Skip to main content

“The Missing Piece”

Why Humanism Must Dominate the Digital Transformation of Legal Work

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Liquid Legal – Humanization and the Law

Part of the book series: Law for Professionals ((LP))

  • 322 Accesses

Abstract

Too often, digital transformation of legal work comes across as a quest to cure imperfection, as a technocratic pursuit of effectiveness and efficiency aiming to eradicate wasted effort and deficiencies. While leaders and their visions certainly phrase it differently—centering around “better service for the client”, “more focus on high value work”, or “higher impact of the legal department”—their companions on the team do feel uneasy, because the underlying message still seems to be to “fix something”. And where there is something to fix, something must be broken. And if technology or digital means are the fix—well, it is probably then the human part that must be “broken” or “deficient”?!

Strange enough, no modern leader in legal services will sign off on the above—including myself! We all genuinely believe that our digital transformation agenda will help both, the team, as well as the client, to benefit from the new opportunities that legal technology and new methodologies bring about. Yes, of course this is our goal—yet, let’s face it: If we read the fine print of our strategies, if we listen to the tone of our presentations and the stories on our vision (specifically the version for executive management), we will find that they are mainly about getting more done with less, about improving the ROI of the legal department, and about broadening and accelerating the delivery of the legal services. More, better, faster!

So, what are we missing? A simple test reveals the missing piece: it is the human factor, or even more boldly, the focus on the human being. How would our story change if we purposely refocused and rephrased our vision and strategy so that it is truly humanistic and centers around the human being and the specific needs as represented by each key stakeholder (the client, executive management, the team as a whole, and the individual on the team)? We will also establish that there is no trade-off in the sense that humanism comes at the expense of optimizing the economics or the impact of a legal team. To the contrary, they are complementary and mutually supportive.

We will then put our findings into the context of current trends around professional work relations in high-skill markets such as the legal market: Relationships between employers and workers change radically; talent becomes an ever scarcer resource; and the strain of an increased density and variety of work demands (combined with the effects of the pandemic) take their toll on the human being. Inevitably the question arises: Can we—even economically—afford to “miss a piece”, i.e., the human factor?

Data—the famous new oil—drives businesses in the digital age. Yet, it also drives business functions and enables informed decision making. For lawyers, is digitalization then the choice between Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde?—We will lay out that data literacy is fundamental and that a humanistic approach to data is crucial. Data and metrics are not a goal in themselves. We must keep focus on what we are ultimately aiming for, and, even more importantly, we must lead on our data journey with clear values.

Finally, we will turn to the question which methodologies are predestined to support a humanistic approach to the digital transformation of legal work. We need a strong culture, based on trust and transparency. This is why Agile practices, supported by a “digital-first” agenda, and embedded in the principles of DevOps offer a perfect basis for modern legal teams.

Dierk Schindler is Co-founder and co-CEO of the Liquid Legal Institute e.V., Vice President Corporate Legal Services, Mobility Solutions, Supply Chain and Logistics at Robert BOSCH GmbH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Harald Welzer, in his book “Obituary to myself” (original title in German: “Nachruf auf mich Selbst”), fischer, Frankfurt am Main, 2021, examines the root cause and effects of the contemporary culture of growth and belief in technology as the savior to the existential challenges of mankind; see p. 26 f.

  2. 2.

    Silverstein (1978).

  3. 3.

    Silverstein (1978), p. 7.

  4. 4.

    Richard Susskind and Mark Cohen have been among the strongest constructive challengers of our profession. Susskind (2017), p. xix and, together with Susskind (2015), p. 67; as to Mark Cohen, see his various blogs under https://www.legalmosaic.com/.

  5. 5.

    KPMG Law, Recht auf Fortschritt, Der IX. Rechtabteilungsreport von KPMG Law 2021/22, p. 72.

  6. 6.

    In full respect of the breadth and depth of science around the term, for the sake of clarity in laying out my theses I am using the term “humanism” in this context as represented by the International Humanist and Ethical Union (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Humanist_and_Ethical_Union) as their “Minimum Statement on Humanism” and as summarized by Andrew Copson in “What is Humanism?”, a contribution to “The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Humanism”, 2015, that he edited with A. C. Grayling, New York, John Wiley & Sons. pp. 5–6: “Humanism is a democratic and ethical life stance, which affirms that human beings have the right and responsibility to give meaning and shape to their own lives. It stands for the building of a more humane society through an ethic based on human and other natural values in the spirit of reason and free inquiry through human capabilities. It is not theistic, and it does not accept supernatural views of reality.”

  7. 7.

    KPMG, Law, Recht auf Fortschritt, Der IX. Rechtabteilungsreport von KPMG Law 2021/22, p. 78.

  8. 8.

    Silverstein (1978), p. 84.

  9. 9.

    For a broader definition and context about the term “transformation” see https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformation_(Betriebswirtschaft).

  10. 10.

    As originally introduced by Schumpeter in his book Schumpeter (1939).

  11. 11.

    As to the aspect of progress and the example provided see Welzer (2021), p. 26.

  12. 12.

    Schwedel et al. (2022), p., at https://www.bain.com/contentassets/d620202718c146359acb05c02d9060db/bain-report_the-working-future.pdf.

  13. 13.

    See https://www.juve.de/karriere/155-000-euro-willkie-prescht-mit-neuem-einstiegsgehalt-vor/.

  14. 14.

    KPMG Law, Recht auf Fortschritt, Der IX. Rechtabteilungsreport von KPMG Law 2021/22, p. 35.

  15. 15.

    Ismael (2014), p. 55.

  16. 16.

    See Strathausen (2017), p. 9 ff.

  17. 17.

    On the crisis in Well-Being and Personal Health, see “The Silent Epidemic”, LLI Drop, Editions Weblaw, Zurich, 2021 and the LLI Whitepaper “Lawyer Well-Being – Personal Health of Legal Professionals in Times of Disruption”, both by Kai Jacob, Jutta Löwe, Diane Manz, Dierk Schindler, Roger Strathausen, Bernhard Waltl Editions Weblaw, Zurich, 2022.

  18. 18.

    Silverstein (1978), pp. 85–89.

  19. 19.

    Ebersoll et al. (2021), p. 7.

  20. 20.

    “Rethinking Legal Work”, published jointly with Jason Padman in 2020 in Rethinking: Law, Vol. 4, 2020, p. 7.

  21. 21.

    Ebersoll et al. (2021), p. 31.

  22. 22.

    See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gartner_hype_cycle.

  23. 23.

    Ebersoll et al. (2021), p. 20.

  24. 24.

    Please find a more elaborate discussion of this aspect in my chapter: The New Legal Agil – and it has a New DNA, in “Liquid Legal, Towards a Common Legal Platform”, Kai Jacob, Roger Strathausen, Dierk Schindler (Eds.), Springer, Cham, 2020, p. 205 ff.

  25. 25.

    This part on DevOps is an extract from a more extensive article called “Rethinking Legal Work”, that I have published jointly with Jason Padman in 2020 in the magazine REthinking:Law, Vol. 4, 2020, Stefan Breidenbach, Dierk Schindler (Eds.), pp. 4–10.

  26. 26.

    https://opensource.com/article/18/3/how-apply-systems-thinking-devops.

  27. 27.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carol_Dweck.

  28. 28.

    https://itrevolution.com/book/the-phoenix-project/.

  29. 29.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaizen.

  30. 30.

    More detail around the adoption of Agile practices into the world of professional legal services can be found in “The New Legal is Agile, and it has a New DNA”, by the author, in “Liquid Legal – towards a Common Legal Platform”, Kai Jacob, Dierk Schindler, Roger Strathausen (Eds.), Cham (Switzerland), 2020.

  31. 31.

    For a good overview on Kanban, see https://kanbanize.com/de/kanban-ressourcen/kanban-erste-schritte/was-ist-kanban/.

  32. 32.

    from the afterword of “The Phoenix Project”, by Gene Kim, Kevin Behr and George Spafford, Portland, 2016, p. 344.

  33. 33.

    “Liquify Legal, The Transformation Method of the Liquid Legal Institute e.V. in 7 Steps”, Kai Jacob, Dierk Schindler, Roger Strathausen, B. Waltl, Editions Weblaw, Zurich, 2021.

  34. 34.

    Wiener (1954), p. 46.

References

  • Ebersoll M, Obst J, Querfurth J, Schichl P, Schindler D, Schreyvogel M, Stoeckl N, Waltl B (2021) Data-driven legal departments – an introduction into metrics and KPIs. LLI Whitepaper, Editions Weblaw, Zurich, p 7

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismael S (2014) Exponential organizations. Diversion Books, New York, p 55

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1939) Business cycles: a theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwedel A, Root J, Allen J, Hazan J, Almquist E, Devlin T (2022) The working future: more human, not less. Bain & Company Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein S (1978) The missing piece, 1st edn. HarperCollins Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathausen R (2017) Masters of ambiguity: how legal can lead the business. In: Liquid legal, transforming legal into a business savvy, information enabled and performance driven industry. Springer, Cham. p 9 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind D (2015) The future of the professions. Oxford University Press, London p, p 67

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Susskind D (2017) Tomorrows lawyers, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, London, p xix

    Google Scholar 

  • Welzer H (2021) Nachruf auf mich selbst, (Obituary to myself – title as translated by the author), S. Fischer, Frankfurt/Main, p 26

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener N (1954) The human use of human beings: cybernetics and society, 2nd edn. Houghton Mifflin, p 46

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dierk Schindler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schindler, D. (2022). “The Missing Piece”. In: Jacob, K., Schindler, D., Strathausen, R., Waltl, B. (eds) Liquid Legal – Humanization and the Law. Law for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14240-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14240-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-14239-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-14240-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics