Skip to main content

Interactions Between Social Norms and Incentive Mechanisms in Organizations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, Norms, and Ethics for Governance of Multi-Agent Systems XIV (COINE 2021)

Abstract

We focus on how individual behavior that complies with social norms interferes with performance-based incentive mechanisms in organizations with multiple distributed decision-making agents. We model social norms to emerge from interactions between agents: agents observe other the agents’ actions and, from these observations, induce what kind of behavior is socially acceptable. By complying with the induced socially accepted behavior, agents experience utility. Also, agents get utility from a pay-for-performance incentive mechanism. Thus, agents pursue two objectives. We place the interaction between social norms and performance-based incentive mechanisms in the complex environment of an organization with distributed decision-makers, in which a set of interdependent tasks is allocated to multiple agents. The results suggest that, unless the sets of assigned tasks are highly correlated, complying with emergent socially accepted behavior is detrimental to the organization’s performance. However, we find that incentive schemes can help offset the performance loss by applying individual-based incentives in environments with lower task-complexity and team-based incentives in environments with higher task-complexity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that along with social norms at the individual level, previous research also addresses social norms at the level of organizations: Dowling et al. [12], for example, conceptualize organizational legitimacy as congruence between the social values associated with an organization’s action and the norms of acceptable behavior in the social system of the organization. This paper, however, focuses on social norms within an organization.

  2. 2.

    For extensive discussions on the role of social norms in behavioral control, the reader is also referred to [25, 39], and most recently [29] and the literature cited in these studies.

  3. 3.

    In our context linear incentives are as efficient as other contracts inducing non-boundary actions. See [16, p. 1461].

  4. 4.

    We use the bidirectional ring network topology, in which each node is connected to exactly two other nodes with reciprocal unidirectional links, where nodes represent agents and the links represent sharing of information.

  5. 5.

    Levinthal [27] describes situations in which agents switch more than one decision at a time as long jumps and states that such scenarios are less likely to occur, as it is hard or risky to change multiple processes simultaneously.

  6. 6.

    Note that agents are homogeneous with respect to goals and that goals are constant over time.

  7. 7.

    For reliable results, we generate the entire landscapes before the simulation, which is computationally feasible for \(P=4\) given modern RAM sizes. Our sensitivity analyses with simpler models without entire landscapes, suggest that the results also hold for larger population sizes.

  8. 8.

    Please note that task complexity in Fig. 3(b) is relatively low, since every task is coupled with \(K+C \cdot S = 2\) other tasks. In Fig. 3(a), on the contrary, each task is coupled with \(K + C \cdot S = 3\) other tasks.

References

  1. Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decis. Process. 50(2), 179–211 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alechina, N., Dastani, M., Logan, B.: Norm specification and verification in multi-agent systems. J. Appl. Logics-IFCoLog J. Logics Appl. 5(2), 457–490 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Andreoni, J., Petri, R.: Social Motives to Giving: Can These Explain Fund Raising Institutions? University of Wisconsin, Technical report (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Axelrod, R.: The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Benabou, R., Tirole, J.: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Rev. Econ. Stud. 70(3), 489–520 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernheim, B.D.: A theory of conformity. J. Polit. Econ. 102(5), 841–877 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W.: Management models and industrial applications of linear programming. Manag. Sci. 4(1), 38–91 (1957)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Cialdini, R., Reno, R., Kallgren, C.: A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J. Pers. Social Psychol. 58, 1015–1026 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cialdini, R.B., Trost, M.R.: Social Influence: Social Norms, Conformity and Compliance. McGraw-Hill, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Coleman, J.S.: Free riders and zealots: the role of social networks. Sociol. Theory 6(1), 52–57 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cranefield, S., Winikoff, M., Dignum, V., Dignum, F.: No pizza for you: value-based plan selection in BDI agents. In: IJCAI, pp. 178–184 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dowling, J., Pfeffer, J.: Organizational legitimacy: social values and organizational behavior. Pac. Sociol. Rev. 18(1), 122–136 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ehrhart, M.G., Naumann, S.E.: Organizational citizenship behavior in work groups: a group norms approach. J. Appl. Psychol. 89(6), 960 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Elster, J.: Social norms and economic theory. J. Econ. Perspect. 3(4), 99–117 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Festre, A.: Incentives and social norms: a motivation-based economic analysis of social norms. J. Econ. Surv. 24(3), 511–538 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fischer, P., Huddart, S.: Optimal contracting with endogenous social norms. Am. Econ. Rev. 98(4), 1459–1475 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Glazer, A., Konrad, K.A.: A signaling explanation for charity. Am. Econ. Rev. 86(4), 1019–1028 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hayek, F.A.: Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1967)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Huck, S., Kübler, D., Weibull, J.: Social norms and economic incentives in firms. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 83(2), 173–185 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Iversion, K.E.: A Programming Language. Wiley, Hoboken (1962)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Janssen, M.C.W., Mendys-Kamphorst, E.: The price of a price: on the crowding out and in of social norms. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 55(3), 377–395 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kauffman, S.A., Johnsen, S.: Coevolution to the edge of chaos: coupled fitness landscapes, poised states, and coevolutionary avalanches. J. Theor. Biol. 149(4), 467–505 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80094-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kauffman, S.A., Weinberger, E.D.: The NK model of rugged fitness landscapes and its application to maturation of the immune response. J. Theor. Biol. 141, 211–245 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kohlberg, L.: The psychology of moral development: essays on moral development, vol. 2 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kübler, D.: On the regulation of social norms. J. Law Econ. Organ. 17(2), 449–476 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Leitner, S., Wall, F.: Multiobjective decision making policies and coordination mechanisms in hierarchical organizations: results of an agent-based simulation. Sci. World J. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/875146

  27. Levinthal, D.A.: Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Manag. Sci. 43(7), 934–950 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lewis, D.: Convention: A Philosophical Study. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lieberman, A., Duke, K.E., Amir, O.: How incentive framing can harness the power of social norms. Organ. Behav. Human Decis. Processes 151, 118–131 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mahmoud, M.A., Ahmad, M.S., Mostafa, S.A.: Norm-based behavior regulating technique for multi-agent in complex adaptive systems. IEEE Access 7, 126662–126678 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mellema, R., Jensen, M., Dignum, F.: Social rules for agent systems (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Moffitt, R.: An economic model of welfare stigma. Am. Econ. Rev. 73(5), 1023–1035 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Morris-Martin, A., De Vos, M., Padget, J.: Norm emergence in multiagent systems: a viewpoint paper. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 33(6), 706–749 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-019-09422-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Paluck, E.L., Shepherd, H.: The salience of social referents: a field experiment on collective norms and harassment behavior in a school social network. J. Pers. Social Psychol. 103(6), 899 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sen, S., Airiau, S.: Emergence of norms through social learning. In: IJCAI, vol. 1507, p. 1512 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Smith, A.: The theory of moral sentiments, vol. 1. J. Richardson (1822)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tuomela, R., Bonnevier-Tuomela, M.: Norms and agreement. Eur. J. Law Phil. Comput. Sci. 5, 41–46 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Veblen, T.: The Theory of the Leisure Class. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Vendrik, M.C.M.: Dynamics of a household norm in female labour supply. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 27(5), 823–841 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Verel, S., Liefooghe, A., Jourdan, L., Dhaenens, C.: On the structure of multiobjective combinatorial search space: Mnk-landscapes with correlated objectives. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 227(2), 331–342 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Wall, F., Leitner, S.: Agent-based computational economics in management accounting research: opportunities and difficulties. J. Manag. Account. Res. (2020). https://doi.org/10.2308/JMAR-19-073

  42. Xie, X.F., Zhang, W.J., Yang, Z.L.: Social cognitive optimization for nonlinear programming problems. In: Proceedings. International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, vol. 2, pp. 779–783. IEEE (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravshanbek Khodzhimatov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Khodzhimatov, R., Leitner, S., Wall, F. (2022). Interactions Between Social Norms and Incentive Mechanisms in Organizations. In: Theodorou, A., Nieves, J.C., De Vos, M. (eds) Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, Norms, and Ethics for Governance of Multi-Agent Systems XIV. COINE 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13239. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16617-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16617-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16616-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16617-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics