Skip to main content

A New Approach to Teach Conceptual Design Integrating Additive Manufacturing Constraints

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing IV (JCM 2022)

Abstract

In the context of the Industry 4.0, new processes have appeared, such as the additive manufacturing (AM) process. Therefore, new approaches to design parts have to be developed to integrate process constraints. It is very difficult for teachers to effectively guide students during conceptual design for AM, even though various idea generation techniques and methods are available. AM requires an important preparation and compromise in design phases. In addition, design need to be generated in a digital environment. Among the various steps, critical impacts on the final part quality are linked to part orientation. So, this paper focuses on the conceptual design phase to educate future technician and engineers to the design for additive manufacturing. Pilot-study on the teacher's role interacts through active pedagogical tool with students. They need to think in 3D and create directly in 3D. The propose education development use an immersive tool to consider the process constraints. Thereby, students need to deal with an AM process chain. New approaches are analyzed based on the design guidelines for Additive Manufacturing, which were developed by the students themselves. Also, the students estimated opportunities and limits linked to product-process relationship. Finally, the success of the new course contents and form is reviewed by a student evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yavari, M.R.,  Cole, K.D.,  Rao, P.K.: Design Rules for Additive Manufacturing, Understanding the Fundamental Thermal Phenomena to Reduce Scrap. Mechanical & Materials, Engineering Faculty Publications  416 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. De Klerk, R., Mendes, D.A., Pires, M.D., Pinto, D.J., Jorge, J., Simoes, L.D.: Usability studies on building early stage architectural models in virtual reality. Autom. Constr. 103, 104–116 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aalborg PBL, Aalborg Universitet, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pérez, L., Diez, E., Usamentiaga, R., Garcia, D.F.: Industrial robot control and operator training using virtual reality interfaces. Comput. Ind. 109, 114–120 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gibson, I., Rosen, D.W., Stucker, B.: Design for additive manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. Technol. (2015). https ://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3_17

  6. Burdea G.C., Coiffet P.: Virtual Reality Technology,  2 edn. 464 pages. John Wiley & Sons (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moro, C., Stromberga, Z., Raikos, A., Stirling, A.: The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anat. Sci. Educ. 10(6), 549–559 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mathur A.S.: Low cost virtual reality for medical training. In: IEEE Virtual Reality,  France, 23–27 March (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Innocenti, E.D., et al.: Mobile virtual reality for musical genre learning in primary education. Comput. Educ. 139, 102–117 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Aebersold M.: Simulation-based learning: no longer a novelty in undergraduate education.  Online J. Issues  Nurs. 23(2), 1 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Halabi, O.: Immersive virtual reality to enforce teaching in engineering education. Multimedia Tools Appli. 79(3–4), 2987–3004 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08214-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abulrub A.G., Attridge A., Williams M.A.:  Virtual reality in engineering education: the future of creative learning. In: International Conference IEEE EDUCON. Princess Sumaya University of Technology in Amman, Jordan  (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Castronovo F., et al.: Design and development of a virtual reality educational game for architectural and construction reviews. In: 126th American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Florida, 15–19 June (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14.  Carfagni, M., Fiorineschi, L.,  Furferi, R., Governi, L., Rotini, F.: , Usefulness of prototypes in conceptual design: students’nview. Int. J. Interac. Des, Manuf. 14(4), 1305–1319 (2020), ISSN 1955–2513

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rieuf, V., Bouchard, C., Meyrueis, V., Omhover, J.-F.: Emotional activity in early immersive design : Sketches and moodboards in virtual reality. Des. Stud. 48, 43–75 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolfartsberger, J.: Analyzing the potential of virtual reality for engineering design review. Autom. Constr. 104, 27–37 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, K., Zheng, J., Soon, S.H.: Progressive sketching with instant previewing. Comput. Graph. 81, 9–19 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Douin, C., Gruhier, E., Kromer, R., Christmann, O., Perry, N.: A method for design for additive manufacturing rules formulation through spatio-temporal process discretization. In: 32nd CIRP Design Conference. Elsevier (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rebaioli and Fassi: A review on benchmark artifacts for evaluating the geometrical per formance of additive manufacturing processes. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 93, 2571–2598 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wong, Y.S.,  Fuh, Y.H.,   Loh, H.T.,  Mahesh, M.: Rapid Prototyping and Manufacturing Benchmarking, 1st edn., Software Solutions for RP, pp.  57–94 (2002) 

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cajal, C., Santolaria, J., Velazquez, J., Aguado, S., Albajez, J.: Volumetric error compensation technique for 3D printers. Proc. Eng. 63, 642–649 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mbow, M.M., Vignat, F., Marin, P., Perry, N.: 16e Colloque National S-mart, Les Karellis, France (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Häfner, P., Häfner, V., Ovtcharova, J.: Teaching methodology for virtual reality practical course in engineering education. Proc. Comput. Sci. 25, 251–260 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin Kromer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kromer, R., Gruhier, E. (2023). A New Approach to Teach Conceptual Design Integrating Additive Manufacturing Constraints. In: Gerbino, S., Lanzotti, A., Martorelli, M., Mirálbes Buil, R., Rizzi, C., Roucoules, L. (eds) Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing IV. JCM 2022. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15928-2_135

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15928-2_135

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15927-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15928-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics