Skip to main content

Challenging Patriarchism in the Family: Law Reform and Female Protest in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Europe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Feminist Approaches to Law

Part of the book series: Gender Perspectives in Law ((GPL,volume 1))

  • 282 Accesses

Abstract

The article deals with the struggle of the European women’s movements for equal rights in the family in the nineteenth and twentieth century and the historical relationship of women with the law. The law codes of the Enlightenment restrained to different degrees married women’s autonomy to function as independent persons in the law and in consequence in society. They worked as a barrier besides the exclusion from political especially suffrage rights to rule women out from equal citizenship rights. It is not surprising that women started to protest against their experience of discrimination in law and tried to use it in turn as a motor for change.

Family law is decisive for women’s rights as it was here, where they had been restricted in the hardest possible way even in relationship to their own children. The struggles in the different European countries for equal laws in the family were remarkably similar in their historic patterns and in their connectedness to the efforts for women’s advancement. It is astonishing how much the legal discrimination against women across legal families and nations is part of all legal systems. It belongs to the basic conditions of the state orders of Europe, without this continuing to be perceived and described outside the history of women and as the basis of the political order of Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Anonymous (1901).

  2. 2.

    Bock (1999), p. 119; Röwekamp (2018a).

  3. 3.

    In most of the new states in Central- and Eastern Europe the governments worked on new civil codes that reflected their new statehood. See Sect. 4.3. as well as Gerhard (2016); Löhnig and Wagner (2018); Löhning (2021).

  4. 4.

    Examples are in Sect. 3.

  5. 5.

    Davidoff and Hall (1987), Frevert (1995), Hausen (1976), and Smith (1981).

  6. 6.

    Gerhard (2016), Kimble and Röwekamp (2017a, b), and Mecke and Meder (2013, 2015).

  7. 7.

    Müller-Freienfels (2003) and Vogel (1995).

  8. 8.

    I have used for this article a larger amount of literature I can cite here due to the length of the article. I hope to be able to include all the secondary literature in a book version later.

  9. 9.

    Vogel (1997).

  10. 10.

    Feinberg (2006), Kimble and Röwekamp (2018), and Stegmann (2000).

  11. 11.

    Vogel (1997, 1998); Wieacker (1995), pp. 384–385.

  12. 12.

    Pateman (1988), pp. 39–76 and 116–153; Vogel (1998), p. 41.

  13. 13.

    For evidence see the sections below.

  14. 14.

    Baker (1984).

  15. 15.

    Eene Vrouw (1870) and Mill (1869).

  16. 16.

    Discours de Mlle Maria Deraismes (1880), p. 58.

  17. 17.

    Meyer (1937), p. 149.

  18. 18.

    Duggan (1915).

  19. 19.

    Stanton (1884), p. 251.

  20. 20.

    Mozzoni (1864), p. 200.

  21. 21.

    Dickmann (2013) and Howard (1978).

  22. 22.

    Kimble (2023) and Offen (2017).

  23. 23.

    Cova (2017).

  24. 24.

    Anonymous (1896), p. 49.

  25. 25.

    Claeys (1891), p. 8; Mozzoni (1864), p. 194.

  26. 26.

    Pietrow-Ennker (1999) and Ruthchild (2010).

  27. 27.

    Stasova (1899), cit. Ruthchild (2010), p. 13.

  28. 28.

    Wollstonecraft (1790) and Loewenherz (1895).

  29. 29.

    Buske (2004), Czelk (2005), and Laslett et al. (1980).

  30. 30.

    Boddaert-Schuuerbeque Boëye et al. (1912); Bosch (2004); Braun (1992); Frank (1892), p. 202; Carlier (2010), pp. 141–160; Cova (1997); Fuchs (2008); Gubin (2002); Offen (2017); Sevenhuijsen (1986).

  31. 31.

    Offen (2017), p. 286.

  32. 32.

    Martin (1896).

  33. 33.

    Mozzoni (1864), p. 194; Buttafuoco (1994); Dickmann (2002), pp. 91–122.

  34. 34.

    Kinnunen (2011).

  35. 35.

    Röwekamp (2018b).

  36. 36.

    Holocombe (1983), Lehmann (2006), Röwekamp (2018b), and Sperling and Wray (2009).

  37. 37.

    Arenal (1884), pp. 33–39; de Burgos (1904); Nash (2004); Nielfa (2017).

  38. 38.

    Cova (2017).

  39. 39.

    Serafini (1873); Caldwell (1991), pp. 51–68; Seymour (2006).

  40. 40.

    Anonymous (1896), p. 136.

  41. 41.

    Anonymous (1896), p. 136.

  42. 42.

    Frysak (2003); Harmat (1999), pp. 1–65.

  43. 43.

    Miskolczy Meller (1913, 1914); Loutfi (2006); Zimmermann (1999), pp. 298–322.

  44. 44.

    Kempin-Spyri (1894); Mackenroth (1901); Meyer (1937); Arni (2004), pp. 26–34; Rogger (2021), pp. 157–201.

  45. 45.

    Dickmann (2002), pp. 91–122.

  46. 46.

    Mozzoni (1892), p. 26.

  47. 47.

    Norton (1839); Probert (2013); Shanley (1993), pp. 22–39.

  48. 48.

    Doxiadis (2017) and Varikas (2003).

  49. 49.

    Bader-Zaar (1999); Geisel (1997), pp. 113–115.

  50. 50.

    Otto-Peters (1876).

  51. 51.

    van Eeghen-Boissevain (1910).

  52. 52.

    ICW (1912), Kimble (2017a), Offen (2013), Röwekamp (2017), and Rupp (2020).

  53. 53.

    For example: Arenal (1974), Beth (1925), de Burgos (1904), Ciselet (1930), Eene Vrouw (1870), Kempin-Spyri (1894), Meyer (1937), Mill (1869), Mozzoni (1864, 1892), and Norton (1839).

  54. 54.

    For example: Goekoop-de Jong van Beek en Donk (1897), Orzeszkowa (1873), and Albert (1875).

  55. 55.

    Kimble (2023), Röwekamp (2011), Kimble and Röwekamp (2017a, b), and Kimble and Röwekamp (2018).

  56. 56.

    Löhning (2021) and Löhnig and Wagner (2018).

  57. 57.

    Daskalova and Zimmermann (2017), Feinberg (2006), Kimble and Röwekamp (2017b, 2018), Kraft (2004), Osterkamp (2017), and Zimmermann (1999), pp. 297–321.

  58. 58.

    Brée and Hin (2020), Bock and Thane (1994), Koonz (1987), and Offen (2017).

  59. 59.

    Goldman (1993); Ruthchild (2010), pp. 239–247; Wood (2000).

  60. 60.

    Ravn (1989), p. 14.

  61. 61.

    Melby et al. (2002) and Willekens (2013).

  62. 62.

    Meyer (1937), Mecke and Meder (2015), and Ravn (1989).

  63. 63.

    Electoral flyer of the Christian National Party, cit. up. Szapor (2018), p. 133.

  64. 64.

    Feinberg (2006), Kimble (2023), Kimble and Röwekamp (2017a, b, 2018), and Röwekamp (2011).

  65. 65.

    Ristikivi (2021), Tammkõrv (2013), and Tartul (2006).

  66. 66.

    Dadej (2017), Kraft (2004), and Schwartz (2021).

  67. 67.

    Feinberg (2006); Harmat (1999), pp. 1–65; Osterkamp (2017); Röwekamp (2021); Zimmermann (1999).

  68. 68.

    Beth (1925), Harmat (1999), and Weinzierl (1978).

  69. 69.

    Blasius (1987) and Röwekamp (2018c).

  70. 70.

    Dawes (2014), Flynn (2020), and Moyse (2009).

  71. 71.

    Kušej (1922), Božić (1939), Drakić (2018), Krešić (2021), and Stojaković (2017).

  72. 72.

    Cova (1997), Kimble (2017b, 2023), and Offen (2017).

  73. 73.

    Anonymous (1923), cit. Cova (2017), p. 382.

  74. 74.

    Cova (2017).

  75. 75.

    Davidson (2011) and Nielfa (2017).

  76. 76.

    Bakker-Nort (1925) and Braun (1992).

  77. 77.

    Annales parlementaires (1927), cit. Jacques (2013a), p. 126.

  78. 78.

    Ciselet (1930).

  79. 79.

    Ciselet (1930), p. 182.

  80. 80.

    Carlier (2010) and Jacques (2013a, b).

  81. 81.

    Bucur and Miroiu (2018), Cheschebec (2012), and Kimble and Röwekamp (2018).

  82. 82.

    Anonymous (1917).

  83. 83.

    Ancona (1919) and Mastroberti (2016).

  84. 84.

    Ancona (1919) and de Grazia (1993).

  85. 85.

    Dodd v. Dodd (1906), p. 207.

  86. 86.

    Report (1912), p. 88.

  87. 87.

    Dyhouse (1989), Moyse (1996, 2009), and Probert (1999).

  88. 88.

    Anonymous (1925), p. 389.

  89. 89.

    Skeffington 1937, cit. Beaumont (1997), p. 563.

  90. 90.

    Zimmermann (2017, 2018) and Wikander et al. (1995).

  91. 91.

    Bock and Thane (1994), Cova (2017), de Grazia (1993), Koonz (1987), and Lenaerts (2014).

  92. 92.

    Beaumont (2016); Caldwell (1991), pp. 69–86; Gerhard (2011).

  93. 93.

    Vol’son (1929), p. 450.

  94. 94.

    Goldman (1993, 2002), Großekathöfer (2003), Einhorn (1993), Lapidus (1978), Reid (1998), Schneider (2004), Shulman (2012), Wolchik and Meyer (1985), and Wood (2000).

References

Sources

  • Albert A (Anna Kistner) (1875) Harte Gesetze. np, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Ancona M (1919) Italy. Senate passes Sacchi Bill. International Women’s News 13(11):156

    Google Scholar 

  • Annales parlementaires de Belgique, senate, 1926–1927, 25 January 1927

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1896) Die Protestversammlung in Berlin am 29. Juni 1896. Die Frauenbewegung 2(14):136–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1901) Die Protestversammlung der Frauen gegen das Vereins- und Versammlungsrecht am 10. Februar in Berlin. Frauenbewegung 7(4):25–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1917) Italy. A bill on the legal status of women. International Women’s News 11(7):103

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1923) Congresso feminista de Roma, Alma Feminina 5(6):n.p

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1925) Women’s position in Ireland. Equal Rights 11(49):389–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Arenal C (1884) Spain. In: Stanton T (ed) The Woman Question in Europe: A Series of Original Essays. Sampson Low, Marston, Searle, and Rivington, London, pp 330–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Arenal C (1974) La emancipación de la mujer en España. Júcar, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker-Nort B (1925) Het echtscheidingsvraagstuk. Meulenhoff

    Google Scholar 

  • Beth M (1925) Neues Eherecht: eine rechtsvergleichende Studie mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Gesetzgebung von Deutschland, der Schweiz, Österreich u.a. Breitenstein, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddaert-Schuuerbeque Boëye H, van Dorp E, Rutgers-Hoitsema MWH (1912) Pays-Bas. In: International Council of Women (ed) Women’s position in the law of the nations. A compilation of laws of different countries. G. Braunsche, Karlsruhe, pp 70–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Božić A (1939) Položaj žene u privatnom pravu kroz istoriju do danas (The position of women in private law through the history until today). Beogradski univerzitet, Pravni fakultet, Belgrade

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciselet G (1930) La Femme, ses droits, ses devoirs et ses revendications. Esquisse de la situation légale de la femme en Belgique et à l’étranger. L’Eglantine, Bruxelles

    Google Scholar 

  • Claeys E (1891) Een woord aan de vrouwen. Foucaert, Gent

    Google Scholar 

  • de Burgos C (1904) El divorcio en España. Viuda de Rodríguez Serra, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Discours de Mlle Maria Deraismes (1880) In: Association Française pour l’Abolition de la Prostitution Réglementée (ed) La Police des moeurs, réunion de la Salle Lévis du 10 avril 1880. AFAPR, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd v. Dodd. 1906. P 189, 207

    Google Scholar 

  • Duggan ME (1915) The woman lawyers - her work for peace. Irish Citizen 3(49):381

    Google Scholar 

  • Eene Vrouw (G. Berkhuis-Feddes) (1870) Gelikjk recht voor allen! H. Kuipers, Leuwarden

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank L (1892) Essai sur la condition politique de la femme. Étude de sociologie et de législation. A. Rousseau, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Goekoop-de Jong van Beek en Donk C (1897) Hilda van Suylenburg. Feministische Uitgeverij Sara, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • International Council of Women (Standing Committee on laws concerning the Legal Position of Women) (1912) Women’s position in the lass of the nations. G. Braunsche, Karlsruhe

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempin-Spyri E (1894) Die Ehefrau im künftigen Privatrecht der Schweiz. A. Müller, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Kušej R (1922) Verska anketa u Beogradu i njeni zaključci. Natianila, Ljubljana

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenherz J (1895) Prostitution oder Production. Eigentum oder Ehe? Studie zur Frauenbewegung. Self-Published, Neuwied

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenroth A (1901) Ueber die Rechtsstellung der Frau im Vorentwurf eines schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuchs in vergleichender Darstellung mit dem deutschen und österreichischen Recht. Schröter, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin M (1896) Dépopulation. Le Journal des Femmes 54:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer HH (1937) Das Eherecht unter dem Gesichtspunkt der Gleichberechtigung von Mann und Frau. Eine Kritik des schweizerischen Eherechts unter vergleichsweiser Heranziehung des deutschen und schwedischen Rechts. Lang, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill JS (1869) The subjection of women. Longmans, Green, Reader & Dyer, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Miskolczy Meller E (1913) Reports from societies affiliated to the Alliance. Hungary. International Women’s News 8(4):39

    Google Scholar 

  • Miskolczy Meller E (1914) Hungary. International Women’s News 8(8):89–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Mozzoni AM (1864) La donna ed i suoi rapporti social. la Tipografia Sociale, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Mozzoni AM (1892) I ‘socialisti e l’emancipazione della donna. Tip. Sociale diretta de G. Panizza, Alessandria

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton C (1839) A plain letter to the Lord Chancellor on the Infant Custody Bill. J. Ridgway, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Orzeszkowa E (1873) (German Translation 1988). Ullstein, Marta. Franfurt/Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto-Peters L (1876) Einige Deutsche Gesetz-Paragraphen über die Stellung der Frau. ADF, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Report (1912) Report of the Royal Commission on divorce and matrimonial causes. H.M. Stationery Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Serafini MA (1873) Matrimonio e divorzio: pensieri. Stabilimento tipográfico nazionale, Salerno

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton T (ed) (1884) The woman question in Europe. A series of original essays. Sampson Low, Marston, Searle and Rivington, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stasova N (1899) Vospominaniia i ocherki. Tipografiia M. Merkusheva, St. Petersburg

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eeghen-Boissevain M (1910) Netherlands. International Women’s News 4(5):39

    Google Scholar 

  • Vol’son SIA (1929) Sotsilogiia braka i sem′i:opyt vvedeniia v marksistskuuiu geneonomiiu (Sociology of MARRIAGE AND FAMILY). Belorusskogo gos. univ, Minsk, Izd

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollstonecraft M (1790) Vindication of the rights of men, in a letter to the right honourable Edmund Burke. Occasioned by his reflections on the revolution in France. J. Johnson, London

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Literature

  • Arni C (2004) Entzweiungen. Die Krise der Ehe um 1900. Böhlau, Cologne

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader-Zaar B (1999) Die Wiener Frauenbewegung und der Rechtsschutz für Frauen 1895-1914. In: Angerer T, Bader-Zaar B, Gradner MM (eds) Geschichte und Recht. Festschrift für Gerald Stourzh zum 70. Geburtstag. Böhlau, Vienna, pp 365–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker P (1984) The domestication of politics: women and American political society, 1780–1920. Am Hist Rev 89(3):620–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont C (1997) Women, Citizenship and Catholicism and the Irish Free State, 1922–1948. Women’s Hist Rev 6(4):563–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont C (2016) Housewives and citizens. Domesticity and the women’s movement in England, 1928-64. Manchester University Press, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasius D (1987) Ehescheidung in Deutschland 1794-1945. Vandenhoek & Ruprecht, Göttingen

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bock G (1999) Frauenwahlrecht. Deutschland um 1900 in vergleichender Perspektive. In: Grüttner M, Haupt H-G, Hachtmann R (eds) Geschichte und Emanzipation. Festschrift für Reinhard Rürup. Campus, Frankfurt am Main, pp 95–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock G, Thane P (1994) Maternity and gender policies: women and the rise of the European welfare states, 1880s-1950s. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch M (2004) First-wave feminism in the Netherlands. In: Palatschek S, Pietrow-Ennker B (eds) Women’s emancipation movements in the nineteenth century. A European perspective. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 53–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun M (1992) De prijs van de liefde. De eerste feministische golf, het huwelijksrecht en de vaderlandse geschiedenis. Het Spinhuis, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Brée S, Hin S (eds) (2020) The impact of World War I on marriages, divorces, and gender relations in Europe. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucur M, Miroiu M (2018) The birth of democratic citizenship: women in modern Romania. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buske S (2004) Fräulein Mutter und ihr Bastard. Eine Geschichte der Unehelichkeit in Deutschland. Wallstein, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttafuoco A (1994) Motherhood as a political strategy: the role of the Italian women’s movement in the creation of the Cassa Nazionale Maternita. In: Gisela Bock G, Thane P (eds) Maternity and gender policies: women and the rise of the European welfare states, 1880s-1950s. Routledge, London, pp 178–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell L (1991) Italian family matters. Women, politics and legal reform. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carlier J (2010) Moving beyond boundaries. An entangled history of feminism in Belgium, 1890-1914. PhD University of Gent

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheschebec R (2012) The achievement of female suffrage in Romania. In: Ruiz BR, Marín RR (eds) The struggle for female suffrage in Europe. Voting to become citizens. Brill, Leiden, pp 369–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Cova A (1997) Maternité et droits des femmes en France, XIXe–XXe siècles. Anthropos-Economica, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Cova A (2017) Legal position of women in Portugal. The case of the Standing Committee on Legislation of the National Council of Portuguese Women (CNMP), 1914-1947. In: Kimble SL, Röwekamp M (eds) New perspectives on European women’s legal history. Routledge, New York, pp 375–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Czelk A (2005) “Privilegierung” und Vorurteil. Positionen der Bürgerlichen Frauenbewegung zum Unehelichenrecht und zur Kindstötung im Kaiserreich. Böhlau, Cologne

    Google Scholar 

  • Dadej I (2017) “The Napoleonic Civil Code is to Blame for My Decision to Study Law”. Female law student and lawyers in the Second Polish Republic (1918-1939). In: Kimble SL, Röwekamp M (eds) New perspectives on European women’s legal history. Routledge, New York, pp 217–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Daskalova K, Zimmermann S (2017) Women’s and gender history. In: Livezeanu I, von Klimó Á (eds) The Routledge history of East Central Europe since 1700. Routledge, New York, pp 278–322

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davidoff L, Hall C (1987) Family fortunes: men and women of the English Middle Class, 1780–1850. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson J (2011) Women, fascism and work in Francoist Spain: the law for political, professional and labour rights. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes H (2014) Catholic women’s movements in liberal and fascist Italy. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Grazia V (1993) How fascism ruled women. Italy, 1922-1945. University of California Press, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickmann E (2002) Die Italienische Frauenbewegung im 19. Jahrhundert. Domus Editoria Europea, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickmann E (2013) The passing of the Civil Code in Italy in 1865 and Anna Maria Mozzoni’s criticism of the traditional family concept. In: Mecke C-E, Meder S (eds) Family law in early women’s rights debates. Western Europe and the United States in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Böhlau, Cologne, pp 143–169

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Doxiadis E (2017) Adaption, emulation, or tradition? Greek family law and the courts in the first decades of the modern Greek State. In: Kimble SL, Röwekamp M (eds) New perspectives on European’s women’s legal history. Routledge, New York, pp 27–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Drakić G (2018) Jugoslawien. Codification of civil law in the Yugoslav State between the world wars. In: Löhnig M, Wagner S (eds) Nichtgeborene Kinder des Liberalismus? Zivilgesetzgebung im Mitteleuropa der Zwischenkriegszeit. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, pp 195–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyhouse C (1989) Feminism and the family in England 1890-1939. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn B (1993) Cinderella goes to market: citizenship, gender, and women’s movements in East Central Europe. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg M (2006) Elusive equality: gender, citizenship, and the limits of democracy in Czechoslovakia, 1918-1950. University of Pittsburg Press, Pittsburgh

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn A (2020) Falangist and National Catholic Women in the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939). Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frevert U (1995) “Mann und Weib, und Weib und Mann.” Geschlechterdifferenzen in der Moderne. Beck, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Frysak E (2003) Legale Kämpfe. Die petitionsrechtlichen Forderungen der österreichischen bürgerlichen Frauenbewegung zur Änderung des Ehe- und Familienrechts um die Jahrhundertwende. L’Homme 14:65–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs RG (2008) Contested paternity. Constructing families in modern France. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisel B (1997) Klasse, Geschlecht und Recht. Vergleichende sozialhistorische Untersuchung der Rechtsberatungspraxis von Frauen- und Arbeiterbewegung (1894-1933). Nomos, Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhard U (2011) Family law and gender equality: comparing family policies in post-war Western Europe. In: Hagemann K, Jarausch K, Allemann-Ghionda C (eds) Time policies: child care and primary education in post-war Europe. Berghahn Books, New York, pp 75–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhard U (2016) Civil law and gender in nineteenth-century Europe. Clio 43(1):250–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman WZ (1993) Women, the state, and revolution: Soviet Family Policy and Social Life, 1917–1936. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman WZ (2002) Women at the gates: gender and industry in Stalin’s Russia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Großekathöfer D (2003) Es ist ja jetzt Gleichberechtigung: die Stellung der Frau im nachehelichen Unterhaltsrecht der DDR. Böhlau, Cologne

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubin É (2002) La recherche de la paternité. La loi d’avril 1908: victoire ou défaite féministe? In: Coenen M-T (ed) Corps de femmes. Sexualité et contrôle social. De Boeck Université, Bruxelles, pp 97–113

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harmat U (1999) Ehe auf Widerruf? Der Konflikt um das Eherecht in Österreich 1918–1938. Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausen K (1976) Die Polarisierung der “Geschlechtscharaktere”. Eine Spiegelung der Dissoziation von Erwerbs- und Familienleben. In: Conze W (ed) Sozialgeschichte der Familie in der Neuzeit Europas. Klett, Stuttgart, pp 363–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Holocombe L (1983) Wives and property. Reform of the married women’s property law in nineteenth-century England. University of Toronto Press, Toronto

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Howard JJ (1978) The Civil Code of 1865 and the origins of the feminist movement in Italy. In: Caroli BB, Harney RF, Tomasi LF (eds) The Italian immigrant woman in North America. Multicultural History Society of Ontario, Toronto, pp 14–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques C (2013a) Les feminists belges et les lutes piour l’égalité politique et économique (1918-1968). Académie royale de Belgique, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques C (2013b) The reform of marital status: a challenge for the Belgian women’s movement from 1880 until 1940. In: Mecke C-E, Meder S (eds) Family law in early women’s rights debates. Western Europe and the United States in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Böhlau, Cologne, pp 113–142

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kimble SL (2017a) Transatlantic networks for legal feminism, 1888-1912. In: Schüler A, Waldschmidt-Nelson B (eds) Forging bonds across borders: transatlantic collaborations for women’s rights and social justice in the long nineteenth century. Bulletin of the German Historical Institute, Supplement 13, Washington, D.C., pp 55–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimble SL (2017b) The rise of “Modern Portias”. Feminist legal activism in Republican France, 1890s-1940s. In: Kimble SL, Röwekamp M (eds) New perspectives on European women’s legal history. Routledge, New York, pp 125–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimble SL (2023) Women, feminism, and the law in modern France: justice redressed. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimble SL, Röwekamp M (eds) (2017a) New perspectives on European’s women’s legal history. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimble SL, Röwekamp M (2017b) Introduction. Legal cultures and communities of female protest in modern European history, 1860-1960. In: Kimble SL, Röwekamp M (eds) New perspectives on European women’s legal history. Routledge, New York, pp 1–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimble SL, Röwekamp M (2018) Exclusion and inclusion in the legal professions: negotiating gender in Central Europe, 1887-1945. Acta Poloniae Historica 117:52–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnunen T (2011) Frederika Bremers Töchter – finnisch-schwedische Geschichte feministische Gemeinschaft. Ariadne 60:18–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Koonz C (1987) Mothers in fatherland. Women, the family, and Nazi politics. St. Martin’s Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft C (2004) Das Eherecht in der Zweiten Polnischen Republik (1917–1939) und das gescheiterte Ideal gleichberechtigter Staatsbürgerschaft. In: Gehmacher J, Harvey E, Kemlein S (eds) Zwischen Kriegen. Nationen, Nationalismen und Geschlechterverhältnisse in Mittel- und Osteuropa 1918–1939. Fibre, Osnabrück, pp 63–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Krešić M (2021) Much Ado about nothing. Debates on the type of marriage in Yugoslavia between the two world wars. In: Löhning M (ed) Kulturkampf um die Ehe. Reform des europäischen Eherechts nach dem Großen Krieg. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, pp 187–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapidus GW (1978) Women in Soviet Society: equality, development, and social change. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laslett P, Oosterveen K, Smith RM (eds) (1980) Bastardy and its comparative history: studies in the history of illegitimacy and marital nonconformism in Britain, France, Germany, Sweden, North America, Jamaica, and Japan. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J (2006) Die Ehefrau und ihr Vermögen. Reformforderungen der bürgerlichen Frauenbewegung zum Ehegüterrecht um 1900. Böhlau, Cologne

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenaerts M (2014) National socialist family law. The influence of national socialism on marriage and divorce in Germany and the Netherlands. Brill, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Löhnig M, Wagner S (eds) (2018) Nichtgeborene Kinder des Liberalismus? Zivilgesetzgebung im Mitteleuropa der Zwischenkriegszeit. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Löhning M (2021) Kulturkampf um die Ehe. Reform des europäischen Eherechts nach dem Großen Krieg. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Loutfi A (2006) Legal ambiguity and the “European norm”: women’s independence and Hungarian family law, 1880-1913. In: Lanzinger M, Frysak E (eds) Women’s movements: networks and debates in post-communist countries in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Böhlau, Cologne, pp 507–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastroberti F (2016) La “Legge Sacchi” sulla condizione guiridica della donna: grande riforma o “modestissima legggina”? Quaderni de Dipartimento Jonico 4:45–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Mecke C-E, Meder S (eds) (2013) Family law in early women’s rights debates. Western Europe and the United States in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Böhlau, Cologne

    Google Scholar 

  • Mecke C-E, Meder S (eds) (2015) Reformforderungen zum Familienrecht international. Westeuropa und die USA (1830-1914). Böhlau, Cologne

    Google Scholar 

  • Melby K, Pylkkänen A, Rosenbeck B, Carlsson Wetterberg C (2002) The Nordic model of marriage and the welfare state. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyse CA (1996) Reform of marriage and divorce law in England and Wales 1909–1937. DPhil thesis, University of Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyse C (2009) A history of the mother’s union: women, anglicanism and globalization, 1876-2008. Boydell Press, Woodbridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Freienfels W (2003) The emergence of Droit de Famille and Familienrecht in continental Europe and the introduction of family Law in England. J Family Hist 28(1):31–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash M (2004) The rise of the women’s movement in nineteenth century Spain. In: Paletschek S, Pietrow-Ennker B (eds) Women’s emancipation movements in the 19th century. A European perspective. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 243–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielfa G (2017) Family law, legal reforms, female lawyers, and feminist claims in Spain, 1868-1950. In: Kimble SL, Röwekamp M (eds) New perspectives on European women’s legal history. Routledge, New York, pp 55–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Offen K (2013) National or international? How and why the Napoleonic Code drove married women’s legal rights on the agenda of the International Council of Women and the League of Nations: an overview. In: Mecke C-E, Meder S (eds) Family law in early women’s rights debates. Western Europe and the United States in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Böhlau, Cologne, pp 42–59

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Offen K (2017) Debating the woman question in the French Third Republic, 1870-1920. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterkamp J (2017) Equality at stake: legal and national discourses on family law in Czechoslovakia, 1918-1931. In: Kimble SL, Röwekamp M (eds) New perspective on European’s women’s legal history. Routledge, New York, pp 97–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman C (1988) The sexual contract. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietrow-Ennker B (1999) Rußlands “neue Menschen”: die Entwicklung der Frauenbewegung von den Anfängen bis zur Oktoberrevolution. Campus, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Probert R (1999) The controversy of equality and the matrimonial causes Act 1923. Child Family Law Q 11(1):33–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Probert R (2013) Family law reform and the women’s movement in England and Wales, 1830–1914. In: Mecke C-E, Meder S (eds) Family law in early women’s rights debates. Western Europe and the United States in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Böhlau, Cologne, pp 170–193

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ravn A-B (1989) Mål og midler i den gamle og nye kvindebevægelse. Lighed eller forskellighed – et umuligt valg! Nyt Forum for Kvindeforskning 9(3):8–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid SE (1998) All Stalin’s Women: gender and power in Soviet Art of the 1930s. Slavic Rev 57(1):133–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ristikivi M (2021) Women and the legal academy in Estonia. In memory of Vera Poska-Grünthal, the first woman law lecturer in Tartu. In: Schultz U, Shaw G, Thornton M, Auchmuty R (eds) Gender and careers in the legal academy. Bloomsbury Publishing, Oñati, pp 309–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogger F (2021) “Wir werden auf das Stimmrecht hinarbeiten!” Die Ursprünge der Schweizer Frauenbewegung und ihre Pionierin Julie Ryff (1831-1908). NZZ Libro, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Röwekamp M (2011) Die ersten deutschen Juristinnen: Eine Geschichte ihrer Professionalisierung und Emanzipation 1900-1945. Böhlau, Cologne

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Röwekamp M (2017) Reform claims in family law and legal struggles within the International Council of Women, 1888-1914. In: Schüler A, Waldschmidt-Nelson B (eds) Forging bonds across borders: transatlantic collaborations for women’s rights and social justice in the long nineteenth century. Bulletin of the German Historical Institute, Supplement 13, Washington, D.C., pp 75–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Röwekamp M (2018a) “The double bind”. Von den Interdependenzen des Frauenwahlrechts und des Familienrechts vor und nach 1918. In: Richter H, Wolff K (eds) 100 Jahre Frauenwahlrecht. Kampf, Kontext, Wirkung. Verlag des Hamburger Instituts für Sozialforschung, Hamburg, pp 99–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Röwekamp M (2018b) Married women’s property rights in the 19th century in France and Spain: a North-South case study. In: Bellavitis A, Micheletto BZ (eds) Gender, law and economic well-being in Europe from the fifteenth to the nineteenth century: North versus South? Routledge, New York, pp 77–90

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Röwekamp M (2018c) Der Kampf um die Ehe: Der Katholischer Frauenbund und das Zentrum im Richtungsstreit um eine Reform des Ehescheidungsrechts. In: Raasch M, Linsenmann A (eds) Die Frauen und der politische Katholizismus. Schöningh Verlag, Paderborn, pp 210–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Röwekamp M (2021) Challenging patriarchy. marriage and the reform of marriage law in imperial Germany and the Weimar Republic. In: Jacob F, Mohammed JA (eds) Marriage discourses in early modern and modern time. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 73–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupp L (2020) Worlds of women: the making of an international women’s movement. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruthchild GR (2010) Equality and revolution. Women’s rights in the Russian Empire, 1905-1917. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider U (2004) Hausväteridylle oder sozialistische Utopie? Die Familie im Recht der DDR. Böhlau, Cologne

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz P (2021) Das Eherecht der jungen Republik Lettland 1918-1940. In: Löhning M (ed) Kulturkampf um die Ehe. Reform des europäischen Eherechts nach dem Großen Krieg. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, pp 265–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevenhuijsen S (ed) (1986) Feminism, illegitimacy, and filiation law in the Netherlands, 1900-1940. University of Wisconsin-Madison Law School, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour M (2006) Debating divorce in Italy: marriage and the making of modern Italians, 1860–1974. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shanley ML (1993) Feminism, marriage and the law in Victorian England. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman E (2012) Stalinism on the frontier of empire: women and state formation in the Soviet Far East. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith BG (1981) Ladies of the leisure class: the bourgeoises of Northern France in the nineteenth century. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling JG, Wray SK (2009) Across the religious divide. Woman, property and law in the wider Mediterranean (ca. 1300–1800). Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stegmann N (2000) Die Töchter der geschlagenen Helden. “Frauenfrage,” Feminismus und Frauenbewegung in Polen 1863-1919. Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Stojaković G (2017) The first lawyers and attorneys. The struggle for professional recognition of women’s rights in Yugoslavia (1918-1953). In: Kimble SL, Röwekamp M (eds) New perspectives on European women’s legal history. Routledge, New York, pp 174–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Szapor J (2018) Hungarian women’s activism in the wake of the first world war: from rights to revanche. Bloomsbury, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tammkõrv T (2013) Eesti Naisadokaadid Esimese Iseseisvusprerioodi Ajal. MA thesis Tartu

    Google Scholar 

  • Tartul S (2006) Vera Poska-Grünthal. In: de Haan F, Daskalova K, Loutfi A (eds) A biographical dictionary of women’s movements and feminisms. Central, Eastern, and South Eastern Europe, 19th and 20th centuries. CEU Press, Budapest, pp 450–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Varikas E (2003) National and gender identities in turn of the century Greece. In: Paletschek S, Pietrow-Ennker B (eds) Women’s emancipation movements in the 19th century. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 263–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel U (1995) Patriarchale Herrschaft, bürgerliches Recht, bürgerliche Utopie. Eigentumsrechte der Frauen in Deutschland und England. In: Kocka J (ed) Bürgertum im 19. Jahrhundert. Verbürgerlichung, Recht und Politik, vol 3. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen, pp 134–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel U (1997) Gleichheit und Herrschaft in der ehelichen Vertragsgesellschaft. Widersprüche der Aufklärung. In: Gerhard U (ed) Frauen in der Geschichte des Rechts. Von der Frühen Neuzeit bis zur Gegenwart. Beck, Munich, pp 265–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel U (1998) The state and the making of gender: some historical legacies. In: Randall V, Waylen G (eds) Gender, politics and the state. Routledge, London, pp 29–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinzierl E (1978) Der Anteil der Frauen an der Reform des österreichischen Familienrechts. In: Weinzierl E, Stadler KR (eds) Geschichte der Familienrechtsgesetzgebung in Österreich. Bundesministerium für Justiz, Vienna, pp 217–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieacker F (1995) A history of private law in Europe (trans: Weir T). Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikander U, Kessler-Harris A, Lewis J (eds) (1995) Protecting women: labor legislation in Europe, the United States, and Australia, 1880-1920. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Willekens H (2013) The pioneer role of the Scandinavian countries in family law reform: a comparative perspective. In: Mecke C-E, Meder S (eds) Family law in early women’s rights debates. Western Europe and the United States in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Böhlau, Cologne, pp 281–312

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wolchik SL, Meyer AG (eds) (1985) Women, state, and party in Eastern Europe. Duke University Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood EA (2000) The Baba and the Comrade. Gender and politics in revolutionary Russia. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann S (1999) Die bessere Hälfte? Frauenbewegung und Frauenbestrebungen in Ungarn der Habsburgermonarchie 1848-1918. Promedia, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann S (2017) Night work for white women and bonded labour for “native” women? Contentious traditions and the globalization of gender-specific labour protection and legal equity politics, 1926 to 1929. In: Kimble SL, Röwekamp M (eds) New perspectives on European women’s legal history. Routledge, New York, pp 394–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann S (ed) (2018) Women’s ILO: transnational networks, global labour standards, and gender equity, 1919 to present. Brill, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marion Röwekamp .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Röwekamp, M. (2023). Challenging Patriarchism in the Family: Law Reform and Female Protest in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Europe. In: Vujadinović, D., Álvarez del Cuvillo, A., Strand, S. (eds) Feminist Approaches to Law. Gender Perspectives in Law, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14781-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14781-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-14780-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-14781-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics