Carlson, D. S., Quade, M. J., & Kacmar, K. M. (2021). Does work passion influence prosocial behaviors at work and home? Examining the underlying work–family mechanisms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2566
Weller, A. (2017). Exploring practitioners’ meaning of “ethics”, “compliance”, and “corporate social responsibility” practices: A communities of practice perspective. Business & Society, 59(3), 518–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650317719263
Zack, M. H. (2000). Jazz improvisation and organizing: Once more from the top. Organization Science, 11(2), 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.2.227.12507
Zietsma, C., Toubiana, M., Voronov, M., & Roberts, A. (2019). Emotions in organization theory. Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moser, C., Deichmann, D., Jurriens, M. (2023). Business Before Pleasure? Bringing Pleasure Back into Workplace Relationships. In: Gerbasi, A., Emery, C., Parker, A. (eds) Understanding Workplace Relationships. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16640-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16640-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16639-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16640-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)