Skip to main content

Impact of Machine Learning on Safety Monitors

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security (SAFECOMP 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13414))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Machine Learning components in safety-critical applications can perform some complex tasks that would be unfeasible otherwise. However, they are also a weak point concerning safety assurance. An aspect requiring study is how the interactions between machine-learning components and other non-ML components evolve with training of the former. It is theoretically possible that learning by Neural Networks may reduce the effectiveness of error checkers or safety monitors, creating a major complication for safety assurance. We present an initial exploration of this problem focused on automated driving, where machine learning is heavily used. We simulated operational testing of a standard vehicle architecture, where a machine learning-based Controller is responsible for driving the vehicle and a separate Safety Monitor is provided to detect hazardous situations and trigger emergency action to avoid accidents. Among the results, we observed that indeed improving the Controller could make the Safety Monitor less effective; it is even possible for a training increment to make the Controller’s own behaviour safer but the vehicle’s less safe. We discuss implications for practice and for research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. WAYMO: Technology. https://waymo.com/tech/. Accessed 23 Dec 2021

  2. NVIDIA: Training AI for Self-Driving Vehicles: the challenge of scale. https://developer.nvidia.com. Accessed 23 Dec 2021

  3. Drago Anguelov (Waymo): MIT Self-Driving Cars (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. WAYMO: Waymo Safety Report (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. UNECE: UN Regulation on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems for cars to significantly reduce crashes (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. EU: Road safety: commission welcomes agreement on new EU rules to help save lives (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. American Safety Council – Should Autonomous Emergency Braking be Mandatory?

    Google Scholar 

  8. Popov, P., Strigini, L.: Assessing asymmetric fault-tolerant software. ISSRE, IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao, X. et al.: Assessing safety-critical systems from operational testing: a study on autonomous vehicles. Inform. Software Technol. 128, 106393 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Littlewood, B., Strigini, L.: Validation of ultrahigh dependability for software-based systems. Commun. ACM 36, 69–80 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Butler, R.W., Finelli, G.B.: The infeasibility of quantifying the reliability of life-critical real-time software. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 19(1), 3–12 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kalra, N., Paddock, S.M.: Driving to safety: how many miles of driving would it take to demonstrate autonomous vehicle reliability? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Koopman, P., Wagner, M.: Autonomous vehicle safety: an interdisciplinary challenge. IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Magaz. 9, 90–96 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Varshney, K.R.: Engineering safety in machine learning. IEEE ITA (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nguyen, A., Yosinski, J., Clune, J.: Deep neural networks are easily fooled: High confidence predictions for unrecognizable images. CVPR, IEEE, pp. 427–436 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao, D., et al.: Autonomous driving simulation for unmanned vehicles. In: IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pp. 185–190 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baltodano, S., et al.: The RRADS platform: a real road autonomous driving simulator. In: Proceedings of AUTOUI, pp. 281–288 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Osiński, B., et al.: Simulation-based reinforcement learning for real-world autonomous driving. IEEE ICRA, pp. 6411–6418 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Koopman, P., Wagner, M.: Challenges in autonomous vehicle testing and validation. SAE Int. J. Transp. Saf. 4(1), 15–24 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Grigorescu, S., et al.: A survey of deep learning techniques for autonomous driving. J. Field Robot. 37(3), 362–386 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dosovitskiy, A., et al.: CARLA: an open urban driving simulator. CoRL, pp. 1–16 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lillicrap, T.P., et al.: Continuous Control with Reinforcement Learning. arXiv:150902971 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Caspi, I., Leibovich, G., Novik, G., Endrawis, S.: Reinforcement Learning Coach (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rusu, R.B., Cousins, S.: 3d is here: Point cloud library (pcl). IEEE ICRA, pp. 1–4 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bozkurt, E.: LidarObstacleDetection (2019). https://github.com/enginBozkurt/

  26. Greengard, S.: Gaming machine learning. Commun. ACM 60.12 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Singh, N., et al.: Facial recognition using deep learning. In: Jain, V., Chaudhary, G., Taplamacioglu, M., Agarwal, M. (eds.) Advances in Data Sciences, Security and Applications, LNEE, vol. 612, pp. 375–382. Springer, Singapore (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0372-6_30

  28. Rao, Q., Jelena F.: Deep learning for self-driving cars: Chances and challenges. SEFAIS 2018

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ravi, M., Kantheti, S.C.: Application of artificial intelligence in healthcare: chances and challenges. Curr. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hoang, D.-T., Kang, H.-J.: A survey on deep learning based bearing fault diagnosis. Neurocomputing 335, 327–335 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jesse, L., et al.: Towards fully autonomous driving: Systems and algorithms. In: 2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Koorosh, A., et al.: SafeML: Safety monitoring of machine learning classifiers through statistical difference measures. In: Zeller, M., Höfig, K. (eds.) IMBSA, LNPSE, vol. 12297. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58920-2_13

  33. Kurd, Z., Kelly, T., Austin, J.: Developing artificial neural networks for safety critical systems. Neural Comput. Appl. 16(1), 11–19 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Randy, G., et al.: Explainable AI: the new 42? In: Holzinger, A., Kieseberg, P., Tjoa, A., Weippl, E. (eds.) CD-MAKE, LNISA, vol. 11015. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99740-7_21

  35. Cheng, C.-H.: Safety-aware hardening of 3D object detection neural network systems. In: Casimiro, A., Ortmeier, F., Bitsch, F., Ferreira, P. (eds.) SAFECOMP, LNPSE, vol. 12234. Springer, Cham, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54549-9_14

  36. Koopman, P., et al.: Credible autonomy safety argumentation. SCSC, UK (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gauerhof, L., Munk, P., Burton, S.: Structuring validation targets of a machine learning function applied to automated driving. In: Gallina, B., Skavhaug, A., Bitsch, F. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2018. LNCS, vol. 11093, pp. 45–58. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99130-6_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Huang, X., et al.: A survey of safety and trustworthiness of deep neural networks: verification, testing, adversarial attack and defence, and interpretability. Comput. Sci. Rev. 37, 100270 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Strigini’s work was supported in part by ICRI-SAVe, the Intel Collaborative Research Institute on Safe Automated Vehicles. The authors are grateful to Peter Bishop for his insightful comments on the results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Terrosi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Terrosi, F., Strigini, L., Bondavalli, A. (2022). Impact of Machine Learning on Safety Monitors. In: Trapp, M., Saglietti, F., Spisländer, M., Bitsch, F. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13414. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14835-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14835-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-14834-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-14835-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics