Skip to main content

Rehabilitative Aims and Values in Finnish (and Nordic) Criminal Justice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Global Rehabilitation in Criminal Justice
  • 927 Accesses

Abstract

The first part of the chapter discusses the role of rehabilitation in Nordic penal thinking over the last 50 years, and the latter part takes a closer look at rehabilitative-oriented penal practices in Finland. It describes how in the mid-1960s the rehabilitative ideal was replaced by humane neoclassicism only for that to be replaced in the 1990s by penal rehabilitation based on What Works. In a discussion about the use of imprisonment, the chapter shows how the defining feature in Finnish (and Nordic) prisons lie in a wide application of open enforcement, and how research confirms higher satisfaction in open prisons regarding programme functionality, contacts with the outside world, respect, staff relations, health services, living conditions, general well-being, safety, or fairness. It points to evaluation that reveals positive outcomes in terms social and human effects, including positive contact to work life, better self-control over substance abuse, and better preservation of family ties. The chapter also emphasizes how concern about human rights has influenced penal policy in Finland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andenaes, J. (1974). Punishment and deterrence. University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, S., & Telle, K. (2022). Better out than in? The effect on recidivism of replacing incarceration with electronic monitoring in Norway. European Journal of Criminology, 19(1), 55–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, L., & Andersen, S. (2014). Effect of electronic monitoring on social welfare dependence. Criminology and Public Policy, 13, 349–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anttila, I. (2012). Conservative and radical crime policies in the Nordic Countries, in Nordic Criminology in fifty years. Scandinavian Research Council for Criminology, University of Iceland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondeson, U. (1989). Prisoners in prison society. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L., Collett, S., & McNeill, F. (2019). Reimagining rehabilitation. Beyond the individual. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, N. (1977). Conflicts as property. British Journal of Criminology., 17(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engbo, H. J. (2017). Normalisation in Nordic Prisons – From a Prison Governor’s Perspective. In P. S Smith & T. Ugelvik (Eds.), Scandinavian penal history, culture and prison practice. Embraced by the welfare state? Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • GovProp. (2004). Government’s proposal for the new prison law, 262.

    Google Scholar 

  • GovProp. (2009). Government’s proposal for reorganization of prison and probation services, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • GovProp. (2014). Government’s proposal for the law on the enforcement of community sanctions, 215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greve, V., & Snare, A. (2009). Ideologies and realities in Prison Law: Some trends. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 54, 305–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristofferssen, R. (2022). Correctional statistics of Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden 2016–2020. University College of Norwegian Correctional Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lappi-Seppälä, T. (2011). Nordic youth justice. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice in Scandinavia: A review of research (Vol. 40). The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lappi-Seppälä, T. (2016). Nordic sentencing. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice in Scandinavia: A review of research (Vol. 45). The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lappi-Seppälä, T. (2019a). Community sanctions as Substitutes to Imprisonment in the Nordic Countries. Law and Contemporary Problems., 82(1), 17–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lappi-Seppälä, T. (2019b). Humane Neoclassicism: Proportionality and other values in nordic sentencing. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Of One-eyed and Toothless Miscreants. Making the Punishment Fit the Crime? Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lappi-Seppälä, T., & Storgaard, A. (2015). Nordic mediation – Comparing Denmark and Finland. Neue Kriminalpolitic, 27(2), 136–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, B. Ø. (2017). Educational outcomes after serving with electronic monitoring: Results from a natural experiment. Quantitative Criminology, 33(1), 157–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linderbor, H., Blomster, P., Muiluvuori, M, L., Tyni, S., & Laurila, T. (2015). Yhtenäinen organisaatio – yhtenäinen laatu? Rise 2/2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, F. (2012). Four forms of ‘offender’ rehabilitation: Towards an interdisciplinary perspective. Legal and Criminological Psychology., 17(1), 18–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mjåland, K., Laursen, J., Schliehe, A., & Larmour, S. (2021). Contrasts in freedom: Comparing the experiences of imprisonment in open and closed prisons in England and Wales and Norway. European Journal of Criminology. Online first. https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708211065905

  • Pettersson, T. (2017). Young offenders and open custody. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J., & Eriksson, A. (2013). Contrasts in Punishment. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storgaard, A. (2009). The youth sanction – A punishment in disguise. In I. P. Wahlgren (red.), Scandinavian studies in law – Criminal law (Bind 54, s. 381–386). The Stockholm University Law Faculty.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolonen, K. (2018). Process and outcome of behaviour-interviewing-change (BIC) programme with clients in probation service. University of Tampere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Törnudd, P. (1996). Facts, values and visions. Essays in criminology and crime policy (p. 138). National Research Institute of Legal Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyni, S. (2015). Vankeinhoidon vaikuttavuus. Rise 1/2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villman, E. (2021). Work, support and solitude: Prisoners’ desistance expectations and self-regulating strategies. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 60(2), 95–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zyl van Smit, D., & Snacken, S. (2009). Principles of European prison law and policy. Penology and human rights. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tapio Lappi-Seppälä .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lappi-Seppälä, T. (2022). Rehabilitative Aims and Values in Finnish (and Nordic) Criminal Justice. In: Vanstone, M., Priestley, P. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Global Rehabilitation in Criminal Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14375-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics