Abstract
The ever increasing complexity of modern software systems requires engineers to constantly raise the level of abstraction at which they operate to suppress the excessive complex details of real systems and develop efficient architectures. Model Driven Engineering has emerged as a paradigm that enables not only abstraction but also automation. UML, an industry de-facto standard for modelling software systems, has established itself as a diagram-based modelling language. However, focusing on only one specific notation limits human communication and the pool of available engineering tools. The results of our prior experiments support this claim and promote the seamless use of multiple notations to develop and manipulate models. In this paper we detail our efforts on the provision of a fully blended (i.e., graphical and textual) modelling environment for UML-RT state-machines in an industrial context. We report on the definition of a textual syntax and advanced textual editing for UML-RT state-machines as well as the provision of synchronization mechanisms between graphical and textual editors.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
Please note that by graphical/textual model, we intend a model rendered using a graphical/textual notation.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
References
Addazi, L., Ciccozzi, F.: Blended graphical and textual modelling for UML profiles: a proof-of-concept implementation and experiment. J. Syst. Softw. 175, 110912 (2021)
Brambilla, M., Cabot, J., Wimmer, M.: Model-driven software engineering in practice. Synth. Lect. Softw. Eng. 3(1), 1–207 (2017)
Cicchetti, A., Ciccozzi, F., Pierantonio, A.: Multi-view approaches for software and system modelling: a systematic literature review. Softw. Syst. Model. 18(6), 3207–3233 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-018-00713-w
Ciccozzi, F., Tichy, M., Vangheluwe, H., Weyns, D.: Blended Modelling - What, Why and How. In: MPM4CPS Workshop, September 2019. http://www.es.mdh.se/publications/5642-
Dévai, G., Kovács, G.F., An, Á.: Textual, executable, translatable UML. In: OCL@ MoDELS, pp. 3–12. Citeseer (2014)
Gheorghies, O.: MetaUML: tutorial, reference and test suite (2005)
Hili, N., Posse, E., Dingel, J.: Calur: an action language for UML-RT. In: 9th European Congress on Embedded Real Time Software and Systems (ERTS 2018) (2018)
Hofmeister, C., Nord, R., Soni, D.: Applied Software Architecture. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2000)
Hutchinson, J., Whittle, J., Rouncefield, M., Kristoffersen, S.: Empirical assessment of MDE in industry. In: Proceedings of ICSE, pp. 471–480. IEEE (2011)
Jouault, F., Delatour, J.: Towards fixing sketchy UML models by leveraging textual notations: application to real-time embedded systems. In: OCL@ MoDELS, pp. 73–82 (2014)
Latifaj, M., Ciccozzi, F., Mohlin, M., Posse, E.: Towards automated support for blended modelling of UML-RT embedded software architectures. In: 15th European Conference on Software Architecture ECSA 2021, 13 September 2021, Virtual (originally Växjö), Sweden (2021)
Lethbridge, T.C., Abdelzad, V., Husseini Orabi, M., Husseini Orabi, A., Adesina, O.: Merging modeling and programming using Umple. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds.) ISoLA 2016. LNCS, vol. 9953, pp. 187–197. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47169-3_14
Malavolta, I., Lago, P., Muccini, H., Pelliccione, P., Tang, A.: What industry needs from architectural languages: a survey. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 39(6), 869–891 (2012)
Martin, R.C.: Clean Code: A Handbook of Agile Software Craftsmanship. Pearson Education, London (2009)
Mazanec, M., Macek, O.: On general-purpose textual modeling languages. In: Dateso, vol. 12, pp. 1–12. Citeseer (2012)
Mens, T., Van Gorp, P.: A taxonomy of model transformation. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 152, 125–142 (2006)
Object Management Group (OMG): Action Language for Foundational UML (Alf), Version 1.1. OMG Document Number formal/2017-07-04 (2017). http://www.omg.org/spec/ALF/1.1
Selic, B.: Real-time object-oriented modeling. IFAC Proc. Vol. 29(5), 1–6 (1996)
Selic, B.: The pragmatics of model-driven development. IEEE Softw. 20(5), 19–25 (2003)
Tisi, M., Jouault, F., Fraternali, P., Ceri, S., Bézivin, J.: On the use of higher-order model transformations. In: Paige, R.F., Hartman, A., Rensink, A. (eds.) ECMDA-FA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5562, pp. 18–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02674-4_3
Tiso, A., Reggio, G., Leotta, M.: Unit testing of model to text transformations. In: AMT 2014-Analysis of Model Transformations Workshop Proceedings, p. 14 (2014)
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Vinnova through the ITEA3 BUMBLE project (rn. 18006). We would like to thank Ernesto Posse for his great support in technical discussions related to the UML-RT textual implementation in Papyrus-RT.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Latifaj, M., Ciccozzi, F., Anwar, M.W., Mohlin, M. (2022). Blended Graphical and Textual Modelling of UML-RT State-Machines: An Industrial Experience. In: Scandurra, P., Galster, M., Mirandola, R., Weyns, D. (eds) Software Architecture. ECSA 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13365. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15116-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15116-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15115-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15116-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)