Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Overcoming Challenges in the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria in Pediatric Patients

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Death Determination by Neurologic Criteria

Part of the book series: Advances in Neuroethics ((AIN))

  • 380 Accesses

Abstract

In the United States, the declaration of death by neurologic criteria in infants and children is clinically determined by standards published in 2011 by a multidisciplinary committee from the Society of Critical Care Medicine, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Child Neurology Society. These standards recognize that developmental differences in infants and children impact the neurologic evaluation for determination of death by neurologic criteria and justify a pediatric-specific approach. Approximately 20% of children who die in pediatric intensive care units are declared dead using neurologic criteria. There is marked variability in institutional standards for the determination of death by neurologic criteria, particularly with respect to prerequisites, apnea testing, and ancillary testing. In this chapter, we review how to overcome challenges in the pediatric death by neurologic criteria evaluation, including how to exclude confounders, perform the neurologic examination, conduct the apnea test, and when to consider ancillary testing. We briefly discuss objections to determination of death by neurologic criteria in children and address how to talk to families about death by neurologic criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Uniform Determination of Death Act. 12 uniform laws annotated 589 (West 1993 and West suppl 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A definition of irreversible coma. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death. Jama 1968;205(6):337–40.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guidelines for the determination of death. Report of the medical consultants on the diagnosis of death to the President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Crit Care Med. 1982;10(1):62–4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Banasiak KJ, Lister G. Brain death in children. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2003;15(3):288–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Report of special Task Force. Guidelines for the determination of brain death in children. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Brain Death in Children. Pediatrics. 1987;80(2):298–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nakagawa TA, Ashwal S, Mathur M, et al. Clinical report-Guidelines for the determination of brain death in infants and children: an update of the 1987 task force recommendations. Pediatrics. 2011;128(3):e720–40.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Greer DM, Shemie SD, Lewis A, et al. Determination of brain death/death by neurologic criteria: the World Brain Death Project. JAMA. 2020;324(11):1078–97.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis A, Bernat JL, Blosser S, et al. An interdisciplinary response to contemporary concerns about brain death determination. Neurology. 2018;90(9):423–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Burns JP, Sellers DE, Meyer EC, Lewis-Newby M, Truog RD. Epidemiology of death in the PICU at five U.S. teaching hospitals. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(9):2101–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Meert KL, Keele L, Morrison W, et al. End-of-life practices among tertiary care PICUs in the United States: a multicenter study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015;16(7):e231–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sands R, Manning JC, Vyas H, Rashid A. Characteristics of deaths in paediatric intensive care: a 10-year study. Nurs Crit Care. 2009;14(5):235–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kirschen MP, Francoeur C, Murphy M, et al. Epidemiology of brain death in pediatric intensive care units in the United States. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173(5):469–76.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lago PM, Piva J, Garcia PC, et al. End-of-life practices in seven Brazilian pediatric intensive care units. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008;9(1):26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Agra-Tunas C, Rodriguez-Ruiz E, Rodriguez Merino E. MOdos de Morir en UCI Pediátrica-2 (MOMUCIP-2) study group of the Spanish Society of Paediatric Intensive Care (SECIP). How do children die in PICUs nowadays? A multicenter study from Spain. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020;21(9):e610–e6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yener N, Paksu MS, Koksoy O. Brain death in children: incidence, donation rates, and the occurrence of central diabetes insipidus. J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2018;4(1):12–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bonetto G, Taffarel P, Gamerman M, et al. Brain death and organ donation in Argentine pediatric intensive care units. A multicenter study. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2018;116(1):e54–60.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Parker BL, Frewen TC, Levin SD, et al. Declaring pediatric brain death: current practice in a Canadian pediatric critical care unit. CMAJ. 1995;153(7):909–16.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hon KL, Tse TT, Au CC, et al. Brain death in children: a retrospective review of patients at a paediatric intensive care unit. Hong Kong Med J. 2020;26(2):120–6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Al-Eyadhy A, Temsah MH, Hasan GM, et al. Causes, timing, and modes of death in a tertiary pediatric intensive care unit: five years’ experience. Saudi Med J. 2021;42(11):1186–94.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mathur M, Ashwal S. Pediatric brain death determination. Semin Neurol. 2015;35(2):116–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wijdicks EF, Varelas PN, Gronseth GS, Greer DM. Evidence-based guideline update: determining brain death in adults: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2010;74(23):1911–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wahlster S, Wijdicks EF, Patel PV, et al. Brain death declaration: practices and perceptions worldwide. Neurology. 2015;84(18):1870–9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lewis A, Bakkar A, Kreiger-Benson E, et al. Determination of death by neurologic criteria around the world. Neurology. 2020;95(3):e299–309.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rubin MA, Kirschen MP, Lewis A. The Neurocritical Care Brain Death Determination Course: purpose, design, and early findings. Neurocrit Care. 2021;35(3):913–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lewis A, Kirschen MP. Brain death/death by neurologic criteria determination. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2021;27(5):1444–64.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nakagawa T, Ashwal S, Mathur M, Mysore M. Brain death in children: why does it have to be so complicated? Ann Neurol. 2012;72(2):300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kirschen MP, Lewis A, Rubin M, Kurtz P, Greer DM. New perspectives on brain death. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021;92(3):255–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sieber FE, Palmon SC, Traystman RJ, Martin LJ. Global incomplete cerebral ischemia produces predominantly cortical neuronal injury. Stroke. 1995;26(11):2091–5. discussion 6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Martin LJ, Brambrink A, Koehler RC, Traystman RJ. Primary sensory and forebrain motor systems in the newborn brain are preferentially damaged by hypoxia-ischemia. J Comp Neurol. 1997;377(2):262–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Smith ML, Auer RN, Siesjo BK. The density and distribution of ischemic brain injury in the rat following 2-10 min of forebrain ischemia. Acta Neuropathol. 1984;64(4):319–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lerner DP, Bassil R, Tadevosyan A, et al. Metabolic values precluding clinical death by neurologic criteria/brain death: survey of neurocritical care society physicians. J Clin Neurosci. 2021;88:16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Olgun G, Newey CR, Ardelt A. Pupillometry in brain death: differences in pupillary diameter between paediatric and adult subjects. Neurol Res. 2015;37(11):945–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Saposnik G, Bueri JA, Maurino J, Saizar R, Garretto NS. Spontaneous and reflex movements in brain death. Neurology. 2000;54(1):221–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Saposnik G, Basile VS, Young GB. Movements in brain death: a systematic review. Can J Neurol Sci. 2009;36(2):154–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Busl KM, Lewis A, Varelas PN. Apnea testing for the determination of brain death: a systematic scoping review. Neurocrit Care. 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Paret G, Barzilay Z. Apnea testing in suspected brain dead children—physiological and mathematical modelling. Intensive Care Med. 1995;21(3):247–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Puccetti DF, Morrison W, Francoeur C, Mai M, Kirschen MP. Apnea testing using continuous positive airway pressure when determining death by neurologic criteria in children: retrospective analysis of potential adverse events. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kirschen MP, McGowan N, Topjian A. Brain death evaluation in children with suspected or confirmed coronavirus disease 2019. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2021;22(3):318–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tibballs J. A critique of the apneic oxygenation test for the diagnosis of “brain death”. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010;11(4):475–8.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Salih F, Hoffmann O, Brandt SA, et al. Safety of apnea testing for the diagnosis of brain death: a comprehensive study on neuromonitoring data and blood gas analysis. Eur J Neurol. 2019;26(6):887–92.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lewis A, Adams N, Chopra A, Kirschen MP. Use of ancillary tests when determining brain death in pediatric patients in the United States. J Child Neurol. 2017;32(12):975–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kirschen MP, Puccetti DF, Morrison W. Incidence and indications for ancillary testing in the determination of death by neurological criteria in children. Pediatr Neurol. 2020;106:68–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Henderson N, McDonald MJ. Ancillary studies in evaluating pediatric brain death. J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2017;6(4):234–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Heran MK, Heran NS, Shemie SD. A review of ancillary tests in evaluating brain death. Can J Neurol Sci. 2008;35(4):409–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zuckier LS. Radionuclide evaluation of brain death in the post-McMath era. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(10):1560–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Young GB, Lee D. A critique of ancillary tests for brain death. Neurocrit Care. 2004;1(4):499–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wijdicks EF. The case against confirmatory tests for determining brain death in adults. Neurology. 2010;75(1):77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. The diagnosis of death by neurological criteria in infants less than two months old. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Francoeur C, Weiss MJ, Macdonald JM, et al. Variability in pediatric brain death determination protocols in the United States. Neurology. 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mathur M, Petersen L, Stadtler M, et al. Variability in pediatric brain death determination and documentation in southern California. Pediatrics. 2008;121(5):988–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Mejia RE, Pollack MM. Variability in brain death determination practices in children. JAMA. 1995;274(7):550–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Chang MY, McBride LA, Ferguson MA. Variability in brain death declaration practices in pediatric head trauma patients. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2003;39(1):7–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Stockwell JA, Pham N, Fortenberry JD. Impact of a computerized note template/checklist on documented adherence to institutional criteria for determination of neurologic death in a pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011;12(3):271–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Krawiec C, Ceneviva GD, Thomas NJ. Assessing and improving documentation of pediatric brain death determination within an electronic health record. Neuropediatrics. 2019;50(2):80–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Lewis A, Adams N, Chopra A, Kirschen MP. Organ support after death by neurologic criteria in pediatric patients. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(9):e916–e24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Mataya L, Ross LF, Ghavam A, Paquette ET. Pediatric intensivist and pediatric neurologist perspectives and practices on death by neurologic criteria. J Clin Ethics. 2021;32(3):195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Lewis A, Adams N, Varelas P, Greer D, Caplan A. Organ support after death by neurologic criteria: results of a survey of US neurologists. Neurology. 2016;87(8):827–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Kon AA, Davidson JE, Morrison W, Danis M, White DB, American College of Critical Care M, et al. Shared decision making in ICUs: an American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(1):188–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Morrison W, Clark JD, Lewis-Newby M, Kon AA. Titrating clinician directiveness in serious pediatric illness. Pediatrics. 2018;142(Suppl 3):S178–S86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Truog RD, Morrison W, Kirschen M. What should we do when families refuse testing for brain death? AMA J Ethics. 2020;22(12):E986–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Neurology, and Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Matthew P. Kirschen & Wynne Morrison

Authors
  1. Matthew P. Kirschen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wynne Morrison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew P. Kirschen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

    Ariane Lewis

  2. Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, USA

    James L. Bernat

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kirschen, M.P., Morrison, W. (2022). Overcoming Challenges in the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria in Pediatric Patients. In: Lewis, A., Bernat, J.L. (eds) Death Determination by Neurologic Criteria. Advances in Neuroethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15947-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15947-3_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15946-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15947-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation